Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T16:52:02.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - How Writing Changes Language

from Part I - Pooling Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

By
Ewa Dąbrowska
Edited by
Anna Mauranen  and
Svetlana Vetchinnikova
Anna Mauranen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Svetlana Vetchinnikova
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Most linguists regard writing as an uninteresting and somewhat artificial add-on to spoken language. However, the availability of the written form influences language structure in profound ways at both the individual level (mental grammar) and the social level (language as a conventional system). The lexical and grammatical differences between spoken and written language are partly attributable to different contexts of use and partly to the fact that the written form provides a ‘processing crutch’ which enables speakers to produce more complex structures than they would otherwise be able to produce; structures which are initially learned with the aid of writing may then find their way into the speech of highly literate speakers. In the long run, the cumulative effects of these individual changes lead to changes at the level of the community language. Thus, languages with a long tradition of literacy, such as English, differ in substantial ways from oral languages.

Keywords

literacyspoken languagewritten languagemental grammarcommunity grammarphonologylexiconregisterhypotactic syntax
Type
Chapter
Information
Language Change
The Impact of English as a Lingua Franca
 , pp. 75 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrián, José Antonio, Alegria, Jesus & Morais, José. 1995. Metaphonological abilities of Spanish illiterate adults. International Journal of Psychology 30, 329–353.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol & Sandler, Wendy. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9, 131–150.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik. 2012. Three languages from America in contact with Spanish. In Sackel, Jeanette & Stolz, Thomas (eds.), Amerindiana: Neue Perspektiven auf die indigenen Sprachen Amerikas, 171–195. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik & Hekking, Ewald. 2012. Clause combining in Otomi before and after contact with Spanish. Linguistic Discovery 10(1), 42–61.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 2007. Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence. In Hoff, Erika & Shatz, Marilyn (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Development, 347–367. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2009. Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In Olson, David R. & Torrance, Nancy (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, 75–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Hared, Mohamed. 1991. Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12, 260–282.Google Scholar
Biemiller, Andrew. 2003. Vocabulary: Needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology 24, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürki, Audrey, Spinelli, Elsa & Gaskell, Gareth. 2012. A written word is worth a thousand spoken words: The influence of spelling on spoken-word production. Journal of Memory and Language 67, 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea & Noble, Claire. 2013. A comparison of book text and Child Directed Speech. First Language 33, 268–279.Google Scholar
Castro-Caldas, Alexandre, Petersson, Karl Magnus, Reis, Alexandra, Stone-Elander, Sharon & Ingvar, Martin. 1998. The illiterate brain: Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 121(6), 1053–1063.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2014. Is there really a syntactic category of subordination? In Kalliokoski, Jyrki, Visapää, Laura & Sorva, Helena (eds.), Contexts of Subordination, 73–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Anne E. & Stanovich, Keith E.. 1997. Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology 33(6), 934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, Anne E., and Stanovich, Keith E.. 1998. What reading does for the mind. American Educator 22, 1–8.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2009. Words as constructions. In Evans, Vyvyan & Pourcel, Stéphanie (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, 201–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2018. Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition 178, 222–235.Google Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth & Merikle, Philip M.. 1996. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 422–433.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas, Pegado, Felipe, Braga, Lucia W., Ventura, Paulo, Filho, Gilberto Nunes, Jobert, Antoinette, Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine, Kolinsky, Régine, Morais, José & Cohen, Laurent. 2010. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 330(6009), 1359–1364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine, Dehaene, Stanislas & Hertz-Pannier, Lucie. 2002. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science 298(5600), 2013–2015.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim. 2003. Standard languages: Taxonomies and histories. In Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2000. Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2010. Through the Language Glass. Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2016. Are Some Languages Better than Others? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C. 1985. Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy & Hildyard, Angela (eds.), Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, 333–367. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46, 621–646.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel. 2012. Language: The Cultural Tool. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 2, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Joshua K., Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Pinker, Steven. 2018. A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition 177, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, Donald P. & Ahrens, Margaret G.. 1988. Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case of “motherese”? Journal of Child Language 15, 395–410.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy & Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick. 1999. The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, Erika. 2009. Language development at an early age: Learning mechanisms and outcomes from birth to five years. Encyclopedia of Early Childhood Development. www.child-encyclopedia.com/sites/default/files/textes-experts/en/622/language-development-at-an-early-age-learning-mechanisms-and-outcomes-from-birth-to-five-years.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2013.Google Scholar
Huettig, Falk, Singh, Niharika & Mishra, Ramesh K.. 2011. Language-mediated visual orienting behavior in low and high literates. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2, 285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00285.Google Scholar
Huettig, Falk. 2015. Literacy influences cognitive abilities far beyond the mastery of written language. In van de Craats, Ineke, Kurvers, Jeanne & van Hout, Roeland (eds.), Adult Literacy, Second Language, and Cognition. LESLLA Proceedings 2014, 115–128. Nijmegen: Centre for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Hunt, Kellog W. 1977. Early blooming and late blooming syntactic structures. In Cooper, Charles L. & Lee, Odell (eds.), Evaluating Writing, 91–104. Buffalo, NY: State University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 2012. The Origins of Grammar: Language in the Light of Evolution II, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakimik, Jola, Cole, Roland A. & Rudnicky, Alexander I. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 165–178.Google Scholar
Joseph, John Earl. 1987. Eloquence and Power: The Rise of Language Standards and Standard Languages. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Kalmar, Ivan. 1985. Are there really no primitive languages? In Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy & Hildyard, Angela (eds.), Literacy, Language and Learning, 148–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Dafna & Berman, Ruth. 2015. Developing linguistic flexibility across the school years. First Language 35, 27–53.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 2007. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43, 365–392.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 2009. Origin and maintenance of clausal embedding complexity. In Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David & Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, 192–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kurvers, Jeanne, Vallen, Ton & van Hout, Roeland. 2006. Discovering features of language: Metalinguistic awareness of adult illiterates. In van de Craats, Ineke, Kurvers, Jeanne & Young-Scholten, Martha (eds.), Low-Educated Second Language and Literacy Acquisition: Proceedings of the Inaugural Symposium Tilburg 2005, 69–68. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Dale, Rick A.. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1), e8559.Google Scholar
Martowicz, Anna. 2011. Origin and Functioning of Circumstantial Clause Linkers: A Crosslinguistic Study. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2004. Talking academic: A corpus approach to academic speech. In Aijmer, Karin (ed.), Dialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and Misunderstanding in Dialogue, 201–217. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Sandler, Wendy, Padden, Carol & Aronoff, Mark. 2010. Emerging sign languages. In Marschark, Marc & Spencer, Patricia Elizabeth (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, vol. 2, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 2012. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh K., Singh, Niharika, Pandey, Aparna & Huettig, Falk. 2012. Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye-movements are modulated by reading ability: Evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research 5(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marienne. 1984. How to avoid subordination. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10, 493–509.Google Scholar
Montag, Jessica L. & MacDonald, Maryellen C.. 2015. Text exposure predicts spoken production of complex sentences in 8- and 12-year-old children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144, 447–468.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-Examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Morais, José, Alegria, Jesus & Content, Alain. 1986. Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition 24, 45–64.Google Scholar
Morais, José, Cary, Luz, Alegria, Jesus & Bertelson, Paul. 1979. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition 7, 415–438.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, Pesetsky, David & Rodrigues, Cilene. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85, 355–404.Google Scholar
Nippold, Marilyn A. 1998. Later Language Development: The School-Age and Adolescent Years. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Nippold, Marilyn A., Mansfield, Tracy C. & Billow, Jesse L.. 2007. Peer conflict explanations in children, adolescents, and adults: Examining the development of complex syntax. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 16, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neil, Wayne. 1977. Clause adjunction in Old English. Linguistics 17, 199–211.Google Scholar
Pakulak, Eric & Neville, Helen. 2010. Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(12), 2728–2744.Google Scholar
Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Morais, José, Ventura, Paulo & Kolinsky, Régine. 2007. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 700–726.Google Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki. 2006. Vähemmistökielestä varioivaksi valtakieleksi. In Juusela, Kaisu & Nisula, Katariina (eds.), Helsinki Kieliyhteisönä, 13–99. Helsinki: Suomen kielen Ja kotimaisen kirjallisuuden laitos.Google Scholar
Perre, Laetitia, Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Montant, Marie & Ziegler, Johannes C.. 2009. Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research 1275, 73–80.Google Scholar
Petersson, Karl Magnus, Silva, Carla, Castro-Caldas, Alexandre, Ingvar, Martin & Reis, Alexandra. 2007. Literacy: A cultural influence on functional left–right differences in the inferior parietal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 26, 791–799.Google Scholar
Philp, Jenefer. 2003. Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1), 99–126.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1995. Language acquisition. In Gleitman, Lila R. & Liberman, Mark (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 1: Language. 2nd ed., 135–182. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Read, Charles A., Zhang, Yun-Fei, Nie, Hong-Yin & Ding, Bao-Qing. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition 24, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, Alexandra & Castro-Caldas, Alexandre. 1997. Illiteracy: A cause for biased cognitive development. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 3(5), 444–450.Google Scholar
Scott, Cheryl M. 1988. Spoken and written syntax. In Nippold, Marilyn A. (ed.), Later Language Development: Ages 9 through 19, 49–95. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark S. & Tanenhaus, Michael K.. 1979. Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5(6), 546–554.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca: A Complete Introduction to the Theoretical Nature and Practical Implications of English Used as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. & Cunningham, Anne E.. 1992. Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition 20, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, James & Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 120, 2080–2094.Google Scholar
Tarone, Elaine, Bigelow, Martha & Hansen, Kit. 2007. The impact of alphabetic print literacy level on oral second language acquisition. In Faux, Nancy (ed.), Low-Educated Second Language and Literacy Acquisition: Proceedings of the Second Annual Forum, The Literacy Institute at Virginia Commonwealth University, 2006, 99–122. Richmond, Virginia: The Literacy Institute.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2015. Societies of intimates and linguistic complexity. In De Busser, Rik & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), Language Structure and Environment: Social, Cultural, and Natural Factors, 133–147. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison & Grace, George W.. 2007. The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua 117, 543–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C., Petrova, Ana & Fernand, Ludovic. 2008. Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 34, 643–661.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×