Book contents
- Kant’s Tribunal of Reason
- Kant’s Tribunal of Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Critique of Pure Reason as the Establishment of Reason’s Lawful Condition
- Chapter 2 The Normativity of Law
- Chapter 3 The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories and the Tradition of Legal Deductions
- Chapter 4 The Question of Fact and the Question of Law in Judicial Imputation and in the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories
- Chapter 5 The Tribunal of Reason
- Chapter 6 Moral Conscience as the Practical Inner Tribunal
- Chapter 7 Distinguishing between Rightful Claims and Groundless Pretensions
- Chapter 8 Epistemic Authority as both Individual and Collectively Shared
- Chapter 9 Systematicity and Philosophy as the Legislation of Reason
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2020
Book contents
- Kant’s Tribunal of Reason
- Kant’s Tribunal of Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Critique of Pure Reason as the Establishment of Reason’s Lawful Condition
- Chapter 2 The Normativity of Law
- Chapter 3 The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories and the Tradition of Legal Deductions
- Chapter 4 The Question of Fact and the Question of Law in Judicial Imputation and in the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories
- Chapter 5 The Tribunal of Reason
- Chapter 6 Moral Conscience as the Practical Inner Tribunal
- Chapter 7 Distinguishing between Rightful Claims and Groundless Pretensions
- Chapter 8 Epistemic Authority as both Individual and Collectively Shared
- Chapter 9 Systematicity and Philosophy as the Legislation of Reason
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant's Tribunal of ReasonLegal Metaphor and Normativity in the <I>Critique of Pure Reason</I>, pp. 174 - 193Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abbott, Don Paul, ‘Kant, Theremin and the Morality of Rhetoric’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 40 (2007), 274–92.Google Scholar
Abela, Paul, ‘The Demands of Systematicity: Rational Judgment and the Structure of Nature’ in Bird, Graham (ed.), A Companion to Kant (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 408–22.Google Scholar
Abrams, Jerrold J., ‘Peirce, Kant and Apel on Transcendental Semiotics: The Unity of Apperception and the Deduction of the Categories of Signs’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 40 (2004), 627–77.Google Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried, Ius naturae in usum auditorum (Editio Quinta Emendatior) (Göttingen: Bossiegel, 1763).Google Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried, Prolegomena iuris naturalis in usum auditorum, 2nd ed. (Göttingen: Bossiegel, 1763).Google Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried and Pütter, Johan Stephan, Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts (Elementa iuris naturae), trans. and ed. Schröder, Jan (Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig: Insel Verlag, 1995).Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia, Alexander, Gavin and Ettenhuber, Katrin, Renaissance Figures of Speech (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Adelung, Johann Christoph, Soltau, Dietrich Wilhelm and Schönberger, Franz Xaver, Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der Hochdeutschen Mundart, mit beständiger Vergleichung der übrigen Mundarten, besonders aber der Oberdeutschen (Vienna: Bauer, 1811).Google Scholar
Alberg, Jeremiah, ‘Metaphysics as Kant’s Coquette: Rousseau’s Influence on Dreams of a Spirit-Seer’, Kantian Review, 20 (2015), 347–71.Google Scholar
Albus, Vanessa, Weltbild und Metapher: Untersuchungen zur Philosophie im 18. Jahrhundert (Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann, 2001).Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E., ‘The Quid Facti and Quid Juris in Kant’s Critique of Taste’ in Cicovacki, Predrag (ed.), Kant’s Legacy: Essays in Honour of Lewis White Beck (University of Rochester Press, 2000), pp. 369–85.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, ‘Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument’, Kant-Studien, 69 (1978), 273–87.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier, ‘Synthesis, Cognitive Normativity and the Meaning of Kant’s Question, “How are Synthetic Cognitions a Priori Possible?”’, European Journal of Philosophy, 9 (2001), 275–305.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Deductio iuris et facti, in Sachen Sachsen-Weymar contra Schwartzburg-Arnstadt (1712).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, ‘The Great Instauration’ in Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie and Heath, Douglas Denon (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon. Faksimile-Neudruck der Ausgabe von Spedding, Ellis und Heath, London 1857–1874 in vierzehn Bänden, Vol. IV (Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1986).Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C., A Progress of Sentiments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia W., Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Baumanns, Peter, ‘Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B). Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Teil 1-4’, Kant-Studien, 82 (1991), 329–48, 436–55; and 83 (1992), 60–83, 185–207.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb, Ethica Philosophica, 3rd ed. (Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde, 1763). Reprinted in Immanuel Kant, Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. 27, ed. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1975), pp. 732–1028).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb, Initia philosophiae practicae primae (Halle: Hemmerde, 1760).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb, Metaphysica/Metaphysik: historisch-kritische Ausgabe, trans. and ed. Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar (Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2011).Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare, Des Herrn Marquis von Beccaria unsterbliches Werk von Verbrechen und Strafen, trans. Karl Ferdinand Hommel (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1966).Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare, On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings, trans. Richard Davies (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, ‘Kant’s Strategy’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 28 (1967), 224–236.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, ‘The Second Analogy and the Principle of Indeterminacy’, Kant-Studien, 57 (1966), 199–205.Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, Heiner, Symbolic Representation in Kant’s Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Biet, Christian, ‘Law, Literature, Theatre: The Fiction of Common Judgment’, Law and Humanities, 5 (2011), 281–92.Google Scholar
Björne, Lars, Deutsche Rechtssysteme im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (Ebelsbach: Gremer, 1984).Google Scholar
Blöser, Claudia, Zurechnung bei Kant: Zum Zusammenhang von Person und Handlung in Kants praktischer Philosophie (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans ‘Beobachtungen an Metaphern’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 15 (1971), 161–214.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans Paradigms for a Metaphorology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, ‘Der Rechtsbegriff in seiner geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Aufriß eines Problems’, Archiv für Begriffgeschichte, 12 (1968), 145–65.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert, Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard, Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard, Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A 67–76; B 92–101 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991).Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard, Eigentumstheorien von Grotius bis Kant (Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1974).Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard, ‘“Sei ein rechtlicher Mensch (honeste vive)” – wie das?’ in Brandhorst, Mario, Hahmann, Andree and Ludwig, Bernd (eds.), Sind wir Bürger zweier Welten? Freiheit und moralische Verantwortung im transzendentalen Idealismus (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2012), pp. 311–59.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela, Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur: eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar
Bubner, Rüdiger, ‘Selbstbezüglichkeit als Struktur transzendentaler Argumente’ in Kuhlmann, Wolfgang and Böhler, Dietrich (eds.), Kommunikation und Reflexion (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1982), pp. 304–32.Google Scholar
Büsch, Otto and Neugebauer, Wolfgang (eds.), Moderne preußische Geschichte 1648–1947 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1981).Google Scholar
Busch, Werner, Die Entstehung der kritischen Rechtsphilosophie Kants 1762–1780 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979).Google Scholar
Butts, Robert E., ‘Kant on Hypotheses in the “Doctrine of Method” and the Logik’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 44 (2009), 185–203.Google Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim (eds.), Kant and Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim (eds.), ‘Kant zu Strafrecht und Strafe im Rechtsstaat’, Juristen Zeitung, 20 (2007), 957–64.Google Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim (eds.), Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Caimi, Mario, ‘Einige Bemerkungen über die Metaphysische Deduktion der Kritik der reinen Vernunft’, Kant-Studien, 91 (2000), 257–82.Google Scholar
Cardwell, Kenneth William, ‘Francis Bacon, Inquisitor’ in Sessions, William A. (ed.), Francis Bacon’s Legacy of Texts: ‘The Art of Discovery Grows with Discovery’ (New York: AMS Press, 1990), pp. 269–89.Google Scholar
Caroni, Pio, Gesetz und Gesetzbuch: Beiträge zu einer Kodifikationsgeschichte (Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2003).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, ‘Die platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge’ in Recki, Birgit (ed.), Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance: Die platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2002), pp. 221–380.Google Scholar
Catana, Leo, The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’: Its Origin, Nature, Influence and Legitimacy (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Cazeaux, Clive, Kant, Cognitive Metaphor and Continental Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Chance, Brian A., ‘Kant and the Discipline of Reason’, European Journal of Philosophy, 23 (2015), 87–110.Google Scholar
Cicovacki, Predrag, ‘Through the Prism of the Metaphor: A Reflection of the Actuality of Kant’s Philosophy’, Filozofija I Društvo, 25 (2004), 101–11.Google Scholar
Cocceji, Heinrich de, Deductio iuris et facti pro colorando possessorio: In Sachen Sr. Königl. Majest. in Preußen als Fürsten zu Halberstadt Contra as Chur- und Fürstl. Hauß Braunschweig und Lüneburg/Die Graffschaft Rheinstein betreffend (Berlin: Gotthard Schlechtiger, 1713).Google Scholar
Cocceji, Heinrich de, Deductiones, Consilia et Responsa in Causis Illustrium (Lemgo: Johann Heinrich Meyer, 1725).Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix, ‘Kant on the Ethics of Belief’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 114 (2014), 317–34.Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard, A Treatise of the Laws of Nature (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005).Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard, De Legibus Naturae Disquisitio Philosophica, In qua Earum Forma, summa Capita, Ordo, Promulgatio, et Obligatio e rerum Natura investigantur, Quinetiam Elementa Philosophiae Hobbianae, Cum Moralis tum Civilis, considerantur et refutantur (London: Sam Parker, 1672).Google Scholar
Cutrofello, Andrew, Discipline and Critique: Kant, Poststructuralism and the Problem of Resistance (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’: 1640–1740 (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Stolleis, Michael, Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar
Delfosse, Heinrich P., Hinske, Norbert and Bordoni, Gianluca Sadun, Stellenindex und Konkordanz zum ‘Naturrecht Feyerabend’ (Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2010).Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander, Metaphern für Geschichte: Sprachbilder und Gleichnisse im historisch-politischen Denken (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1978).Google Scholar
Descartes, René, Discourse on the Method: The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 111–51.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, Lector in fabula: la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi (Milan: Giunti, 2011).Google Scholar
Eisler, Rudolf, Kant-Lexikon, Nachschlagewerk zu Kants sämtlichen Schriften, Briefen und handschriftlichem Nachlass (Berlin: E. Mittler und Sohn, 1930) www.textlog.de/rudolf-eisler.html.Google Scholar
Emundts, Dina, ‘Über Gewissen und Gewissheit’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 64 (2016), 495–521.Google Scholar
Enns, Phil, ‘Reason and Revelation: Kant and the Problem of Authority’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 62 (2007), 103–14.Google Scholar
Esser, Andrea M., ‘The Inner Court of Conscience, Moral Self-Knowledge and the Proper Object of Duty’ in Trampota, Andreas, Sensen, Oliver and Timmermann, Jens (eds.), Kant’s ‘Tugendlehre’: A Comprehensive Commentary (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 269–91.Google Scholar
Eucken, Rudolf, ‘Über Bilder und Gleichnisse bei Kant’ in Beiträge zur Einführung in die Geschichte der Philosophie (Leipzig: Verlag der Dürrschen Buchhandlung, 1906), pp. 55–81.Google Scholar
Falduto, Antonino, The Faculties of the Human Mind and the Case of Moral Feeling in Kant’s Philosophy (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Feldman, Karen S., Binding Words: Conscience and Rhetoric in Hobbes, Hegel and Heidegger (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo, Il pensare e l’io: Hegel e la critica di Kant (Rome: Carocci, 2016).Google Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo, The Powers of Pure Reason: Kant and the Idea of Cosmic Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Flach, Werner, ‘Zu Kants Lehre von der symbolischen Darstellung’, Kant-Studien, 73 (1982), 452–62.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael, ‘Laws of Nature and Causal Necessity’, Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 531–53.Google Scholar
Fulda, Hans F. and Stolzenberg, Jürgen (eds.), Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants (Berlin: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, ‘Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo’, in Favaro, Antonio (ed.), Le Opere di Galileo Galilei. Ristampa della Edizione Nazionale sotto l’alto patronato di S. M. il Re d’Italia e di S. E. Benito Mussolini, Vol. VII (Florence: G. Barbera, 1933), pp. 21–520.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, ‘Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze. Attenenti alla mecanica e i movimenti locali’ in Favaro, Antonio (ed.), Le Opere di Galileo Galilei. Ristampa della Edizione Nazionale sotto l’alto patronato di S. M. il Re d’Italia e di S. E. Benito Mussolini, Vol. VIII (Florence: G. Barbera, 1933), pp. 39–319.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, ‘Il Saggiatore’, in Favaro, Antonio (ed.), Le Opere di Galileo Galilei. Ristampa della Edizione Nazionale sotto l’alto patronato di S. M. il Re d’Italia e di S. E. Benito Mussolini, Vol. VI (Florence: G. Barbera, 1933), pp. 197–372.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, ‘Istoria e Dimostrazioni Intorno Alle Macchie Solari e Loro Accidenti’, in Favaro, Antonio (ed.), Le Opere di Galileo Galilei. Ristampa della Edizione Nazionale sotto l’alto patronato di S. M. il Re d’Italia e di S. E. Benito Mussolini, Vol. V (Florence: G. Barbera, 1932), pp. 71–249.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe, ‘Some Reflections on the Notion of Hypotyposis in Kant’, Argumentation, 85 (1990), 84–100.Google Scholar
Gava, Gabriele, ‘Kant’s Definition of Science in the Architectonic of Pure Reason and the Essential Ends of Reason’, Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 372–93.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido, ‘Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?’, Kant-Studien, 94 (2003), 273–98.Google Scholar
Gelfert, Axel, ‘Kant on Testimony’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 14 (2006), 627–52.Google Scholar
Volker, Gerhardt, ‘Die Disziplin der reinen Vernunft, 2. bis 4. Abschnitt’ in Mohr, Georg and Willaschek, Marcus (eds.), Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Auslegen, Klassiker 19 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1998), pp. 571–95.Google Scholar
GibbsJr., Raymond W. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, ‘Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding’, Philosophical Topics, 25 (1997), 37–81.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, ‘Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?’, Philosophical Studies, 137 (2008), 65–77.Google Scholar
Glaser, Julius, ‘Die geschichtlichen Grundlagen des neuen Deutschen Strafprozeßrechts’ in von Holtzendorff, Franz (ed.), Handbuch des deutschen Strafprozesses (Berlin: Habel, 1879), pp. 3–76.Google Scholar
Gmelin, Christian Gottlieb, Grundsätze der Gesetzgebung über Verbrechen und Strafen (Linz: Johann Thomas Edler von Trattner, 1786).Google Scholar
Grahl, Christian, Die Abschaffung der Advokatur unter Friedrich dem Großen: Prozeßbetrieb und Parteibeistand im preußischen Zivilgerichtsverfahren bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Materialien zum Corpus Juris Fridericianum von 1781 (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 1994).Google Scholar
Gram, Moltke S., ‘Must We Revisit Transcendental Arguments?’, The Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1975), 624–6.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle, ‘Kant on the Illusion of a Systematic Unity of Knowledge’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 14 (1997), 1–28.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De iure belli ac pacis: libri tres, in quibis ius naturae et gentium item iuris publici praecipua explicantur, Editionis anni 1939 exemplar photomechanice iteratum (Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1993).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace, from the edition by Barbeyrac, Jean, ed. Tuck, Richard (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul(ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.), ‘The Deduction of the Categories: The Metaphysical and Transcendental Deductions’ in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 118–50.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, ‘Kant’s Legacy for German Idealism: Versions of Autonomy’ in Altman, Matthew C. (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 34–60.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, ‘Kant’s Tactics in the Transcendental Deduction’, Philosophical Topics, 12 (1981), 157–99.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, ‘Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity’, Noûs, 24 (1990), 17–43.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, ‘Stellenindex und Konkordanz zum Naturrecht Feyerabend, Teilband I: Einleitung des Naturrechts Feyerabend’, Ratio Juris, 25 (2012), 110–16.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul and Walker, Ralph, ‘Kant’s Conception of Empirical Law’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 64 (1990), 221–58.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, ‘The History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy: History or Philosophy?’ in Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, ‘Voluntarism and Early Modern Science’, History of Science, 40 (2002), 63–89.Google Scholar
Hattenhauer, Hans and Bernert, Günther (eds.), Allgemeines Landrecht für die preußischen Staaten von 1794: Gesetzestext und Register (Frankfurt am Main: Metzner, 1970).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Phänomenologie des Geistes (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2006).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, ‘Die Beweisstruktur der transzendentalen Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe – eine Diskussion mit Dieter Henrich’ in Tuschling, B (ed.), Probleme der ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’: Kant-Tagung Marburg 1981 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984), pp. 34–96.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, ‘Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique’ in Förster, E (ed.), Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique (Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, ‘The Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction’, The Review of Metaphysics, 22 (1969), 640–59.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Henry, John, ‘Metaphysics and the Origins of Modern Science: Descartes and the Importance of Laws of Nature’, Early Science and Medicine, 9 (2004), 73–114.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag, 1955).Google Scholar
Heser, Johann, Deductio Iuris et Facti, in Causa Nassau-Siegen Contra Nassau-Siegen Cum rationibus dubitandi and decidendi and refutatione contrariorum. Das ist: Rechtliche Außführung und Geschichts-Erzehlung In Sachen, Nassau-Siegen Contra Nassau-Siegen: Mit beygefügten Gründen und Ursachen des Zweifelns und Entscheidens, und Widerlegung der Gegenseitigen Einwürffe (1685).Google Scholar
Heubült, Willem, Die Gewissenslehre Kants in ihrer Endform von 1797: Eine Anthroponomie (Bonn: Bouvier, 1980).Google Scholar
Hinske, Norbert, ‘In memoriam Giorgio Tonelli * 10.6. 1928 † 28.4. 1978’, Kant-Studien, 69 (1978), 247–51.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘Transcendental Arguments: Genuine and Spurious’, Noûs, 6 (1972), 274–81.Google Scholar
Hirata, Toshihiro, ‘Kants Modellwechsel im Hinblick auf die Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Vom Gerichtshofmodell zum Polizeimodell’ in Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 2 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001), pp. 748–57.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, or the Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil (Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1966).Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried, ‘Bild – Metapher – Modell. Eine philosophische Einführung mit einigen Exempla’, Nova Acta Leopoldina, 113 (2012), 9–21.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009).Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried and Ameriks, Karl (eds.), Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas Sören, ‘Gewissen als praktische Apperzeption. Zur Lehre vom Gewissen in Kants Ethik-Vorlesungen’, Kant-Studien, 93 (2006), 424–43.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas Sören, ‘Kant und das Naturrechtsdenken’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 87 (2001), 449–67.Google Scholar
Hohenegger, Hansmichael, Kant, filosofo dell’architettonica: Saggio sulla critica della facoltà di giudizio (Macerata: Quodlibet, 2004).Google Scholar
Hölscher, Lucian, Öffentlichkeit und Geheimnis: Eine begriffsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Entstehung der Öffentlichkeit in der frühen Neuzeit (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1979).Google Scholar
The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments: Authorized King James Version (Oxford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Christoph Siegmund von, Holzschuher and Siebenkees, Johann Christian, Deductions-Bibliothek von Teutschland: Nebst dazu gehörigen Nachrichten (Frankfurt, 1778).Google Scholar
Hommel, Carl Ferdinand, Rhapsodia Quaestionum in Foro Quotidie Obvenientivm Neque Tamen Legibus Decisarum (Bayreuth: Johann Andreas Lübecks Erben, 1782).Google Scholar
Hruschka, Joachim, ‘On the Logic of Imputation in the Vigilantius Lecture Notes’ in Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver (eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 170–83.Google Scholar
Hutton, James, ‘Epistemic Normativity in Kant’s “Second Analogy”’, European Journal of Philosophy, (2018), 1–17.Google Scholar
Illetterati, Luca, Figure del limite: esperienze e forme della finitezza (Trento: Verifiche, 1996).Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Fumiyasu, ‘Das Gerichtshofmodell des Gewissens’ in Hinske, Norbert (ed.), Kant und die Aufklärung (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1992), pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Fumiyasu, Kants Denken von einem Dritten. Das Gerichtshof-Modell und das unendliche Urteil in der Antinomienlehre (Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang, 1990).Google Scholar
Jäger, Ludwig, ‘Das schreibende Bewusstsein. Transkriptivität und Hypotypose in Kants “Andeutungen zur Sprache”’ in Elisabeth, Birk and Schneider, Jan Georg (eds.), Philosophie der Schrift (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2009), pp. 97–123.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas, ‘How to Appropriate a World System: The Wittich Connection: Conflict and Priority in Late Sixteenth-Century Cosmology’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 21 (1990), 353–58.Google Scholar
Jeserich, Kurt G. A., Deutsche Verwaltungsgeschichte (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1982).Google Scholar
Joerden, Jan C., ‘Zwei Formeln in Kants Zurechnungslehre’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 77 (1991), 525–38.Google Scholar
Josifovic, Saša and Kok, Arthur, Der ‘innere Gerichtshof’ der Vernunft: Normativität, Rationalität und Gewissen in der Philosophie Immanuel Kants und im Deutschen Idealismus (Leiden: Brill, 2016).Google Scholar
Justi, Johann Heinrich Gottlob von, Anweisung zu einer guten Deutschen Schreibart und allen in den Geschaefften und Rechtssachen vorfallenden schriftlichen Ausarbeitungen: Zu welchem Ende allenthalben wohlausgearbeitete Proben und Beyspiele beygefüget werden (Leipzig: Breitkopf, 1758).Google Scholar
Kahn, Samuel J. M., ‘Kant’s Theory of Conscience’ in Muchnik, Pablo and Thorndike, Oliver (eds.), Rethinking Kant, Vol. 4 (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015), pp. 135–56.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, eds. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W. (Cambridge University Press, 1992–).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason: Unified Edition, trans. Werner S. Pluhar, ed. Kitcher, Patricia (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1996).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Kants gesammelte Schriften, Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften/Königliche Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1900–).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Lezioni sul diritto naturale, ed. Hinske, Norbert and Sadun Bordoni, Gianluca (Milan: Bompiani, 2016).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, ed. Stark, Werner (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Alexander, ‘Reason, Self-legislation and Legitimacy: Conceptions of Freedom in the Political Thought of Rousseau and Kant’, The Review of Politics, 59 (1997), 25–52.Google Scholar
Kaulbach, Friedrich, ‘Das transzendental-juridische Grundverhältnis im Vernunftbegriff Kants unter der Bezug zwischen Recht und Gesellschaft’ in Kaulbach, Friedrich and Krawietz, Werner (eds.), Recht und Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Helmut Schelsky zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1978), pp. 263–86.Google Scholar
Kaulbach, Friedrich, ‘Der Herrschaftsanspruch der Vernunft in Recht und Moral bei Kant’, Kant-Studien, 67 (1976), 390–408.Google Scholar
Kaulbach, Friedrich, ‘Der Zusammenhang zwischen Naturphilosophie und Geschichtsphilosophie bei Kant’, Kant-Studien, 56 (1966), 430–51.Google Scholar
Kaulbach, Friedrich, ‘Dialektik und Theorie der philosophischen Methode bei Kant’, Kant-Studien, 64 (1973), 395–410.Google Scholar
Kazim, Emre, Kant on Conscience: A Unified Approach to Moral Self-Consciousness (Leiden: Brill, 2017).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd ed. (Vienna: Österreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1960).Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes, ‘Ad Ioannem Leonhardum Breitschwert doctorem creatum’ in Kepler-Kommission, (ed.), Gesammelte Werke, Vol. XII (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1990), pp. 250–1.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes, ‘Apologia Tychonis contra Ursum scripta’ in Kepler-Kommission, (ed.),Gesammelte Werke, Vol. XX.1 (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1988), pp. 15–62.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes, Astronomia nova in Kepler-Kommission, (ed.), Gesammelte Werke, Vol. III (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1990).Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes, ‘Dioptrice’ in Kepler-Kommission, (ed.), Gesammelte Werke, Vol. IV (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1941), pp. 329–414.Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang, ‘Die juridische Gesetzgebung der Vernunft’ in Funke, Gerhard and Seebohm, Thomas M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress, Vol. 2 (1989), pp. 253–66.Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang, ‘Neuere Interpretationen der Kantischen Rechtsphilosophie’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 37 (1983), 282–98.Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang, Wohlgeordnete Freiheit: Immanuel Kants Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, ‘Projecting the Order of Nature’ in Butts, Robert E. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft 1786–1986 (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986), pp. 201–35.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline, ‘Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and his Ideal of a World Federation’, European Journal of Philosophy, 12 (2004), 304–25.Google Scholar
Knappik, Franz and Mayr, Erasmus, ‘“An Erring Conscience is an Absurdity”: The Later Kant on Certainty, Moral Judgment and the Infallibility of Conscience’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 101 (2019), 92–134.Google Scholar
Kohler, Josef and Scheel, Willy (eds.), Die Peinliche Halsgerichtsordnung Kaiser Karls V. Constitutio Criminalis Carolina. Neudruch der Ausgabe Halle A. D. S. 1900 (Aalen: Schientia Verlag, 1968).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M., The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, Preußen zwischen Reform und Revolution: Allgemeine Landrecht, Verwaltung und soziale Bewegung von 1791 bis 1848, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag, 1975).Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, Brunner, Otto and Conze, Werner (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2004).Google Scholar
Krausser, Peter, ‘Kant on the Hypothetical Employment of Reason in Science’ in Funke, Gerhard and Seebohm, Thomas M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress, Vol. 2 (1989), pp. 123–34.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard, ‘Kant and the Crisis of Natural Law’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 26 (1965), 191–210.Google Scholar
Krug, Wilhelm Traugott, Allgemeines Handwörterbuch der philosophischen Wissenschaften nebst ihrer Literatur und Geschichte (Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1832).Google Scholar
Kühn, Manfred, ‘The Wolffian Background of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction’ in Easton, Patricia A. (ed.), Logic and the Workings of the Mind, the Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, 5 (Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing, 1997), pp. 229–50.Google Scholar
Willem van der, Kuijlen, ‘The Legal Metaphor in Kant’s Kritik der reinen Vernunft: Its Structure and Meaning’, Kantovskij sbornik, 21 (1999), 108–40.Google Scholar
Küper, Wilfried, Die Richteridee der Strafprozessordnung und ihre geschichtlichen Grundlagen (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1967).Google Scholar
Kutschmann, Werner, ‘Erfinder und Entdecker oder Richter der Natur? Die Kantsche Richter-Metapher und die Selbstlosigkeit der modernen Naturwissenschaften’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 43 (1989), 32–57.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Lamacchia, Ada, ‘Sprachphilosophische Erwägungen zur Funktion von Signum und Symbolum in Kants kritischer Philosophie’ in Beck, Lewis White (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1972), pp. 376–86.Google Scholar
La Rocca, Claudio, ‘Kant on Self-knowledge and Conscience’ in Hüning, Dieter, Klingner, Stefan and Olk, Carsten (eds.), Das Leben der Vernunft (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 364–85.Google Scholar
Leech, Jessica, ‘The Normativity of Kant’s Logical Laws’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 34 (2017), 1–31.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm,Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1960–78).Google Scholar
Liedtke, Max, ‘Der Begriff der Reflexion bei Kant’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 48 (2009), 207–16.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice, Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason (Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Louden, Robert, ‘The End of All Human Action/The Final Object of All My Conduct: Aristotle and Kant on the Highest Good’ in Aufderheide, Joachim and Bader, Ralf M. (eds.), The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 112–28.Google Scholar
Lu‐Adler, Huaping, ‘Kant and the Normativity of Logic’, European Journal of Philosophy, 25 (2017), 207–30.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, John, ‘Frege, Kant and the Logic in Logicism’, The Philosophical Review, 111 (2002), 25–65.Google Scholar
Mácha, Jakub, ‘Zwiefacher Begriff der Metapher in Kants Ästhetik’, SATS Northern European Journal of Philosophy, 10 (2009), 69–84.Google Scholar
Macor, Laura Anna, Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1748–1800): Eine Begriffsgeschichte (Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2013).Google Scholar
Manchester, Paula, ‘Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in its Historical Context’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41 (2003), 187–207.Google Scholar
Manchester, Paula, ‘Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in its Philosophical Context’, Kant-Studien, 99 (2008), 133–51.Google Scholar
Massimi, Michela, ‘Prescribing Laws to Nature. Part I. Newton, the Pre-Critical Kant and Three Problems about the Lawfulness of Nature’, Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 491–508.Google Scholar
McDowell, John Henry, Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich, ‘Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre’ in Wissenschaften, Königliche Preußische Akademie der (ed.), Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Abt. 3. Kants Handschriftlicher Nachlass, Vol. 16 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1969), pp. 1–872.Google Scholar
Meyer, Joseph, Hanle, Adolf, Moskowitz, Daniel and Drosdowski, Günther (eds.), Meyers enzyklopädisches Lexikon, mit 100 signierten Sonderbeiträgen (Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut, 1971).Google Scholar
Menne, Albert, ‘Zur formalen Struktur der Autorität’, Kant-Studien, 60 (1969), 289–97.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer, Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Meyer, Ahlrich, ‘Mechanische und organische Metaphorik politischer Philosophie’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 13 (1969), 128–99.Google Scholar
Mikalsen, Kjartan Koch, ‘Testimony and Kant’s Idea of Public Reason’, Res Publica, 16 (2010), 23–40.Google Scholar
Milton, John R., ‘The Origin and Development of the Concept of the “Laws of Nature”’, European Journal of Sociology, 22 (1981), 173–95.Google Scholar
Mohr, Georg and Willaschek, Marcus (eds.), Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, Des Herrn von Montesquieu Werk von den Gesetzen, oder von der Verhältniss, welche die Gesetze zu jeder Regimentsverfassung, den Sitten, dem Landstriche, der Religion, der Handlung u. s. f. haben sollen, trans. Abraham Gotthelf Kästner (Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1753).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, The Spirit of Laws, 2nd ed., trans. Nugent, Thomas, ed. Adler, Mortimer J. (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1990).Google Scholar
Morgan, Jeffrey, ‘Self-knowledge and the Approximation of Divine Judgment: Conscience in the Practical Philosophy and Moral Theology of Immanuel Kant’, Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 36 (2016), 107–22.Google Scholar
Moyar, Dean, ‘Unstable Autonomy: Conscience and Judgment in Kant’s Moral Philosophy’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 5 (2008), 327–60.Google Scholar
Møller, Sofie, ‘The Court of Reason in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason’, Kant-Studien, 104 (2013), 301–20.Google Scholar
Møller, Sofie, ‘Human Rights Jurisprudence Seen through the Framework of Kant’s Legal Metaphors’ in Maliks, Reidar and Føllesdal, Andreas (eds.), Kantian Theory and Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 74–91.Google Scholar
Møller, Sofie, ‘The Politics of Reason’ in Walla, Alice Pinheiro and Demiray, Mehmet Ruhi (eds.), Reason, Rights, Law: New Essays Kantian Philosophy. (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Naragon, Steven, ‘Kant in the Classroom. Materials to Aid the Study of Kant’s Lectures’, (2009) www.manchester.edu/kant/.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (London: Jussu Societatis Regiae ac Typis Josephi Streater, 1687).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and his System of the World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life (Boston: Beacon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Nuyen, Anh Tuan, ‘The Kantian Theory of Metaphor’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 22 (1989), 95–109.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis, ‘Christian Theology and the Newtonian Science: The Rise of the Concept of the Laws of Nature’, Church History, 30 (1961), 433-57.Google Scholar
Oberer, Hariolf, ‘Zur Frühgeschichte der Kantischen Rechtslehre’, Kant-Studien, 64 (1973), 88–102.Google Scholar
Oberhausen, Michael, Das neue Apriori. Kants Lehre von einer “ursprünglichen Erwerbung” apriorischer Vorstellungen (Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1997).Google Scholar
Oesterreich, Peter L., ‘Richten’ in Konersmann, Ralf (ed.), Wörterbuch der philosophischen Metaphern (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2007), pp. 311–21.Google Scholar
Oesterreich, Peter L.,‘Vom Vernunftgerichtshof zum Weltgericht. Gerichtliche Metaphorik bei Kant und Hegel’ in Bowman, Brady (ed.), Darstellung und Erkenntnis (Paderborn: Mentis Verlag, 2007), pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, ‘Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes’. The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 77 (2003), 1–21.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, ‘Critical Notice of Susan Meld Shell, “The Rights of Reason” (Book Review)’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12 (1982), 797–804.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, ‘Vindicating Reason’ in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 280–308.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, José, ‘Las dos grandes metáforas’ in Obras Completas, 6th ed. (Madrid: Revista de Occidente, 1963), pp. 387–400.Google Scholar
O’Shea, James R., ‘The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 5 (1997), 216–54.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L., ‘The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 12 (1992), 311–32.Google Scholar
Pesic, Peter, ‘Nature on the Rack; Leibniz’s Attitude towards Judicial Torture and the “Torture” of Nature’, Studia Leibnitiana, 29 (1997), 189.Google Scholar
Pesic, Peter, ‘Wrestling with Proteus: Francis Bacon and the “Torture” of Nature’, Isis, 90 (1999), 81–94.Google Scholar
Dietmar von der, Pfordten, ‘Zum Begriff des Staates bei Kant und Hegel’, Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus, 2 (2004), 103–20.Google Scholar
Pickering, Mark, ‘The Idea of the Systematic Unity of Nature as a Transcendental Illusion’, Kantian Review, 16 (2011), 429–48.Google Scholar
Pietsch, Lutz-Henning, Topik der Kritik: die Auseinandersetzung um die Kantische Philosophie (1781–1788), und ihre Metaphern (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010).Google Scholar
Pievatolo, Maria Chiara, ‘The Tribunal of Reason: Kant and the Juridical Nature of Pure Reason’, Ratio Juris, 12 (1999), 311–27.Google Scholar
Pinheiro Walla, Alice, ‘Global Government or Global Governance? Realism and Idealism in Kant’s Legal Theory’, Journal of Global Ethics, 13 (2017), 312–25.Google Scholar
Pocock, John Greville Agard, ‘The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Inquiry’ in Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin, ‘“An Almost Single Inference” – Kant’s Deduction of the Categories Reconsidered’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 90 (2008), 323–45.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin, ‘From the Clarity of Ideas to the Validity of Judgments: Kant’s Farewell to Epistemic Perfectionism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44 (2014), 18–35.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin, Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin, ‘“The Understanding Prescribes Laws to Nature”: Spontaneity, Legislation and Kant’s Transcendental Hylomorphism’, Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 509–30.Google Scholar
Pozzo, Riccardo, ‘Prejudices and Horizons: G. F. Meier’s Vernunftlehre and its Relation to Kant’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 43 (2005), 185–202.Google Scholar
Pozzo, Riccardo and Oberhausen, Michael (eds.), Vorlesungsverzeichnisse der Universität Königsberg (1720–1804). Mit einer Einleitung und Registern (Bad Cannstatt: Fromann-Holzboog, 1999).Google Scholar
Proops, Ian, ‘Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41 (2003), 209–29.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, Of the Law of Nature and Nations: Eight Books, trans. Basil Kennett and George Carew, ed. Barbeyrac, Jean (London: J. Walthoe et al., 1729).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, trans. Michael Silverthorne, ed. Tully, James (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Pütter, Johann Stephan, Anleitung zur juristischen Praxi, wie in Teutschland sowohl gerichtliche als aussergerichtliche Rechtshändel … verhandelt und in Archiven beygeleget werden (Göttingen: Vandenhont, 1765).Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias, ‘Nineteenth Century German Legal Science’, Boston Law Review, 31 (1990), 837–97.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard, Letters on the Kantian Philosophy, trans. James Hebbeler, ed. Ameriks, Karl (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Richelet, Pierre, Dictionnaire françois contenant les mots et les choses, plusieurs nouvelles remarques sur la langue française: ses expressions propres, figurées and burlesques, la prononciation des Mots les plus difficiles, le Genre des Noms, le Régime des Verbes: avec Les Termes les plus connus des Arts and des Sciences Le tout tiré de l’usage et des bons auteurs (Geneva: Jean Herman Widerhold, 1680).Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred, ‘Imputation der Handlung und Applikation des Sittengesetzes’, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 14 (1989), 27–50.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Ritter, Christian, Der Rechtsgedanke Kants nach den frühen Quellen (Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1971).Google Scholar
Ritter, Joachim, Gründer, Karlfried and Gabriel, Gottfried, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 1972).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘The Contingency of Language’ in Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres’ in Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, Jerome B. and Skinner, Quentin (eds.), Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 49–75.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian, Dialectic of Nihilism, Post-Structuralism and Law (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay F., Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay F., ‘Transcendental Arguments Revisited’, The Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1975), 611–24.Google Scholar
Röttgers, Kurt, Kritik und Praxis. Zur Geschichte des Kritikbegriffs von Kant bis Marx (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1975).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile: Or, On Education, trans. Alan Bloom (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses, trans. and ed. Dunn, Susan (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Ruby, Jane E., ‘The Origins of Scientific “Law”’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 47 (1986), 341–59.Google Scholar
Sadun Bordoni, Gianluca, ‘Kant e il diritto naturale. L’lntroduzione al Naturrecht Feyerabend’, Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto, 84 (2007), 201–81.Google Scholar
Sadun Bordoni, Gianluca, ‘Some Notes on Law, Reason and Moral Sentiment in the Kantian Lectures on Natural Law’, Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas, 4 (2016), 201–7.Google Scholar
Sage, Nicholas W., ‘Original Acquisition and Unilateralism: Kant, Hegel and Corrective Justice’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 25 (2012), 119–219.Google Scholar
Sassen, Brigitte (ed.), Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Schildknecht, Christiane, ‘Experiments with Metaphors: On the Connection between Scientific Method and Literary Form in Francis Bacon’ in Radman, Zdravko (ed.), From a Metaphorical Point of View: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995), pp. 27–50.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Eberhard, Einführung in die Geschichte der deutschen Strafrechtspflege (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1965).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Robert H., ‘Influence of the Legal Paradigm on the Development of Logic’, South Texas Law Review, 40 (1999), 367–400.Google Scholar
Schmucker, Josef, Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflektionen (Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain, 1961).Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Schröder, Jan, ‘Gottfried Achenwall, Johann Stephan Pütter und die “Elementa Iuris Naturae”’ in Achenwall, Gottfried and Pütter, Johan Stephan, Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts (Elementa iuris naturae), ed. and trans. Schröder, Jan (Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig: Insel, 1995), pp. 331–51.Google Scholar
Schröder, Jan, ‘“Naturrecht bricht positives Recht” in der Rechtstheorie des 18. Jahrhunderts’ in Schwab, Dieter, Giesen, Dieter, Listl, Joseph and Strätz, Hans-Wolfgang (eds.), Staat, Kirche, Wissenschaft in einer pluralistischen Gesellschaft. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Paul Mikat (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1989), pp. 419–33.Google Scholar
Schumacher, René, ‘Metapher’: Erfassen und Verstehen frischer Metaphern (Tübingen: A. Francke, 1997).Google Scholar
Schütz, Hans J., Vernunft ist immer republikanisch. Texte zur demokratischen Tradition in Deutschland 1747–1807 (Modautal-Neunkirchen: Graue Hefte, 1977).Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver, ‘The Moral Importance of Autonomy’ in Sensen, Oliver (ed.), Kant on Moral Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 262–81.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld, The Rights of Reason: A Study of Kant’s Philosophy and Politics (University of Toronto Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Shieber, Joseph, ‘Between Autonomy and Authority: Kant on the Epistemic Status of Testimony’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80 (2010), 327–48.Google Scholar
Simon, Josef, Kant – Die fremde Vernunft und die Sprache der Philosophie (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2003).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, History and Theory, 8 (1969), 3–53.Google Scholar
Smend, Rudolf, Das Reichskammergericht. Erster Teil: Geschichte und Verfassung (Weimar: Scientia Verlag/Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1965).Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Smith, Norman Kemp, A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International, 1992).Google Scholar
Sperander (Friedrich Gladov), A la Mode-Sprach der Teutschen, oder Compendieuses Hand-Lexicon: Jn welchem die meisten aus fremden Sprachen entlehnte Wörter und Redens-Arten, So in denen Zeitungen, Briefen und täglichen Conversationen vorkommen (Nuremberg: Buggel und Seitz, 1728).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch de, Theological-Political Treatise, trans. Michael Silverthorne, ed. Israel, Jonathan (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sticker, Martin, ‘When the Reflective Watch-Dog Barks: Conscience and Self-Deception in Kant’, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 1 (2016), 85–104.Google Scholar
Stoddard, Eve W., ‘Reason on Trial: Legal Metaphors in the Critique of Pure Reason’, Philosophy and Literature, 12 (1988), 245–60.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara, Der Staat als Maschine: zur politischen Metaphorik des absoluten Fürstenstaats (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1986).Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael, Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1988).Google Scholar
Streidl, Paul, Naturrecht, Staatswissenschaften und Politisierung bei Gottfried Achenwall (1719–1772): Studien zur Gelehrtengeschichte Göttingens in der Aufklärung (Munich: Herbert Utz Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry, ‘Transcendental Arguments and “Epistemological Naturalism”’, Philosophical Studies, 31 (1977), 105–15.Google Scholar
Tarbet, David W., ‘The Fabric of Metaphor in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 6 (1968), 257–70.Google Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nikolaus, Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung, ed. Roth, Udo and Stiening, Gideon. Werkprofile Philosophen und Literaten des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts, 5 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, Björn, ‘“Quid juris? Quid facti?”: D’une nouvelle tentative de relever une opposition capitale: Jean-Renaud Seba, le partage de l’empirique et du transcendantal. Essai sur la normativité de la raison: Kant, Hegel, Husserl”, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 22 (2009), 253–8.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens, ‘Agency and Imputation: Comments on Reath’, Philosophical Books, 49 (2008), 114–24.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens, ‘Kant on Conscience, “Indirect” Duty and Moral Error’, International Philosophical Quarterly, 46 (2006), 293–308.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton, ‘Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws’, Philosophical Topics, 34 (2006), 371–407.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton, ‘The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach’, Kantian Review, 18 (2013), 107–36.Google Scholar
Tonn, Christiane, “Eigentum” und Selbstbewußtsein Untersuchung einer Metapher bei Kant und Hegel. PhD dissertation, Bonn, 2004.Google Scholar
Topitsch, Ernst, Vom Ursprung und Ende der Metaphysik: Eine Studie zur Weltanschauungskritik (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013).Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, ‘The “Modern” Theory of Natural Law’ in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
United Nations, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans, Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1970).Google Scholar
Vanzo, Alberto, ‘Kant’s False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures in its Intellectual Context’ in Cosci, Matteo and Sgarbi, Marco (eds.), The Aftermath of Syllogism (London: Bloomsbury, 2014), pp. 157–90.Google Scholar
Vanzo, Alberto, ‘Leibniz on Innate Ideas and Kant on the Origin of the Categories’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 100 (2018), 19–45.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emmerich de, The Law of Nations, or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to The Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essays on the Origin and Nature of Natural Law and on Luxury, trans. Thomas Nugent, ed. Kapossy, Bela and Whatmore, Richard (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008).Google Scholar
Vigo, Alejandro G., ‘Kant’s Conception of Natural Right’ in González, Ana Marta (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Natural Law: Natural Law as a Limiting Concept (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2016), pp. 121–40.Google Scholar
Vujošević, Marijana, ‘The Judge in the Mirror: Kant on Conscience’, Kantian Review, 19 (2014), 449–74.Google Scholar
Waldenfels, Bernhard, Deutsch-Französische Gedankengänge (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995).Google Scholar
Warda, Arthur, Immanuel Kants Bücher, mit einer getreuen Nachbildung des bisher einzigen bekannten Abzuges des Versteigerungskataloges der Bibliothek Kants (Berlin: Martin Breslauer, 1922).Google Scholar
Wartenberg, Thomas E., ‘Reason and the Practice of Science’ in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 228–48.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, (ed.), The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, ‘What Is, for Kant, a Law of Nature?’, Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 471–90.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric and Fitzpatrick, William, ‘O’Neill and Korsgaard on the Construction of Normativity’, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 36 (2002), 349–67.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R., Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wieland, Christoph Martin, ‘Vorrede des Herausgebers’, Der Teutsche Merkur, 1 (1773), 3–22.Google Scholar
Wieland, Wolfgang, ‘Kants Rechtsphilosophie der Urteilskraft’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 52 (1998), 1–22.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus, ‘Kant’s Two Conceptions of (Pure) Reason in the Critique of Pure Reason’ in Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio and Ruffing, Margit (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 483–92.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard, ‘Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant’, Hobbes Studies, 25 (2012), 66–90.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, ‘De Jurisprudentia civili in formam demonstrativam redigenda’ in Horae subsecivae Marburgenses 1730 (Trimestre Brumale) (Frankfurt and Leipzig: Renger, 1732), pp. 84–150.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael, Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel: mit einem Essay über Freges Begriffsschrift (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995).Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm, Ethik: eine Untersuchung der Thatsachen und Gesetze des sittlichen Lebens (Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1886).Google Scholar
Ypi, Lea, The Architectonic of Reason: Teleology and Systematic Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Ypi, Lea, ‘Practical Agency, Teleology and System in Kant’s Architectonic of Pure Reason’ in Baiasu, Sorin, Pihlström, Sami and Williams, Howard (eds.), Politics and Metaphysics in Kant (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2011), pp. 134–52.Google Scholar
Zedler, Johann Heinrich, Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschafften und Künste, welches bishero durch Menschlichen Verstand und Witz erfunden und verbessert wurden (Halle and Leipzig: Johann Heinrich Zedler, 1731-54).Google Scholar
Zilsel, Edgar, ‘The Genesis of the Concept of Physical Law’, The Philosophical Review, 51 (1942), 245–79.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter, ‘Metaphor or Method: Jennifer Mensch’s Organicist Kant Interpretation in Context’, Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 1 (2015), 217–34.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter, ‘“[O]hne Hoffnung und Furcht”. Kants Naturrecht Feyerabend über den Grund der Verbindlichkeit zu einer Handlung’ in Dörflinger, Bernd, La Rocca, Claudio, Louden, Robert and Rancan de Azevedo Marques, Ubirajara (eds.), Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015), pp. 197–212.Google Scholar