Book contents
- Keynes’s Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years
- Keynes’s Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Lessons of Keynes’s Economic Consequences in a Turbulent Century
- 2 The Making of a Classic: Keynes and the Origins of The Economic Consequences of the Peace
- 3 Keynes’s Economic Consequences (1919)
- 4 “Too Bad to Be True”: Swedish Economists on Keynes’s The Economic Consequences of the Peace and German Reparations, 1919–29
- 5 Revisionism as Intellectual-Political Vindication, or the French Receptions of Consequences after the Two World Wars (1919–1946)
- 6 Between Cambridge, Paris, and Amsterdam
- 7 Keynes, the Transfer Problem, and Reparations
- 8 The Speculative Consequences of the Peace
- 9 Why Was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace?
- 10 One Case Where The Economic Consequences of the Peace Mattered
- 11 Keynes and International Trade Politics after the First World War
- 12 Gold, International Monetary Cooperation, and the Tripartite Agreement of 1936
- 13 Exchange Rates, Tariffs and Prices in 1930s Britain
- 14 “Unusual, Unstable, Complicated, Unreliable and Temporary”: Reinterpreting the Ebb and Flow of Globalization
- 15 Keynes’s Arc of Discovery
- 16 Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, and Popular Perceptions of the First World War
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
9 - Why Was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 December 2023
Book contents
- Keynes’s Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years
- Keynes’s Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Lessons of Keynes’s Economic Consequences in a Turbulent Century
- 2 The Making of a Classic: Keynes and the Origins of The Economic Consequences of the Peace
- 3 Keynes’s Economic Consequences (1919)
- 4 “Too Bad to Be True”: Swedish Economists on Keynes’s The Economic Consequences of the Peace and German Reparations, 1919–29
- 5 Revisionism as Intellectual-Political Vindication, or the French Receptions of Consequences after the Two World Wars (1919–1946)
- 6 Between Cambridge, Paris, and Amsterdam
- 7 Keynes, the Transfer Problem, and Reparations
- 8 The Speculative Consequences of the Peace
- 9 Why Was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace?
- 10 One Case Where The Economic Consequences of the Peace Mattered
- 11 Keynes and International Trade Politics after the First World War
- 12 Gold, International Monetary Cooperation, and the Tripartite Agreement of 1936
- 13 Exchange Rates, Tariffs and Prices in 1930s Britain
- 14 “Unusual, Unstable, Complicated, Unreliable and Temporary”: Reinterpreting the Ebb and Flow of Globalization
- 15 Keynes’s Arc of Discovery
- 16 Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, and Popular Perceptions of the First World War
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
The Economic Consequences of the Peace was first published in 1919 and, since then, changed the economic discourse surrounding reparations and Carthaginian peace. This chapter specifies how three elements hinted at in the introduction of the Economic Consequences of the Peace – social classes, national sovereignty, and the international political system – can explain Keynes’ assessment of Carthaginian peace. The chapter analyses the optimality of reparations in the context of these three elements.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Keynes's Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 YearsPolemics and Policy, pp. 234 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R.. (2000). “Economics and Identity,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 715–753.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R.. (2010). Identity Economics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Siman Tov, Y. (2004). From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Binkley, R. C. (1929). “Ten Years of Peace Conference History,” The Journal of Modern History, 4: 607–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezis, E. S. (1995). “Foreign Capital Flows in the Century of Britain’s Industrial Revolution: New Estimates, Controlled Conjectures,” Economic History Review, February, pp. 46–67.Google Scholar
Brezis, E. S. and Hellier, J.. (2018). “Social Mobility at the Top and the Higher Education System,” European Journal of Political Economy, 52: 36–54.Google Scholar
Brezis, E. S. and Temin, P.. (2008). “Elites and Economic Outcomes,” In Durlauf, S. and Blume, L., eds., New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brezis, E. S. and Temin, P., eds. (1999). Elites, Minorities and Economic Growth, Holland, North: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brezis, E. S., Krugman, P. and Tsiddon, D.. (1993). “Leapfrogging in International Competition,” American Economic Review, December, pp. 211–19.Google Scholar
Brito, D. and Intriligator, M. (1976). “Strategic Weapons and the Allocation of International Rights,” In Gillespie, John V. and Zinnes, Dino A., eds., Mathematical Systems in International Relations Research, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Calleo, D. P. and Rowland, B. M. (1973). America and the World Political Economy, Bloomington: Indiana UP.Google Scholar
Ciampani, A. and Tolomeo, R.. (2015). “The Need for an Interpretive Framework in the History of European Élites.” In Ciampani, A. and Tolomeo, R., eds., National Identities and Transnational European Élites, 5–13, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino Editore.Google Scholar
Cline, R. S. (1980). World Power Trends and US Foreign Policy for the 1980s, Routledge.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1986). “Social Theory, Social Research and a Theory of Action,” American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1309–1335.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. and Robinson, R. (1953). “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review, 6(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1977). “Economic Interdependence and National Security in Historical Perspective.” In Klaus, K. and Trager, F.N., eds., Economic Issues and National Security, Kansas: Regents Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkeley: Univesity of CP.Google Scholar
Katiforis, G. (2004). “Keynes as a Bourgeois Marxist.” In Arestis, Philip and Sawyer, Malcolm C., eds., The Rise of the Market: Critical Essays on the Political Economy of Neo-liberalism, 181–224. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. (1980). “The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967–1977,” In Holsti, Ole R., Siverson, Randolph M., and George, Alexander L., eds., Change in the International System, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. and Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kinder, H., and Hilgemann, W. (1964). The Anchor Atlas of World History, New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. (1975). “The Rise of Free Trade in Western Europe, 1820–1875,” Journal of Economic History, XXXV, 20–55.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1976). “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics 28 (April 1976).Google Scholar
Lake, D. (1983). “International Economic Structures and American Foreign Economic Policy, 1887–1934,” World Politics, 35: 517–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, F. H. (1983). “Hegemony and the Structure of International Trade Reassessed: A View from Arabia,” International Organization, 37: 317–339.Google Scholar
Lemyre, L. and Smith, P.. (1985). “Intergroup Discrimination and Self-esteem in the Minimal Group Paradigm” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 660–670.Google Scholar
MacDonagh, O. (1962). “The Anti-Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review, 2d series, 14 (August).Google Scholar
MacEwan, A. (1978). “The Development of the Crisis in the World Economy,” In Steinberg, B. et al., eds., US Capitalism in Crisis, New York.Google Scholar
Malmgren, H. (1970). “Coming Trade Wars? Neo-Mercantilism and Foreign Policy,” Foreign Policy, 1(1): 115–143.Google Scholar
Mantoux, E. (1946). The Carthaginian Peace: Or the Economic Consequences of Mr. Keynes, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mathew, W. M. (1968). “The Imperialism of Free Trade: Peru, 1820–70,” Economic History Review, 2d series, 21 (December).Google Scholar
Metzl, J. (2019). Dying of Whiteness: How the Politics of Racial Resentment is Killing America’s Heartland, Hachette.Google Scholar
Moore, R. J. (1964–5). “Imperialism and ‘Free Trade’ Policy in India, 1853–4,” Economic History Review, 2d series, 17(1): 135–145.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J. and Turner, J. C.. (1989). “Social Categorisation and Intergroup behaviour,” European Journal of Social Psychology 10: 295–301.Google Scholar
Platt, D. C. M. (1968). “The Imperialism of Free Trade: Some Reservations,” Economic History Review, 2d series, 21 (August).Google Scholar
Platt, D. C. M. (1973). “Further Objections to an ‘Imperialism of Free Trade,’ 1830–1860,” Economic History Review, 2d series, 26 (February).Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. (1976). “Balance of Power or Hegemony” In Rowland, B. M. ed., The Interwar Monetary System, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. (2003). John Maynard Keynes 1883–1946, Economist, Philosopher, Statesman, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.. (1979). “An Integrative Theory of Inter-Group Conflict,” In Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S. eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey.Google Scholar
Taussig, F. (1892). The Tariff History of the United States, New York: Capricorn Books, 1964 edition.Google Scholar
Temin, P. (1997). “Is it Kosher to Talk about Culture?” The Journal of Economic History, 57(2): 267–287.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, M. (1979). “Reparations at the Paris Peace Conference,” The Journal of Modern History, 51: 24–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J. (1930). “English Theories of Foregn Trade Before Adam Smith,” Journal of Political Economy, XXXVIII, 239–310 and 404–457.Google Scholar
Viner, J. (1955). Studies in the Theory of International Trade, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Viotti, P. and Kauppi, M. (1987). International Relations Theory, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1980). The Modern World System, vol.2: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World Economy, 1670–1750, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weber, T. (2008). Our Friend “The Enemy”: Elite Education in Britain and Germany before World War I, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. (1949). “Treasure and Trade Balances: The Mercantilist Problem” Economic History Review, 2(2).Google Scholar