Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:04:24.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

René Brouwer
René Brouwer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Philosophy in the Late Roman Republic , pp. 134 - 163
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

CAG : Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (1882–1909) Cambridge.Google Scholar
FRHist. : Cornell, T.J. (ed.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians. Cambridge.Google Scholar
FDS : Hülser, K. (1987–1988) Fragmente der Dialektik der Stoiker. Cambridge Google Scholar
FIRA : Riccobono, S. and others (1968–1972 [1940–1941]) Fontes iuris Romani Antejustiniani. Cambridge Google Scholar
FSS: Ferrary, J.-L., Schiavone, A. and Stolfi, A. (2018) Quintus Mucius Scaevola. Opera. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garbarino: Garbarino, G. (1973) Roma e la filosofia greca dalle origini alla fine del II secolo A.C. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giannantoni: Giannantoni, G. (1990) Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lenel: Lenel, O. (1889) Palingenesia iuris civilis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
LS: Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge.Google Scholar
LSJ: Liddell, H.G., R. Scott and H.S. Jones (1996) A Greek-English Lexicon. With a Revised Supplement. Cambridge.Google Scholar
RE : Wissowa, G., Kroll, W. and Mittelhaus, K. (eds) (1893–1980) Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Cambridge Google Scholar
SVF : Arnim, H. von (1903–1905) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta 1–3. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aelian, , Historical Miscellany : Wilson, N.G. (ed., tr.) (1997) Aelian. Historical Miscellany. Cambridge Google Scholar
Aelius, , Fragments : Bottiglieri, A. (2019) ‘Sextus Aelius’, in Bottiglieri, A., A Manzo, F. Nasti and G. Viarengo Antiquissima iuris sapientia. Cambridge: 297–321.Google Scholar
Anaximenes of Lampsacos [?], Rhetoric to Alexander : Fuhrmann, M. (ed.) (2000) Anaximenes. Ars rhetorica quae vulgo fertur Aristotelis ad Alexandrum, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Appian, , Civil Wars : Mendelssohn, L. and Viereck, P. (eds) (1905) Appiani Historia Romana 2, 2nd ed.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arcesilaus, , Fragments: Mette, H.J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaus von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 7–94, and Vezzoli, S. (2016) Arcesilao di Pitane. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Aristophanes of Byzantium: Nauck, A. (1848) Aristophanis Byzantii grammatici Alexandrini fragmenta . Halle, , and Slater, W.J. (1986) Aristophanis Byzantii fragmenta, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aristotle, On the Heaven : Moraux, P. (ed.) (1965) Aristote. Du ciel. Cambridge Google Scholar
Aristotle, Metaphysics : Ross, W.D. (ed.) (1924) Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics : Susemihl, F. and Apelt, O. (eds) (1912) Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea, 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aristotle, Physics: Ross, W.D. (ed.) (1936) Aristotle’s Physics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aristotle, Politics : Dreizehnter, A. (ed.) (1970) Aristoteles’ Politik. Cambridge Google Scholar
Aristotle, Rhetoric : Kassel, R. (ed.) (1976) Aristotelis Ars rhetorica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aristotle, On the Soul: Siwek, P. (ed.) (1965) Aristotelis De anima Graece et Latine.Google Scholar
Aristotle, Topics : Brunschwig, J. (ed., tr.) (1967–2007) Aristote. Topiques. Cambridge Google Scholar
Aristotle, Fragments : Gigon, O. (1987) Aristotelis opera volumen tertium: librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Cambridge.Google Scholar
[Aristotle], Constitution of Athens : Chambers, M. (ed.) (1994) Aristoteles. ΑΘΗΝΑΙΩΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑ, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Aspasius, , Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics : Heylbut, G. (ed.) (1889) Aspasii in Ethica Nicomacheia quae supersunt commentaria. CAG 19.1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Athenaeus: Olson, S.D. (ed., tr.) (2006–2012) Athenaeus. The Learned Banqueters. Cambridge, and, for books 8–15, Olson, S.D. (ed.) (2019–2020) Athenaeus Naucratites Deipnosophistae. Berlin.Google Scholar
Augustine, On Christian Doctrine : Martin, J. (ed.) (1982) Sancti Aurelii Augustini De doctrina christiana, De vera religione. Cambridge Google Scholar
Augustine, On the City of God : Dombart, B. and Kalb, A. (eds.) (1955) Sancti Aurelii Augustini De civitate dei. Cambridge Google Scholar
[Augustine], On Rhetoric : Halm, C. (ed.) (1863) Rhetores Latini minores. Cambridge: 135–51.Google Scholar
Carneades, , Fragments: Mette, H.J. (1985) ‘Weitere Akademiker heute (Fortsetzung von Lustr. 26, 7-94): Von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’, Lustrum 27: 39–148.Google Scholar
Cato the Elder, Fragments: see Jordan, H. (ed.) (1840) Catonis quae exstant. Leipzig, and Malcovati, H. (1976) Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta liberae rei publicae, 4th ed., Turin: 12–97.Google Scholar
Charisius, , Science of Grammar : Barwick, K. and Kühnert, F. (eds) (1964 [1925]), Charisius. Ars grammatica, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Appropriate Actions : Winterbottom, M. (ed.) (1994) M. Tulli Ciceronis De officiis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , Brutus : Jahn, O., Kroll, W. and Kytzler, B. (eds.), Cicero. Brutus, 6th ed., Cambridge 1962, and Douglas, A.E. (ed.) (1966) M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cicero, , In Defence of Cluentius : in Clark, A.C. (ed.) (1905), M. Tulli Ciceronis orationes 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Divination : Pease, A.S. (ed.) (1955 [1920–1923]), M. Tulli Ciceronis De divinatione, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Ends : Schiche, T. (ed.) (1915) M. Tulli Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Friendship : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 317–65.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Invention: Bornecque, H. (ed., tr.) (1932) Cicéron. De l’invention. Paris.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Laws : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 155–266.Google Scholar
Cicero, , Letters to Atticus : Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (ed., tr.) (1999) Cicero. Letters to Atticus. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cicero, , Letters to Friends : Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (ed., tr.) (2001) Cicero. Letters to Friends. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cicero, , Lucullus : Schäublin, C. (ed., tr.) (1995) Cicero. Akademische Abhandlungen. Lucullus. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cicero, , In Defence of Murena : in Clark, A.C. (ed.) (1905) M. Tulli Ciceronis orationes 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Old Age : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 267–315.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On the Nature of the Gods : Pease, A.S. (ed.) (1955–1958) M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cicero, , Orator : Westman, R. (ed.) (1980) Cicero. Orator. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On the Orator : Wilkins, A.S. (ed.) (1902) M. Tullius Cicero. De Oratore. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , On the Paradoxes of the Stoics : Molager, J. (ed., tr.) (1971) Cicéron. Les paradoxes des Stoïciens. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cicero, , On the res publica : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 1–154.Google Scholar
Cicero, , Topics : Reinhardt, T. (ed.) (2003) Cicero’s Topica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , Tusculan Disputations 1–2: Pohlenz, M. (ed.) (1918) M. Tulli Ciceronis scripta quae manserunt omnia 44: Tusculanae disputationes. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cicero, , Varro : in Plasberg, O. (ed.) (1922) Cicero: Academicorum reliquiae cum Lucullo. Cambridge: 1–25.Google Scholar
Cicero, , Fragments on philosophy : Garbarino, I. (1984) M. Tulli Ciceronis fragmenta ex libris philosophicis, ex aliis libris deperditis, ex scriptis incertis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clement of Alexandria, Miscellanies 1–6: Stählin, O. and Früchtel, L (eds) (1960) Clemens Alexandrinus 2: Stromata Buch 1–6 , 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coruncanius, , Fragments: Viarengo, G. (2019) ‘Tiberius Corunicianus’ in Bottiglieri, A., A Manzo, F. Nasti and G. Viarengo Antiquissima iuris sapientia. Cambridge: 167–89.Google Scholar
Crantor of Soli, Fragments: Mette, H.J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaus von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 7–43.Google Scholar
Crates of Mallus, Fragments : Broggiato, M. (2001) Cratete di Mallo. I frammenti. Cambridge Google Scholar
Crates of Thebes, Fragments: in Giannantoni, (1990), vol. 2, 523–75.Google Scholar
Critolaus of Phaselis, Fragments : Wehrli, F. (1969b) Hieronymos von Rhodos. Kritolaos und seine Schüler. Rückblick: Der Peripatos in vorchristlicher Zeit. Register, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
David, , Introduction : in Busse, A. (ed.) (1904) Davidis Prolegomena philosophiae et In Porphyrii isagogen commentarium. CAG 18.2. Cambridge: 1–79.Google Scholar
Digest: in Mommsen, T. (ed.) (1911) Corpus iuris civilis 1, 12th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Diogenes of Sinope, Fragments: in Giannantoni (1990), vol. 2, 227–509.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius: Dorandi, T. (ed.) (2013) Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diomedes, , Science of Grammar : in Keil, H. (ed.) (1857) Grammatici Latini 1. Cambridge: 297–590.Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities : Jacoby, C. (ed.) (1885–1925) Dionysi Halicarnasensis Antiquitatum Romanarum quae supersunt. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dionysius Thrax, The Science of Grammar : Pecorella, G.B. (ed.) (1962) Dionisio Trace. ΤΕΧΝΕ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΙΚΗ. Cambridge.Google Scholar
[Dionysius Thrax] Scholia on Dionysius Thrax : Hilgard, A. (ed.) (1901) Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem grammaticam. Grammatici graeci 1.3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Epicurus, , Fragments : Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Epiphanius, , On Faith : in Holl, K. and Dummer, J. (eds) (1985) Epiphanius 3: Panarion haer. 65–80, De fide, 2nd ed. Cambridge: 496–526.Google Scholar
Eudorus of Alexandria, Fragments: Mazzarelli, C. (1985) ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria’, Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica 77: 197–209, 535–55.Google Scholar
Eusebius of Casarea, Preparation for the Gospel: Mras, K. (ed.) (1954) Eusebius Werke 8: Die Praeparatio evangelica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eustathius of Thessalonica, Commentary on the Odyssey : Stallbaum, J.G. (ed.) (1826) Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Homeri Odysseam 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gaius, , Teaching Manual : Seckel, E. and Kübler, B. (eds) (1939) Gai Institutiones, 8th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gellius, , Attic Nights : Holford-Strevens, L. (ed.) (2020) Auli Gellii Noctes Atticae libri. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hecato, , Fragments : Gomoll, H. (1933) Der stoische Philosoph Hekaton. Cambridge Google Scholar
Hermagoras of Temnos, Fragments : Matthes, D. (1962) Hermagorae Temnitae testimonia et fragmenta. Cambridge, and Woerther, F. (2012) Hermagoras. Fragments et témoignages. Paris.Google Scholar
[Hippolytus of Rome?], Refutation of All Heresies : Litwa, M.D. (ed., tr.) (2016) Refutation of all heresies. Cambridge Google Scholar
Isidorus of Sevilla, Etymology : Lindsay, W.M. (ed.) (1911) Isidori Hispalensis episcopi Etymologiarum sive originum libri xx. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Justinian, Digest, see Digest.Google Scholar
Justinian, Teaching Manual: in Mommsen, T. (ed.), Corpus iuris civilis 1, 12th edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Juvenal, , Satires : in Clausen, W.V. (ed.) (1992) A. Persi Flacci et D. Iuni Iuvenalis Saturae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lactantius, , Divine Teaching Manual : Brandt, S. (ed.) (1890) L. Caeli Firmiani Lactanti opera omnia 1. Cambridge Google Scholar
Livy, : Livy’s work is quoted from the OCT editions.Google Scholar
Marius, Victorinus, Science of Grammar : Mariotti, I. (ed.) (1967) Marii Victorini Ars grammatica. Cambridge Google Scholar
Olympiodorus, , Commentary on the Gorgias : Westerink, L.G. (ed.) (1970) Olympiodori in Platonis Gorgiam commentaria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Origen, , Commentary on Matthew : Klostermann, E. (ed.) (1935–1941) Origenes. Matthäuserklärung. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Panaetius, , Fragments : Straaten, M. van (1962) Panaetii Rhodii fragmenta, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Alesse, F. (1997) Panezio di Rodi. Testimonianze. Naples, and Vimercati, E. (2002) Panezio. Testimonianze e frammenti. Milan.Google Scholar
Pausanias, : Spiro, F. (ed.) (1903) Pausaniae Graeciae descriptio. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peripatetics, Fragments: Sharples, R.W. (2010) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to AD 200, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Philodemus of Gadara, History of the Stoics : Dorandi, T. (ed., tr.) (1994) Philodemus. Storia dei filosofi. Cambridge Google Scholar
Philodemus of Gadara, On Property Management : Tsouna, V. (ed., tr.) (2012) Philodemus. On Property Management. Cambridge Google Scholar
Philodemus of Gadara, On the Stoics: Dorandi, T. (ed., tr.) (1982) ‘Filodemo. Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339)’, Cronache ercolanesi 12: 92–133.Google Scholar
Philodemus of Gadara, [ On Choices and Avoidances] : Indelli, G. and Tsouna, V. (eds, tr.) (1995) [Philodemus]. [On Choices and avoidances]. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Plato, : Plato’s dialogues are quoted from the Oxford Classical Texts (OCT) editions.Google Scholar
Platonists, Fragments: Boys-Stones, G. (2017) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to 250 AD, Cambridge, and Dörrie, H. and M. Baltes (1987–1996) Der Platonismus in der Antike, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder, Natural History : Mayhoff, C. (ed.) (1899–1909) C. Plini Secundi Naturalis historiae libri xxxvii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pliny, the Younger, Letters : Mynors, R.A.B. (ed.) (1966) C. Plini Caecili Secundi epistularum libri decem. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Life of Aemilius Paullus: in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1993) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 2.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Stuttgart: 184–222.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Lives of Agis and Cleomenes: in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Stuttgart: 352–415.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Life of Aratus : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. Gärtner, H.. Cambridge: 264–317.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Life of Cato the Elder : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (2000) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 1.1, 5th ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Cambridge: 287–423.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Lives of the Gracchi : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Cambridge: 416–63.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Life of Pyrrhus : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Cambridge: 153–203.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Life of Sulla : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1973) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.2, 2nd ed. Cambridge: 131–93.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , On the Generation of the Soul in the Timaeus : in Cherniss, H. (ed.) (1976) Plutarch. Moralia 13.1, Cambridge: 131–345.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Political Instructions : in Hubert, C., Pohlenz, M. and Drexler, M. (eds) (1971) Plutarchi moralia 5.1. Cambridge: 58–126.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Sayings of the Romans : in Nachstädt, W., Sieveking, W. and Titchener, J.B. (eds) (1971) Plutarchi moralia 2. Cambridge: 70–109.Google Scholar
Pollux of Naucratis, Thesaurus : Bethe, E. (ed.) (1900–1937) Pollucis Onomasticon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Polybius, , Histories : Dindorf, L. and Büttner-Wobst, T. (eds) (1889–1905) Polybios. Historiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pomponius, Handbook: see Digest (at. 1.2.2).Google Scholar
Posidonius, , Fragments : Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I.G. (eds) (1972) Posidonius 1. The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rutilius Rufus, Fragments: in FRHist. no. 21.Google Scholar
Seneca the Elder, Controversies : Winterbottom, M. (ed., tr.) (1974) The Elder Seneca. Cambridge Google Scholar
Seneca, , On Benefits : in Hosius, C. (ed.) (1914) L. Annaei Senecae de beneficiis libri VII de clementia libri II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Seneca, , On Clemency : Malaspina, E. (ed.) (2016) L. Annaeus Seneca. De clementia libri duo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Seneca, , Letter(s) : Reynolds, L.D. (ed.) (1965) L. Annaei Senecae ad Luculium epistulae morales. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Against the Professors 1–6: Mutschmann, H. and Mau, I.. (eds) (1954) Sexti Empirici opera 3: Adversus mathematicos libros 1–6, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Against the Professors 7–11: Mutschmann, H. (ed.) (1914) Sexti Empirici opera 2: Adversus dogmaticos libros quinque (Adv. Mathem. 7–11). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism: Mutschmann, H. and Mau, I. (eds) (1958) Sexti Empirici opera 1: ΠΥΡΡΩΝΕΙΩΝ ΥΠΟΤΥΠΩΣΕΩΝ, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stobaeus, : Wachsmuth, C. and Hense, O. (eds) (1884–1923) Ioannis Stobaei anthologium. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Strabo, : Radt, S. (ed., tr.) (2002–2011) Strabons Geographika. Cambridge Google Scholar
Suetonius, , Caesar : Ihm, M. (ed.) (1907) C. Suetoni Tranquilli De vita Caesarum libri. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Suetonius, , On the Teachers of Grammar and Rhetoric: Kaster, R. (ed., tr.) (1995) C. Suetonius Tranquilius. De grammaticis et rhetoribus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Suidas, : Adler, A. (ed.) (1928–1938) Suidae lexicon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tacitus, , Yearbooks : Borzsák, S. (ed.) (1992) Cornelii Taciti libri qui supersunt 1: Ab excessu Divi Augusti libri I–VI. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Terence, , The Eunuch : in Barsby, J. (ed., tr.) (2001) Terence 1. Cambridge: 305–443.Google Scholar
Terence, , The Self-Tormentor : in Barsby, J. (ed., tr.) (2001) Terence 1. Cambridge: 171–303.Google Scholar
Thespis, : Pickard-Cambridge, A.W. and Webster, T.B.L. (1962), Dithyramb. Cambridge, and Snell, B., ‘Thespis’ (1971) in his Tragicorum Graecorum fragmenta 1, Göttingen: 61–7.Google Scholar
Timon of Phlius, Fragments : Di Marco, M. (1989) Timone di Fliunte. Cambridge. Rome, and Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum, Berlin: 369–95.Google Scholar
Varro, , Rural Matters : Flach, D. (ed., tr.) (2006) Marcus Terentius Varro. Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft. Cambridge Google Scholar
Varro, , On the Latin Language : De Melo, W.D.C. (ed., tr.) (2019) Varro: De lingua Latina. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paterculus, Velleius, Roman History : Watt, W.S. (ed.) (1998) Vellei Paterculi Historiarum ad M. Vinicium consulem libri duo, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Xenocrates, , Fragments : Isnardi Parente, M. and Dorandi, T. (2012) Senocrate e Ermodoro. Testimonianze e frammenti. Cambridge Google Scholar
Abel, K. (1987) ‘100 Jahre Hekaton-Forschung’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft NF 13: 101–20.Google Scholar
Alesse, F. (1997) Panezio di Rodi. Testimonianze. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alesse, F. (2017) ‘Filosofia stoica e classe dirigente romana nel II secolo a.C. Panezio, Blossio, gli Scipioni’, in Philosophari, ed. Vesperini, P.. Cambridge: 77–88.Google Scholar
Alexander, M.C. (1990) Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Cambridge Google Scholar
Algra, K.A. (1997) ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero. The ethical divisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus ’, in Assent and Argument, eds Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J.. Cambridge: 107–39.Google Scholar
Altheim, F. (1929) ‘Persona’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 27: 35–52.Google Scholar
Althoff, J. and Zeller, D. (2006) Die Worte der sieben Weisen. Cambridge Google Scholar
Ankum, H. (1974) ‘Towards a rehabilitation of Pomponius’, in noster , Daube , ed. Watson, A.. Edinburgh: 1–14.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1989) ‘Cicero on Stoic moral philosophy and private property’, in Philosophia togata 1, eds. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Cambridge: 151–73.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2007) ‘Carneades’ classification of ethical theories’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, eds Ioppolo, A.M. and Sedley, D.N.. Cambridge: 187–223.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G.E. (1958) ‘Modern moral philosophy’, Philosophy 33: 1-19.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, V. (1970 [1938]) ‘La règle de droit et la loi dans l’antiquité classique’, reprinted in his Rariora. Cambridge: 231–69.Google Scholar
Archi, G.G. (1970) ‘Interpretatio legis – interpretatio iuris – interpretatio legum’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung. Romanistische Abteilung 87: 1–49.Google Scholar
Armgardt, M. (2008) ‘Zur Bedingungsdogmatik im klassischen römischen Recht und zu ihren Grundlagen in der stoischen Logik’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 76: 219–35.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von (1898) Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa mit einer Einleitung: Sophistik, Rhetorik, Philosophie in ihrem Kampf um die Jugendbildung . Cambridge.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Cambridge Google Scholar
Astin, A.E. (1967) Scipio Aemilianus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Astin, A.E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Cambridge Google Scholar
Atkins, E.M. (tr.) and Griffin, M. (ed.) (1991) Cicero. On Duties. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, E.M. (2000) ‘Cicero’, in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds Rowe, C. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 477–516.Google Scholar
Atkins, J.W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, J.W. (2015) ‘Zeno’s Republic, Plato’s Laws, and the early development of Stoic natural law theory’, Polis 32: 166–90.Google Scholar
Atkins, J.W. (2018) Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Audring, G. and Brodersen, K. (2008) Quellen zur Wirtschaftstheorie der griechischen Antike. Cambridge Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1995 [1832]) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. Rumble, S.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (1996) ‘Pragmatic morphology: Varro’s defence of analogy in Book 9 of his De lingua Latina’, in Ancient Grammar: Content and Context, ed. Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A.. Cambridge: 105–19.Google Scholar
Babusiaux, U. (2015) Wege zur Rechtsgeschichte: Römisches Erbrecht. Cambridge Google Scholar
Backhaus, R. (2006) ‘Ethik und Recht in Cicero, de officiis 3.12.50ff.’, in Humaniora, eds Kern, B.-R. and others. Cambridge: 3–23.Google Scholar
Bakker, F.A. (2016) Epicurean Metereology. Cambridge Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2016) The Peripatetics. Cambridge Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic. Princeton. Google Scholar
Barlow, J.J. (2012) ‘Cicero on property and the state’, in Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, ed. Nicgorski, W.. Cambridge: 212–41.Google Scholar
Barlow, J.J. (2018) ‘Scipio Aemilianus and Greek ethics’, Classical Quarterly 64: 112–27.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2015 [1986]) ‘Is rhetoric an art?’, reprinted in Barnes (2015), 80–105.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1999) ‘An introduction to Aspasius’, in Aspasius: the Earliest Extant Commentary on Aristotle’s Ethics, eds Alberti, A. and Sharples, R.W.. Cambridge: 1–50, reprinted in Barnes (2011), 212–60.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) ‘Roman Aristotle,’ in Philosophia togata 2, eds Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Cambridge: 1–69, reprinted in Barnes (2015), 359–406.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2011) Essays in Ancient Philosophy 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2015) Essays in Ancient Philosophy 4. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds) (1989) Philosophia togata 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baronowski, D.W. (2011) Polybius and Roman Imperialism. Cambridge Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (tr.) (2001) Terence 1. Cambridge Google Scholar
Barta, H. (2010) ‘Graeca non leguntur’? Cambridge Google Scholar
Bauman, R.A. (1983) Lawyers in Roman Republican Politics. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bauman, R.A. (1985) Lawyers in Roman Transitional Politics. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bauman, R.A. (1989) Lawyers and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bauman, R.A. (1996) Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome, Cambridge Google Scholar
Beard, M., and Crawford, M. (1999) Rome in the Late Republic, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Becker, J.C. (1964) ‘The influence of Roman Stoicism upon the Gracchi economic land reforms’, La parola del passato 19: 125–34.Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (1976) Die Wissenschaftslehre im Zivilrecht des Q. Mucius Scaevola pontifex. Cambridge Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (1978) ‘Institutionelles und prinzipielles Denken im römischen Privatrecht’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 95: 187–231, reprinted in Behrends (2004), 15–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrends, O. (1980a) ‘Prinzipat und Sklavenrecht’, in Rechtsentwicklung und Rechtswissenschaft, ed. Immenga, U.. Cambridge: 53–88, reprinted in Behrends (2004), 417–55.Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (1980b) ‘Tiberius Gracchus und die Juristen seiner Zeit – die römische Jurisprudenz gegenüber der Staatskrise des Jahres 133 v. Chr.’, in Das Profil des Juristen in der europäischen Tradition, eds Luig, K. and Liebs, D.. Cambridge: 25–121.Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (1982) Die fraus legis. Cambridge Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (2004) Institut und Prinzip. Cambridge Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (2008) ‘Die geistige Mitte des römischen Rechts. Die Kulturanthropologie der skeptischen Akademie’, Zeitschrift für Rechtsgeschichte der Savigny-Stiftung. Romanistische Abteilung 125: 25–107.Google Scholar
Benelli, E. (ed.) (2009) Thesaurus linguae Etruscae 1: Indice lessicale, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Ciues Epicurei. Cambridge Google Scholar
Beresford, A. (tr.) (2020) Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge Google Scholar
Berger, A. (1932) ‘Tabulae duodecim’, RE 4A: cols. 1900–49.Google Scholar
Berger, A. (1940) ‘Tabulae duodecim’, RE Suppl. 7: cols. 1275–6.Google Scholar
Berger, A. (1953) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Law. Philadelphia (Pa).Google Scholar
Berthold, R.M. (1984) Rhodes in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bett, R. (tr.) (2005) Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2012) Vertere. Un’antropologia della traduzione nella cultura antica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bichlin, R. (1991) ‘Über die Geschichte des Hellenismus-Begriffs in der deutschen Historiographie. Leitende Gedanken, Probleme, Perspektiven’, in Hellenismos, ed. Said, S.. Cambridge: 363–86.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. (1930) ‘Maske’, RE 14: cols. 2070–120.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. (1979) Der Kyniker Demetrius. Cambridge Google Scholar
Blank, D. (2005) ‘Varro’s anti-analogist’, in Language and Learning, eds Frede, D. and Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 210–38.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. (1995) Die Verfassung der römischen Republik, 8th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (2016) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, F. von and Düll, R. (1937) ‘Persona’, RE 19: cols. 1036–41.Google Scholar
Bod, R. (2013) A New History of the Humanities, tr. Richards, L.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boeri, M.D. (2013) ‘Natural law and world-order in Stoicism’, in Nature and the Best Life, ed. Rosi, G.. Cambridge: 183–223.Google Scholar
Boeri, M.D. and Salles, R. (2014) Los filósofos estoicos. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bollansée, J. (1999) Hermippus of Smyrna and His Biographical Writings. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bona, F. (1973) ‘Sulla fonte di Cicero, De oratore 1,56, 239–240 e sulla chronologia dei ‘Decem libelli’ di P. Mucio Scevola’, Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 39: 425–80.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2015) Il platonismo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bonfante, G. and Bonfante, L. (2003) The Etruscan Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. (2006) An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. Cambridge Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2017) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to 250 AD. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bremer, F.P. (1898) Iurisprudentiae Antehadrianae quae supersunt 2.1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brennan, T.C. (2000) The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bretone, M. (1971) ‘Publius Mucius et Brutus Manilius qui fundaverunt ius civile’, in La critica del testo, ed. Pardisi, B.. Cambridge: 103–16.Google Scholar
Bretone, M. (1982 [1970]) Tecniche e ideologie dei giuristi romani, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Bretone, M. (2008) Ius controversum nella giurisprudenza classica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brett, A.S. (1997) Liberty, Right and Nature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Breyer, G. (1993) Etruskisches Sprachgut im Lateinischen unter Ausschluss des spezifisch onomastischen Bereiches. Cambridge Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (tr.) (2006) Cicero. On Academic Scepticism. Cambridge Google Scholar
Broggiato, M. (2001) Cratete di Mallo. I frammenti. Cambridge Google Scholar
Broggiato, M. (2014) Filologia e interpretazione a Pergamo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Broggini, G. (1959) ‘Ius lexque esto’, in Ius et lex, eds Isele, E., Schwander, V. and Broggini, G.. Cambridge: 23–44.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2008) ‘On the ancient background of Grotius’s notion of natural law’, Grotiana 29: 1–24.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2011a) ‘On law and equity: the Stoic view’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 128: 17–38.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2011b) ‘Polybius on Stoic tyche ’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 51: 111–32.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2012) ‘Musil’s search for ethics’, Monatshefte 104: 511–26.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2014) The Stoic Sage. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2015) ‘Ulpian’s appeal to nature: Roman law as universal law’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 83: 60–76.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2017) ‘“Richer than the Greeks”: Cicero’s constitutional thought in Republic 1’, in Ciceros Staatsdenken, ed. Höffe, O.. Cambridge: 33–46.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2018) ‘On the meaning of ‘system’ in the Common and Civil Law traditions: two approaches to legal unity’, Utrecht Journal for International and European Law, 45–55.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2019) ‘Funerals, faces and Hellenistic philosophy: on the origins of the concept of person in Rome’, in Persons, ed. Lolordo, A.. Cambridge: 19–45.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2020a) ‘Divine and human will in Imperial Stoicism’, in Fate, Providence, and Free Will, eds Brouwer, R. and Vimercati, E.. Cambridge: 31–48.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2020b) ‘Socratic ethics and ignorance in the Stoa’, in The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Arenson, K.. Cambridge: 107–118.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2021) ‘Cynic origins of natural law?’, in State and Nature in Antiquity, eds Adamson, P. and Rapp, C.. Cambridge: 159–80.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (unpublished) ‘Rhetoric, philosophy and law in the late Roman Republic’ (paper presented at the conference ‘Rhetoric of Philosophers’ at the Czech Academy of Sciences, March 2020).Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. and Vimercati, E. (eds) (2020) Fate, Providence, and Free Will. Cambridge Google Scholar
Brown, P.G.M. (2014) ‘The beginnings of Roman comedy’, in The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy, eds Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A.C.. Cambridge: 401–8.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1995 [1977]) ‘Épicure et le problème du “langage privé”’, reprinted in his Études sur les philosophies hellénistiques. Cambridge: 43–68.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1995 [1988]) ‘Le problème de l’heritage conceptuel dans le scepticisme: Sextus Empiricus et la notion de κριτήριον’, reprinted in his Études sur les philosophies hellénistiques. Cambridge: 289–319.Google Scholar
Brunt, P.A. (2013) Studies in Stoicism, eds Griffin, M. and Samuels, A.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bryen, A.Z. (2014) ‘Law in many pieces’, Classical Philology 109: 346–65.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1960) ‘Platon oder Pythagoras. Zum Ursprung des Wortes “Philosophie”’, Hermes 88: 159–77.Google Scholar
Cairns, J.W. and Du Plessis, P.J. (eds) (2010) The Creation of the ius commune. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Camporeale, G. (2003 [2000]) Die Etrusker, tr. Schareika, H.. Cambridge Google Scholar
Canfora, L. (1989 [1987]) The Vanished Library, tr. Ryle, M.. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cannata, C.A. (1997) Per una storia della scienza giuridica europea 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, L. (2014 [2009]). Law and Power in the Making of the Roman Commonwealth, tr. Kopp, L.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carcaterra, A. (1966) Le definizioni dei giuristi romani. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. (2001) M. Terentius Varro. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cascione, C. (2018) ‘Il contesto storico della legislazione decemvirale’, in XII Tabulae, ed. Cursi, M.F.. Cambridge: 1–30.Google Scholar
Castner, C.J. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans. Cambridge Google Scholar
Catana, L. (2008) The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A. (2000) Oratoria a Roma. Rome.Google Scholar
Cavazza, F. (1981) Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico. Cambridge Google Scholar
Cerami, P. (1998) ‘Il sistema ofiliano’, in La codificazione del diritto dall’antico al moderno. Cambridge: 83–119.Google Scholar
Chaumartin, F.-R. (1985) Le De Beneficiis de Seneque, sa signification philosophique, politique et sociale. Cambridge Google Scholar
Chiusi, T.J. (2005) ‘Strukturen des römischen Eigentums im Spiegel rhetorisch-philosophischer Texte Ciceros’, in Was ist Eigentum?, eds Eckl, A. and Ludwig, B.. Cambridge: 59–72.Google Scholar
Christes, J. (1975) Bildung und Gesellschaft. Cambridge Google Scholar
Chroust, A.-H. (1962) ‘The miraculous disappearance and recovery of the corpus aristotelicum’, Classica et mediaevalia 23: 50–67.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.L. (1971) Higher Education in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar
Cohn, L. (1896) ‘Aristophanes aus Byzanz’, RE 2: cols. 994–1005.Google Scholar
Corbino, A. (2014) ‘Caso, diritto e regula. Limiti della funzione normativa del caso deciso nella visione romana’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 61: 47–82.Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. (1995) The Beginnings of Rome. Cambridge Google Scholar
Crawford, M.H. (ed.) (1996) Roman Statutes. Cambridge Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2010) ‘The Stoics on definitions’, in Definition in Greek Philosophy, ed. Charles, D.. Cambridge: 359–423.Google Scholar
Crönert, W. (1906) Kolotes und Menedemos. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cursi, M.F. (ed.) (2018) XII Tabulae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. (2004) Ethics without Principles, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. (2017) ‘Moral particularism’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online).Google Scholar
Dawson, D. (1992) Cities of the Gods. Cambridge Google Scholar
De Ste, . Croix, G.E.M. (1980) The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World. Cambridge Google Scholar
Desbordes, F. (1995) ‘Les débuts de la grammaire à Rome’, Laelius 15: 125–37.Google Scholar
Desbordes, F. (1990) Idées romains sur l’écriture. Cambridge Google Scholar
Desmond, W.D. (2006) The Greek Praise of Poverty. Cambridge Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2007) Ancient Greek Scholarship. Cambridge Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2016) ‘The reception of Aristotle in Antiochus and Cicero’, in Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, ed. Falcon, A.. Cambridge: 183–201.Google Scholar
Dillon, J.M. and Long, A.A. (eds) (1988) The Question of ‘Eclecticism’. Cambridge Google Scholar
Dillon, S. (2006) Ancient Greek Portrait Sculpture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Domingo, R. (2018) Roman Law. Cambridge Google Scholar
Dominik, W. (2017) ‘The development of Roman rhetoric’, in The Oxford Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, ed. MacDonald, M.J.. Cambridge: 159–72.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (2011) ‘The rise and fall of the Socratic problem’, in The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, ed. Morrison, D.R.. Cambridge: 1–23.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1996) Der Platonismus in der Antike 4. Cambridge Google Scholar
Dovring, F. and others (eds) (1965 [1951]), Hugo de Groot. Inleidinge tot de Hollandsche rechts-geleerdheid, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Droysen, J.G. (1836) Geschichte des Hellenismus. Cambridge Google Scholar
Du Plessis, P. (ed.) (2016) Cicero and the Law. Cambridge Google Scholar
Du Plessis, P. (2020) Burkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law, 6th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, P., Ando, C. and Tuori, K. (eds) (2016) The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dudley, D. (1937) A History of Cynicism. Cambridge Google Scholar
Dudley, D. (1941) ‘Blossius of Cumae’, Journal of Roman Studies 31: 94–9.Google Scholar
Düll, R. (1995) Das Zwölftafelgesetz, 7th ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Düring, I. (1968) ‘Aristotle’s use of examples in the Topics ’, in Aristotle on Dialectic, ed. Owen, G.E.L., Cambridge: 202–29.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge Google Scholar
Dyck, A.R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis. Cambridge Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990) ‘Stoic philosophy and the concept of the person’, in The Person and the Human Mind, ed. Gill, C.. Cambridge: 109–35.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.) (2017) From Stoicism to Platonism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1990) The Hellenistic Stoa. Cambridge Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2010) Roman Imperialism. Cambridge Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2012) ‘Polybius among the Romans: life in the Cyclops’ cave’, in Imperialism, Cultural Politics and Polybius, eds Smith, C. and Yarrow, L.M.. Cambridge: 17–31.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1997) ‘The contexts and occasions of Roman rhetoric’, in Roman Eloquence, ed. Dominik, W.. Cambridge: 111–28.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Faro, S. (2010) ‘La maschera è il volto’, Atti dell’ accademia Romanistica Costantiniana 17: 629–48.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2005) ‘The beginnings of a literature in Latin’, Journal of Roman Studies 95: 226–40.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016) Beyond Greek. Cambridge Google Scholar
Ferguson, W.S. (1911) Hellenistic Athens. Cambridge Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (2003) ‘La législation romaine dans les livres 21 à 45 de Tite-Live’, in Laurea internationalis, ed. Hantos, T.. Cambridge: 107–42.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (2007) ‘Les philosophes grecs à Rome (155–86 av J.-C.)’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, eds Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D.N.. Cambridge: 17–46.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (2014 [1988]) Philhellénisme et impérialisme, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L., Schiavone, A. and Stolfi, A. (2018) Quintus Mucius Scaevola. Opera. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Festa, N. (1932–1935) I frammenti degli Stoici antichi. Cambridge Google Scholar
Fink, J. (1952) ‘Analogie und Anomalie in der Sprache. Zu Varro De lingua Latina 9, 1’, Hermes 80: 377–9.Google Scholar
Finkenauer, T. (2012) ‘[Review of] Barta 2010’, Sehepunkte 12 nr. 12 (online).Google Scholar
Finkenauer, T. (2014) ‘Die römischen Juristen und Gerechtigkeit’, in Recht und Gerechtigkeit, ed. Höffe, O.. Cambridge.: 11–46.Google Scholar
Finkenauer, T. (2015) ‘Le ‘regulae iuris’ come strumenti mnemotecnici’, Index 43: 15–21.Google Scholar
Fiori, R. (2011) Bonus vir. Politica filosofia retorica e diritto nel De officiis di Cicerone. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fiori, R. (2013) ‘Il vir bonus tra filosofia greca e tradizioni romani nel De officiis di Cicerone’, in Vir bonus, ed. Lovato, A.. Cambridge: 19–39.Google Scholar
Fiori, R. (2014) ‘The vir bonus in Cicero’s De officiis: Greek philosophy and Roman legal science’, in Aequum ius. Cambridge: 187–202.Google Scholar
Flach, D. (2004) Das Zwölftafelgesetz. Cambridge Google Scholar
Flower, H.I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Flower, H.I. (2010) Roman Republics. Cambridge Google Scholar
Flower, H.I. (2014) ‘Spectacle and political culture in the Roman Republic’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Flower, H., 2nd ed. Cambridge: 377–98.Google Scholar
Fögen, M.T. (2002) Rechtsgeschichten. Cambridge Google Scholar
Forschner, M. (2001) ‘Der Begriff der Person in der Stoa’, in Person, ed. Sturma, D.. Cambridge: 37–57.Google Scholar
Forschner, M. (2018) Die Philosophie der Stoa. Cambridge Google Scholar
Fott, D. (tr.) (2014) Marcus Tullius Cicero. On the Republic and On the Laws. Cambridge Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2016) Discours et verité précédé de La parrêsia, eds Fruchaud, H.-P. and Lorenzini, D.. Cambridge Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2001) Fearless Speech, tr. Pearson, J.. Cambridge Google Scholar
Frank, J. (2005) A Democracy of Distinction. Cambridge Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1974) Die stoische Logik. Cambridge Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1978) ‘Principles of Stoic grammar’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.M.. Cambridge: 27–75, reprinted in Frede (1987), 301–37.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987) Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2011) A Free Will. Cambridge Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1909) ‘Persona’, Glotta 2: 164–8.Google Scholar
Frier, B.W. (1985) The Rise of the Roman Jurists. Princeton. Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T. and Hose, M. (2017) Das antike Drama. Munich.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Das systematische Lehrbuch. Cambridge Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1997) Seneca und Kaiser Nero. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garbarino, G. (1973) Roma e la filosofia greca dalle origini alla fine del II secolo A.C. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garbarino, G. (1984) M. Tulli Ciceronis fragmenta ex libris philosophicis, ex aliis libris deperditis, ex scriptis incertis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garbarino, G. (2003) Philosophorum Romanorum fragmenta usque ad L. Annaei Senecae aetatem. Cambridge Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2016) ‘Why the scientific revolution wasn’t a scientific revolution and why it matters’, in Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty, eds Richards, R.J. and Daston, L.. Cambridge: 115–48.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. (2012) Caesar’s De analogia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (2007) Thinking about Property. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (2017) ‘Property and its limits: historical analysis’, in La propriété et ses limites/Der Eigentum und seine Grenzen, eds Winiger, B. and others. Cambridge: 12–38.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. and Whittaker, C. (eds) (1978) Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giglio, F. (2018) ‘The jurist’s mind’ (unpublished inaugural lecture at the University of Surrey, October 2018).Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1987) Aristotelis opera volumen tertium: librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1988) ‘Personhood and personality: the four-personae theory in Cicero, De officiis 1’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 169–99.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2009) ‘Ancient concepts of personal identity’, in The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies, eds Boys-Stones, G. and others. Cambridge: 260–70.Google Scholar
Giltay, J. (2016) ‘Greek philosophy and classical Roman law’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, eds du Plessis, P., Ando, C. and Tuori, K.. Cambridge: 188–99.Google Scholar
Glare, P.G.W. (2012) Oxford Latin Dictionary, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Glenn, H.P. (2014) Legal Traditions in the World, 5th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Cicero’s philosophical affiliations’, in The Question of “Eclecticism”, eds Dillon, J.M. and Long, A.A.. Cambridge: 34–69.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1992) ‘Critolaus’ scale and Philo’, Classical Quarterly 42: 142–6.Google Scholar
Gomoll, H. (1933) Der stoische Philosoph Hekaton. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H.B. (1987) ‘Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman world from the time of Cicero to the end of the second century AD’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.2, ed. Haase, W.. Cambridge: 1079–174.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1993) ‘Le mouvement cynique et les Romains: attraction et repulsion’, in Le cynisme ancien et ses prolongements, eds Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. and Goulet, R.. Cambridge: 241–58.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002) Cicero on the Emotions, Cambridge Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion. Cambridge Google Scholar
Green, P. (tr.) (1974) Juvenal. Sixteen Satires, 2nd ed, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2015) Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2008) ‘ Iure plectimur. The Roman critique of Roman imperialism’, in East & West, eds Brennan, T.C. and Flower, H.I.. Cambridge: 85–110.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2013a) ‘Latin philosophy and Roman law’, in Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy, eds Harte, V. and Lane, M.. Cambridge: 96–116.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2013b) Seneca on Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2017) ‘Dignity in Roman and Stoic thought’, in Dignity, ed. Debes, R.. Cambridge: 47–65.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds) (1997) Philosophia togata 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, T. (tr.) (2000) Plato. The Republic, ed. Ferrari, G.R.F. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, T. (tr.) (2016) Plato. The Laws, ed. Schofield, M.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1975) Le siècle des Scipions. Cambridge Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1618) Mare liberum [Eng.: The Free Sea]. Leiden.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. Introduction to the Study of the Law of Holland: see Dovring and others (1965) and Lee (1953).Google Scholar
Grotius, H. On the Right of Booty : Hamaker, H.G. (ed.) (1868) Hugonis Grotii De jure praedae commentarius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Guarino, A. (1969) ‘Noterelle Pomponiane’, Labeo 15: 102–7.Google Scholar
Guarino, A. (1981) La coerenza di Publio Mucio. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gudeman, A. (1934) Aristoteles. ΠΕΡΙ ΠΟΙΗΤΙΚΗΣ. Berlin.Google Scholar
Guibal, M.-P. (1937) De l’influence de la philosophie sur le droit romain et la jurisprudence de l’époque classique. Cambridge Google Scholar
Gwynn, A. (1926) Roman Education from Cicero to Quintilian. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1990) Cicero the Politician. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (2005) Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1970) ‘Tradition stoïcienne et idées politiques au temps des Gracques’, Revue des études latines 48: 133–79.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (2002) Exercises spirituels et philosophie antique, 4th ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Hager, P. (1998) ‘System’, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie 10, eds Ritter, J. and Gründer, K.. Cambridge: cols. 824–5.Google Scholar
Hahm, D.E. (2007) ‘Critolaus and late Hellenistic Peripatetic philosophy’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, eds Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D.N.. Cambridge: 47–101.Google Scholar
Hard, R. (2012) Diogenes the Cynic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, W.F.R. (1965) ‘The final good in Aristotle’s ethics’, Philosophy 40: 277–95.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2006) Cicero and the Jurists. Cambridge Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2007) Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A (2012 [1961]) The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2011) Potamo of Alexandria and the Emergence of Eclecticism in Late Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2013) ‘The texts of Plato and Aristotle in the first century BC’, in Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC, ed. Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 1–27.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2016) ‘Andronicus of Rhodes and the construction of the Aristotelian corpus’, in Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, ed. Falcon, A.. Cambridge: 81–100.Google Scholar
Haynes, S. (1963) ‘Ludiones etruriae’, in Festschrift Harald Keller. Cambridge: 13–21.Google Scholar
Helmer, É. (ed.) (2016) Richesse et pauvreté chez les philosophes de l’antiquité. Cambridge Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, J. (1925) Penia en ploutos. Cambridge Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G.L. (1933) ‘The Memoirs of Rutilius Rufus’, Classical Philology 28: 153–75.Google Scholar
Heumann, H.G. and Seckel, G. (1914) Handlexikon zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts, 9th ed. Jena.Google Scholar
Hodge, H.G. (tr.) (1927) Cicero. The Speeches: Pro lege Manilia, Pro Caecina, Pro Cluentio, Pro Rabirio perduellionis. Cambridge Google Scholar
Höffe, O. (2017) ‘De re publica III: Über Ungerechtigkeit und Gerechtigkeit’, in Ciceros Staatsphilosophie, ed. Höffe, O.. Cambridge: 73–89.Google Scholar
Hoetink, H.R. (1955) ‘Les notions anachroniques dans l’historiographie du droit’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 23: 1–20.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T.S. (2005) ‘Die Güter, das Gute und die Frage des rechten Maßes: Platon und das Eigentum’, in Was ist Eigentum?, eds Eckl, A. and Ludwig, B.. Cambridge: 29–42.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T.S. (2009) Wirtschaftsphilosophie. Cambridge Google Scholar
Honoré, T. (1962) Gaius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. (1973) ‘Legal reasoning in Rome and today’, Cambrian Law Review 4: 58–67.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. (2002) Ulpian, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Horn, C. (2018) ‘Anknüpfung an die Schultradition’, in Die Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike, eds Riedweg, C., Horn, C. and Wyrwa, D.. Cambridge: 15–18.Google Scholar
Howe, H.M. (1951) ‘Amafinius, Lucretius and Cicero’, American Journal of Philology 72: 57–62.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2005) Appius Claudius Caecus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2014) ‘Numa and Pythagoras: the life and death of a myth’, in The Roman Historical Tradition, eds Richardson, J.H. and Santangelo, F.. Cambridge: 35–52.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2017) ‘La philosophie grecque et les réformes d’Appius Claudius Caecus’, in Philosophari, ed. Vesperini, P.. Cambridge: 13–75.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2018) La République romaine et son empire. Cambridge Google Scholar
Humfress, C. (2015) ‘Telling stories about (Roman) law’, in Legalism: Rules and Categories, eds Dresch, P. and Scheele, J.. Cambridge: 79–104.Google Scholar
Huss, W. (1988) Geschichte der Karthager. Cambridge Google Scholar
Husson, S. (2016) ‘Peut-on être riche et cynique?’, in Richesse et pauvreté chez les philosophes de l’antiquité, ed. Helmer, É.. Cambridge: 125–46.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. (2015) ‘Sources of law from the Republic to the Dominate’, in The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, ed. Johnston, D.. Cambridge: 25–44.Google Scholar
Indelli, G. and Tsouna, V. (eds, tr.) (1995) [Philodemus]. [On Choices and avoidances]. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014) Ethics after Aristotle. Cambridge Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Gerson, L.P. (2008) The Stoics Reader. Cambridge Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A.M. (1980) Aristone di Chio e lo Stoicismo antico. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ioro, M. and Reisenzein, R. (eds) (2010) Regel, Norm, Gesetz. Cambridge Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1966) Techne. Cambridge Google Scholar
Jannot, J.-R. (1993) ‘Phersu, phersuna, persona. À propos du masque étrusque’, in Spectacles sportifs et scèniques dans le monde étrusco-italique. Cambridge: 281–320.Google Scholar
Jörs, P. (1888) Römische Rechtswissenschaft zur Zeit der Republik 1: Bis auf die Catonen. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnston, D. (2000) ‘The jurists’ in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds Rowe, C. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 616–34.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, H.F. and Nicholas, B. (1972) Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, A.H.M. (1972) The Criminal Courts of the Roman Republic and Principate, 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, G. (ed.) (1973) The Sovereignty of the Law. Selections from Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Cambridge Google Scholar
Jonsen, A.R. and Toulmin, S. (1988) The Abuse of Casuistry. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kacprzak, A. (2016) ‘Rhetoric and Roman law’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, eds du Plessis, P., Ando, C. and Tuori, K.. Cambridge: 200–13.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1911 [1785]), Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Eng.: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals], Akademie-Ausgabe [Ak.] 4. Berlin: 385–483.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G.E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (1956) Eigentum und Besitz im älteren Römischen Recht, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (1971) Das römische Privatrecht 1, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (1986 [1978]) ‘Zur Problematik der römischen Rechtsquellenlehre’, in his Römische Rechtsquellen und angewandte Juristenmethode. Cambridge: 8–41.Google Scholar
Kaser, M. and Hackl, K. (1996) Das römische Zivilprozessrecht. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kaser, M., Knütel, R. and Lohsse, S. (2021) Römisches Privatrecht, 22nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kaster, K.A. (tr.) (2020) Cicero. Brutus and Orator. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kasulke, C.T. (2005) Fronto, Marc Aurel und kein Konflikt zwischen Rhetorik und Philosophie im 2. Jh. n. Chr. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kelly, J.M. (1979) ‘Gaius noster: substructures of Western social thought’, American Historical Review 84: 619–48.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. (1987) ‘The Tekhnē Grammatikē of Dionysius Thrax: English translation with introduction and notes’, in The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period, ed. Taylor, D.J.. Cambridge: 169–90.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1963) The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton. Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1994) A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kerferd, G.B. (1972–1973) ‘The search for personal identity in Stoic thought’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 55: 177–96.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio funebris. Cambridge Google Scholar
Klebs, E. (1919) ‘Aelius 155’, RE 1: cols. 535–7.Google Scholar
König, I. (2012) Die römische Republik, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kränzlein, A. (1963) Eigentum und Besitz im griechischen Recht des fünften und vierten Jahrhunderts. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Krauskopf, I. (1985) ‘Phersu’, in Dizionario della civiltà etrusca, ed. Cristofani, M.. Cambridge: 218–19.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1940) ‘Rhetorik’, RE 7A: cols. 1039–1138.Google Scholar
Krüger, P. (1912) Geschichte der Quellen und Litteratur des römischen Rechts, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (1962) Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung des römischen Kriminalrechtsverfahrens in vorsullanischer Zeit. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (2001) Die römischen Juristen. Cambridge Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. and Wittmann, R. (1995) Die Magistratur. Cambridge Google Scholar
La Greca, F. (2016) Tiberio Gracco e Blossio di Cuma. Cambridge Google Scholar
La Pira, G. (1935a) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana [1]’, in Studi in onore di Filippo Virgilii. Cambridge: 159–82.Google Scholar
La Pira, G. (1934) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana 2: L’arte sistematrice’, Bullettino dell istituto di diritto romano N.S. 1: 336–55.Google Scholar
La Pira, G. (1935b) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana 3: Il metodo’, Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 1: 319–48.Google Scholar
La Pira, G. (1936–1937) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana 4: Il concetto di scienza e gli strumenti della costruzione scientifica’, Bullettino dell istituto di diritto romano N.S. 3: 131–59.Google Scholar
Lanni, A. (2016) Law and Order in Ancient Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. (1973) Filodemo e il pensiero economico degli Epicuri. Cambridge Google Scholar
Law, V. (2003) The History of Linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lee, R.W. (tr.) (1953) Hugo Grotius. The Jurisprudence of Holland, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leeman, A.D. (1963) Orationis ratio. Cambridge Google Scholar
Lefebvre, R. (2004) ‘Règle et critère chez Épicure’, Revue des études grecques 117: 82–103.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2001) Panaitios’ und Ciceros Pflichtenlehre. Cambridge Google Scholar
Lenel, O. (1889) Palingenesia iuris civilis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2019) Varrone. Unus scilicet antiquorum hominum. Cambridge Google Scholar
Lesky, A. (1956) Die tragische Dichtung der Hellenen. Cambridge Google Scholar
Lesky, A. (1971) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, 3rd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962) La pensée sauvage. Cambridge Google Scholar
Lewis, C.T. and Short, C. (1879) A Latin Dictionary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lewis, J.P. (2013) ‘Did Varro think that slaves were talking tools?’, Mnemosyne 66: 634–48.Google Scholar
Liebersohn, Y.Z. (2010) The Dispute Concerning Rhetoric in Hellenistic Thought, Cambridge Google Scholar
Liebs, D. (1997) ‘Jurisprudenz’, in Die Literatur des Umbruchs von der römischen zur christlichen Literatur, ed. Sallmann, K.. Cambridge: 83–217.Google Scholar
Liebs, D. (2002) ‘Die vorklassischen juristischen Fachschriften’, in Die archaische Literatur, ed. Suerbaum, W.. Cambridge: 560–80.Google Scholar
Lipsius, J. (1905–1913) Das attische Recht und Rechtsverfahren. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Locke, J., Second Treatise on Government: in Laslett, P. (ed.) (1988) John Locke. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: 265–428.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1978) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.M.. Cambridge: 101–24.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1991) ‘The harmonics of Stoic virtue’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Supplement, 97–116, reprinted in Long (1996), 202–33.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1996) Stoic Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1997) ‘Stoic philosophers on persons, property-ownership and community’, in Aristotle and After, ed. Sorabji, R.. Cambridge: 13–31.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. and Boas, G. (1935) Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity. Cambridge Google Scholar
Lübtow, U. von (1944) ‘Cicero und die Methode der römischen Jurisprudenz’, in Festschrift Wenger. Cambridge: 224–35.Google Scholar
Luschnat, O. (1958) ‘Das Problem des ethischen Fortschritts in der alten Stoa’, Philologus 102: 178–214.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D.M. (1968) The Law in Classical Athens. Cambridge Google Scholar
Macé, A. (ed.) (2012) Choses privées et chose publique en Grèce ancienne. Cambridge Google Scholar
Machek, D. (2016) ‘Using our selves: an interpretation of the Stoic four-personae theory in Cicero’s De officiis I’, Apeiron 49: 163–92.Google Scholar
Macrae, D. (2017) “‘The laws of the rites and of the priests”: Varro and late Republican Roman sacral jurisprudence’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 60: 34–48.Google Scholar
Magdelain, A. (2015) ‘Ius respondendi’ [1950] in his Jus imperium auctoritas, 2nd ed, Cambridge: 103–52.Google Scholar
Malcovati, H. (1976) Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta liberae rei publicae, 4th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1983) ‘ Techne: a new fragment of Chrysippus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies 24: 57–65.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1986) ‘Diogenes Laertius on Stoic philosophy’, Elenchos 7: 295–382.Google Scholar
Mantovani, D. (1999) Le formule del processo privato romano, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Mantovani, D. (2009) ‘Cicerone e il doppio ritratto di Tuberone il vecchio. Sul liber de iure civile in artem redigendo’, Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 75: 113–30.Google Scholar
Mantovani, D. (2018a [2012]) Legum multitudo, tr. Babusieux, U.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mantovani, D. (2018b) Les juristes écrivains de la Rome antique. Cambridge Google Scholar
Manzoni, G.E. (tr.) (2019) Cicerone. Opere di retorica. Cambridge Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2011) Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (tr.) (2019) Fragmentary Republican Latin: Oratory. Cambridge Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2017) On Writing History, Cambridge Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. (ed.) (1967) Marii Victorini Ars grammatica. Cambridge Google Scholar
Marx, K., Das Kapital 1 (1983 [1867]). Marx-Engels-Gesamtausagabe [MEGA] 2.5. Berlin.Google Scholar
Masi Doria, C. (2011) ‘Principii e regole. Valori e razionalità come forme del discorso giuridico’, in Tra retorica e diritto, ed. Lovato, A.. Cambridge: 19–41.Google Scholar
Maso, S. (2012) Filosofia a Roma. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Matthaios, S. (1999) Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs. Cambridge Google Scholar
Matthaios, S. (2001) ‘Das Wortartensystem der Alexandriner: Skizze seiner Entwicklungsgeschichte und Nachwirkung’, Göttinger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 5: 65–94.Google Scholar
May, J.M. and Wisse, J. (tr.) (2001) Cicero. On the Ideal Orator. Cambridge Google Scholar
Mazzarelli, C. (1985) ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria’, Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica 77: 197–209, 535–55.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McElduff, S. (2013) Roman Theories of Translation. Cambridge Google Scholar
McGing, B. (2010) Polybius’ Histories. Cambridge Google Scholar
McGing, B. (2019) ‘Introduction’, in Appian. Roman History 1, tr. McGing, B.. Cambridge: ix–xxxv.Google Scholar
McKnight, E. (2017) ‘Offences against the res publica: the role of public interest arguments in Cicero’s forensic speeches’, The Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 9: 237–63.Google Scholar
Mette, H.J. (1954) Ius civile in artem redactum. Cambridge Google Scholar
Mette, H.J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaus von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 7–94.Google Scholar
Mette, H.J. (1985) ‘Weitere Akademiker heute (Fortsetzung von Lustr. 26, 7-94): Von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’, Lustrum 27: 39–148.Google Scholar
Metzger, E. (2015) ‘Roman litigation’, in The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, ed. Johnston, D.. Cambridge: 272–98.Google Scholar
Miglietta, M. (2010) ‘Servius respondit’. Studi intorno a metodo e interpretazione nella scuola giuridica serviana – Prolegomena I. Cambridge Google Scholar
Miller, F.D. (1991) ‘Aristotle on property rights’, in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy 4: Aristotle’s Ethics, eds Anton, J.P. and Preus, A.. Cambridge: 227–61.Google Scholar
Miller, F.D. (1995) Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.E. (1990) Patricians and Plebeians. Cambridge Google Scholar
Miquel, J. (1970) ‘Stoische Logik und römische Jurisprudenz’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte 87: 85–122.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (1997) La raison de Rome. Cambridge Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2015) The Birth of Critical Thinking in Rome, tr. Lloyd, J. of Moatti (1997). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2018) Res publica. Cambridge Google Scholar
Möllers, C. (2015) Die Möglichkeit der Normen, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) ‘[Review of] Farrington, B. (1939) Science and Politics in the Ancient World. London’, Journal of Roman studies 31: 149–57.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1971) Alien Wisdom. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1887) Römisches Staatsrecht 2.1, 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Montana, F. (2015) ‘Hellenistic scholarship’, in Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, eds Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A.. Cambridge: 60–183.Google Scholar
Moore, C. (2020) Calling Philosophers Names. Cambridge Google Scholar
Moore, G.E. (1993 [1903]) Principia ethica, ed. Baldwin, T.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1973) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen 1: Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im 1. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morford, M. (2002) The Roman Philosophers. Cambridge Google Scholar
Mousourakis, G. (2007) A Legal History of Rome. Cambridge Google Scholar
Mühll, P. von der (1976 [1963]) ‘Zwei alte Stoiker: Zuname und Herkunft’, in his Ausgewählte kleine Schriften. Cambridge: 359–70.Google Scholar
Mygind, B. (1999) ‘Intellectuals in Rhodes’, in Hellenistic Rhodes, eds Gabrielsen, V. and others. Cambridge: 247–93.Google Scholar
Nagy, A. (2017) ‘Author and actor. Plotinus and the Stoics on the autonomy of action’, Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 109: 109–30.Google Scholar
Natali, C. (1995) ‘ Oikonomia in Hellenistic political thought’, in Justice and Generosity, eds Laks, A. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 95–128.Google Scholar
Natali, C. and Viano, C. (eds) (2014) Aitia 2 . Cambridge Google Scholar
Nédoncelle, M. (1948) ‘Prosopon et persona dans l’antiquité classique’, Revue des sciences religieuses 22: 277–99.Google Scholar
Neuhausen, K.A. (2008) ‘Kato v. Karneades in Rom (155 v. Chr.): Grenzen des tolerablen Streits zwischen Protagonisten römischer Politik und griechischer Philosophie im Hellenismus’, in Streitkultur, eds Baumann, U., Steiner, W. and Becke, A.. Cambridge: 31–78.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, W. (1958) Patronus und orator. Cambridge Google Scholar
Nicholas, B. (1962) An Introduction to Roman Law. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K.M. (2012) ‘The Nicomachean Ethics in Hellenistic philosophy’, in The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 5–30.Google Scholar
Nörr, D. (1972a) Divisio et partitio. Bemerkungen zur römischen Rechtsquellenlehre und zur antiken Wissenschaftstheorie. Cambridge, reprinted in Nörr (2003), 775–850.Google Scholar
Nörr, D. (1972b) ‘Spruchregel und Generalisierung’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 89: 18–93, reprinted in Nörr (2003), 705–74.Google Scholar
Nörr, D. (1976) ‘Pomponius oder “Zum Geschichtsverständnis der römischen Juristen”’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.15, eds Temporini, H. and Haase, W.. Cambridge: 497-604, reprinted in Nörr (2003), 985–1092.Google Scholar
Nörr, D. (2003) Historiae iuris antiqui. Cambridge Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (1986) The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (1988) ‘Nature, functioning and capability: Aristotle on political distribution’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Supplementary Volume, 145–84.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (2000) ‘Duties of justice, duties of material aid_ Cicero’s problematic legacy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8: 176–206, reprinted with revisions in Strange and Zapko (2004), 214–49 and in Nussbaum (2019), 18–63.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (2019) The Cosmopolitan Tradition. Cambridge Google Scholar
Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P. and Burwood, S. (2013) An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pallottino, M. (ed.) (1968) Testimonia linguae Etruscae, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Papke, R. (1988) Caesars ‘De analogia’. Cambridge Google Scholar
Paricio, J. (2012) ‘[Review of] Ribas Alba, J., Persona, Granada 2012’, Annali del seminario giuridico dell’ università degli studi di Palermo 55: 443–62.Google Scholar
Pearson, A.C. (1891) The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes. Cambridge Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2000) La rhétorique dans l’Antiquité, Paris.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. (2017) ‘Caesar the linguist: the debate about the Latin language’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar, eds Grillo, L. and Krebs, C.B.. Cambridge: 173–92.Google Scholar
Phillips, D.D. (2013) The Law of Ancient Athens. Cambridge Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A.W. and Webster, T.B.L.. (1962) Dithyramb. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pierson, C. (2013) Just Property 1 . Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pitcher, L. (2009) Writing Ancient History, Cambridge Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1934a) Antikes Führertum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1934b) ‘Cicero de officiis III’, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Philologisch-historische Klasse I 1: 1–40, reprinted in Pohlenz (1965), 253–91.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1949) ‘Panaetius 5)’, RE 9: cols. 418–40.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1965) Kleine Schriften 1. Cambridge Google Scholar
Pólay, E. (1965a) ‘Der Kodifizierungsplan des Julius Caesar’, Iura 16: 27–51.Google Scholar
Pólay, E. (1965b) ‘Der Kodifizierungsplan des Pomponius’, Acta antiqua academicae scientiarum Hungaricae 13: 85–95.Google Scholar
Pólay, E. (1968) ‘Zur Geschichte der Rechtswissenschaft im republikanischen Rom’, in Gesellschaft und Recht im griechisch-römischen Altertum, eds Andreev, M.N. and others. Cambridge: 150–92.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1989) Der Begriff der Würde im antiken Rom und später. Cambridge Google Scholar
Powell, J.F.G. (2013) ‘The embassy of the three philosophers to Rome in 155 BC’, in Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, eds Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K.. Cambridge: 219–47.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2007) ‘Ein Blick in den Stollen von Skepsis: vier Kapitel zur frühen Überlieferung des Corpus Aristotelicum ’, Philologus 151: 51–77.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. and Rapp, C. (2016) Aristoteles. Cambridge Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. (1672) De iure naturae et gentium [Eng.: On the Law of Nature and Nations]. Lund.Google Scholar
Pugsley, D. (1993) ‘On compiling Justinian’s Digest 3: The Florentine index’, Journal of Legal History 14: 94–105, reprinted in Pugsley (1995), 41–52.Google Scholar
Pugsley, D. (1994) ‘Gaius or Pomponius’, Revue de l’histoire des droits de l’antiquité 41 (online), reprinted in Pugsley (1995), 83–97.Google Scholar
Pugsley, D. (1995) Justinian’s Digest and the Compilers. Cambridge Google Scholar
Puhle, A. (1987) Persona. Zur Ethik des Panaitios. Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar
Quadrato, R. (1986) ‘La persona in Gaio’, Iura 37: 1–33.Google Scholar
Ramis Barceló, R. (2013) ‘Notas sobre la historia del concepto de persona’, Index 41: 305–12.Google Scholar
Raubitscheck, A.E. (1949) ‘Phaidros and his Roman pupils’, Journal of the American School at Athens 18: 96–103.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1978) ‘The introduction of logical organisation in Roman prose literature’, Papers of the British School at Rome 46: 12–34, reprinted in Rawson (1991), 324–51.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1991) Roman Culture and Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reeve, C.D.C. (1989) Socrates in the Apology. Cambridge Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2000) ‘Rhetoric in the fourth Academy’, Classical Quarterly 50: 531–47.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2003) Cicero’s Topica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rheinfelder, H. (1928) Das Wort ‘persona’. Cambridge Google Scholar
Ribas Alba, J.M. (2012) Persona desde el derecho romano a la teología cristiana. Cambridge Google Scholar
Ribas Alba, J.M. (2014) ‘El concepto de persona: culminación de la antropolgía jurídica romana’, in Persona, derecho y poder en perspectiva histórica, eds Perinán, B. and Guerrero, M.. Cambridge: 1–15.Google Scholar
Riesenweber, T. (2019) ‘Rhetorische Theorie in Rom: Von den rhetores Latini bis zu Seneca d. Ä.’, in Handbuch Antike Rhetorik, eds Erler, M. and Tornau, C.. Cambridge: 383–418.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. (2016) ‘Public and private criminal law’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, eds du Plessis, P., Ando, C. and Tuori, K.. Cambridge: 310–21.Google Scholar
Rist, J.M. (2020) What Is a Person? Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rix, H. (1995) ‘Il latino e l’etrusco’, Eutopia 4: 73–88.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. (1870) De Julii Pollucis in apparatu scaenico enarrando fontibus. Cambridges.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J.C. (tr.) (1927) Aulus Gellius. Attic Nights. Cambridge (Mass.). Google Scholar
Roller, D. (2018) A Historical and Topographical Guide to the Geography of Strabo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007) Live unnoticed (ΛΑΘΕ ΒΙΩΣΑΣ). Cambridge Google Scholar
Rotondi, G. (1922a) ‘L’indice fiorentino delle Pandette e l’ipotesi del Bluhme’, in his Scritti giuridici 1, Milan: 298–339.Google Scholar
Rotondi, G. (1922b) Leges publicae populi Romani. Cambridge Google Scholar
Ruschenbusch, E. (1963) ‘Die Zwölftafeln und die römische Gesandtschaft nach Athen’, Historia 12: 250–3.Google Scholar
Russo, F. (2005) ‘Genealogie numaiche e tradizioni pitagoriche’, Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 47: 265–90.Google Scholar
Sacchi, O. (2008) ‘ Phersu/persona? Contributo per un’etimologia di prosōpon ,’ Ius antiquum 22: 26–41.Google Scholar
Sacchi, O. (2010) ‘Persona e diritto romano. Elementi per un’archeologia giuridica del concetto’, Atti dell’accademia Romanistica Costantiniana 17: 1189–263.Google Scholar
Sachers, E. (1954) ‘potestas patria’, RE 22: cols. 1046–175.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F.H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sanio, F.D. (1845) Rechtshistorische Abhandlungen und Studien, Cambridge Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (1911) ‘The introduction of masks on the Roman stage’, American Journal of Philology 32: 58–73.Google Scholar
Scarano Ussani, V. (1997) L’ars dei giuristi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1973) ‘Humanitas Romana’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 1.4 , ed. Temporini, H.. Cambridge: 52–61.Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. (1934) Ein frühmittelstoisches System der Ethik bei Cicero. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (1991) Playing by the Rules. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1943) Die Bildnisse der antiken Dichter, Redner und Denker. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. (1997) ‘Philosophical prose’, in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C.–400 A.D., ed. J.E. Porter. Leiden: 195–337.Google Scholar
Scherillo, G. (1952) ‘Note critiche: 3. Quinti Mucii ὅρων liber singularis’, Iura 1: 180–90.Google Scholar
Scherillo, G. (1953) ‘Il sistema civilistico’, in Festschrift Arangio-Ruiz 4. Cambridge: 445–67.Google Scholar
Schiavone, A. (1974) ‘Quinto Mucio teologo’, Labeo 20: 315–61.Google Scholar
Schiavone, A. (1976) Nascita della giurisprudenza. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schiavone, A. (1992) Giuristi e nobili nella Roma repubblicana. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schiavone, A. (2012) The Invention of Law in the West, tr. Carden, J. and Shugaar, A. of Schiavone (2005). Cambridge Google Scholar
Schiavone, A. (2017 [2005]) Ius. L’invenzione del diritto in Occidente, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schiavone, A. (ed.) (2016) Storia giuridica di Roma. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2007) ‘Didaxis, rhetoric and the law in Lucretius’, in Classical Constructions, ed. Heyworth, S.J.. Cambridge: 63–90.Google Scholar
Schiller, A.A. (1978) Roman Law. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schlatter, R. (1951) Private Property. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schmekel, A. (1892) Die Philosophie der mittleren Stoa in ihrem geschichtlichen Zusammenhange. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmidlin, B. (1970) Die römischen Rechtsregeln. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schmidlin, B. (1976) ‘Horoi, pithana, und regulae. Zum Einfluß der Rhetorik und Dialektik auf die juristische Regelbildung’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.15, ed. Haase, W.. Cambridge: 101–30.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995) ‘Cicero’s definition of the res publica ’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J.G.F.. Cambridge: 63–83.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999a) ‘Morality and the law: the case of Diogenes of Babylon’, in his Saving the City. Cambridge: 160–77.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999b [1991]) The Stoic Idea of the City, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012) ‘The fourth virtue’, in Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, ed. Nicgorski, W.. Cambridge: 43–57.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013) ‘Cosmopolitanism, imperialism, and justice in Cicero’s Republic and Laws’ , Journal of Intellectual History and Political Thought 2: 5–34.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2018) ‘Philosophers and politics in Diogenes Laertius’, in Diogenes Laertius. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, tr. Mensch, P.. Cambridge: 570–4.Google Scholar
Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J. (eds) (1980) Doubt and Dogmatism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scholz, P. (2015) Der Hellenismus. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schriefl, A. (2013) Platons Kritik an Geld und Reichtum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schulz, F. (1936) Principles of Roman Law, translated from a text revised and enlarged by the author by M. Wolff. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schulz, F. (1946) History of Roman Legal Science, abbreviated translation by de Zulueta, F. of Schulz (1961). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schulz, F. (1961) Geschichte der römischen Rechtswissenschaft. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (ed.) (2008) Heraclides of Pontus. Cambridge Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (1951) ‘Das strittige Recht der römischen Juristen’, in Festschrift Fritz Schulz 2, eds Niedermeyer, H. and Flume, W.. Weimar: 201–25.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1989) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’, in Philosophia togata, eds Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Cambridge: 97–119.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997) ‘The ethics of Brutus and Cassius’, Journal of Roman studies 87: 41–53.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2003) ‘The school from Zeno to Arius Didymus’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 7–32.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2009) ‘Epicureanism in Rome’, in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge: 29–45.Google Scholar
Sellars, J., (2007) ‘Stoic cosmopolitanism and Zeno’s Republic ’, History of Political Thought 28: 1–29.Google Scholar
Sellars, J., (2009) The Art of Living, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1984) ‘Rights and capabilities’, in his Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge: 307–24.Google Scholar
Senn, F. (1927) De la justice et du droit. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sensen, S. (2009) ‘Kant’s conception of dignity’, Kant-Studien 100: 309–31.Google Scholar
Sensen, S. (2011) ‘Human dignity in historical perspective’, European Journal of Political Theory 10: 71–91.Google Scholar
Settis, S. and Gasparri, C. (eds) (2020) I marmi Torlonia. Rome.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (1996) The Scientific Revolution. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sharples, R.W. (2008) ‘Habent sua fata libelli: Aristotle’s Categories in the first century BC’, Acta antiqua academiae scientiarum Hungaricae 48: 273–87.Google Scholar
Sharples, R.W. (2010) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to AD 200. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2014) Aristotle, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sinko, T. (1903) De Romanorum viro bono. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, P. (1983) Kritik der zynischen Vernunft. Cambridge Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2018) ‘Varro and the contours of Roman antiquarianism’, Latomus 77: 1090–118.Google Scholar
Smith, J.E.H. (2016) The Philosopher. Princeton. Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics. Book I and VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smuts, F. (1958) ‘Stoïcynse invloed op Tiberius Gracchus’, Acta classica 1: 106–16.Google Scholar
Sonnabend, H. (1996) Die Freundschaften der Gelehrten und die zwischenstaatliche Politik im klassischen und Hellenistischen Griechenland. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sonntag, M. (1913) L. Annaei Senecae De beneficiis libri explicantur. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sparshott, F.E. (1978) ‘Zeno on art: anatomy of a definition’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.. Cambridge: 273–90.Google Scholar
Stanojević, O. (1977) ‘Gaius and Pomponius’, Revue de l’histoire des droits de l’antiquité 44 (online).Google Scholar
Stanojević, O. (1989) Gaius noster. Cambridge Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2006) Roman Oratory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1962) ‘The Digest title, De diversis regulis iuris antiqui and the general principles of law’, in Essays in Jurisprudence in Honour of Roscoe Pound, ed. R.A. Newman. Westport (Conn.): 1–20.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1966) Regulae iuris. Cambridge Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1967) ‘Justice Cardozo, Marcus Terentius Varro and the Roman juristic process’, Irish Jurist 2: 367–74.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1969) Roman Law and English Jurisprudence Yesterday and Today. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1971) ‘The relations between grammar and law in the Early Principate: the beginnings of analogy’, in La critica del testo 2. Cambridge: 757–69.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1978) ‘The place of Servius Sulpicius Rufus in the development of Roman legal science’, in Festschrift Wieacker. Cambridge: 175–84.Google Scholar
Steinbauer, D.H. (1999) Neues Handbuch des Etruskischen. Cambridge Google Scholar
Steingräber, S. (1985) Etruskische Wandmalerei. Cambridge Google Scholar
Stephens, W.O. (ed.) (2006) The Person. Readings in Human Nature. Upper Saddle River (NJ).Google Scholar
Stokes, M.C. (1997) Plato. Apology. Cambridge Google Scholar
Strange, S. and Zapko, J. (eds) (2004) Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2015) Roman Law in the State of Nature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2016) Crisis and Constitutionalism. Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. New York.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996 [1974]) ‘κριτήριον τῆς αληθείας’, reprinted, translated by Smith, B., in her Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: 22–76.Google Scholar
Stroup, S.C. (2007) ‘Greek rhetoric meets Rome: expansion, resistance, and acculturation’, in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Cambridge: 23–37.Google Scholar
Stroux, J. (1926) Summum ius, summa iniuria . Leipzig, reprinted in Stroux (1949), 1–66.Google Scholar
Stroux, J. (1934) ‘Griechische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung der römischen Rechtswissenschaft gegen Ende der republikanischen Zeit’, in Atti del congresso internazionale di diritto romano 1. Cambridge: 111–32, reprinted in Stroux (1949), 81–107.Google Scholar
Stroux, J. (1949) Römische Rechtswissenschaft und Rhetorik. Cambridge Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (ed.) (2002) Die archaische Literatur. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1996) Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Cambridge Google Scholar
Sutton, E.W. and Rackham, H. (tr.) (1942) Cicero. On the Orator. Cambridge Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Szaif, J. (2004) ‘Naturbegriff und Güterlehre in der Ethik des Aristoteles’, in Was ist das fuer den Menschen Gute?, eds Szaif, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M.. Cambridge: 54–100.Google Scholar
Talamanca, M. (1977) Lo schema ‘genus-species’ nelle sistematiche dei giuristi romani. Accademia nazionale dei Lincei 374. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Talamanca, M. (1981) ‘Costruzione giuridica e struttura social fino a Quinto Mucio’, in Modelli etici, diritto e trasformazioni sociali, eds Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A.. Cambridge: 15–39.Google Scholar
Talamanca, M. (2009) ‘L’oratore, il giurista, il diritto nel De oratore ’, Ciceroniana 13: 29–100.Google Scholar
Taylor, D.J. (2015) ‘The new Varro and the structure of his De Lingua Latina ’, in Varro varius, ed. Butterfield, D.. Cambridge: 19–32.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, O.E. (1991) ‘C. Aquilius Gallus dans le discours Pro Caecina de Cicéron’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 59: 37–46.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, O.E. and Tellegen, J.W. (2013) ‘ Artes urbanae: Roman law and rhetoric’, in New Frontiers, ed. Du Plessis, P.. Cambridge: 31–50.Google Scholar
Thamin, R. (1884) Un problème moral dans l’antiquité. Cambridge Google Scholar
Thomas, P. (2016) ‘A Barzunesque view of Cicero’, in Du Plessis (2016), 11–25.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. (2011 [1986]) ‘Idées romaines sur l’origine et la transmission du droit’, reprinted in Thomas (2011), 69–84.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. (2011) Les opérations du droit. Cambridge Google Scholar
Thonemann, P. (2016) The Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tièche, E. (1933) Thespis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2007) ‘Panaetius’ place in the history of Stoicism with special reference to his moral psychology’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, eds Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D.N.. Cambridge: 103–42.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. (1997) The Idea of Natural Rights. Cambridge Google Scholar
Todd, S.C. (1993) The Shape of Athenian Law. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Toher, M. (1986) ‘The Tenth Table and the conflict of the orders’, in Social Struggles in Archaic Rome, ed. Raaflaub, K.. Cambridge: 301–26.Google Scholar
Tondo, S. (1979) ‘Note esegetiche sulla giurisprudenza romana’, Iura 30: 34–77.Google Scholar
Tornau, C. (2018) ‘Rhetorik’, Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 29: 1–94.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, A. (1908) ‘Zur Geschichte des Wortes Person’, Kant-Studien 13: 1–17.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, A. (1910), ‘A contribution to the history of the word person’, tr. C.H. Haessler of Trendelenburg (1908), Monist 20: 336–63.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007) The Ethics of Philodemus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (tr.) (2012) Philodemus. On Property Management. Cambridge Google Scholar
Tuck, R. (1979) Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. (1990) ‘Humanism and political thought’, in The Impact of Humanism on Western Europe, eds Goodman, A. and MacKay, A.. Cambridge: 43–65.Google Scholar
Tuori, K. (2004) ‘The myth of Quintus Mucius Scaevola: founding father of legal science?’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 72: 243–62.Google Scholar
Tuori, K. (2007) Ancient Roman Lawyers and Modern Legal Ideals. Cambridge Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. (2013) ‘Libraries and intellectual debate in the late Republic: The case of the Aristotelian corpus,’ in Ancient Libraries, eds König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G.. Cambridge: 152–66.Google Scholar
Twining, W. and Miers, D. (2010) How to do Things with Rules, 5th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Varvaro, M. (2014) Der Glücksstern Niebuhrs und die Institutionen des Gaius. Cambridge Google Scholar
Veillard, C. (2000) ‘Hécaton de Rhodes’, in Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques 3, ed. Goulet, R.. Cambridge: 526–7.Google Scholar
Veillard, C. (2008) ‘Hécaton de Rhodes et la transformation de l’éthique stoïcienne’, diss. Aix-en-Provence 2008 [unfortunately not accessible to me].Google Scholar
Veillard, C. (2014) ‘Comment définir son dévoir? Les enseignements du plan suivi par Panétius dans son Peri kathekontos’, Philosophie antique 14: 71–109.Google Scholar
Veillard, C. (2015) Les Stoïciens 2: Le stoïcisme intermédiaire. Cambridge Google Scholar
Vesperini, P. (2012) La philosophia et ses pratiques d’Ennius à Cicéron. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Viehweg, T. (1974) Topik und Jurisprudenz. 5th ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Villey, M. (1945) Recherches sur la littérature didactique du droit romain. Cambridge Google Scholar
Villey, M. (1951) ‘Logique d’Aristote et droit romain’, Revue historique de droit français et étranger 4.28: 309–28.Google Scholar
Villey, M. (2003 [1975]) La formation de la pensée juridique moderne, ed. Rials, S.. Cambridge Google Scholar
Vimercati, E. (2002) Panezio. Testimonianze e frammenti. Cambridge Google Scholar
Vimercati, E. (2004) Il mediostoicismo di Panezio. Cambridge Google Scholar
Visconti, C.L. (1884–1885) I monumenti del Museo Torlonia. Rome.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1983) ‘The Socratic elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 27–74, reprinted in Vlastos (1994), 1–37.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates. Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1994) Socratic Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2008) Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wacht, M. (1982) ‘Privateigentum bei Cicero und Ambrosius’, Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 25: 28–64.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. (1979) A Historical Commentary on Polybius 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Waldstein, W. and Rainer, M. (2014) Römische Rechtsgeschichte, 11th ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wallace, R.E. (2008) Zikh Rasna. A Manual of the Etruscan Language and Inscriptions. Cambridge Google Scholar
Walter, U. (2017) ‘Legislation in the Roman Republic: setting rules or just political communication?’, in La norme sous la République romaine et le Haut-Empire, eds Itgenshorst, T. and Le Doze, P.. Cambridge: 533–40.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1996) The Birth of Rhetoric. Cambridge Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. (tr.) (2010) Polybius. The Histories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. (2014) Taken at the Flood. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1974) Lawmaking in the Later Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1995a) ‘From legal transplants to legal formants’, American Journal of Comparative Law 43: 469–76.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1995b) The Spirit of the Laws, Cambridge Google Scholar
Watson, A. (ed.) (1998) The Digest of Justinian, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wegehaupt, H. (1932) Die Bedeutung und Anwendung von dignitas in den Schriften der republikanischen Zeit. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1969a) Herakleides Pontikos, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1969b) Hieronymos von Rhodos. Kritolaos und seine Schüler. Rückblick: Der Peripatos in vorchristlicher Zeit. Register, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wenger, L. (1924) ‘Hausgewalt und Staatsgewalt im römischen Altertum’, in Miscellanea Francesco Ehrle. Cambridge: 1–24.Google Scholar
Wenger, L. (1953) Die Quellen des römischen Rechts. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1944) Vom römischen Recht. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1950) ‘[Review of] Stroux 1949’, Gnomon 22: 253–8.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1953) ‘Griechische Wurzeln des Institutionensystems’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 70: 93–126.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1961) Vom römischen Recht. Zehn Versuche, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1967) Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1969) ‘Über das Verhältnis der römischen Fachjurisprudenz zur griechisch-hellenistischen Theorie’, Iura 20: 448–77.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1970) ‘Die römischen Juristen in der politischen Gesellschaft des zweiten vorchristlichen Jahrhunderts’, in Sein und Werden im Recht, eds W.G. Becker und L. Schnorr von Carolsfeld. Cambridge: 183–214.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1971) ‘Solon und die XII Tafeln’, in Studi in onore di E. Volterra 3. Cambridge: 757–84.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1988) Römische Rechtsgeschichte 1. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2018) The Stoics and the State. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wiles, D. (1991) The Masks of Menander. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Winkel, L.C. (1985) Error iuris nocet, tr. Mittring, K.E.. Cambridge Google Scholar
Winkel, L.C. (2000–2001) ‘Alcune osservazioni sulla classificazione delle obbligazioni e sui contratti nominati nel diritto romano’, Bulletino dell’istituto di diritto romano 103–4: 51–66.Google Scholar
Winkel, L.C. (2005) ‘Quintus Mucius Scaevola once again’, Fundamina 11: 425–33.Google Scholar
Wöhrle, G. and Hellmann, O. (2011) ‘Peripatos’, in Aristoteles Handbuch, eds Rapp, C. and Corcilius, C.. Cambridge: 405–9.Google Scholar
Wolf, J.G. (2015) ‘Die XII Tafeln und Magna Graecia’, in his Recht im frühen Rom. Cambridge: 9–20.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (2015) L’éducation dans le monde romain. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wood, N. (1988) Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Cambridge Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2007) ‘Particularism, promises, and persons in Cicero’s De officiis ’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 317–46.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2015) Cicero. The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. Cambridge Google Scholar
Wootton, D. (2015) The Invention of Science. Cambridge Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995) The Mask of Socrates, tr. Shapiro, A.. Cambridge Google Scholar
Zarecki, J. (2014) Cicero’s Ideal Statesman in Theory and Practice. Cambridge Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • René Brouwer, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Law and Philosophy in the Late Roman Republic
  • Online publication: 29 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868907.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • René Brouwer, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Law and Philosophy in the Late Roman Republic
  • Online publication: 29 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868907.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • René Brouwer, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Law and Philosophy in the Late Roman Republic
  • Online publication: 29 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868907.010
Available formats
×