Book contents
- Latin American Literature in Transition 1930–1980
- Latin American Literature in Transition
- Latin American Literature in Transition 1930–1980
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I War, Revolution, Dictatorship
- Part II Metropolis and Ruins
- Chapter 6 Economic, Political, and Ecological Disasters
- Chapter 7 Mexican Miracle Modernism
- Chapter 8 Crime and the City
- Part III Solidarity
- Part IV Aesthetics and Innovation
- Index
- References
Chapter 6 - Economic, Political, and Ecological Disasters
The Metropolis and Its Ruins in Latin American Poetry in the 1960s and 1970s
from Part II - Metropolis and Ruins
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 January 2023
Book contents
- Latin American Literature in Transition 1930–1980
- Latin American Literature in Transition
- Latin American Literature in Transition 1930–1980
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I War, Revolution, Dictatorship
- Part II Metropolis and Ruins
- Chapter 6 Economic, Political, and Ecological Disasters
- Chapter 7 Mexican Miracle Modernism
- Chapter 8 Crime and the City
- Part III Solidarity
- Part IV Aesthetics and Innovation
- Index
- References
Summary
Pablo Neruda’s Macchu Picchu and Octavio Paz’s Tenochtitlán determine how the modern city in twentieth-century Latin American poetry is conceptualized as one shaped by its ruins. This chapter explores how these earlier visions of the city are reconsidered in Latin American poetry from the 1960s and 1970s. It analyzes Rosario Castellanos’ Poesía no eres tú (1948-71) and José Emilio Pacheco’s Irás y no volverás (1973), and how their poems about the Tlatelolco massacre shed light on how Neruda’s Macchu Picchu and Paz’s Tenochtitlán shape modern poetics and their political critique to contemporary violence. Pacheco’s allusions to the icnocuícatl in “La visión de los vencidos” and the use of multiple voices in “Manuscrito de Tlatelolco” link the political ruins of the Mexican state after the massacre to the violent legacy of its colonial past. Castellanos’ defiant response to the massacre in “Memorial de Tlatelolco” problematizes the Aztec historical past and the moral decay of the Mexican state. These poems underscore an ethical and political critique of modernity through a representation of economic, ecological, and political disasters. The urban space in ruins stirs a poetic meditation on the torn self, shaped by a society in crisis.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Latin American Literature in Transition 1930–1980 , pp. 99 - 115Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Works Cited
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Ed. Arendt, Hannah. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1968.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. “Slow Death (Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency),” Critical Inquiry 33.4 (Summer 2007): 754–780.Google Scholar
Camayd-Freixas, Erik. “‘Alturas de Macchu Picchu’: Forma y sentido en su retórica elegíaca.” Romance Languages Annual 7 (1995): 405–412.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Victoria. “‘Y el olor de la sangre manchaba el aire’: Tlatelolco 1521 and 1968 in José Emilio Pacheco’s ‘Lectura de los Cantares Mexicanos.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 95.4 (2018): 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, Rosario. Poesía no eres tú (1948–1971). Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1995.Google Scholar
Enjuto Rangel, Cecilia. Cities in Ruins: The Politics of Modern Poetics. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fein, John. “Himno entre ruinas.” Aproximaciones a Octavio Paz. Ed. Flores, Angel, pp. 165–170. Mexico City: Mortiz, 1974.Google Scholar
Feinsod, Harris. The Poetry of the Americas: From Good Neighbors to Countercultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, Rubén. “Tlatelolco: Mexico City’s urban dystopia.” In Noir Urbanisms: Dystopic Images of the Modern City. Ed. Prakash, Gyan, pp. 52–68. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Goic, Cedomil. “Alturas de Macchu Picchu: La torre y el abismo.” Pablo Neruda, el escritor y la crítica. Ed. Rodz, Emir, pp. 219–244. Madrid: Taurus, 1980.Google Scholar
González Acosta, Alejandro. “En la raíz mexicana: Petrificada petrificante de Octavio Paz.” Revista Iberoamericana 57 (1991): 519–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Amanda. “Pen and Brush in Dialogue: Octavio Paz and Antoni Tàpies in Their Trans-Atlantic Livre d’Artiste,” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 88.3 (2011): 369–383.Google Scholar
Holmes, Amanda City Fictions: Language, Body and Spanish American Urban Space. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lazzara, Michael and Unruh, Vicky. “Introduction: Telling Ruins.” Telling Ruins in Latin America. Ed. Lazzara, Michael and Unruh, Vicky, pp. 1–9. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
León-Portilla, Miguel. Visión de los vencidos: relaciones indígenas de la conquista. 29th ed. Mexico City: UNAM, Coordinación de Humanidades, Programa Editorial, 2007.Google Scholar
“Pensamiento de Nezahualcóyotl,” Humanistas de Mesoamérica, vol. 1. [Online – Fondo 2000.] Available at: http://bibliotecadigital.ilce.edu.mx/sites/fondo2000/vol1/mesoamerica-i/html/4.html.Google Scholar
Nezahualcóyotl: poesía y pensamiento, 1402–1472. Mexico City: Biblioteca Enciclopédica del Estado de México, 1979.Google Scholar
Trece poetas del mundo azteca. Mexico City: UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, 1975.Google Scholar
Nandorfy, Martha J. “Petrificada petrificante.” Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos 16 (1992): 567–586.Google Scholar
Neruda, Pablo. Canto general. Prólogo de Fernando Alegría. Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho, 1981.Google Scholar
Neruda, Pablo Canto general. Trans. Jack Schmitt. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pacheco, José Emilio. Tarde o temprano (Poemas 1958–2000). Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2000.Google Scholar
Pacheco, José Emilio Selected Poems. Ed. McWhirter, George. Trans. Thomas Hoeksema, George McWhirter, Alastair Reid, and Linda Scheer. New York: A New Directions Book, 1987.Google Scholar
Paz, Octavio “Himno entre ruinas/Hymn among the Ruins.” In Octavio Paz: Selected Poems. Ed. Weinberger, Eliot. Trans. William Carlos Williams, pp. 22–24. New York: New Directions, 1984.Google Scholar
Paz, Octavio “Petrificada petrificante/The Petrifying Petrified.” In Octavio Paz: Selected Poems. Ed. and trans. Weinberger, Eliot, pp. 107–111. New York: New Directions, 1984.Google Scholar
Paz, Octavio “Piedra de Sol/Sunstone.” In Octavio Paz: Selected Poems. Ed. Weinberger, Eliot. Trans. Muriel Rukeyser, pp. 29–45. New York: New Directions, 1984.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Monegal, Emir. El acto de las palabras: Estudios y diálogos con Octavio Paz. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1997.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Monegal, Emir “El sistema del poeta.” Pablo Neruda, el escritor y la crítica. Ed. Rodz, Emir, pp. 633–691. Madrid: Taurus, 1980.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Monegal, Emir “Relectura de El Arco y la Lira.” Revista Iberoamericana 37 (1971): 35–46.Google Scholar
Santí, Enrico Mario. “The Accidental Tourist: Walt Whitman in Latin America.” Do the Americas Have a Common Literature? Ed. Firmat, Gustavo Pérez, pp. 156–176. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Santí, Enrico Mario Pablo Neruda: The Poetics of Prophecy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Santí, Enrico Mario , ed. Luz espejeante: Octavio Paz ante la crítica. Mexico City: Ediciones Era y la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2009.Google Scholar
Stanton, Anthony. “José Emilio Pacheco, poeta elegíaco.” José Emilio Pacheco, reescritura en movimiento. Ed. de Báez, Yvette Jiménez. Mexico City: Colegio de México, 2014.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Diana. “Tlatelolco 1968: Paz and Poniatowska on law and violence,” Mexican Studies/ Estudios Mexicanos 18 (2002): 297–321.Google Scholar