Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:10:07.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Kinship, Property Transmission, and Stratification in Javanese Villages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Douglas R. White
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Thomas Schweizer
Affiliation:
University of Cologne
Thomas Schweizer
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Douglas R. White
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Kinship is a basic institution in human societies, ordering social interaction, reproduction, and the flow of resources. Although there is some questioning of underlying conceptions and definitions (Schneider 1984), kinship continues to be a central focus of anthropological inquiry (Peletz 1995; Shimizu 1991). The goal of this chapter is to analyze and represent kinship structures in a precise and comprehensible way, focusing on rural Javanese communities and social strata. We combine cultural analysis of kinship principles (kinship as a cultural construction) with an analysis of differentiation in kinship networks. Specifically, we are interested in studying the linkage between kinship and property transmission in different social strata by means of rigorous methods that are capable of mapping, in concrete ways, the embeddedness of economy and society.

In achieving these goals, we want to be able to map actual networks of genealogical (descent and marriage) ties, but we find the standard genealogical chart (from Rivers 1910 onward) too crude a way of representing network structure. Genealogies, with symbols for distinct individuals, their (often multiple) marriage ties, and the relations between parents and offspring, are typically so cumbersome as to limit the number of actors, kinship ties, and property flows that can be brought into a comprehensive diagram. In any case they lack a simple visual gestalt. The standard genealogy also cannot be represented as a graph with points for individuals and different kinds of lines for relations between them. This is because one of the basic genealogical relations, that of parentage, is not between one individual and another, but between one individual and a pair of other individuals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×