Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:24:19.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2020

Claire Kramsch
Claire Kramsch
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language as Symbolic Power , pp. 238 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamian, A. A. (2015). The cosmopolites: The coming of the global citizen. New York: Columbia University Press Global Report.Google Scholar
Abrahamian, A. A. (2019, January 26). The real wall isn’t at the border: It’s everywhere, and we’re fighting against the wrong one. New York Times. Retrieved from: www.nytimes.com/2019/01/26/opinion/sunday/border-wall-immigration-trump.htmlGoogle Scholar
Albright, J. and Luke, A. (eds.). (2008). Pierre Bourdieu and literacy education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Brewster, B., trans.). Lenin and Philosophy (pp.170–186). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Angermüller, J. (2018). Why there is no poststructuralism in France: The making of an intellectual generation. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Auden, W. H. (1940). In memory of W. B. Yeats. Another Time. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1979). Performative utterances. Philosophical Papers (pp.233–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (Holquist, M., trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (Iswolsky, H., trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability. Early philosophical essays. Holquist, M. and Liapunov, V. (eds. and trans). Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University press.Google Scholar
Barney, D. (2004). The vanishing table, or community in a world that is no world. In Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the digital age (pp.31–52). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (Cape, J., trans). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1957.)Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1977). Rhetoric of the image (Heath, S., trans.). Image-Music-Text (pp.32–51). New York: Noonday Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1982). Empire of signs (Howard, R., trans). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1970.)Google Scholar
Basso, E. (1990). The trickster’s scattered self. Anthropological linguistics, 30, (3:4), 292–318.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations (Beitchman, P., Foss, P. and Patton, P., trans.). New York: Semiotext.Google Scholar
Beacco, J-C. (ed.). (2013). Ethique et politique en didactique des langues. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Beckett, S. (2012). Waiting for Godot. London: Faber & Faber. (Original work published 1953.)Google Scholar
Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media and Society, 11(6), 985–1002.Google Scholar
Berenstain, S. and Berenstain, J. (1994). The Berenstain Bears’ new neighbors. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckman, T. (1966) The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bettelheim, B. (1975). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Bichsel, P. (1969). Kindergeschichten. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2007). Second language identities. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2018). Political economy and sociolinguistics. Neoliberalism, inequality and social class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2019). Post-truth and political discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Block, D., Gray, J. and Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005a). Discourse. A critical introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005b). Difference and value: Orders of indexicality and pretextuality. Discourse (pp.73–78). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2017). Small genres of veridiction: The Twitter profile. Retrieved from https://alternative–democracy-research.org/2017/04/28/small-genres-of-veridiction-the-twitter-profile/.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2018). Trump’s Tweetopoetics. Tilburg papers in Culture Studies, Paper 203, 1–5. Retrieved from http://137.56.247.223/upload/983ecbaf-bcfe-4dcc-b167-f52aae4ed3fc_TPCS_203_Blommaert.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1980). Language. The loaded weapon. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977a. Sur le pouvoir symbolique. In: Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations. 32e année. 3, 405–411.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977b). Outline of a theory of practice (Nice, R., trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972.)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977c). The economics of linguistic exchanges (Nice, R., trans.). Social Science Information, 16, 645–668.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.(1990). Fieldwork in philosophy (Adamson, M., trans.). In Other Words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology (pp.3–33). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (Raymond, G. and Adamson, M., trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Elite schools in the field of power (Clough, L., trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Introduction (Nice, R., trans.). Pascalian Meditations (pp.1–8). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations (Nice, R., trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1997.)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2008). Sketch for a self–analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 2004.)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.–C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Nice, R., trans.). London: Sage. (Original work published 1970.)Google Scholar
Boyer, D. and Yurchak, A. (2010). American Stiob: Or, what late socialist aesthetics of parody reveal about contemporary political culture in the West. Cultural Anthropology 25(2), 179–221.Google Scholar
Brockmeier, J. and Carbaugh, D. (eds.) (2001). Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. (2017a, May 26). Four American narratives. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/opinion/the-four-american-narratives.html.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. (2017b, July 18). Getting radical about inequality. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/opinion/inequality-pierre-bourdieu.html.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. (2018, November 19). Fighting America’s spiritual void. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/11/19/opinion/mental-health-ptsd-community.html.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. (2019, May 30). When trolls and crybullies rule the earth. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/opinion/online-trolling-empathy.html.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and Levinson, S. (1978). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., and Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in language (pp.252–281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1997). How applied linguistics is the same as any other science. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 86–94.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2001). Self-making and world-making. In Brockmeier, J. and Carbaugh, D. (eds.), Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture (pp.25–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2002). The narrative construction of reality. In Mateas, M. and Sengers, P. (eds.), Narrative intelligence (pp.41–62). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Bucher, T. (2018). If…then. Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: The political promise of the performative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2014). Vulnerability and resistance. Profession 2014. Retrieved from https://profession.mla.org/vulnerability-and-resistance/Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2016). Rethinking vulnerability and resistance. In Butler, J., Gambetti, Z. and Sabsay, L. (eds.), Vulnerability in resistance (pp.12–27). Durham, NC: Duke University press..Google Scholar
Butler, J., Gambetti, Z., and Sabsay, L. (eds.) (2016). Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M., Golubeva, I., Hui, H. and Wagner, M. (eds.) (2017). From principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byrd Clark, J. and Dervin, F. (eds.). (2014). Reflexivity in language and intercultural education. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E. and Postone, M. (eds.). (1993). Bourdieu: Critical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, S. and Meinhof, U. (eds.), Language and masculinity (pp.47–64). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1998). “Is there any ketchup, Vera?”: Gender, power and pragmatics. Discourse & Society, 9(4), 437–455.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2005). Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 482–502.Google Scholar
Camus, A. (1946). The stranger (Gilbert, S., trans.). New York: Alfred Knopf. (Original work published 1942.)Google Scholar
Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus and other essays (O’Brien, J., trans.). New York: Alfred Knopf. (Original work published 1942.)Google Scholar
Cardon, D. (2015). A quoi rêvent les algorithmes: Nos vie à l’heure des big data. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Carles, P. (2001). La sociologie est un sport de combat [Sociology is a martial arts] [Video]. France: C-P Productions et VF Films.Google Scholar
Carnegie, D. (1936). How to win friends and influence people. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984a). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984b). “Foucault and Bourdieu” and “Walking in the City.” The practice of everyday life (pp.45–60, 91–110) Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (ed.). 2012. Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, P. (2011). Réflections pour l’analyse du discours populiste. Mots: Les Langages du Politique, 97. Retrieved from http://mots.revues.org/20534Google Scholar
Chun, C. (ed.) (forthcoming). Applied linguistics and politics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cicurel, F. (2013). Culture professorale et singularité: Une lecture de Bergson pour aborder la fabrique de l’action d’enseignement. In Beacco, J.-C.. (ed.), Ethique et politique en didactique des langues (p.169–190). Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Cook, G. (1994). A basis for analysis: Schema theory, its general principles, history and terminology. Discourse and literature (pp.9–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, G. (2010). Translation in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coste, D. (2013). La didactique des langues entre pôles d’attraction et lignes de fracture. In Beacco, J.-C. (ed.), Ethique et politique en didactique des langues (pp.38–75). Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Crozet, C. (2006). The spiritual dimension of intercultural education. International Journal of the Humanities, 4(3), 119–124.Google Scholar
Crozet, C., and Diaz, A. (2020). Tertiary language teacher-researchers between ethics and politics. Silent voices, unseized spaces. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culler, J. (1982). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Curran, A. (2019). Diderot: The art of thinking freely. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury.Google Scholar
Darnton, R. (2000a). Paris: The early internet. The New York Review of Books, 4 7(11), 42–47.Google Scholar
Darnton, R. (2000b). An early information society: News and the media in 18th century Paris. The American Historical Review, 105(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Davies, A. and Elder, C. (eds.). (2004). The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davis, E. (2017). Post-truth: Why we have reached peak bullshit and what we can do about it. London: Little Brown Books.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Debord, G. (1983). Society of the spectacle (Nicholson-Smith, D., trans.). Detroit, MI: Black & Red. (Original work published 1967.)Google Scholar
De Costa, P., Park, J. and Wee, L. (2016). Language learning as linguistic entrepreneurship: Implications for language education. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 25(6), 695–702.Google Scholar
De Francisco, V. L. (1991). The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse & Society, 2(4), 413–423.Google Scholar
De la Peña, M. (2015). Last stop on Market Street. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Delbanco, A. (2018, November 2). The long struggle for America’s soul. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/11/02/opinion/the-long-struggle-for-americas-soul.html.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1977). Signature Event Context. In Graff, G. (ed.), Limited, Inc. (pp.1–24) Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1978). Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences (Bass, A., trans.). Writing and Difference (pp.278–294) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1911). Meditations: The philosophical works of Descartes (Haldane, E. S., trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1641).Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). Emotions in multiple languages. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E. (1993). A word is dead. Poems (p.13). New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1990). Foreword: No free gift. In Mauss, M., Essay on the gift (p.i–x). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dretzin, R. (Producer), Goodman, B. (Producer) and Rushkoff, D. (Producer). (2004). The persuaders. Boston: WGBH.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A. and Heller, M. (eds.). (2012). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dürrenmatt, F. (1973). The visit. London: Penguin. (Original work published in 1956.)Google Scholar
Esslin, M. (1965). Introduction. Absurd drama (pp.7–23). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2014). Language and power (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feldman, C. F. (1987). Thought from language: The linguistic construction of cognitive representation. In Bruner, J. and Haste, H. (eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world (pp.133–146. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Feldman, C. F. (2001). Narratives of national identity as group narratives: Patterns of interpretive cognition. In Brockmeier, J., and Carbaugh, D. (eds.), Narrative and identity (pp.129–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Felman, S.(1983). The literary speech act: Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or seduction in two languages (Porter, C., trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ferraris, M. (2019). Du postmoderne à la postvérité (Orcel, M., trans.). Post–vérité et autres énigmes (pp.21–74). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 2017.)Google Scholar
Ferraris, M., and Martino, V. (2018). What is documediality and why traces, documents and archives are normative. Law Text Culture, 22, 21–30. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc/vol22/iss1/3Google Scholar
Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social problems, 25(4), 397–406.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1971). L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979). Governmentality. Ideology and consciousness, 6, 5–21.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish (2nd ed.). (Sheridan, A., trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1977.)Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the College de France (Burchell, G., trans.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. (Original work published 1981–1982.)Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1996). Linguistic criticism (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freadman, A. (2014). Fragmented memory in a global age: The place of storytelling in modern language curricula. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 373–385.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1946). Totem and Taboo (Brill, A.A., trans.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gainous, J. and Wagner, K. M. (2013). Tweeting to power. The social media revolution in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gao, S. (2018a). Multilingualism and good citizenship: The making of language celebrities in Chinese media. Multilingua, 37(6), 541–559.Google Scholar
Gao, S. (2018b, March). The neoliberal moralization of language learning: Stories of a tour guide in Chinese media. Paper presented at conference of American Association of Applied Linguistics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gee, J., Hull, G. and Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). The contours of high modernity. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age (pp.10–34). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goel, V. (2014, June 29). Facebook tinkers with users’ emotions in newsfeed experiment, stirring outcry. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/technology/facebook-tinkers-with-users-emotions-in-news-feed-experiment-stirring-outcry.html.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (2009). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp.1–52). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gramling, D. (2019). Supralingualism and the translatability industry. Applied Linguistics, 1–20. doi:10.1093/applin/amz023Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2017, May 19). Post-truth by Matthew d’Ancona and Post-truth by Evan Davis review – is this really a new era of politics? The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/books/2017/may/19/post-truth-matthew-dancona-evan-davis-reiews.Google Scholar
Gray, J. and Block, D. (2012). The marketization of language teacher education and neoliberalism: Characteristics, consequences and future prospects. In Block, D., Gray, J. and Holborow, M., Neoliberalism and applied linguistics (pp.114–143). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation: In Cole, P., and Morgan, J. L.. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp.41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A. (ed.). (1990). Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guilherme, M. (2002). Critical citizens for an intercultural world: Foreign language education as cultural politics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Guilherme, M. and de Souza, L. (2019). Glocal languages and critical intercultural awareness: The South answers back. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.). (1996). Revisiting linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J., Jupp, T. C. and Roberts, C. (1979). Cross-talk: A study of cross-cultural communication. London: National Center for Industrial Language Training.Google Scholar
Gunderman, D. (2016, November 10). President elect Donald Trump’s big beautiful wall may end up just being a modest, double-layered fence. New York Daily News.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1970). Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13, 360–375.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action (McCarthy, T., trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1999a). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1999b). Kind-making: The case of child abuse. The social construction of what? (pp.125–162). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, G. (2015). Literature in language education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. American Review of Anthropology, 34, 67–83.Google Scholar
Harcourt, B. E. (2014). Digital security in the expository society: Spectacle, surveillance, and exhibition in the neoliberal age of big data. Columbia Public Law Research Paper, No. 14–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2455223Google Scholar
Harcourt, B. (2015). Exposed: Desire and disobedience in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, J. (2017). Mourning Harambe, the last great meme. The Daily Dot www.dailydot.com/unclick/harambe-memes.anniversary.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. and McElhinny, B. (2017). Language, capitalism and colonialism: Toward a critical history. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hermand, J. (1958). Die literarische Formenwelt des Biedermeiers. Giessen: W. Schmitz.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. (1986). Der Struwwelpeter oder lustige Geschichten und drollige Bilder. Münster: F. Coppenrath Verlag. (Original work published 1845.)Google Scholar
Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberal keywords and the contradictions of an ideology. In Block, D., Gray, J. and Holborow, M., Neoliberalism and applied linguistics (pp.33–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holquist, M. (1981). The politics of representation. In Greenblatt, S. (ed.), Allegory and representation (pp.163–183). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2017). Donald Trump and the language of populism. Retrieved from www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/perspective.Google Scholar
Hyde, L. (1998). Trickster makes this world: Mischief, myth, and art. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp.269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1986). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp.35–71). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1987). Communicative competence. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N. and Mattheier, K. (eds.), Soziolinguistik/Sociolinguistics Vol.1 (pp.219–229). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. (2008). The lottery. New York: Wildside Press. (Original work published in 1948.)Google Scholar
Jacquemet, M. (2009 ). Credibility in court: Communicative practices in the Camorra trials (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in language (pp.350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (ed.). (2003). Les représentations sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2018). Discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2016). Surveillance. In Georgakopoulou, A. and Spilloti, T. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp.408–411). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2019a). The text is reading you: Teaching language in the age of the algorithm. Linguistics and Education. https://doi.org/10.106/j.linged.2019.100750.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2019b). Surveillant media. Technology, language and control. In Cotter, C. and Perrin, D. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and media (pp.244–262). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2020a). The rise of the pragmatic web: Implications for rethinking meaning in interaction. In Tagg, C. and Evans, M. (eds), Historicising the digital. English language practices in new and old media. Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2020b). Mediated discourse analysis and the digital humanities. In Adolph, S. and Knight, D. (eds.), Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities. Ch.12. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (in press). Discourse analysis and digital surveillance. In A. de Fina and A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), Cambridge handbook of discourse studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. and Hafner, C. (2012). Understanding digital literacy: A practical introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R., Chik, A. and Hafner, C. (eds.). (2015). Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kafka, F. (1971). The judgment; In the penal colony; A report to an academy. In Glazer, N. N., Kafka: The complete stories (pp. 77–88; 140–167; 250–258). New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Kaminski, M. (2018 August 16). Toward defining privacy expectations in an age of oversharing. Open Future. The Economist. Retrieved from www.economist.com/open-future/2018/08/16/toward-defining-privacy-expectations-in-an-age-of-oversharingGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, A. (1993). French Lessons: A memoir. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kearney, E. (2016). Intercultural learning in modern language education: Expanding meaning-making potentials. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kerlan, A. and Simard, D. (eds.). (2012.) Paul Ricoeur et la question éducative. Lyon: ENS de Lyon.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2015). Language, literacy, and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Khan, K. (2014). Citizenship, securitization and suspicion in UK ESOL policy. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, Paper 130. London: King’s College Centre for Language Discourse & Communication.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Potomac: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2017). No is not enough: Resisting Trump’s shock politics and winning the world we need. Chicago: Haymarket books.Google Scholar
Klemperer, V. (2000). The language of the Third Reich: LTI – Lingua Tertii Imperii. A philologist’s notebook (Brandy, M., trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1996). Wem gehört die deutsche Sprache? Die Unterrichtspraxis, 29 (1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2004). Language, thought, and culture. In Davies, A. and Elder, C. (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp.235–261). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 249–251.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu: A biographical memoir. In Albright, J. and Luke, A. (eds.), Pierre Bourdieu and literacy education (pp.33–49) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2009a). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2009b). La circulation transfrontalière des valeurs dans un projet de recherche international. Le Francais dans le monde, 46, 66–75.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2011). The symbolic dimensions of the intercultural. Language Teaching, 4 4(3), 354–367.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2012a). Imposture: A late modern notion in poststructuralist SLA research. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 483–502.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2012b). Symbolic mediation. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp.620–622.). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2014). Introduction: Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2015). What can the native language instructor contribute to foreign language education in an era of globalization? ADFL Bulletin, 4 3(2), 88–101.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2019). Between globalization and decolonization: Foreign languages in the cross-fire. In Macedo, D. (ed.), Decolonizing foreign language education: The misteaching of English and other colonial languages (pp.50–72). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2020). “I hope you can let this go”/“Ich hoffe, Sie können das fallen lassen” – Focus on the perlocutionary in contrastive pragmatics. Journal of Contrastive Pragmatics, 1 (1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2019). Educating the global citizen or the global consumer? Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144 4819000363Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (forthcoming). The politics of culture. In Chun, C. (ed.), Applied linguistics and politics. London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. and Huffmaster, M. (2008). The political promise of translation. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen, 37(1), 283–297.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. and Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 2 9(4),645–671.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. and Zhang, L. (2018). The multilingual instructor: What foreign language teachers say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreis, R. (2017). The ‘Tweet politics” of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 1 4(4), 607–618.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (1993). Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 169–191.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. (2016). The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 37, 474–494.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. (2019). Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1093/applin/amz033.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (2017). The hollow man: Donald Trump, populism and post-truth politics. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 595–606.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2017). Où atterrir? Comment s’orienter en politique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Laviosa, S. (2014). Translation and language education: Pedagogic approaches explored. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, W. (ed.). (2014). Applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. (2016). Native and non-native speaker identities in interaction: Trajectories of power. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(4), 409–430Google Scholar
Lipton, S. 2017. Trump’s meddlesome priest. New York Times. June 8.Google Scholar
Luntz, F. (2008). Words that work: It’s not what you say, it’s what people hear. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Bennington, G. and Massumi, B., trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979.)Google Scholar
Macedo, D. (ed). (2019). Decolonizing foreign language education: The misteaching of English and other colonial languages. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Mao, L. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “Face” revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451–486.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. and Davis, E. (2019a). Rebooting AI: Building artificiaI intelligence we can trust. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marcus, G., and Davis, E. (2019b, September 7). How to build artificial intelligence we can trust. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2019/09/06/opinion/ai-explainability.htmlGoogle Scholar
Marin, L. (1988). Portrait of the King (Houle, M.M., trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published in 1981.)Google Scholar
Marin, L. (2002). On representation (Porter, C., trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E., and boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.Google Scholar
Mathias, P. (2009). Qu’est-ce que l’internet? Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. (Halls, W.D., trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1950.)Google Scholar
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2012). Poststructuralism and its challenges for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics Special Issue, 33(5), 473–482.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2019). Language and subjectivity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (2018, July 20). The unmonitored president. The Atlantic. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump–speech/565646/Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, A. (1971). The crucible. Harmondsworth: Viking Press. (Original work published in 1953.)Google Scholar
Minsky, M. (1977). Frame theory. In Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Wason, P.C. (eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp.355–376). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mishler, E. (2006). Narrative and identity: the double arrow of time. In de Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. and Bamberg, M. (eds.), Discourse and identity (pp.30–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2017). Post-truth politics?: Authenticity, populism and the electoral discourses of Donald Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (2007). Discussion of poststructuralism vs. postmodernism. In Cummins, J. and Davison, C. (eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp.669–680). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. (1993). The Nobel lecture in literature. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mortensen, M. (1971). Noam Chomsky – Michel Foucault. Human nature: justice versus power. Youtube video.Google Scholar
Morville, P. and Rosenfeld, L. (2006). Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large scale websites (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2003). Des représentations collectives aux représentations sociales. In Jodelet, D. (ed.), Les représentations sociales (pp.79–103). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Designing social futures. In Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp.9–37). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 2 9(1), 9–31.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities and the language classroom. In Breen, M. (ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp.159–171). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2010). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Oren, I. and Solomon, T. (2014). WMD, WMD, WMD: Securitization through ritualized incantation of ambiguous phrases. Review of International Studies, 4 1(2), 313–336.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (2017). 1984. New York: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published 1949.)Google Scholar
Osborne, J. (1993). Look back in anger. In Plays. New York: Faber & Faber. (Original work published in 1957.)Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, E. (1999). Transformative learning: Educational vision for the 21st century. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Ott, B. L. (2016). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 3 4(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. New York: D. McKay Co.Google Scholar
Packard, V. (1964). The naked society. New York: D. McKay Co.Google Scholar
Packer, G. (2019, August 6). The left needs a language potent enough to counter Trump. The Atlantic. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/language-trump-era/595570/.Google Scholar
Pan, Y. (2000). Politeness in Chinese face-to-face interaction. Greenwich: Ablex.Google Scholar
Paran, A. and Robinson, P. (2016). Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1976). Pensées. Paris: Flammarion. (Original work published 1670.)Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2004). ‘The making of an American’: Negotiation of identities at the turn of the 20th century. In Pavlenko, A. and Blackledge, A. (eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp.34-67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and multilingualism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2008). “I’m very not about the law part”: Non-native speakers of English and the Miranda warning. TESOL Quarterly, 4 2(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. and Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language learning. In Cummins, J. and Davison, C. (eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp.669–680). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1992 and 1998). Selected philosophical writings, Vol.1 and 2. Bloomington, Indiana University Press. Vol.1 edited by Houser, N. and Kloesel, C., 1992; Vol.2, edited by The Peirce Edition Project, 1998.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In Cazden, C., John, V. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp.370–394). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Phipps, A. (2019). Decolonising multilingualism: Struggles to decreate. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Picketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century (Goldhammer, A., trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinter, H. (1988). Mountain language. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Piper, W. (1930). The little engine that could. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Politico Staff. (2017). Full text: James Comey testimony transcript on Trump and Russia. www.politico.com/story/2017/06/08/full-textGoogle Scholar
Poniewozik, J. (2019a). Audience of one: Donald Trump, television and the fracturing of America. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Poniewozik, J. (2019b, September 8). The real Donald Trump is a character on TV. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2019/09/06/opinion/sunday/trump-reality-tv.html.Google Scholar
Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poster, M. (2006). Information please. Culture and politics in the age of digital machines. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Radeska, T. (2018, January 27). The fun but morbid Struwwelpeter is a 19th century German children’s book in which the children suffer bizarre punishments. The Vintage News. Retrieved from: www.thevintagenews.com/2018.01.27/struwwelpeter-german-childrens-bookGoogle Scholar
Ramos, J. (2019, January 9). Trump is the Wall. New York Times.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2016). Foucault, Gumperz and governmentality: Interaction, power and subjectivity in the 21st century. In Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp.303–328) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (1998). Autour du politique. Paris: Folio.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp.164–201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rettberg, J. W. (2014). Seeing ourselves through technology: How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see and shape ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1980). Narrative time. In Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.), On narrative (pp.165–186). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1991). Tâches de l’éducateur politique. Lecture I: Autour du politique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (2016). Philosophical anthropology: Writings and lectures (Vol. 3) (Pellauer, D., trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rieffel, R.(2014). Révolution numérique, révolution culturelle? Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Riezler, K. (1943). Comment on the social psychology of shame. American Journal of Sociology 48(4), 457–465.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. (2003). Performative linguistics: Speaking and translating as doing things with words. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Rogers, R. (2014). Debanalising Twitter: The transformation of an object of study. In Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M. and Puchmann, C. (eds.), Twitter and society (pp.ix–xxvi). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1980) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C. and Brewer, W. F. (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp.33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sacasas, L.M. (2019). The inescapable town square. The New Atlantis, 58, 47–53.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1934). Symbolism. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 14, 492–495. Retrieved from: www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Sapir/Sapir_1934_a.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. (1949). Culture, language and personality: Selected essays. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, F.de (1959) Course in general linguistics (Baskin, W., trans.). New York: McGraw Hill. (Original work published 1916.)Google Scholar
Schmenk, B., Breidbach, S. and Küster, L. (eds.). (2019). Sloganization in language education discourse. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schultz, E. A. (1990). Dialogue at the margins: Whorf, Bakhtin, and linguistic relativity. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Sclafani, J. (2018). Talking Donald Trump: A sociolinguistic study of style, metadiscourse, and political identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (2001). Interpersonal politeness and power. Intercultural Communication. A discourse approach (2nd ed.) (pp.43–59). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W. and Jones, R. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sealey, A. (2007). Linguistic ethnography in realist perspective. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 641–60.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seuss, Dr (1953). The Sneetches and other stories. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Seuss, Dr (1957). The cat in the hat. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, K. and Selby, H. (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology (pp.11–55). Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23, 193–229.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. (1996). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, P. (1997). Language through literature: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. (ed.). (2011). The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.70–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (2004). Righting wrongs. South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2–3), 523–581.Google Scholar
Statistic Brain – Twitter statistics. (2017, May 28). Retrieved from: www.statisticbrain.com/twitter-statisticsGoogle Scholar
Swaffar, J., Arens, K. and Byrnes, H. (1991). Reading for meaning: An integrated approach to language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture & power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Gender and Conversational interaction (pp.165–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (2001). He said, she said: Gender, language and communication with Deborah Tannen [video]. San Francisco: Kanopy.Google Scholar
Terkel, S. (1964, October 22). “Dr. Martin Luther King discusses civil rights in regards to his ‘I have a Dream’ speech” [Audio Recording]. Retrieved from https://studsterkel.wfmt.com/programs/dr-martin -luther-king/jr-discusses-civil-rights.Google Scholar
Teubert, W. (2013). Was there a cat in the garden? Knowledge between discourse and the monadic self. Language and Dialogue, 3(2), 273–297.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1984). Symbolic violence: Language and power in the writings of Pierre Bourdieu. Studies in the theory of ideology (pp.42–72). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1991). Editor’s introduction. In Bourdieu, P., Language and symbolic power (pp.1–31). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. (1997). Pourrons nous vivre ensemble? Egaux et différents. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Turner, V. (1975). Symbolic studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 145–161.Google Scholar
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2011). The googlization of everything (and why we should worry). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2019). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L. (2004).The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, : MIT Press.Google Scholar
Varis, P. and Blommaert, J. (2015). Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures. Multilingual margins, 2(1), 31–45.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (Matejka, L. and Titunik, I. R., trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, C. (2018). Transdisciplinarity across two-tiers: The case of applied linguistics and literary studies in U.S. foreign language departments. AILA Review, 31, 29–52.Google Scholar
Warzel, C. (2019, October 29). Pierre Delecto, QAnon and the paradox of anonymity. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/opinion/pierre-delecto-qanon-anonymous-anonymity.htmlGoogle Scholar
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and post-structuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wen, Q. (2016). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51(4), 526–540. doi10.1017/S026144481600001XGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, H. (1980). The value of narrative in the representation of reality. In Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.) On narrative (pp.1–24). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1991). Science and linguistics. In Caroll, J. B. (ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp.207–219). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1956.)Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 2 8(2), 377–389.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2018). Applied linguistics as transdisciplinary practice: What’s in a prefix? AILA Review, 31(1), 135–142.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (2018). Fire and fury: Inside the Trump White House. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (2019). Siege: Trump under fire. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Woodward, B. (2018). Fear in the Trump white house. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Wortham, J. (2019, March 7). Jenna Wortham on the exhilarating work that leaves her ‘naked and shivering’. Interview by Lara Takenaga. New York Times. Retrieved from: www.nytimes.com/2019/03/07/reader-center/jenna-wortham-new-york-times-magazine-still-processing.html.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2006). Social identification and local metapragmatic models. Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning (pp.29–89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. (1991). Totalitarian language: Orwell’s newspeak and its Nazi and Communist antecedents. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Yurchak, A. (2006). Everything was to be forever, until it was no more: The last Soviet generation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zarate, G. and Liddicoat, A. (eds.) (2009). La circulation internationale des idées en didactique des langues. Le Francais dans le Monde, 46, 66–75Google Scholar
Zhu, H., and Kramsch, C. (eds.). (2016). Symbolic power and conversational inequality in intercultural communication. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(4), 375–383.Google Scholar
Zhu, H., and Li, W. (2016). “Where are you really from?” Nationality and ethnicity talk in everyday interactions. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(4), 449–470.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public AffairsGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Claire Kramsch, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Language as Symbolic Power
  • Online publication: 15 October 2020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Claire Kramsch, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Language as Symbolic Power
  • Online publication: 15 October 2020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Claire Kramsch, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Language as Symbolic Power
  • Online publication: 15 October 2020
Available formats
×