Book contents
- Language in the Trump Era
- Language in the Trump Era
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transcription Conventions
- Note on Ethnonyms and Phenotypic Descriptors
- Introduction: The Trump Era as a Linguistic Emergency
- Part I Dividing the American Public
- 1 Part I Introduction: “Ask the Gays”: How to Use Language to Fragment and Redefine the Public Sphere
- 2 The Significance of Trump’s Incoherence
- 3 “Get ’Em Out!”: The Meaning of Ejecting Protesters
- 4 Crybabies and Snowflakes
- Part II Performance and Falsehood
- Part III The Interactive Making of the Trumpian World
- Part IV Language, White Nationalism, and International Responses to Trump
- Index
- References
4 - Crybabies and Snowflakes
from Part I - Dividing the American Public
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
- Language in the Trump Era
- Language in the Trump Era
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transcription Conventions
- Note on Ethnonyms and Phenotypic Descriptors
- Introduction: The Trump Era as a Linguistic Emergency
- Part I Dividing the American Public
- 1 Part I Introduction: “Ask the Gays”: How to Use Language to Fragment and Redefine the Public Sphere
- 2 The Significance of Trump’s Incoherence
- 3 “Get ’Em Out!”: The Meaning of Ejecting Protesters
- 4 Crybabies and Snowflakes
- Part II Performance and Falsehood
- Part III The Interactive Making of the Trumpian World
- Part IV Language, White Nationalism, and International Responses to Trump
- Index
- References
Summary
This paper explores the “crybaby/snowflake” name calling leveled by Trump’s supporters against his detractors, a discourse that exploded in the immediate wake of the 2016 election. It explores interdiscursive (or intertextual) relationships and functional similarities between the crybaby discourse and the language historically used by Drill Instructors during basic training in the United States Marine Corps. In both cases, someone in the role of “ritual elder” uses language as a punitive and didactic cudgel to weed out the weak (whether literally, from the military, or more symbolically, from cultural citizenship/the nation) while signifying that the interlocutor needs to “grow up” or “man up” by attenuating their sensitivity to both suffering and linguistic meaning. The ideal citizen then has a calloused quality, in the model of military masculinity, ready to face harsh realities and to turn a blind eye to the suffering of others. The crybaby discourse is intended to discredit political opposition and discourage empathy as part of Trump’s new nationalism. Its interdiscursive passage between military personnel and American conservatives can be seen in memes and mass media. The crybaby discourse has also been taken up by many of Trump’s detractors and leveled at Trump himself to infantilize and discredit him.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language in the Trump EraScandals and Emergencies, pp. 74 - 88Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
- 10
- Cited by