Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:26:39.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Language Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

Sungdai Cho  and
John Whitman
Sungdai Cho
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Binghamton
John Whitman
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Korean
A Linguistic Introduction
 , pp. 61 - 292
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Readings

Choo, Miho and O’Grady, William. 2003. The Sounds of Korean. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1996. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Shin, Jiyoung, Kiaer, Jieun, and Cha, Jaeun. 2013. The Sounds of Korean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ahn, Sang-Cheol and Iverson, Gregory. 2004. Dimensions in Korean laryngeal phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13 (4), 345–379.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc. 2010. The role of larynx height in the Javanese tense~lax contrast. In Mercado, Raphael, Potsdam, Eric, and de Mena Travis, Lisa (eds.), Austronesian and Theoretical Linguistics, 7–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, Jun, Sun-Ah, and Ladefoged, Peter. 2002. Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew and Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. World Atlas of Linguistic Structures Online.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris and Stevens, Ken. 1971. A note on laryngeal features. Quarterly Progress Report no. 101, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 198–212.Google Scholar
Han, Jeong-Im. 1996. The phonetics and phonology of “tense” and “plain” consonants in Korean. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory and Kim, Kee-Ho. 1987. Underspecification and hierarchical feature representation in Korean consonantal phonology. Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society 23(2). 182–198.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 1994. Metrical weight consistency in Korean partial reduplication. Phonology 11, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyunsoon. 1999. The place of articulation of Korean revisited. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8, 313–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyunsoon. 2005. The representation of the three-way laryngeal contrast in Korean consonants. In van Oostendorp, M. and van de Weijer, J. (eds.), The Internal Organization of Phonological Segments, 287–315. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyunsoon, Honda, K., and Maeda, S.. 2005. Stroboscopic-cine MRI study of the phasing between the tongue and the larynx in the Korean three-way phonation contrast. Journal of Phonetics 33, 1–26.Google Scholar
Kim, Mi-Ryoung and San, Duanmu. 2004. “Tense” and “lax” stops in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13 (1), 59–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 1974. Korean consonantal phonology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Lisa. 1991. Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1951. Korean phonemics. Language 27, 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1954. Korean Morphophonemics. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Schertz, Jessamyn, Kang, Yoonjung, Kochetov, Alexei, Kong, Eunjong, and Sungwoo, Ha. 2014. Dialectal variability in place and manner of Korean affricates. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2S4NSN6.Google Scholar
Shin, Jiyoung. 2015. Vowels and consonants. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 3–21. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silva, David J. 1992. The phonetics and phonology of stop lenition in Korean. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Silva, D. J. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology 23 (2), 287–308.Google Scholar
Tak, Jin-Young and Davis, Stuart. 1994. A reanalysis of Korean tense consonants. In Beals, Katharine (ed.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1994: The Main Session, 405–417. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Yu Cho, Young-mee. 2011. Laryngeal contrast in Korean. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2662–2684. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yu Cho, Young-mee. 2015. Syllable-based phonological processes. In Brown, Lucien and Yoon, Jaehoon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 22–40. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu Cho, Young-mee. 2016-10-26. Korean Phonetics and Phonology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Retrieved April 15, 2018, from https://bit.ly/2UXoWJy.Google Scholar

References

Chae, Hee-Rak. 2007. Clitics and a classification of parts of speech in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 32 (4).Google Scholar
Chae, Hee-Rak and Roh, Chang-Hwa. 2010. Clitics and related phenomena in Korean and English. In Kuno, Susumo et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics Vol. XIII, 395–403. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chae, Hee-Rak and No., Yongkyoon 1998. A survey of morphological issues in Korean: Focusing on syntactically relevant phenomena. Korean Linguistics 9.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu and Sells, Peter. 1995. A lexical account of inflectional suffixes in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4.Google Scholar
Kuh, Hakan. 1988. The morphological status of Korean case markers. Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, 324–338.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1954. Korean Morphophonemics. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Samuel R. 1978. Accent and morphology in Korean dialects. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy. 1993. Are Japanese particles clitics? Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 27 (1), 3–33.Google Scholar
Yang, In-Seok. 1972. Korean syntax: Case markers, delimiters, complementation, and relativization. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On Clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1987. Clitics and particles. Language 61 (2), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983. Cliticization vs inflection: English n’t. Language 59 (3), 502–513.Google Scholar

Further Readings

Young-Ran, An. 2008. Korean tul and English all. In Boeckx, Cedric and Ulutas, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL4). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 55. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungeun. 2003. A conditioning factor in possessor agreement constructions. In Clancy, Pat (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 11, 343–351. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hong, Jongseon. 2004. Myengsahwa [Nominalizing]. Say Kwuke Saynghwal 14 (2): 167–185. National Institute of Korean Language.Google Scholar
Kang, Beommo. 2002. Pemcwu munpep: Hankwuke-uy hyeongthaylon, thongsalon, thaip-nonlicek uymilon [Categorial grammar: The morphology, syntax, and typo-logical semantics of Korean]. Seoul: Korea University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo. 1989. Inalienable possession as a semantic relationship underlying predication: The case of multiple-accusative constructions. In Kuno, Susumo et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, Vol. 3, 445–468. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
Young-Kun, Ko. 1995. Tane, Mwuncang, Theyksuthu [Word, Sentence, Text]. Seoul: Hankuk Publisher.Google Scholar
Nam, Ki-Shim and Young-Kun, Ko. 2013. Phyocwun Kwuke Mwunpeplon [Grammar of Standard Korean], 3rd ed. Seoul: TOP Publisher.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2011. Nominalization and stance markings in Korean. In Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen, and Wrona, Jack (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 393–422. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi and Sim, Chang-Yong. 2007. The event semantic root of inalienable possession. Unpublished manuscript, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Yang, Dong-Whee. 1999. Case features and case particles. In Bird, et al. (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 18, 626–639. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jong Yurl. 1989. On the multiple ka and lul constructions in Korean. In Takubo, Yukinori et al. (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 16, 64–83. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

References

Chun, Sun-Ae. 1985. Possessor ascension for multiple case sentences. In Kuno, Susumo et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics Vol. 1, 30–39. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 1993. Syntactic predication in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 167–211.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias and Hnin Tun, San San. 2013. Burmese: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kang, Youngse. 1985. Korean syntax and universal grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok and Sells, Peter. 2007. Two types of multiple nominative construction: A constructional approach. In Muller, Stephen (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stanford Department of Linguistics and CSLI’s LingGo Lab, 364–372. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, E. and Shimojo, M.. 2016. Mismatch of topic between Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25: 81.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan and Kim, Soowon. 1992. Case assignment in the inalienable possession construction in Korea. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 37–68.Google Scholar
O’Grady, William. 1991. Categories and Case. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Park, Chongwon. 2013. Metonymy in grammar: Korean multiple object constructions. Functions of Language 20: 31–63.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris and Barshi, Immanuel. 1999. External Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–555.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 2001. On Korean case stacking: The varied functions of the particles Ka and Lul. The Linguistic Review 18: 193–232.Google Scholar
Whitman, John. 2001. Kayne 1994: p. 143, fn. 3. In Alexandrova, G. and Artunova, O. (eds.), The Minimalist Parameter, 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jae Hoon. 2010. Constraints on double-accusative external possession constructions in Korean: A cognitive approach. In Yeon, J. and Kaiser, Jieun (eds.), Selected Papers of 2nd European Conference on Korean Linguistics. Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Yoon, James. 1986. Some queries concerning the syntax of multiple subject constructions in Korean. Studies in Linguistic Science 16: 215–236.Google Scholar
Yoon, James. 2004. Non-nominative (major) subjects and case-stacking in Korean. In Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, K. V. (eds.), Non-Nominative Subjects, Vol. 2, 265–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yoon, James. 2015. Double nominative and double accusative constructions. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Youn, Cheong. 1990. A relational analysis of Korean multiple nominative constructions. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar

Further Readings

Kang, Hyun-Hwa. 1998. Kwukeuy Tongsayenkeyl Kwusengey Kwanhan Yekkwu [Research on Korean Verbal Connectives]. Seoul: Hankuk Publisher.Google Scholar
Ko, Yong-Kun and Ki-Sim, Nam. 2003. Phyocwun Kwuke Muspeplon [Standard Korean Grammar]. Seoul: Thap Publishing.Google Scholar
Ko, Yong-Kun and Pon-Kwan, Ku. 2008. Wulimal Munpeplon [Korean Grammar].Phacwu-si: Cipmundang.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Gap. 1991. Hankwuke Eswun Yeynkwusa [Research on Korean Word Order]. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Nam, Ki-Shim. 2010. Hyentay Kwuke Tongsalon [Modern Korean Syntax], 4th ed. Seoul: Taehaksa.Google Scholar
Nam, Ki-Shim and Ko, Young-Kun. 2013. Pyocwun Kwuke Mwunpeplon [Grammar of Standard Korean], 3rd ed. Seoul: TOP Publisher.Google Scholar
Park, Jeong-Woon. 1992. The Korean morphological causative and passive. Korea Journal 32 (3): 44–59.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61: 821–848.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
You, Hyun-Kyung. 1998. Kwuke Hyengyongsa Yenkwu [Research on Korean Adjectives]. Seoul: Hankuk Publisher.Google Scholar

References

Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government and Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam and Ramchand, Gillian. 2005. Complex aspectual structure in Hindi/Urdu. In Ertishik-Shir, Nomi and Rappaport, Tova (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect, 117–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure, Vol. 39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part VI: Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo. 1990. The syntax and semantics of Korean case: The interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kwon, Jae-Il. 2011. Hankuke Tongsalon [Korean Syntax], 5th ed. Seoul: Minumsa.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–555.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints in variables in syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1973. Lexical versus periphrastic causatives in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 9: 209–383.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 2015. Causatives. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 98–115. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Whitman, John and Hahn, S., 1988. Korean morphological passive/causatives. In Baek, Eung-Jin (ed.), Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, 714–728. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Yang, In-Seok. 1974. Two causative forms in Korean. Language Research 10: 83–117.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jaehoon. 2015. Passives. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 116–136. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Yoon, James. 1997. Coordination asymmetries. In Kuo, S. et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, Vol. 7: 3–30.Google Scholar

Further Readings

Choi, Young Sik. 2004. The structure of selo and its implication for binding theory. Language Research 40 (3), 681–694.Google Scholar
Chung, K. S. 2006. Korean evidentials and assertion. In Baumer, D., Montero, D., and Scanlon, M. (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 25, 105–113. Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 366–431. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Kang, Beom-mo. 1998. Three kinds of Korean reflexives: A corpus linguistic investigation on grammar and usage. Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC12), 10–19.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2000. The Grammar of Negation: A Lexicalist Constraint-Based Perspective. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1995. Discourse configurational languages: Introduction. In Kiss, Katalin É. (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages, 3–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ko, Young-Kun. 2009. Hanwkukeuy Sicey Sepep Tongcaksang [Tense, Mood, Aspect in Korean], revised ed. Seoul: Taehaksa.Google Scholar
Lee, Eun Hee and Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2016. Mismatch of topic between Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25: 81.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2012. Ellipsis. In Kiss, Tobor and Alexiadou, Artemis (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Kunio, Whitman, John, and Yi, Eun-Young. 1996. Syntactic movement of overt wh-phrases in Japanese and Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 5, 337–351. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Park, Chongwon. 2014. The ambiguity and alternative construals of the [X-ko iss-ta] construction in Korean. Korean Linguistics 16 (1), 18–50.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1987. On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In McDonough, J. and Plunket, B. (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 17, 483–499. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 2001. Three aspects of negation in Korean. Journal of Linguistic Studies 6: 1–15.Google Scholar
Yoon, Pyung-Hyun. 2013. Kwuke Uymilon [Korean Semantics], 7th ed. Seoul: Youkrack.Google Scholar

References

Han, Chung-hye and Kim, Jong-Bok. 2004. Are there “double relative clauses” in Korean? Linguistic Inquiry 35: 315–333.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo. 2000. Subject/object drop in the acquisition of Korean: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9 (4), 325–351.Google Scholar
Li, Charles and Thompson, Sandra. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Li, Charles (ed.), Subject and Topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mattissen, Johanna. 2003. Dependent-Head Synthesis in Nivkh: A Contribution to a Typology of Polysynthesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor. 1997. Evenki. Routledge Descriptive Grammars. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ohtani, Kazuyo and Whitman, John. 1991. V-raising and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22 (2), 345–358.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×