Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:49:13.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2016

Baudouin Heuninckx
Baudouin Heuninckx
Affiliation:
Belgian Armed Forces Procurement Division, Brussels; University of Nottingham; Belgian Royal Military Academy, Brussels
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Law of Collaborative Defence Procurement in the European Union , pp. 226 - 237
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, T. and de Jesús Butler, I., ‘The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective’ (2006) 17(4) European Journal of International Law 771–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akande, D., ‘The Competence of International Organizations and the Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’ (1998) 9(3) European Journal of International Law 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albano, G-L. and Sparro, M., ‘Flexible Strategies for Centralized Public Procurement’ (2010) 1(2) Review of Economics and Institutions article no. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J.E., International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerasinghe, C.F., Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organisations, 2nd Ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law – The Foreign Relation Law of the United States, 3rd Ed. (American Law Institute Publishers, 1987).Google Scholar
Andresson, J.J., Cold War Dinosaurs or High-Tech Arms Providers? The West European Land Armaments Industry at the Turn of the Millennium, Occasional Paper No 23 (Institute for Security Studies, 2001).Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, S. (Ed.), EU Public Procurement Law: An Introduction (Asialink, 2011).Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, S., The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement: Regulation in the EU and UK, 3rd Ed., 2 vols. (Sweet and Maxwell, 2014).Google Scholar
Audit, M. and Schill, S. W. (Eds.), Transnational Law of Public Contracts (Bruylant, 2016).Google Scholar
Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Barber, N.W., ‘The Limited Modesty of Subsidiarity’ (2005) 11(3) European Law Journal 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R. and Harrison, J., Monopsony in Law and Economics (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnen, P., Towards a Common European Security and Defence Policy: The Ways and Means of Making It a Reality (COMPAS, 2003).Google Scholar
Bonnet, J. (Ed.), Un Demi-Siècle d'Aéronautique en France – Les Avions Militaires (Centre des Hautes Etudes de l’Armement, 2007).Google Scholar
Bourn, J., Ministry of Defence: Collaborative Projects, document 1990/91 HC 247 (UK House of Commons, 1991).Google Scholar
Bourn, J., Ministry of Defence: Major Projects Report 2005 (UK National Audit Office, 2005).Google Scholar
Bourn, J., Ministry of Defence: Major Projects Report 2006 (UK National Audit Office, 2006).Google Scholar
Bourn, J., Maximizing the Benefits of Defence Equipment Co-Operation, HC 300 Session 2000–2001 (UK National Audit Office, 2007).Google Scholar
Brauer, J. and Dunne, J-P. (Eds.), Arms Trade and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and Cases in Arms Trade Offsets (Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, P., ‘A Matter of Principle(s) – The Treatment of Contracts Falling Outside the Scope of the European Public Procurement Directives’ (2000) 9(1) Public Procurement Law Review 39–48.Google Scholar
Broomer, K. J., An Analysis of the NATO Procurement System, MSc thesis (US Naval Postgraduate School, 1999).Google Scholar
Brown, A., ‘Application of the Procurement Directives to Contracts Awarded by Public Bodies to Subsidiaries and the Scope of the Remedies Directive: A Note on Case C-26/03 Stadt Halle’ (2005) 14(3) Public Procurement Law Review NA72–77.Google Scholar
Brown, A., ‘Seeing through Transparency: The Requirement to Advertise Public Contracts and Concessions under the EC Treaty’ (2007) 16(1) Public Procurement Law Review 1–21.Google Scholar
Brown, A., ‘Changing a Sub-contractor under a Public Services Concession: Wall AG v. Stadt Frankfurt am Main (C-91/08)’ (2010) 19(5) Public Procurement Law Review 160–166.Google Scholar
Brown, A., ‘EU Primary Law Requirements in Practice: Advertising, Procedures and Remedies for Public Contracts Outside the Procurement Directives’ (2010) 19(5) Public Procurement Law Review 169–181.Google Scholar
Burgess, K. and Antill P. (Eds.), Emerging Strategies in Defense Acquisitions and Military Procurement (IGI Global, 2016).Google Scholar
Capuano, J-M., ‘OCCAR: A Pragmatic View on European Defence Cooperation’ (2006) Eurofuture 110.Google Scholar
Cardinali, N., ‘L'OCCAR, un Outil pour les Coopérations Futures en Europe’ (2004) 75 CAIA Bulletin 26–30.Google Scholar
Cardinali, N., ‘Is Europe a Help or a Hindrance in National Defence Acquisition Strategies?’ (2007) 10(3) RUSI Defence Systems 38.Google Scholar
Castellani, P., ‘OCCAR: un Exemple Pratique de la Coopération Européenne en Matière de Défense’, conference paper, IRSD, Brussels (2004).Google Scholar
Cavallo Perin, R. and Casalini, D., ‘Control over In-house Providing Organisations’ (2009) 18(5) Public Procurement Law Review 227–240.Google Scholar
Cheyne, I., ‘International Agreements and the European Community Legal System’ (1994) 19(6) European Law Review 581–598.Google Scholar
Coelmont, J. ‘What Are the Missing Instruments to Reach Another Level of European Defence?’ (2014) 6 European Defence Matters 20–22.Google Scholar
Combacau, J. and Sur, S., Droit International Public, 7th Ed. (Montchrestien, 2006).Google Scholar
Covington, T., Brendley, K. and Chenoweth, M., A Review of European Arms Collaboration and Prospects for its Expansion under the Independent European Programme Group, Note N-2638-ACQ (RAND, 1987).Google Scholar
Andrew, Cox, ‘The Future of European Defence Policy: The Case for a Centralised Procurement Agency’ (1994) 3(2) Public Procurement Law Review 65–86.Google Scholar
Antonia, Cox, More Bang for the Buck – How We Can Get Better Value from the Defence Budget (Centre for Policy Studies, 2009).Google Scholar
Craig, P. and De Búrca, G., EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials, 3rd Ed. (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Creasey, P. and May, S. (Eds.), The European Armaments Market and Procurement Cooperation (St. Martin's Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, D. and Heukels, T. (Eds.), Institutional Dynamics of European Integration: Essays in Honour of H.G. Schermers (Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Darnis, J-P., et al., Lessons Learned from European Defence Equipment Programmes, Occasional Paper N° 69 (Institute for Security Studies, 2007).Google Scholar
Dashwood, A., ‘The Relationship between the Member States and the European Union/European Community’ (2004) 41(2) Common Market Law Review 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dautremont, S., ‘Econométrie des Contrats de Défense’ (2006) 40 ECODEF 5.Google Scholar
De Mars, S., ‘The Limits of General Principles: A Procurement Case Study’ (2013) 38(3) European Law Review 316–334.Google Scholar
De Neve, A., L'Agence européenne de Défense dans le Paysage européen de la Coopération en Matière d’équipements de Défense, Sécurité & Stratégie N° 103 (IRSD, 2009).Google Scholar
Dischendorfer, M. and Fruhmann, M., ‘Contracting Authorities as Service Providers under the EC Public Procurement Directives’ (2005) 14(3) Public Procurement Law Review NA80–85.Google Scholar
Dörfer, I., Arms Deal: The Selling of the F-16 (Praeger, 1983).Google Scholar
Dubey, G. and Moricot, C., La Polyvalence du Rafale ou l'Objet Total – La Relation entre une Technologie Nouvelle et ses Utilisateurs (Centre d’Etude en Sciences Sociales de la Défense, 2006).Google Scholar
Dufour, N. et al., Intra-Community Transfers of Defence Products (Unisys, 2005).Google Scholar
Eikenberg, K., ‘Article 296 (ex 223) EC and External Trade in Strategic Goods’ (2000) 25(2) European Law Review 117–138.Google Scholar
Eisenhut, D., ‘The Special Security Exemption of Article 296 EC: Time for a New Notion of “Essential Security Interests”?’ (2008) 33(4) European Law Review 577–585.Google Scholar
Eisenhut, D., ‘Offsets in Defence Procurement: A Strange Animal – At the Brink of Extinction?’ (2013) 38(3) European Law Review 393–403.Google Scholar
Eriksson, E.A. et al., Study on the effects of offsets on the Development of a European Defence Industry and Market (FOI and SCS, 2007).Google Scholar
Estrup Ippolito, A., ‘Government to Government Contracts in EU Defence Procurement’ (2014) 23(6) Public Procurement Law Review 249–265.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Communication: European Defence – Industrial and Market Issues – Towards an EU Defence Equipment Policy’, COM(2003)113.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Green Paper on Defence Procurement’, COM(2004)608.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the Results of the Consultation Launched by the Green Paper on Defence Procurement and on the Future Commission Initiatives’, COM(2005)626.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Interpretative Communication on the application of Article 296 of the Treaty in the Field of Defence Procurement (Presented by the Commission)’, COM(2006)779.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Interpretative Communication on the Community Law Applicable to Contract Awards Not or Not Fully Subject to the Provisions of the Public Procurement Directives’, [2006]OJ C179/2.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Strategy for a Stronger and More Competitive European Defence Industry’, COM(2007)764.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Directive 2009/81/EC on the Award of Contracts in the Fields of Defence and Security – Guidance Note – Defence- and Security-Specific Exemptions’ (2010).Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Directive 2009/81/EC on the Award of Contracts in the Fields of Defence and Security – Guidance Note – Offsets’ (2010).Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Directive 2009/81/EC on the Award of Contracts in the Fields of Defence and Security – Guidance Note – Security of Supply’ (2010).Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Implementing European Union Strategy on Defence-Related Industry’, COM(97)538.Google Scholar
European Commission, Report to the European Parliament and the Council on Transposition of Directive 2009/43/EC Simplifying Terms and Conditions for Transfer of Defence-Related Products within the EU’, COM(2012)359.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a More Competitive and Efficient Defence and Security Sector’, COM(2013)542.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Communication: The Challenges Facing the European Defence-Related Industry, A Contribution for Action at the European Level’, COM(96)10.Google Scholar
European Defence Agency, ‘An Initial Long-Term Vision for European Defence Capability and Capacity Needs’ (2006).Google Scholar
European Defence Agency, A Guide to the EDA's New European Defence Equipment Market (EDA, 2007).Google Scholar
European Defence Agency, ‘European Armaments Co-operation Strategy’, 15 October 2008.Google Scholar
European Defence Agency, ‘Futures Capabilities: A Long-Term Vision’ (2015) 7 European Defence Matters 20.Google Scholar
European Defence Agency, ‘Trends in European Defence Spending’ (2015) 7 European Defence Matters 16.Google Scholar
Flournoy, M. et al., European Defense Integration: Bridging the Gap between Strategy and Capabilities (CSIS, 2005).Google Scholar
Foakes, J. and Wilmshurst, E., ‘U.N. Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property’ (2006) 7(2) Business Law International 105.Google Scholar
Fraser, S. ‘European Defence Equipment Collaboration: A View from the UK Ministry of Defence’ (2004) 7(1) RUSI Defence Systems 16–18.Google Scholar
Furter, D., The Influence of Legislation and Government Policy on Patterns of International Defence Trade and Future Markets: The Case of Offset and Directive 2009/81/EC, Doctoral Thesis (Brunel University, 2014).Google Scholar
Gattini, A., ‘Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council and Commission’ (2009) 46(1) Common Market Law Review 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., European Defence Procurement Integration: Proposals for Action within the European Union, PhD Thesis (University of Nottingham, 2004).Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘The New European Defence Agency: Major Development or Fig Leaf’ (2005) 14(2) Public Procurement Law Review 103–112.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘Defence Procurement and EU Law’ (2005) 30(4) European Law Review 559–572.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘The Commission's Green Paper on Defence Procurement’ (2005) 14(2) Public Procurement Law Review NA34–38.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘Commission's Communication on the Results of the Consultation Process on European Defence Procurement’ (2006) 15(4) Public Procurement Law Review NA119–122.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘The European Defence Agency's Code of Conduct for Armament Acquisitions: A Case of Paramnesia?’ (2006) 15(2) Public Procurement Law Review 55–65.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘European Defence Agency: The New Code of Best Practice in the Supply Chain’ (2006) 15(5) Public Procurement Law Review NA145–149.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘The Commission's Interpretative Communication on the Application of Article 296 EC in the Field of Defence Procurement’ (2007) 16(3) Public Procurement Law Review NA43–52.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A., ‘Revisiting Offset Practices in European Defence Procurement: The European Defence Agency's Code of Conduct on Offsets’ (2011) 20(1) Public Procurement Law Review 29–41.Google Scholar
Gilli, A., Unipolarity, Technological Change and Arms Manufacturing: Industrial Alliances in the European Defense Industry, PhD Thesis (European University Institute, 2014).Google Scholar
Hartley, K., The Economics of Defence Policy (Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Hartley, K., ‘Competition in Defence Contracting in the United Kingdom’ (1992) 1(6) Public Procurement Law Review 440–454.Google Scholar
Hartley, K., The Industrial and Economic Benefits of Eurofighter Typhoon (University of York, 2006).Google Scholar
Hartley, K. and Martin, S., ‘Evaluating Collaborative Programs’ (1993) 4 Defence Economics 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, K., Towards a European Weapons Procurement Process – The Shaping of Common European Requirements for New Arms Programmes, Chaillot Paper No 27 (Institute for Security Studies, 1997).Google Scholar
Heisbourg, F. et al., European Defence: Making it Work, Chaillot Paper No 42 (Institude for Security Studies, 2000).Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘A Note on Case Commission v Italy (Case C-337/05) (Agusta Helicopters Case)’ (2008) 17(5) Public Procurement Law Review NA187–192.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘A Primer to Collaborative Defence Procurement in Europe: Troubles, Achievements and Prospects’ (2008) 17(3) Public Procurement Law Review 123–145.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘Towards a Coherent European Defence Procurement Regime? European Defence Agency and European Commission Initiatives’ (2008) 17(1) Public Procurement Law Review 1–20.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘Defence Procurement: The Most Effective Way to Grant Illegal State Aid and Get Away with It…Or Is It?’ (2009) 46(1) Common Market Law Review 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘The European Defence Agency Capability Development Plan and the European Armaments Cooperation Strategy: Two Steps in the Right Direction’ (2009) 18(4) Public Procurement Law Review NA136–143.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘The European Defence Agency Electronic Bulletin Board: A Survey after Two Years’ (2009) 18(3) Public Procurement Law Review 43–66.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘Lurking at the Boundaries: Applicability of EU Law to Defence and Security Procurement’ (2010) 19(3) Public Procurement Law Review 91–118.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘Applicable Law to the Procurement of International Organisations in the European Union’ (2011) 20(4) Public Procurement Law Review 103–122.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘The EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive: Trick or Treat?’ (2011) 20(1) Public Procurement Law Review 9–28.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., The Law of Collaborative Defence Procurement through International Organisations in the European Union, PhD Thesis (University of Nottingham and Belgian Royal Military Academy, 2011).Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘Forums to Adjudicate Claims related to the Procurement Activities of International Organisations in the European Union’ (2012) 21(3) Public Procurement Law Review 95–112.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘Security of Supply and Offsets in Defence Procurement: What's New in the EU?’ (2014) 23(2) Public Procurement Law Review 33–49.Google Scholar
Heuninckx, B., ‘Defence Procurement and the European Defence Equipment Market: the Virtues of Kissing the Frog’ (2015) 2(4) Upphandlingsrättslig Tidskrift 319–337.Google Scholar
Higgins, R. et al., ‘The Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-Fulfilment by International Organizations of their Obligations toward Third Parties’ (1995) 66(1) Institute of International Law Yearbook 251–291.Google Scholar
Homan, K., ‘BENESAM: “Kroonjuweel” van internationale defensiesamenwerking!’, Marineblad June 2012.Google Scholar
Jones, S., ‘The Rise of a European Defense’ (2006) 121(2) Political Science Quarterly 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczorowska, A., EU Law for Today's Lawyers (Old Bailey Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kalėda, S. L., ‘Claims for Damages in EU Procurement and Effective Protection of Individual Rights’ (2014) 39(2) European Law Review 193–209.Google Scholar
Karampekios, N. and Oikonomou, I. (Eds.), The European Defence Agency (Routledge, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karjalainen, K., Challenges of Purchasing Centralisation – Empirical Evidence from Public Procurement, PhD Dissertations A-344 (Helsinki School of Economics, 2009).Google Scholar
Keohane, D., The EU and Armaments Co-operation (Centre for European Reform, 2002).Google Scholar
Keohane, D. (Ed.), Toward a European Defence Market, Chaillot Paper No 113 (Institute for Security Studies, 2008).Google Scholar
Kinkaid, B., ‘We Can't Do Collaborative Projects!’ (2004) 7(1) RUSI Defence Systems 12.Google Scholar
Kirat, T. and Bayon, D., Les Marchés Publics de la Défense – Droit du Contrat Public, Pratique Administrative et Enjeux Economiques (Bruylant, 2006).Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., The Concept of Treaties in International Law (Springer, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J., ‘Moribund on the Fourth of July? The Court of Justice on Prior Agreements of the Member States’ (2001) 26(2) European Law Review 187–197.Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., An Introduction to International Institutional Law (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Kuechle, H., The Cost of non-Europe in the Area of Security and Defence, Document DGExPo/B/PolDep/2005/13 (European Parliament, 2006).Google Scholar
Kunoy, B. and Dawes, A., ‘Plate Tectonics in Luxembourg: The Ménage à Trois Between EC Law, International Law, and the European Convention of Human Rights Following the UN Sanctions Cases’ (2009) 46(1) Common Market Law Review 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K. and Van Nuffel, P., Constitutional Law of the European Union (Sweet & Maxwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Lord, Garden, ‘We Need Capability Integration – “Not Equipment Cooperation’ (2004) 7(1) RUSI Defence Systems 13.Google Scholar
Lorell, M., Multinational Development of Large Aircraft: The European Experience, Paper R-2596 (RAND, 1980).Google Scholar
Lorell, M. and Lowell, J., Pros and Cons of International Weapons Procurement Collaboration (RAND, 1995).Google Scholar
Lustgarten, L., ‘The European Union, the Member States, and the Arms Trade: A Study in Law and Policy’ (2013) 38(4) European Law Review 521–541.Google Scholar
Malmendier, B., ‘The Liability of International Development Banks in Procurement Proceedings: The Example of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)’ (2010) 19(4) Public Procurement Law Review 135–154.Google Scholar
Manzini, P., ‘The Priority of Pre-Existing Treaties of EC Member States within the Framework of International Law’ (2001) 12(4) European Journal of International Law 781–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsia, J., ‘La Base Légale des Accords de Coopération Internationale pour l'Acquisition de Matériel Militaire’ (2002) 3 Bulletin des Anciens 8–9.Google Scholar
Martin, S. (Ed.), The Economics of Offsets: Defence Procurement and Countertrade (Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Maulny, J-P. et al., Cooperative Lessons Learned: How to Launch a Successful Co-Operative Programme (IRIS/CER/DGAP/IAI, 2006).Google Scholar
Mawdsey, J., The Gap Between Rhetoric and Reality: Weapons Acquisition and ESDP (Bonn International Center for Conversion, 2002).Google Scholar
Mawdsey, J., The European Union and Defence Industrial Policy, Paper 31 (Bonn International Center for Conversion, 2003).Google Scholar
Mawdsey, J. et al., Equipping the Rapid Reaction Force – Options for and Constraints on a European Defence Equipment Strategy, Paper 33 (Bonn International Center for Conversion, 2003).Google Scholar
McGoldrick, D., International Relations Law of the European Union (Longman, 1996).Google Scholar
McGowan, D., ‘Clarity at Last? Low Value Contracts and Transparency Obligations’ (2007) 16(4) Public Procurement Law Review 274–283.Google Scholar
Mezzadri, S., L'ouverture des Marchés de la Défense: Enjeux et Modalités, Occasional Paper No 12 (Institute for Security Studies, 2000).Google Scholar
Michel, J. and Rivière, J. (rapporteurs), Rapport d'Information sur les nouveaux défis de la construction de l'Europe de la défense (French National Assembly, 2005).Google Scholar
Morlino, E., ‘Cosmopolitan democracy or administrative rights? International organisations as public contractors’ (2014) 3(3) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 647–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NATO, Guidance for the Drafting of MOUs and Programme MOUs – Basic Considerations and Checklist (AACP-1) (Allied Acquisition Practices Publication, 1989).Google Scholar
NATO, NATO Handbook (NATO HQ, 2006).Google Scholar
NATO, Phased Armaments Programming System (PAPS) (AAP-20), 2nd Ed. (NATO HQ, 2010).Google Scholar
NATO Standardization Office, NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions (English and French) (AAP-6), Ed. 2015 (NATO HQ, 2015).Google Scholar
Neuman, S., Defense Industries and Dependency: Current and Future Trends in the Global Defense Sector (International Security Network, 2006).Google Scholar
Newhouse, J., The Sporty Game: The High-Risk Competitive Business of Making and Selling Commercial Airliners (Knopf, 1982).Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. and Treumer, S. (Eds.), The New EU Public Procurement Directives (Djøf, 2005).Google Scholar
OECD, Central Public Procurement Structures and Capacity in Member States of the European Union, SIGMA Papers No. 40 (OECD Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Ølykke, G. and Fanøe Andersen, C., ‘A State Aid Perspective on Certain Elements of Article 12 of the New Public Sector Directive on In-house Provision’ (2015) 24(1) Public Procurement Law Review 1–15.Google Scholar
Parrein, P-J., De evolutie en toekomst van de Belgisch-Nederlandse marinesamenwerking: spill-over en politieke samenwerking, Veiligheid & Strategie Nr 111 (IRSD/KHID, 2011).Google Scholar
Patterson, D. (Ed.), A companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Blackwell: 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, K. and Olsson, E., ‘Commission v Germany – A New Approach to In-house Providing?’ (2010) 19(1) Public Procurement Law Review 33–45.Google Scholar
Pijnacker Hordijk, E. and Meulenbelt, M., ‘A Bridge Too Far: Why the European Commission's Attempts to Construct an Obligation to Tender outside the Scope of the Public Procurement Directives should be dismissed’ (2005) 14(3) Public Procurement Law Review 123–130.Google Scholar
Public Accounts Committee, Ministry of Defence: Maximising the Benefits of Defence Equipment Co-Operation, Document number 2001/02 HC 586 (UK House of Commons, 2002).Google Scholar
Pugh, P. et al., ‘Our Unaffordable Defence Policy: What Now?’ (2006) 9(2) RUSI Defence Systems 12.Google Scholar
Reinisch, A., ‘European Court Practice Concerning State Immunity from Enforcement Measures’ (2006) 17(4) European Journal of International Law 803–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, A., International Organisations before National Courts (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Remy, C., ‘The NATO Agency Reform and its Legal Implications’ (2012) 27 NATO Legal Gazette 9–13.Google Scholar
Retter, L. et al., Study and Analysis of ‘Government-to-Government Sales’ of Defence Materiel – Executive Summary (RAND Europe, 2014).Google Scholar
Rich, M. and Dews, E., Improving the Military Acquisition Process, Lessons from RAND Research, Paper R-3373 (RAND, 1986).Google Scholar
Rich, M. et al., Multinational Coproduction of Military Aerospace Systems, Paper R-2861 (RAND, 1981).Google Scholar
Rich, M. et al., Cost and Schedule Implications of Multinational Coproduction, Paper P-6998 (RAND, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risvig Hamer, C., ‘Regular Purchases and Aggregated Procurement: The Changes in the New Public Procurement Directive Regarding Framework Agreements, Dynamic Purchasing Systems and Central Purchasing Bodies’ (2014) 23(4) Public Procurement Law Review 201–210.Google Scholar
Risvig Hansen, C., Contracts Not Covered or Not Fully Covered by the Public Sector Directive (Djøf, 2012).Google ScholarPubMed
Risvig Hansen, C., Tvarnø, C. and Skovgaard Ølykke, G. (Eds.), EU Public Procurement: Modernisation, Growth and Innovation (Djøf, 2012).Google Scholar
Rosenne, Sh., Documents on the International Court of Justice, 3rd Ed. (Nijhof, 1991).Google Scholar
Ruzié, D., Droit International Public, 13th Ed. (Dalloz, 1997).Google Scholar
Sànchez Graells, A. and Herrera Anchustegui, I., Impact of Public Procurement Aggregation on Competition. Risks, Rationale and Justification for the Rules in Directive 2014/24, Research Paper No. 14–35 (University of Leicester, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sari, A., ‘The Conclusion of International Agreements by the European Union in the Context of the ESDP’ (2008) 57(1) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarooshi, D., International Organizations and their Exercise of Sovereign Power (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Schaub, G., Learning from the F-16 (Københavns Universitet, 2015).Google Scholar
Schermer, H.G. and Blokker, N.M., International Institutional Law, 4th Ed. (Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar
Schmitt, B., From Cooperation to Integration: Defence and Aerospace Industries in Europe, Chaillot Paper No. 40 (Institute for Security Studies, 2000).Google Scholar
Schmitt, B. (Ed.), European Armaments Cooperation – Core Documents, Chaillot Paper No 59 (Institute for Security Studies, 2003).Google Scholar
Schmitt, B., The European Union and Armaments – Getting a Bigger Bang for the Euro, Chaillot Paper No. 63 (Institute for Security Studies, 2003).Google Scholar
Schmitt, B. (Ed.), Between Cooperation and Competition: The Transatlantic Defence Market, Chaillot Paper No. 44 (Institute for Security Studies, 2004).Google Scholar
Schmitt, B. (rapporteur), Defence Procurement in the European Union – The Current Debate (Institute for Security Studies, 2005).Google Scholar
Stein, E. and Carreau, D., ‘Law and Peaceful Change in a Subsystem: ‘Withdrawal’ of France from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’ (1968) 62(3) American Journal of International Law 577–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrand, A., ‘Procurement Outside the EC Directives’, conference paper, 4th Public Procurement PhD Conference (University of Nottingham, 2009).Google Scholar
Taylor, C., UK Defence Procurement Policy, Research Paper 03/78 (UK House of Commons, 2003).Google Scholar
Treumer, S. and Werlauff, E. ‘The Leverage Principle: Secondary Community Law as a Lever for the Development of Primary Community Law’ (2003) 28(1) European Law Review 124–133.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘Challenges Facing the European Defence-Related Industry – Commission Communication COM(96)08’ (1996) 5(4) Public Procurement Law Review CS98–102.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., European Defence Procurement Law – International and National Procurement Systems as Models for a Liberalised Defence Procurement Market in Europe (Kluwer, 1999).Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘Case Comment: On the Application of the E.C. Treaty to Armaments’ (2000) 25(6) European Law Review 663–668.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘The Recent Judgment in Commission v. Spain and the Procurement of Hard Defence Material’ (2000) 9(4) Public Procurement Law Review NA99–103.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘Procurement for the Armed Forces: Balancing Security and the Internal Market’ (2002) 27 European Law Review 692–713.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘The EC Treaty as an instrument of European Defence Integration: Judicial Scrutiny of Defence and Security Exceptions’ (2002) 39(6) Common Market Law Review 1347–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘The List of Hard Defence Products under Article 296 EC’ (2003) 12(3) Public Procurement Law Review NA15–21.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘Case C-186/01, Alexander Dory v Federal Republic of Germany’ (2003) 40(5) Common Market Law Review 1269–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘Defence Procurement: The New Public Sector Directive and Beyond’ (2004) 13(4) Public Procurement Law Review 198–210.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., European Union Law and Defence Integration (Hart, 2005).Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘The New European Defence Agency: A Contribution to a Common European Security and Defence Policy and a Challenge to the Community Acquis?’ (2006) 43(3) Common Market Law Review 667–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘With or Without the EU Constitutional Treaty: Towards a Common Security and Defence Policy?’ (2006) 31 European Law Review 145–166.Google Scholar
Trybus, M., ‘Case C-337/05, Commission v Italy (Agusta and Agusta Bell Helicopters)’ (2009) 46(3) Common Market Law Review 973–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trybus, M., Buying Defence and Security in Europe – The EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive in Context (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trybus, M. and White, N.D. (Eds.), European Security Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valasek, T., ‘EU Wants More Defence Competition, Lower Costs’, ISN Security Watch, 1 December 2005.Google Scholar
Van Eekelen, W., The Parliamentary Dimension of Defence Procurement – Requirements, Production, Cooperation and Acquisition, Occasional Paper No. 5 (Geneva Center for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces, 2005).Google Scholar
Van Raepenbusch, S., Droit Institutionnel de l'Union et des Communautés européennes, 2nd Ed. (De Boek, 1998).Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Struikelblokken binnen de Benelux-defensiesamenwerking, Master's Thesis (University of Antwerp, 2014).Google Scholar
Vincenzi, C. and Fairhurst, J., Law of the European Community, 3rd Ed. (Pearson, 2002).Google Scholar
Vlachos, K., Safeguarding European Competitiveness – Strategies for the Future European Arms Production and Procurement, Occasional Paper No 4 (Institute for Security Studies, 1998).Google Scholar
Wauters, K., ‘In-house Provision and the Case Law of the European Court of Justice’, conference paper, 4th Public Procurement PhD Conference (University of Nottingham, 2009).Google Scholar
Wellens, K., Remedies Against International Organisations (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltzien, K., ‘Avoiding the Procurement Rules by Awarding Contracts to an In-house Entity – Scope of the Procurement Directives in the Classical Sector’ (2005) 14(5) Public Procurement Law Review 237–255.Google Scholar
Western European Armaments Group, Principles, Procedures and Methods for the Harmonisation of Military Requirements and the Facilitation of Armaments Co-operation in Europe, WEAG/PI/D-106 (WEAG, March 2000).Google Scholar
Weston, J. et al., ‘Why Does It All Take So Long?’ (2007) 10(1) RUSI Defence Systems 32.Google Scholar
Wheaton, J., ‘Defence Procurement and the European Community: The Legal Provisions’ (1992) 1(6) Public Procurement Law Review 432–439.Google Scholar
White, N.D., The Law of International Organisations, 2nd Ed. (Manchester University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Williams, R., ‘Contracts Awarded Outside the Scope of the Public Procurement Directives’ (2007) 16(1) Public Procurement Law Review NA1–10.Google Scholar
Zandee, D., Drent, M., Hendriks, R., Bekkers, F. and Wijninga, P., Internationale Materieelsamenwerking – Rapport ten behoeve van het Interdepartementaal Beleidsonderzoek naar internationale samenwerking op het gebied van defensiematerieel (Clingendael, 2015) (‘Clingendael Rapport’).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Baudouin Heuninckx
  • Book: The Law of Collaborative Defence Procurement in the European Union
  • Online publication: 25 November 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443170.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Baudouin Heuninckx
  • Book: The Law of Collaborative Defence Procurement in the European Union
  • Online publication: 25 November 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443170.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Baudouin Heuninckx
  • Book: The Law of Collaborative Defence Procurement in the European Union
  • Online publication: 25 November 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443170.026
Available formats
×