Book contents
- Language Awareness in Business and the Professions
- Language Awareness in Business and the Professions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Language Awareness in Business and the Professions
- Part III Language Awareness in Education and Training
- Index
- References
Part III - Language Awareness in Education and Training
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2022
Edited by
Book contents
- Language Awareness in Business and the Professions
- Language Awareness in Business and the Professions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Language Awareness in Business and the Professions
- Part III Language Awareness in Education and Training
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language Awareness in Business and the Professions , pp. 137 - 224Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Belcher, D. (2004). New trends in teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 156–186.Google Scholar
Belcher, D., Johns, A. M. and Paltridge, B. (2011). New Directions in English for Specific Purposes. The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Benesch, S. (1999). Rights analysis: Studying power relations in an academic setting. English for Specific Purposes 18, 313–327.Google Scholar
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical pragmatism: A politics of L2 composition. In Silva, T. and Matsuda, P. (eds.), On Second Language Writing, pp. 161–172. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, C. S. C. (2009). Forging a link between research and pedagogy: A holistic framework for evaluating business English materials. English for Specific Purposes 28(2), 125–136.Google Scholar
Chan, C. S. C. (2017). Investigating a research-informed teaching idea: The use of transcripts of authentic workplace talk in the teaching of spoken business English. English for Specific Purposes 46, 72–89.Google Scholar
Chan, C. S. C. and Frendo, E. (eds.) (2014). New Ways in Teaching Business English. TESOL Press.Google Scholar
Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and Criticism: Poststructural Investigations in Education. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Deresiewicz, William (2015). The neoliberal arts: How college sold its soul to the market’. Harper’s Magazine, September 2015. [https://harpers.org/archive/2015/09/the-neoliberal-arts, accessed March, 2019]Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Introduction. In Fairclough, N. (ed.), Critical Language Awareness, pp. 1–29. Longman.Google Scholar
Fenga, H. and Du-Babcock, B. (2016). ‘Business is Business’: Constructing cultural identities in a persuasive writing task. English for Specific Purposes 44, 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2005). Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: The ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4, 135–147.Google Scholar
Garrett, P. (2018). Introduction. In Garrett, P. and Cots, J. M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Awareness, pp. 1–19. Routledge.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. A. (2001). Theory and Resistance in Education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Handford, M., Lisboa, M. Koester, A. and Pitt, A. (2012). Business Advantage Upper-intermediate. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2000). Doing collegiality and keeping control at work: Small talk in government departments. In Coupland, J. (ed.), Small Talk, pp. 32–36. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (2004). Metalanguage: Why now? In Jaworski, A., Coupland, N. and Galasiński, D. (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives, pp. 3–8. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johns, A. M. (ed.) (2002). Genre in the Classroom: Multiple perspectives. Erlbaum. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Johns, A. M. and Makalela, L. (2011) Needs Analysis, Critical Ethnography, and Context: Perspectives from the Client—and the Consultant. In Belcher et al. (Eds), pp. 197–221.Google Scholar
Kandil, M. and Belcher, D. (2011). ESP and corpus-informed critical discourse analysis: Understanding the power of genres of power. In Belcher, D. et al. (eds.), pp. 252–270. New Directions in English for Specific Purposes. The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Koester, A., Pitt, A., Handford, M. and Lisboa, M. (2012). Business Advantage Intermediate. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika (2018). Language awareness and language workers. Language Awareness 27(1–2), 4–20.Google Scholar
Lesnik-Oberstein, Karin (2015). Let UK universities do what they do best – teaching and research’. The Guardian, 6 July 2015. [www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jul/06/let-uk-universities-do-what-they-do-best-teaching-and-research, accessed March, 2019]Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2016). Discourse and Management: Critical Perspectives through the Language Lens. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Millot, P. (2017). Inclusivity and exclusivity in English as a Business Lingua Franca: The expression of a professional voice in email communication. English for Specific Purposes 46, 59–71.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism and EAP. English for Specific Purposes 16(4), 253–269.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (2016). Save our public universities: In defense of America’s best idea. Harper’s Magazine, March 2016, 29–37. [https://harpers.org/archive/2016/03/save-our-public-universities/, accessed March, 2019]Google Scholar
Starfield, S. (2011) Doing critical ethnographic research into academic writing: The theory of the methodology. In Belcher, D. et al. (eds.), pp. 174–196. New Directions in English for Specific Purposes. The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (1998). The relationship between consciousness, interaction and language learning. Language Awareness, 7(2–3), 128 – 145.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (2004). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. In Jaworski, A. et al., Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives, pp. 15–51.Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU). (n.d.) About WU. [https://www.wu.ac.at/en/the-university/about-wu/, accessed March 2019]Google Scholar
Vine, B. (2020). Introducing Language in the Workplace. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, C. (1999). Critical Language Awareness: Key principles for a course in critical reading. Language Awareness 8, 98–110.Google Scholar
Weninger, C. and Hoi-Yi Kan, K. (2013). (Critical) Language awareness in business communication. English for Specific Purposes 32(2), 59–71.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (n.d.) Critical Thinking VALUE Rubric. Retrieved from https://assessment.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/CriticalThinking.pdf.Google Scholar
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2019). Essential Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from www.aacu.org/leap/essential-learning-outcomesGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Beaufort, A. (1999). Writing in the Real World: Making the Transition from School to Work. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Black, E. (1980). The mutability of rhetoric. In White, E. E. (ed.), Rhetoric in Transition: Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric (pp. 71–83). The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bower, J. L. (2000). The purpose of change: A commentary on Jensen and Senge. In Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (eds.), Breaking the Code of Change (pp. 83–95). Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Brummett, B. (1984). Rhetorical theory as heuristic and moral: A pedagogical justification. Communication Education, 33, 97–107.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (1997). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems.Anchor Books, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Musson, G., and Tietze, S. (2005). Teaching communication to business and management students: A view from the United Kingdom. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 279–287. doi:10.1177/0893318905278536Google Scholar
Cornell University. (n.d.). University Mission. Retrieved from www.cornell.edu/about/mission.cfmGoogle Scholar
Council of Writing Program Administrators (2014). WPA outcomes statement for first-year composition (3.0), Approved July 17, 2014. Retrieved from http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html/Google Scholar
Cyphert, D. (2001). Ideology, knowledge and text: Pulling at the knot in Ariadne’s thread. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87(4), 378–395.Google Scholar
Cyphert, D. (2006). The rhetoricity of enterprise. In Clift, E. M. (ed.), How Language Is Used to Do Business: Essays on the Rhetoric of Economics (pp. 209–226). Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Cyphert, D., Dodge, E. N., Holke-Farnam, C., Lee, W. E., and Rosol, S. (2019). Communication Activities in the 21st Century Business Environment. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 169–201. doi: 10.1177/2329490619831279.Google Scholar
Disbrow, L., Engleberg, I., Katt, J., Myers, S. A., O’Keefe, P., and Ward, S. (2014). Core Competencies for Introductory Communication Courses. Retrieved from Washington, DC: www.natcom.org/sites/default/files/pages/Basic_Course_and_Gen_Ed_Core_Competencies_Handout_April_2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). The appropriacy of ‘appropriateness’. In Fairclough, N. (ed.), Critical Language Awareness (pp. 33–56). Longman.Google Scholar
Farmer School of Business. (2019). Learning Goals and Objectives. Retrieved from https://miamioh.edu/fsb/about/learning/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaelology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (A. M. S. Smith, trans.). Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1970 (1931)). On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems I (J. v. Heijenoort, trans.). In Heijenoort, J. v. (ed.), Frege and Gödel: Two Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic (pp. 83–108). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69–74.Google Scholar
Henry, J. (2000). Writing Workplace Cultures: An Archeology of Professional Writing. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, S. M. (2002). The Trivium: The Liberal Arts of Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric. Paul Dry Books.Google Scholar
Kegan, R. (1994). In over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, K. and Rawlins, J. (2015). The competency pivot: Introducing a revised approach to the business communication curriculum. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 167–193.Google Scholar
Lunsford, A. A., Ruszkiewicz, J. J., and Walters, K. (2019). Everything’s an Argument (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979/1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Bennington, G. M., trans. Vol. 10). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J. (1993). Becoming a rhetor: Developing writing ability in a mature, writing-intensive organization. In Spilka, R. (ed.), Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives (pp. 41–55). Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communication Monographs, 56, 91–111.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1997). The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. (1999). Grasping the nettle: Possibilities and pitfalls of a critical management pedagogy. British Journal of Management, 9, 171–184.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1987). Science as solidarity. In Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., and McCloskey, D. N. (eds.), The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs. University of Wisconson Press.Google Scholar
Russell, D. R. (1991). Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870–1990: A Curricular History. Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simons, H. W. (ed.) (1990). The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spilka, R. (1993). Negotiating meaning in a hospital discourse community. In Spilka, R. (ed.), Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives (pp. 98–110). Southern Illionis University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
University of Oregon. (n.d.). University of Oregon. Retrieved from www.uoregon.edu/our-missionGoogle Scholar
Wolcott, S. K. (2006). College Faculty Handbook: Steps for Better Thinking: Wolcott Lynch.Google Scholar
References
Alexander, J. C. (2010). The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arminen, I. (2012). Ethnomethodology in the analysis of discourse and interaction. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Baker, Carolyn D. (2000). Locating culture in action: Membership categorisation in texts and talk. In Lee, A. and Poynton, C., (eds.) Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies. Allen & Unwin: 99–113.Google Scholar
Bale, T. (2012/2016). The Conservatives since 1945: The Drivers of Party Change. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, D. and Hughes, J. A. (1983). The Perspective of Ethnomethodology. Longman Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Benwell, B. and Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 79–103.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1987). Anti-Semitic themes and the British far Left: some social-psychological observations on indirect aspects of the conspiracy tradition. In Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. Springer: 115–136.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. C. and Starr, S. L. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2014). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014). The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell shooting. Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 699–736.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1915) (reprinted 2008). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (Oxford World’s Classics). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. J. (1977). Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. J. (1964) (reprinted 1985). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1(4), 515–542.Google Scholar
Eglin, P. and Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorization Analysis. Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Eglin, P. and Hester, S. (1999). ‘You’re all a bunch of feminists:’ Categorization and the politics of terror in the Montreal Massacre. Human Studies, 22(2–4), 253–272.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. (2012). Enriching CA through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA keys. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 313–319.Google Scholar
Hall, P. M. (1972). A symbolic interactionist analysis of politics. Sociological Inquiry, 42(3–4), 35–75.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hester, S. (1992). Recognizing references to deviance in referral talk. Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, 156–174.Google Scholar
Hester, S. and Eglin, P. (1997). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (No. 4). University Press of America.Google Scholar
Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2002). The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 59–83.Google Scholar
Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2015) Introduction to Membership Categorisation Analysis. In Fitzgerald, R. and Housley, W. (eds.) Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Sage: 1–22.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, N. and Hindmarsh, J. (2013). The order problem: Inference and interaction in interactive service work. Human Relations, 66(11), 1401–26.Google Scholar
Mulkay, M. (2014). Science and the Sociology of Knowledge (RLE Social Theory). Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. Sage.Google Scholar
Psathas, G. (1999). Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies, 22(2–4): 139–162.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. Studies in Social Interaction, 31–73..Google Scholar
Seldon, A. and Snowdon, P. (2015). Cameron at 10: The Inside Story, 2010–2015. William Collins.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snowdon, P. (2010). Back from the Brink: The Extraordinary Fall and Rise of the Conservative Party. HarperCollins UK.Google Scholar
Stetson, J. (1999). Victim, offender and witness in the employment of news stories. In Jalbert, P. L. (ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. University Press of America: 77–110.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E. (2010). ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse & Society, 21(1), 59–82.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E. and Attenborough, F. (2015). Prospective and retrospective categorisation. In Fitzgerald, R. and Housley, W. (eds.) Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Sage: pp. 51–70. Publications Ltd, www.doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873Google Scholar
Thornborrow, J. (2014). Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Routledge.Google Scholar
Watson, D. R. (1978). Categorizations, authorization and blame: Negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105–113.Google Scholar
Watson, R. (2015). De-reifying categories. In Fitzgerald, R. and Housley, W. (eds.) Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. SAGE: 23–50.Google Scholar
Watson, G. and Goulet, J. G. (1998). What can ethnomethodology say about power? Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 96–113.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. and Mueller, F. (2011). The language of interests: The contribution of discursive psychology. Human Relations, 64(3), 415–435.Google Scholar
References
Annis, B. and Gray, J. (2014) Work with Me: The 8 Blind Spots between Men and Women in Business. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bandler, R. and Grinder, J. (1982) Reframing: Neuro-Linguistic Programming and the Transformation of Meaning. Real People Press.Google Scholar
Bandler and McKenna (2010) Get the Life You Want: Secrets to Quick and Lasting Life Change. Harper Books.Google Scholar
Bandler, R. and Le Valle, J. (2013) The Ultimate Introduction to NLP: How to Build a Successful Life. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Brookes, G., Harvey, K. and Mullany, L. (2016) ‘Off to the best start’? A multimodal critique of breast and formula feeding health promotional discourse. Gender & Language 10(3), 340–363.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2010) Locating identity in language. In Llamas, C. and Watt, D. (eds.) Language and Identities. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Second Ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2003) Gender and language ideologies. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, pp. 447–467.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B. and Richardson, K. (1992) Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. Routledge.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 35–72.Google Scholar
Darics, E. (2020) The relevance of applied linguistic and discourse research: On the margins of communication consultancy. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2002) Mars and Venus in the Workplace: A Practical Guide to Improving Communication and Getting Results at Work. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2003) How to Get What You Want in the Workplace: How to Maximise Your Professional Potential. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1990) Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese, Journal of Pragmatics 1–2, 237–257.Google Scholar
Handford, M., van Maele, J., Matous, P. and Maemura, Y. (2019) ‘Which culture? A critical analysis of intercultural communication in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 108, 161–177.Google Scholar
Handford, M. (2020) Training ‘international engineers’ in Japan: Discourse and stereotypes. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Hardaker, C. (2020) In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Sage.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2020) Epilogue: Future directions in professional communication research. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave, pp. 227–248.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., Marra, M. and Vine, B. (2013) Leadership, Discourse and Ethnicity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003b) “Feminine” workplaces: Stereotype and reality. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, pp. 573–599.Google Scholar
Koller, V. and Ereaut, G. (2020) Culture change and rebranding in the charity sector: A linguistic consultancy approach. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) The social stratification of r in New York department stores. In Labov, W. (ed.) Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 43–69.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (2003) Language, gender and politics: Putting ‘women’ and ‘power’ in the same sentence. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, pp. 161–178.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2016) Discourse and Management: Critical Perspectives through the Language Lens. Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2004) Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings. Multilingua 23(1/2), 13–37.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2006a) Narrative constructions of gendered and professional identities. In White, G. and Omoniyi, T. (eds.) The Sociolinguistics of Identity. Continuum, pp. 157–172.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2006b) ‘Girls on tour’: Politeness, small talk and gender identity in managerial business meetings. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 2(1), 55–77.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2007b) Negotiating methodologies: Making language and gender relevant in the professional workplace. In Harrison, K., Litosseliti, L., Sauntson, H. and Sunderland, J. (eds.) Gender and Language: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches. Palgrave, pp. 43–67.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2008) “Stop hassling me!” Impoliteness in the workplace. In Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. (eds.) Impoliteness in Language. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231–254.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2010) Gendered identities in the professional workplace: Negotiating the glass ceiling. Language and identities, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2012) Corpus analysis of language in the workplace. In Chapelle, C. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0248.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2020) Rethinking language in the professions: New departures for global workplace research. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mullany, L., Harvey, K., Smith, C. and Adolphs, S. (2015) ‘Am I anorexic?’ Weight, eating and discourses of the body in online adolescent communication. Communication & Medicine 12(2–3), 211–223.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (1999) The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds.) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings.Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Sharpley, C. (1987) Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Non-supportive data or an untestable theory? Journal of Counselling Psychology 34(1), 103–107.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, C. (1990) Not just ‘doctor’s orders’: Directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse & Society 1(1), 85–112.Google Scholar