Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:14:51.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2021

John Collins
Affiliation:
Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, Vienna
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Legalising the Drug Wars
A Regulatory History of UN Drug Control
, pp. 268 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Barrett, Damon. ‘Reflections on Human Rights and International Drug Control’. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Barrett, Damon, Bewley-Taylor, David, and Jelsma, Martin. ‘Fatal Attraction: Brownfield’s Flexibility Doctrine and Global Drug Policy Reform’. Huffington Post Politics UK (blog), 18 November 2014. www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/damon-barett/drug-policy-reform_b_6158144.html.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard Saul. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Free Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bello, David. ‘The Venomous Course of Southwestern Opium: Qing Prohibition in Yunnan, Sichuan, and Guizhou in the Early Nineteenth Century’. The Journal of Asian Studies 62, no. 4 (2003): 1109–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3591761.Google Scholar
Bentham, Mandy. The Politics of Drug Control. New York: Macmillan, 1998.Google Scholar
Berridge, Virginia. ‘Illicit Drugs and Internationalism: The Forgotten Dimension’. Medical History 2, no. 45 (2001): 282–8.Google Scholar
Berridge, Virginia. Opium and the People: Opiate Use and Drug Control Policy in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century England. London: Free Association Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, David R. International Drug Control: Consensus Fractured. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, , The United States and International Drug Control, 1909–1997. London: Continuum, 1999.Google Scholar
Biermann, Frank, Pattberg, Philipp, Van Asselt, Harro, and Zelli, Fariborz. ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis’. Global Environmental Politics 9, no. 4 (2009): 1440. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.Google Scholar
Block, Alan A.European Drug Traffic and Traffickers between the Wars: The Policy of Suppression and Its Consequences’. Journal of Social History 23, no. 2 (1 December 1989): 315–37.Google Scholar
Bradford, J.T. Poppies, Politics, and Power: Afghanistan and the Global History of Drugs and Diplomacy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2019. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=iapzDwAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
Brook, Timothy. ‘Opium and Collaboration in Central China 1938–1940’. In Opium Regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952, edited by Brook, Timothy and Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashi. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brown, Richard Harvey. ‘The Opium Trade and Opium Policies in India, China, Britain, and the United States: Historical Comparisons and Theoretical Interpretations’. Asian Journal of Social Science 30, no. 3 (2002): 623–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853102320945420.Google Scholar
Brownfield, William R. ‘Trends in Global Drug Policy’. US Department of State press office. New York City, 9 October 2014. http://fpc.state.gov/232813.htm.Google Scholar
Bruun, Kettil, Pan, Lynn, and Rexed, Ingemar. The Gentlemen’s Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Herald, Buenos Aires. ‘Mujica Blasts UN Official Raymond Yans over Marijuana Law’, 15 December 2013. www.buenosairesherald.com/article/147539/mujica-blasts-un-official-raymond-yans-over-marijuana-law (accessed 8/10/2015)Google Scholar
Campos, Isaac. Home Grown: Marijuana and the Origins of Mexico’s War on Drugs. University of North Carolina Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Chouvy, Pierre-Arnaud. ‘Drug Trafficking in and out of the Golden Triangle’. In An Atlas of Trafficking in Southeast Asia. The Illegal Trade in Arms, Drugs, People, Counterfeit Goods and Natural Resources in Mainland, 132. I.B. Tauris, 2013. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01050968.Google Scholar
Cogan, Jacob, Matz-Lück, Nele, Prost, Mario, and Singh, Sahib. ‘Fragmentation of International Legal Orders and International Law: Ways Forward?’ In American Society of International Law. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 123–32. Washington: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff, Keohane, Robert, and Van de Graaf, Thijs. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex’. The Review of International Organizations 7, no. 2 (2012): 117–43.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘A Brief History of Cannabis and the Drug Conventions’. AJIL Unbound (October 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Breaking the Monopoly System: American Influence on the British Decision to Prohibit Opium Smoking and End Its Asian Monopolies, 1939–1945’. International History Review 39, no. 5 (February 2017): 770–90.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Evaluating Trends and Stakeholders in the International Drug Control Regime Complex’. International Journal of Drug Policy 90 (1 April 2021): 103060, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103060.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Imperial Drug Economies, Development, and the Search for Alternatives in Asia, from Colonialism to Decolonisation’. Drug Policies and Development (27 August 2020): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004440494_004.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Losing UNGASS? Lessons from Civil Society, Past and Present’. Drugs and Alcohol Today 17, no. 2 (2017): 8897.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Regulations and Prohibitions: Anglo-American Relations and International Drug Control, 1939–1964’. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 2015. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3107/.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Rethinking “Flexibilities” in the International Drug Control SystemPotential, Precedents and Models for Reforms’. International Journal of Drug Policy 60 (2018): 107–14.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘The State Department’s Move to a More Flexible Diplomatic Policy on Drugs Is a Rational Approach to a Difficult Question’. USAPP (blog), 1 December 2014. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2014/12/01/the-u-s-new-more-flexible-diplomatic-doctrine-on-drugs-is-a-rational-approach-to-a-difficult-question/.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘War, Decolonisation and the Birth of the Illicit Opium Trade in Burma’. In Historical Perspectives on Organised Crime and Terrorism, edited by Windle, James, Mirrison, John, Winter, Aaron, and Silke, Andrew. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Collins, John. Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971. New York: United Nations, 1971. www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/psychotropics.html.Google Scholar
Courtwright, David. ‘A Short History of Drug Policy or Why We Make War on Some Drugs but Not on Others’. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE IDEAS, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Csete, Joanne. ‘Overhauling Oversight: Human Rights at the INCB’. Edited by John Collins. Governing the Global Drug Wars, LSE IDEAS Special Reports, October 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Denza, Eileen. ‘The Relationship Between International and National Law’. In International Law, edited by Evans, Malcolm D., Edition, Fourth. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Edwards, Lee. Missionary for Freedom: The Life and Times of Walter Judd. Paragon House, 1990.Google Scholar
Engle Merry, Sally. ‘Legal Pluralism’. Law and Society Review 22, no. 5 (1 January 1988): 869–96.Google Scholar
Friman, H. Richard. NarcoDiplomacy: Exporting the U.S. War on Drugs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ghiabi, Maziyar. Drugs Politics: Managing Disorder in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://books.google.be/books?id=HoOWDwAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
Gootenberg, Paul. Andean Cocaine: The Making of a Global Drug. University of North Carolina Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Sean. Britain and the Cold War, 1945–1991. St. Martin’s Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bradley. ‘Learning to Tax: The Political Economy of the Opium Trade in Iran, 1921–1941’. The Journal of Economic History 61, no. 1 (1 March 2001): 95113.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R.Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System’. Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 1 (2009): 3944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoopes, Townsend, and Brinkley, Douglas. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Creation of the U.N . Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jelsma, Martin. ‘UN Common Position on Drug Policy – Consolidating System-Wide Coherence’. Transnational Institute, December 2019. www.tni.org/en/publication/un-common-position-on-drug-policy-consolidating-system-wide-coherence.Google Scholar
Jelsma, Martin, and Bewley-Taylor, David. ‘UNGASS 2016: A Broken or B-r-o-a-d Consensus?’ Transnational Institute (blog), 5 July 2016. www.tni.org/en/publication/ungass-2016-a-broken-or-b-r-o-a-d-consensus.Google Scholar
Jelsma, Martin, and Bewley-Taylor, David R.. ‘The UN Drug Control Conventions: The Limits of Latitude’. Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies. Transnational Institute and International Drug Policy Consortium, March 2012. www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/dlr18.pdf.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. Wilfred, . ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’. BYBIL 3 (1953).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O, and Victor, David G. ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’. Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 1 (2011): 723.Google Scholar
Kinder, Douglas Clark. ‘Bureaucratic Cold Warrior: Harry J. Anslinger and Illicit Narcotics Traffic’. Pacific Historical Review 50, no. 2 (1 May 1981): 169–91.Google Scholar
Kinder, Douglas Clark. ‘Shutting Out the Evil: Nativism and Narcotics Control in the United States’. In Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical Comparative Perspective, edited by Walker, William O. III. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’. In Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. United Nations, 2006. http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, and Leino, Pivi. ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’. Leiden Journal of International Law 15, no. 3 (2002): 553–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156502000262.Google Scholar
Kranton, Rachel, and Swamy, Anand V.. ‘Contracts, Hold-Up, and Exports: Textiles and Opium in Colonial India’. American Economic Review 98, no. 3 (1 June 2008): 967–90. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.967.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D.Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’. International Organization 36, no. 2 (1982): 185205.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. 1st ed. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan W.Global Democratization and International Regime Complexity’. European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 3 (2014): 620–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113497492.Google Scholar
Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy. ‘Drugs and Democracy: Toward a Paradigm Shift’, February 2009. www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/the-latin-american-commission-on-drugs-and-democracy.Google Scholar
Lewy, Jonathan. ‘The Drug Policy of the Third Reich’. Social History of Alcohol and Drugs 22, no. 2 (2008): 144–67.Google Scholar
Lines, Richard. Drug Control and Human Rights in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zNqiDgAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
Lines, Rick, and Barrett, Damon. ‘The Human Rights Win at UNGASS on Drugs That No One Is Talking About and How We Can Use It’, 9 May 2016. https://hrcessex.wordpress.com/2016/05/09/the-human-rights-win-at-the-ungass-on-drugs-that-no-one-is-talking-about-and-how-we-can-use-it/.Google Scholar
Maule, Robert. ‘British Policy Discussions on the Opium Question in the Federated Shan States, 1937–1948’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 2 (June 2002): 203–24.Google Scholar
Maule, Robert. ‘The Opium Question in the Federated Shan States, 1931-36: British Policy Discussions and Scandal’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 23, no. 1 (March 1992): 1436.Google Scholar
McAllister, William B. ‘A Limited Enterprise: The History of International Efforts to Control Drugs in the Twentieth Century’. PhD Dissertation, University of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar
McAllister, William B. Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An International History. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
McAllister, William B. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf. Google Scholar
McAllister, William B.The Global Political Economy of Scheduling: The International–Historical Context of the Controlled Substances Act’. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 76, no. 1 (5 October 2004): 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.012.Google Scholar
McCoy, Alfred W. The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade, Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, Central America, Colombia. 3rd ed. Brooklyn, NY: Lawrence Hill Books, 2003.Google Scholar
McWilliams, John C. The Protectors: Harry J. Anslinger and the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 1930–1962. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Meyer, Kathryn, and Parssinen, Terry M.. Webs of Smoke: Smugglers, Warlords, Spies, and the History of the International Drug Trade. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Mills, James H. Cannabis Britannica : Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928: Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mills, James H. Cannabis Nation: Control and Consumption in Britain, 1928–2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Mills, James H.Cocaine and the British Empire: The Drug and the Diplomats at the Hague Opium Conference, 1911–12’. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 42, no. 3 (2014): 400419.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. Wayne. Drugs in America: A Social History, 1800–1980. Syracuse University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Musto, David F. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Muzaka, Valbona. ‘Linkages, Contests and Overlaps in the Global Intellectual Property Rights Regime’. European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 4 (2011): 755–76.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A.Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society’. International Organization 44, no. 4 (1 October 1990): 479526.Google Scholar
Organization of American States. ‘Scenarios for the Drug Problem in the Americas, 2013–2025’. Cartagena de Indias: OAS, 2012. www.oas.org/documents/eng/press/scenarios_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Paoli, Letizia, Greenfield, Victoria A., and Reuter, Peter. The World Heroin Market: Can Supply Be Cut? Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne. ‘The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 15, no. 3 (2017): 671704. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox056.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 277309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036.Google Scholar
Richards, John F.Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895’. Modern Asian Studies 36, no. 2 (2002): 375420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X02002044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Thomas. Egyptian Service: 1902–1946. Murray, 1949.Google Scholar
Santos, Juan Manuel. ‘Re-Examining the Drug Problem Through a Fresh Lens’. Edited by John Collins. Governing the Global Drug Wars, LSE IDEAS Special Reports, October 2012, 2–3. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Schur, Edwin M. Narcotic Addiction in Britain and America: The Impact of Public Policy. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis, 1962.Google Scholar
Spillane, Joseph, and Mcallister, William B.. ‘Keeping the Lid On: A Century of Drug Regulation and Control’. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 70, no. 3 (2003): S512. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12759194/.Google Scholar
Stein, S. D. International Diplomacy, State Administrators, and Narcotics Control: The Origins of a Social Problem. Aldershot: Gower, 1985.Google Scholar
Strang, John, and Gossop, Michael, eds. Heroin Addiction and the British System: Origins and Evolution. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Strang, John, and Gossop, Michael, eds. ‘Misreported and Minunderstoodthe “British System” of Drug Policy’. In Heroin Addiction and the British System: Origins and Evolution, edited by Strang, John and Gossop, Michael. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Taylor, Arnold H. American Diplomacy and the Narcotics Traffic, 1900–1939: A Study in International Humanitarian Reform. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
The Global Commission on Drug Policy. ‘War on Drugs’. New York: GCDP, 2011. www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/reports/war-on-drugs/.Google Scholar
The Global Commission on Drug Policy. ‘The Hague International Opium Convention’. The Hague, 1912.Google Scholar
Traver, Harold H. ‘Colonial Relations and Opium Control Policy in Hong Kong, 1841–1945’. In Drugs, Law, and the State, edited by Traver, Harold H. and Gaylord, Mark S.. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Trocki, Carl A.Opium and the Beginnings of Chinese Capitalism in Southeast Asia’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 2 (2002): 297314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463402000152.Google Scholar
Trocki, Carl A. Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade, 1750–1950. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
UK All Party Parliamentary Group on Drug Policy Reform. ‘Guidance on Drug Policy: Interpreting the UN Drug Conventions’, 2015.Google Scholar
UNDP. ‘Addressing the Development Dimensions of Drug Policy’. New York: United Nations Development Programme, June 2015. www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hiv-aids/addressing-the-development-dimensions-of-drug-policy.html.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971’. New York: United Nations, 1976.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961’. New York: United Nations Secretariat, 1973. www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/Drug%20Convention/Commentary_on_the_single_convention_1961.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961’. New York: United Nations, 1973.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988’. New York: United Nations, 1998.Google Scholar
United Nations. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as Amended by the 1972 Protocol. New York: Nations, United, 1961.Google Scholar
United Nations. United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988. Vienna: United Nations, 1988. www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1988_en.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. ‘Our Joint Commitment to Effectively Addressing and Countering the World Drug Problem’. New York: United Nations, 19 April 2016.Google Scholar
UNODC. ‘A Century of International Drug Control’. Vienna: United Nations, 2008. www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/100_Years_of_Drug_Control.pdf.Google Scholar
Walker, III, William, O. ‘Bibliographic Essay’. In Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical and Comparative Perspective, edited by Walker, William O. III. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Walker, III, William, O. ed. Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Walker, III, William, O. Opium and Foreign Policy: The Anglo-American Search for Order in Asia, 1912–1954. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar
WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. ‘Seventeenth Report’. WHO Technical Report Series, n.d.Google Scholar
Williams, Adam, and Cattan, Nacha. ‘Biden Says Drug Legalization Debate Is “Totally Legitimate”’. Bloomberg News, 3 June 2012. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-05/biden-visits-mexico-honduras-amid-calls-to-debate-drug-strategy.Google Scholar
Windle, James. ‘How the East Influenced Drug Prohibition’. The International History Review 35, no. 5 (October 2013): 1185–99.Google Scholar
Gao, Yanli. ‘Judd’s China: A Missionary Congressman and US-China Policy’. Journal of Modern Chinese History 2, no. 2 (December 2008): 197219.Google Scholar
Young, Oran, Chambers, W. Bradnee, Kim, Joy, and Ten Have, Claudia. Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade. Tokyo, Japan: UNU, 2008. http://search.proquest.com/docview/903905443/.Google Scholar
Yung-Ning Hoo, Mona. Painting the Shadows: The Extraordinary Life of Victor Hoo. London: Eldridge and Co., 1998.Google Scholar
Zhou, Yongming. Anti-Drug Crusades in Twentieth-Century China: Nationalism, History, and State Building. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar
Barrett, Damon. ‘Reflections on Human Rights and International Drug Control’. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Barrett, Damon, Bewley-Taylor, David, and Jelsma, Martin. ‘Fatal Attraction: Brownfield’s Flexibility Doctrine and Global Drug Policy Reform’. Huffington Post Politics UK (blog), 18 November 2014. www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/damon-barett/drug-policy-reform_b_6158144.html.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard Saul. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Free Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bello, David. ‘The Venomous Course of Southwestern Opium: Qing Prohibition in Yunnan, Sichuan, and Guizhou in the Early Nineteenth Century’. The Journal of Asian Studies 62, no. 4 (2003): 1109–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3591761.Google Scholar
Bentham, Mandy. The Politics of Drug Control. New York: Macmillan, 1998.Google Scholar
Berridge, Virginia. ‘Illicit Drugs and Internationalism: The Forgotten Dimension’. Medical History 2, no. 45 (2001): 282–8.Google Scholar
Berridge, Virginia. Opium and the People: Opiate Use and Drug Control Policy in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century England. London: Free Association Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, David R. International Drug Control: Consensus Fractured. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, , The United States and International Drug Control, 1909–1997. London: Continuum, 1999.Google Scholar
Biermann, Frank, Pattberg, Philipp, Van Asselt, Harro, and Zelli, Fariborz. ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis’. Global Environmental Politics 9, no. 4 (2009): 1440. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.Google Scholar
Block, Alan A.European Drug Traffic and Traffickers between the Wars: The Policy of Suppression and Its Consequences’. Journal of Social History 23, no. 2 (1 December 1989): 315–37.Google Scholar
Bradford, J.T. Poppies, Politics, and Power: Afghanistan and the Global History of Drugs and Diplomacy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2019. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=iapzDwAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
Brook, Timothy. ‘Opium and Collaboration in Central China 1938–1940’. In Opium Regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952, edited by Brook, Timothy and Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashi. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brown, Richard Harvey. ‘The Opium Trade and Opium Policies in India, China, Britain, and the United States: Historical Comparisons and Theoretical Interpretations’. Asian Journal of Social Science 30, no. 3 (2002): 623–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853102320945420.Google Scholar
Brownfield, William R. ‘Trends in Global Drug Policy’. US Department of State press office. New York City, 9 October 2014. http://fpc.state.gov/232813.htm.Google Scholar
Bruun, Kettil, Pan, Lynn, and Rexed, Ingemar. The Gentlemen’s Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Herald, Buenos Aires. ‘Mujica Blasts UN Official Raymond Yans over Marijuana Law’, 15 December 2013. www.buenosairesherald.com/article/147539/mujica-blasts-un-official-raymond-yans-over-marijuana-law (accessed 8/10/2015)Google Scholar
Campos, Isaac. Home Grown: Marijuana and the Origins of Mexico’s War on Drugs. University of North Carolina Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Chouvy, Pierre-Arnaud. ‘Drug Trafficking in and out of the Golden Triangle’. In An Atlas of Trafficking in Southeast Asia. The Illegal Trade in Arms, Drugs, People, Counterfeit Goods and Natural Resources in Mainland, 132. I.B. Tauris, 2013. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01050968.Google Scholar
Cogan, Jacob, Matz-Lück, Nele, Prost, Mario, and Singh, Sahib. ‘Fragmentation of International Legal Orders and International Law: Ways Forward?’ In American Society of International Law. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 123–32. Washington: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff, Keohane, Robert, and Van de Graaf, Thijs. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex’. The Review of International Organizations 7, no. 2 (2012): 117–43.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘A Brief History of Cannabis and the Drug Conventions’. AJIL Unbound (October 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Breaking the Monopoly System: American Influence on the British Decision to Prohibit Opium Smoking and End Its Asian Monopolies, 1939–1945’. International History Review 39, no. 5 (February 2017): 770–90.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Evaluating Trends and Stakeholders in the International Drug Control Regime Complex’. International Journal of Drug Policy 90 (1 April 2021): 103060, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103060.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Imperial Drug Economies, Development, and the Search for Alternatives in Asia, from Colonialism to Decolonisation’. Drug Policies and Development (27 August 2020): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004440494_004.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Losing UNGASS? Lessons from Civil Society, Past and Present’. Drugs and Alcohol Today 17, no. 2 (2017): 8897.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Regulations and Prohibitions: Anglo-American Relations and International Drug Control, 1939–1964’. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 2015. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3107/.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘Rethinking “Flexibilities” in the International Drug Control SystemPotential, Precedents and Models for Reforms’. International Journal of Drug Policy 60 (2018): 107–14.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘The State Department’s Move to a More Flexible Diplomatic Policy on Drugs Is a Rational Approach to a Difficult Question’. USAPP (blog), 1 December 2014. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2014/12/01/the-u-s-new-more-flexible-diplomatic-doctrine-on-drugs-is-a-rational-approach-to-a-difficult-question/.Google Scholar
Collins, John. ‘War, Decolonisation and the Birth of the Illicit Opium Trade in Burma’. In Historical Perspectives on Organised Crime and Terrorism, edited by Windle, James, Mirrison, John, Winter, Aaron, and Silke, Andrew. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Collins, John. Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971. New York: United Nations, 1971. www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/psychotropics.html.Google Scholar
Courtwright, David. ‘A Short History of Drug Policy or Why We Make War on Some Drugs but Not on Others’. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE IDEAS, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Csete, Joanne. ‘Overhauling Oversight: Human Rights at the INCB’. Edited by John Collins. Governing the Global Drug Wars, LSE IDEAS Special Reports, October 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Denza, Eileen. ‘The Relationship Between International and National Law’. In International Law, edited by Evans, Malcolm D., Edition, Fourth. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Edwards, Lee. Missionary for Freedom: The Life and Times of Walter Judd. Paragon House, 1990.Google Scholar
Engle Merry, Sally. ‘Legal Pluralism’. Law and Society Review 22, no. 5 (1 January 1988): 869–96.Google Scholar
Friman, H. Richard. NarcoDiplomacy: Exporting the U.S. War on Drugs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ghiabi, Maziyar. Drugs Politics: Managing Disorder in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://books.google.be/books?id=HoOWDwAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
Gootenberg, Paul. Andean Cocaine: The Making of a Global Drug. University of North Carolina Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Sean. Britain and the Cold War, 1945–1991. St. Martin’s Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bradley. ‘Learning to Tax: The Political Economy of the Opium Trade in Iran, 1921–1941’. The Journal of Economic History 61, no. 1 (1 March 2001): 95113.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R.Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System’. Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 1 (2009): 3944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoopes, Townsend, and Brinkley, Douglas. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Creation of the U.N . Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jelsma, Martin. ‘UN Common Position on Drug Policy – Consolidating System-Wide Coherence’. Transnational Institute, December 2019. www.tni.org/en/publication/un-common-position-on-drug-policy-consolidating-system-wide-coherence.Google Scholar
Jelsma, Martin, and Bewley-Taylor, David. ‘UNGASS 2016: A Broken or B-r-o-a-d Consensus?’ Transnational Institute (blog), 5 July 2016. www.tni.org/en/publication/ungass-2016-a-broken-or-b-r-o-a-d-consensus.Google Scholar
Jelsma, Martin, and Bewley-Taylor, David R.. ‘The UN Drug Control Conventions: The Limits of Latitude’. Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies. Transnational Institute and International Drug Policy Consortium, March 2012. www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/dlr18.pdf.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. Wilfred, . ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’. BYBIL 3 (1953).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O, and Victor, David G. ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’. Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 1 (2011): 723.Google Scholar
Kinder, Douglas Clark. ‘Bureaucratic Cold Warrior: Harry J. Anslinger and Illicit Narcotics Traffic’. Pacific Historical Review 50, no. 2 (1 May 1981): 169–91.Google Scholar
Kinder, Douglas Clark. ‘Shutting Out the Evil: Nativism and Narcotics Control in the United States’. In Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical Comparative Perspective, edited by Walker, William O. III. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’. In Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. United Nations, 2006. http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, and Leino, Pivi. ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’. Leiden Journal of International Law 15, no. 3 (2002): 553–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156502000262.Google Scholar
Kranton, Rachel, and Swamy, Anand V.. ‘Contracts, Hold-Up, and Exports: Textiles and Opium in Colonial India’. American Economic Review 98, no. 3 (1 June 2008): 967–90. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.967.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D.Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’. International Organization 36, no. 2 (1982): 185205.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. 1st ed. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan W.Global Democratization and International Regime Complexity’. European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 3 (2014): 620–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113497492.Google Scholar
Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy. ‘Drugs and Democracy: Toward a Paradigm Shift’, February 2009. www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/the-latin-american-commission-on-drugs-and-democracy.Google Scholar
Lewy, Jonathan. ‘The Drug Policy of the Third Reich’. Social History of Alcohol and Drugs 22, no. 2 (2008): 144–67.Google Scholar
Lines, Richard. Drug Control and Human Rights in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zNqiDgAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
Lines, Rick, and Barrett, Damon. ‘The Human Rights Win at UNGASS on Drugs That No One Is Talking About and How We Can Use It’, 9 May 2016. https://hrcessex.wordpress.com/2016/05/09/the-human-rights-win-at-the-ungass-on-drugs-that-no-one-is-talking-about-and-how-we-can-use-it/.Google Scholar
Maule, Robert. ‘British Policy Discussions on the Opium Question in the Federated Shan States, 1937–1948’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 2 (June 2002): 203–24.Google Scholar
Maule, Robert. ‘The Opium Question in the Federated Shan States, 1931-36: British Policy Discussions and Scandal’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 23, no. 1 (March 1992): 1436.Google Scholar
McAllister, William B. ‘A Limited Enterprise: The History of International Efforts to Control Drugs in the Twentieth Century’. PhD Dissertation, University of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar
McAllister, William B. Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An International History. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
McAllister, William B. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf. Google Scholar
McAllister, William B.The Global Political Economy of Scheduling: The International–Historical Context of the Controlled Substances Act’. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 76, no. 1 (5 October 2004): 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.012.Google Scholar
McCoy, Alfred W. The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade, Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, Central America, Colombia. 3rd ed. Brooklyn, NY: Lawrence Hill Books, 2003.Google Scholar
McWilliams, John C. The Protectors: Harry J. Anslinger and the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 1930–1962. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Meyer, Kathryn, and Parssinen, Terry M.. Webs of Smoke: Smugglers, Warlords, Spies, and the History of the International Drug Trade. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Mills, James H. Cannabis Britannica : Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928: Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mills, James H. Cannabis Nation: Control and Consumption in Britain, 1928–2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Mills, James H.Cocaine and the British Empire: The Drug and the Diplomats at the Hague Opium Conference, 1911–12’. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 42, no. 3 (2014): 400419.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. Wayne. Drugs in America: A Social History, 1800–1980. Syracuse University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Musto, David F. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Muzaka, Valbona. ‘Linkages, Contests and Overlaps in the Global Intellectual Property Rights Regime’. European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 4 (2011): 755–76.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A.Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society’. International Organization 44, no. 4 (1 October 1990): 479526.Google Scholar
Organization of American States. ‘Scenarios for the Drug Problem in the Americas, 2013–2025’. Cartagena de Indias: OAS, 2012. www.oas.org/documents/eng/press/scenarios_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Paoli, Letizia, Greenfield, Victoria A., and Reuter, Peter. The World Heroin Market: Can Supply Be Cut? Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne. ‘The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 15, no. 3 (2017): 671704. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox056.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 277309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036.Google Scholar
Richards, John F.Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895’. Modern Asian Studies 36, no. 2 (2002): 375420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X02002044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Thomas. Egyptian Service: 1902–1946. Murray, 1949.Google Scholar
Santos, Juan Manuel. ‘Re-Examining the Drug Problem Through a Fresh Lens’. Edited by John Collins. Governing the Global Drug Wars, LSE IDEAS Special Reports, October 2012, 2–3. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Schur, Edwin M. Narcotic Addiction in Britain and America: The Impact of Public Policy. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis, 1962.Google Scholar
Spillane, Joseph, and Mcallister, William B.. ‘Keeping the Lid On: A Century of Drug Regulation and Control’. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 70, no. 3 (2003): S512. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12759194/.Google Scholar
Stein, S. D. International Diplomacy, State Administrators, and Narcotics Control: The Origins of a Social Problem. Aldershot: Gower, 1985.Google Scholar
Strang, John, and Gossop, Michael, eds. Heroin Addiction and the British System: Origins and Evolution. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Strang, John, and Gossop, Michael, eds. ‘Misreported and Minunderstoodthe “British System” of Drug Policy’. In Heroin Addiction and the British System: Origins and Evolution, edited by Strang, John and Gossop, Michael. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Taylor, Arnold H. American Diplomacy and the Narcotics Traffic, 1900–1939: A Study in International Humanitarian Reform. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
The Global Commission on Drug Policy. ‘War on Drugs’. New York: GCDP, 2011. www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/reports/war-on-drugs/.Google Scholar
The Global Commission on Drug Policy. ‘The Hague International Opium Convention’. The Hague, 1912.Google Scholar
Traver, Harold H. ‘Colonial Relations and Opium Control Policy in Hong Kong, 1841–1945’. In Drugs, Law, and the State, edited by Traver, Harold H. and Gaylord, Mark S.. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Trocki, Carl A.Opium and the Beginnings of Chinese Capitalism in Southeast Asia’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 2 (2002): 297314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463402000152.Google Scholar
Trocki, Carl A. Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade, 1750–1950. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
UK All Party Parliamentary Group on Drug Policy Reform. ‘Guidance on Drug Policy: Interpreting the UN Drug Conventions’, 2015.Google Scholar
UNDP. ‘Addressing the Development Dimensions of Drug Policy’. New York: United Nations Development Programme, June 2015. www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hiv-aids/addressing-the-development-dimensions-of-drug-policy.html.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971’. New York: United Nations, 1976.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961’. New York: United Nations Secretariat, 1973. www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/Drug%20Convention/Commentary_on_the_single_convention_1961.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961’. New York: United Nations, 1973.Google Scholar
United Nations. ‘Commentary on the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988’. New York: United Nations, 1998.Google Scholar
United Nations. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as Amended by the 1972 Protocol. New York: Nations, United, 1961.Google Scholar
United Nations. United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988. Vienna: United Nations, 1988. www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1988_en.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. ‘Our Joint Commitment to Effectively Addressing and Countering the World Drug Problem’. New York: United Nations, 19 April 2016.Google Scholar
UNODC. ‘A Century of International Drug Control’. Vienna: United Nations, 2008. www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/100_Years_of_Drug_Control.pdf.Google Scholar
Walker, III, William, O. ‘Bibliographic Essay’. In Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical and Comparative Perspective, edited by Walker, William O. III. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Walker, III, William, O. ed. Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Walker, III, William, O. Opium and Foreign Policy: The Anglo-American Search for Order in Asia, 1912–1954. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar
WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. ‘Seventeenth Report’. WHO Technical Report Series, n.d.Google Scholar
Williams, Adam, and Cattan, Nacha. ‘Biden Says Drug Legalization Debate Is “Totally Legitimate”’. Bloomberg News, 3 June 2012. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-05/biden-visits-mexico-honduras-amid-calls-to-debate-drug-strategy.Google Scholar
Windle, James. ‘How the East Influenced Drug Prohibition’. The International History Review 35, no. 5 (October 2013): 1185–99.Google Scholar
Gao, Yanli. ‘Judd’s China: A Missionary Congressman and US-China Policy’. Journal of Modern Chinese History 2, no. 2 (December 2008): 197219.Google Scholar
Young, Oran, Chambers, W. Bradnee, Kim, Joy, and Ten Have, Claudia. Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade. Tokyo, Japan: UNU, 2008. http://search.proquest.com/docview/903905443/.Google Scholar
Yung-Ning Hoo, Mona. Painting the Shadows: The Extraordinary Life of Victor Hoo. London: Eldridge and Co., 1998.Google Scholar
Zhou, Yongming. Anti-Drug Crusades in Twentieth-Century China: Nationalism, History, and State Building. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • John Collins
  • Book: Legalising the Drug Wars
  • Online publication: 25 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009058278.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • John Collins
  • Book: Legalising the Drug Wars
  • Online publication: 25 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009058278.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • John Collins
  • Book: Legalising the Drug Wars
  • Online publication: 25 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009058278.012
Available formats
×