Book contents
- Legacies of Repression in Egypt and Tunisia
- Legacies of Repression in Egypt and Tunisia
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Authoritarian Politics and Founding Elections
- Part I Members of the Club or the Only Game in Town?
- Part II Phoenix from the Ashes
- 4 Linking the Authoritarian Landscape to Party Formation and Political Mobilization in Egypt’s Founding Elections (2011)
- 5 Party Formation and Political Mobilization in Comparative Perspective
- Part III Epilogue
- Appendix
- References
- Index
5 - Party Formation and Political Mobilization in Comparative Perspective
from Part II - Phoenix from the Ashes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2022
- Legacies of Repression in Egypt and Tunisia
- Legacies of Repression in Egypt and Tunisia
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Authoritarian Politics and Founding Elections
- Part I Members of the Club or the Only Game in Town?
- Part II Phoenix from the Ashes
- 4 Linking the Authoritarian Landscape to Party Formation and Political Mobilization in Egypt’s Founding Elections (2011)
- 5 Party Formation and Political Mobilization in Comparative Perspective
- Part III Epilogue
- Appendix
- References
- Index
Summary
Chapter 5 expands the tracing of the theorized causal mechanisms beyond Egypt to see how far these mechanisms travel and if they operate in the same way across other cases of founding elections. Each case comparison begins with an analysis of the processes of party formation, linking the political opportunity structure of the authoritarian era to the contours of the ideological landscape and the strategic incentives facing different groups at this juncture. Each case then examines the evidence for the mechanisms linking the authoritarian era political opportunity structure to the organizational and persuasive resources available to each political group and their ability to use different mobilization tactics. As in Egypt, opposition groups that were excluded from electoral participation possess similar organizational and symbolic resources and thus are able to use more effective voter mobilization tactics than other political groups, resulting in their electoral success. The accounts find evidence for this causal chain in Tunisia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Zambia, but the mechanism operates differently in the case of Brazil, offering useful insight into the scope conditions under which the mechanisms theorized in the Egypt case operate elsewhere.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legacies of Repression in Egypt and TunisiaAuthoritarianism, Political Mobilization, and Founding Elections, pp. 174 - 236Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022