Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T17:37:31.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Effects of large herbivores on other fauna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2009

By
Otso Suominen  and
Kjell Danell
Edited by
Kjell Danell ,
Roger Bergström ,
Patrick Duncan  and
John Pastor
Otso Suominen
Affiliation:
University of Turku
Kjell Danell
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Kjell Danell
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Roger Bergström
Affiliation:
The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden
Patrick Duncan
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
John Pastor
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Here we will describe and discuss the effects of large herbivores on animal community composition, diversity and abundance, using examples from different taxonomic and functional groups in different habitats. The main focus is the effect of wild ungulates in natural or semi‐natural habitats, but when relevant we will also cover the effects of domestic grazers in agricultural systems. Less attention will be given to the effects of large herbivores on groups which recently have been reviewed (e.g. birds) (McShea & Rappole 1997, Van Wieren 1998, Fuller 2001), less studied groups (e.g. reptiles and aquatic communities) (but see e.g. Strand & Merritt 1999) and on the consequences following the transfer of forests into grasslands by large herbivores (e.g. Van Wieren 1998, see also Chapter 7).

Our focus will be on ecological processes affecting animal communities, e.g. impacts of competition for food with other herbivores, and indirect impacts via changes in habitat structure on seemingly unrelated taxa. The possible differences between introduced and native wild herbivores as well as between wild and domestic grazers will be discussed; parasitism and the role of dung will only briefly be mentioned. By impacts, or effects, we mean observed changes in animal community composition, or abundance in response to changes in presence, density or species composition of large herbivores. The last part of the chapter summarizes the observed impacts on other biota, and discusses some theoretical and practical issues associated with the effects of large herbivores on other animals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation , pp. 383 - 412
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andresen, H., Bakker, J. P., Brongers, M., Heydemann, B. & Irmler, U. (1990). Long‐term changes of salt marsh communities by cattle grazing. Vegetatio, 89, 137–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J.K. & Whitham, T. G. (2003). Interactions among elk, aspen, galling sawflies and insectivorous birds. Oikos, 101, 127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, D., Sage, R. B. & Baines, M. M. (1994). The implications of red deer grazing to ground vegetation and invertebrate communities of Scottish native pinewoods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 776–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D., Wardle, D. A. & Yeates, G. W. (1998). Linking above‐ground and below‐ground interactions: how plant responses to foliar herbivory influence soil organisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30, 1867–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J. L. & Mitchell, D. L. (2000). Influences of livestock grazing on sage grouse habitat. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 993–1002.Google Scholar
Beever, E. A. & Brussard, F. (2000). Examining ecological consequences of feral horse grazing using exclosures. Western North American Naturalist, 60, 236–54.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Stacey, P. B., Bellis, L. & Johnson, M. P. (2001). A mammalian predator‐prey imbalance: grizzly bear and wolf extinction affect avian neotropical migrants. Ecological Applications, 11, 947–60.Google Scholar
Bromham, L., Cardillo, M., Bennett, A. F. & Elgar, M. A. (1999). Effects of stock grazing on the ground invertebrate fauna of woodland remnants. Australian Journal of Ecology, 24, 1999–2007.Google Scholar
Bryant, J. P. & Chapin, F. S., III (1986). Browsing‐woody plant interactions during boreal forest plant succession. In Forest Ecosystems in the Alaskan Taiga, ed. Kleve, K., Chapin, III, F. S., Flanagan, P. W., Viereck, L. A. & Dyrness, C. T.. New York: Springer, pp. 213–25.Google Scholar
Cagnolo, L., Molina, S. I. & Valladares, G. R. (2002). Diversity and guild structure of insect assemblages under grazing and exclusion regimes in a montane grassland from Central Argentina. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 407–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, D. & Hein, D. (1983). Effects of heavy browsing on a bird community in deciduous forest. Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 829–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, E. J. & Wookey, P. A. (2003). Floral herbivory of Dryas octopetala by Svalbard reindeer. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research, 35, 369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danell, K. & Huss‐Danell, K. (1985). Feeding by insects and hares on birches earlier affected by moose browsing. Oikos, 44, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deCalesta, D. (1994). Effect of white‐tailed deer on songbirds within managed forests in Pennsylvania. Journal of Wildlife Management, 58, 711–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herder, M. (2003). Impacts of ungulates in boreal forest and subarctic tundra ecosystems in Finland. D.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland.
Dennis, P., Young, M. R., Howard, C. L. & Gordon, I. J. (1997). The response of epigeal beetles (Col.: Carabidae, Staphylinidae) to varied grazing regimes on upland Nardus stricta grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 433–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, P., Young, M. R. & Gordon, I. J. (1998). Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands. Ecological Entomology, 23, 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, P. F., Haycock, D. & Fuller, R. J. (1997). Winter bird communities in forest plantations in western England and their response to vegetation growth stage and grazing. Bird Study, 44, 206–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, S. (2003). Habitat quality and management for the northern brown argus butterfly Aricia artaxerxes (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in North East England. Biological Conservation, 113, 285–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmark, O., Hofgaard, A. & Arnborg, T. (1998). Successional trends 219 years after fire in an old Pinus sylvestris stand in northern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 583–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feber, R. E., Brereton, T. M., Warren, M. S. & Oates, M. (2001). The impact of deer on woodland butterflies: the good, the bad and the complex. Forestry, 74, 271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. R. & Ellwood, S. A. (2001). Impacts of woodland deer on small mammal ecology. Forestry, 74, 277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focardi, S., Capizzi, D. & Monetti, D. (2000). Competition for acorns among wild boar (Sus scrofa) and small mammals in a Mediterranean woodland. Journal of Zoology, 250, 329–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhlendorf, S. D. & Engle, D. M. (2001). Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. BioScience, 51, 625–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. J. (2001). Responses of woodland birds to increasing numbers of deer : a review of evidence and mechanisms. Forestry, 74, 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, R. W. (1988). Predation on ground‐nesting seabirds by island populations of red deer Cervus elaphus and sheep Ovis. Journal of Zoology, 216, 565–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giezentanner, J. B. (1970). Avian Distribution and Population Fluctuations on the Shortgrass Prairie of North Central Colorado. USIBP‐Grassland Biome Technical Report No. 62, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Fort. Collins, CO.
Gómez, J. M. & González‐Megías, A. (2002). Asymmetrical interactions between ungulates and phytophagous insects: being different matters. Ecology, 83, 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzáles‐Megías, A., Gómez, J. M. & Sánches‐Piñero, F. (2004). Effects of ungulates on epigeal arthropods in Sierra Nevada National Park (southeast Spain). Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 733–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. J., Duncan, P., Grillas, P. & Lecomte, T. (1990). The use of domestic herbivores in the conservation of the biological richness of European wetlands. Bulletin Ecologique, 21, 49–60.Google Scholar
Grant, W. E., Birney, E. C., French, N. R. & Swift, D. M. (1982). Structure and productivity of grassland small mammal communities related to grazing‐induced changes in vegetative cover. Journal of Mammalogy, 63, 248–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, S. E., Gardner, S. M. & Mitchell, R. J. (2003). Indirect effects of grazing and nutrient addition on the hemipteran community of heather moorlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 793–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukioja, E. & Heino, J. (1974) Birch consumption by reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in Finnish Lapland. Reports from the Kevo Subarctic Research Station, 11, 22–5.Google Scholar
Hayward, B., Heske, E. J. & Painter, C. W. (1997). Effects of livestock grazing on small mammals at a desert cienaga. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazebroek, E., Groot Bruiderink, G. W. T. A. & Biezen, J. B. (1994). Changes in the occurrence of small mammals following the exclusion of red deer, roe deer and wild boar. Lutra, 38, 50–9. (In Dutch with an English abstract.)Google Scholar
Holt, R. D., Lawton, J. H., Polis, G. A. & Martinez, N. D. (1999). Trophic rank and species‐area relationship. Ecology, 80, 1495–504.Google Scholar
Järvinen, O. & Väisänen, R. A. (1978). Long‐term population changes of the most abundant south Finnish forest birds during the past 50 years. Journal of Ornithology, 119, 441–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H. & Shachak, M. (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 69, 373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H. & Shachak, M. (1997). Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology, 78, 1946–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallio, P. & Lehtonen, J. (1975). On the ecocatastrophe of birch forests caused by Oporinia autumnata (Bkh.) and the problem of reforestation. In Fennoscandian Tundra Ecosystems, Part 2, ed. F. E. Wielgolaski Ecological Studies 17. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 174–80.
Keesing, F. (1998). Impacts of ungulates on the demography and diversity of small mammals in central Kenya. Oecologia, 116, 381–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kielland, K. & Bryant, J. P. (1998). Moose herbivory in taiga: effects on biogeochemistry and vegetation dynamics in primary succession. Oikos, 82, 377–83.Google Scholar
Kruess, A. & Tscharntke, T. (2002a). Grazing intensity and the diversity of grasshoppers, butterflies, and trap nesting bees and wasps. Conservation Biology, 16, 1570–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruess, A. & Tscharntke, T. (2002b). Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity. Biological Conservation, 106, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, D. (1968). Ecological Adaptations for Breeding Birds. London, UK: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lavigne R. J., Kumar, R., Leetham, J. W. & Keith, V. (1972). Population Densities and Biomass of Arthropods under Various Grazing and Environmental Stress Treatments on Pawnee Site, 1971. USIBP‐Grassland Biome Technical Report No. 204, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Fort Collins, CO.
Leetham, J. W. & Milchunas, D. G. (1985). The composition and distribution of soil microarthropods in the shortgrass steppe in relation to the soil water, root biomass, and grazing by cattle. Pedobiologia, 28, 311–25.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. E. et al. (1973). Abundance and Biomass of Soil Macroinvertebrates of the Pawnee Site Collected from Pastures Subjected to Different Grazing Pressures, Irrigation and/or Water Fertilization, 1970–1971. USIBP‐Grassland Biome Technical Report No. 239, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Fort Collins, CO.
MacArthur, R. H. & MacArthur, J. W. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, G. D., Driebe, E. M. & Whitham, T. (1998). Indirect interactions mediated by changing plant chemistry: beaver browsing benefits beetles. Ecology, 79, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlack, R. S., Kaufman, D. W. & Kaufman, G. A. (2001). Influence of grazing by bison and cattle on deer mice in burned tallgrass prairie. American Midland Naturalist, 146, 361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShea, W. J. & Rappole, J. H. (1997). Herbivores and the ecology of forest understory birds. In The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management, ed. W. J. McShea, H. B. Underwood & J. H. Rappole. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 298–309.
McShea, W. J. & Rappole, J. H. (2000). Managing the abundance and diversity of breeding bird populations through manipulation of deer populations. Conservation Biology, 14, 1161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, E. H., Stanton, N. I. & Hak, J. C. (1994). Responses of bluebunch wheatgrass, Idaho fescue, and nematodes to ungulate grazing in Yellowstone National Park. Oikos, 69, 231–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milchunas, D. G., Sala, O. E. & Lauenroth, W. K. (1988). A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. American Naturalist, 132, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milchunas, D. G., Lauenroth, W. K. & Burke, I. C. (1998). Livestock grazing: animal and plant biodiversity of shortgrass steppe and the relationship to ecosystem function. Oikos, 83, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. G., Bratton, S. P. & Hadidian, J. (1992). Impacts of white‐tailed deer on endangered plants. Natural Areas Journal, 12, 67–74.Google Scholar
Mills, L. S., Soulé, M. E. & Doak, D. F. (1993). The keystone‐species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience, 43, 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashita, T., Takada, M. & Shimazaki, A. (2004). Indirect effects of herbivory by deer reduce abundance and species richness of web spiders. Ecoscience, 11, 74–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, Å. & Persson, I.‐L. (2002). Habitat differences of coprophilous fungi on moose dung. Mycological Research, 106, 1360–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, J. & Strengbom, J. (2000). Response of galling invertebrates on Salix lanata to reindeer herbivory. Oikos, 91, 493–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, J., Hulme, P. E., Oksanen, L. & Suominen, O. (2004). Importance of large and small mammalian herbivores for the plant community structure in the forest tundra ecotone. Oikos, 106, 324–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palm, A. (1993). Den fyrbenta valen. Fauna och Flora, 88, 37–9. (In Swedish.)Google Scholar
Perrins, C. M. & Overall, R. (2001). Effect of increasing numbers of deer on bird populations in Wytham Woods, central England. Forestry, 74, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, I.‐P. (2003). Moose population density and habitat productivity as drivers of ecosystem processes in northern boreal forests. Ph.D. thesis, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria 272, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Polis, G. A., Myers, C. A. & Holt, R. D. (1989). The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 297–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popotkin, G. J. & Giuliano, W. M. (2000). Response of birds to grazing of riparian zones. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 976–82.Google Scholar
Putman, R. J., Edwards, P. J., Mann, J. C. E, How, R. C. & Hill, S. D. (1989). Vegetational and faunal changes in an area of heavily grazed woodland following relief of grazing. Biological Conservation, 47, 487–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pykälä, J. (2000). Mitigating human effects on European biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Conservation Biology, 14, 705–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambo, J. L. & Faeth, S. H. (1999). Effect of vertebrate grazing on plant and insect community structure. Conservation Biology, 13, 1047–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roininen, H., Price, P. W. & Bryant, J. P. (1997). Response of galling insects to natural browsing by mammals in Alaska. Oikos, 80, 481–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samways, M. J. & Kreuzinger, K. (2001). Vegetation, ungulate and grasshopper interactions inside vs. outside an African savanna game park. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 1963–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. L., Skagen, S. K. & Merigliano, M. F. (2003). Relating geomorphic change and grazing to avian communities in riparian forests. Conservation Biology, 17, 284–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, C. L. & Dean, W. R. J (1999). Effects of heavy grazing on invertebrate assemblage in the succulent Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 43, 267–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soikkeli, M. & Salo, J. (1979). The bird fauna of abandoned shore pastures. Ornis Fennica, 56, 124–32.Google Scholar
Stark, S., Wardle, D. A., Ohtonen, R., Helle, T. & Yeates, G. W. (2000). The effect of reindeer on decomposition, mineralization and soil biota in a dry oligotrophic Scots pine forest. Oikos, 90, 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, A. J. A (2001). The impact of deer on lowland woodland invertebrates: a review of the evidence and priorities for future research. Forestry, 74, 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, M. & Merritt, R. W. (1999). Impacts of livestock grazing activities on stream insect communities and the riverine environment. American Entomologist, 45, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkava, P. & Huhta, V. (1998). Habitat patchiness affects decomposition and faunal diversity: a microcosm experiment on forest floor. Oecologia, 116, 390–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suominen, O. (1999a). Impact of cervid browsing and grazing on the terrestrial gastropod fauna in the boreal forests of Fennoscandia. Ecography, 22, 651–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suominen, O. (1999b). Mammalian herbivores, vegetation and invertebrate assemblages in boreal forests: feeding selectivity, ecosystem engineering and trophic effects. Ph.D. thesis, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis Ser. AII Tom. 122, University of Turku, Finland.
Suominen, O. & Olofsson, J. (2000). Impacts of semi‐domesticated reindeer on structure of tundra and forest communities in Fennoscandia: a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 37, 233–49.Google Scholar
Suominen, O., Danell, K. & Bergström, R. (1999a). Moose, trees, and ground‐living invertebrates: indirect interactions in Swedish pine forests. Oikos, 84, 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suominen, O., Danell, K. & Bryant, J. P. (1999b). Indirect effects of mammalian browsers on vegetation and ground‐dwelling insects in an Alaskan floodplain. Ecoscience, 6, 505–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suominen, O., Niemelä, J., Martikainen, P., Niemelä, P. & Kojola, I. (2003). Impact of reindeer on ground‐dwelling Carabidae and Curculionidae assemblages in Lapland. Ecography, 26, 503–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tscharntke, T. (1997). Vertebrate effects on plant‐invertebrate food‐webs. In Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Ecosystems., ed. Gange, A. C. & Brown, V. K.. Oxford, UK: Proceedings of the 36th Symposium of the Brittish Ecological Society. Blackwell Science, pp. 277–297.
Van Wieren, S. E. (1998). Effects of large herbivores upon the animal community. In Grazing and Conservation Management, ed. Vries, M. F. Wallis De, Bakker, J. P. & , S. E. Van Wieren. Dortdrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 185–214.
Väre, H., Ohtonen, R. & Mikkola, K. (1996). The effect of heavy grazing by reindeer in oligotrophic pine heats in northeastern Fennoscandia. Ecography, 19, 245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, D. P. (2002). Multiple effects of introduced mammalian herbivores in a temperate forest. Biological Invasions, 4, 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haartman, L. (1975). Changes in breeding bird fauna of coastal bays in southwestern Finland. Ornis Fennica, 52, 57–67.Google Scholar
Haartman, L. (1978). Changes in the bird fauna in Finland and their causes. Fennia, 150, 25–32.Google Scholar
Wallis De Vries, M. F. (1998). Habitat quality and the performance of large herbivores. In Grazing and Conservation Management, ed. WallisDeVries, M. F., Bakker, J. P. & Wieren, S. E.. Dortdrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 275–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WallisDeVries, M. F. & Raemakers, I. (2001). Does extensive grazing benefit butterflies in coastal dunes? Restoration Ecology, 9, 179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., Barker, G. M.et al. (1999). Plant removals on perennial grassland: vegetation dynamics, decomposers, soil biodiversity, and ecosystem properties. Ecological Monographs, 69, 535–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Barker, G. M., Yeates, G. W., Bonner, K. I. & Ghani, A. (2001). Introduced browsing mammals in New Zealand natural forests: aboveground and belowground consequences. Ecological Monographs, 71, 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. (1989). The Ecology of Bird Communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, J. T. (1994). The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics, 25, 443–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×