Book contents
- Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics
- Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Wolff, Crusius, and Kant
- Chapter 2 The “Thorny Paths of Critique”
- Chapter 3 Ontology, Metaphysics, and Transcendental Philosophy
- Chapter 4 Things in Themselves, Transcendental Objects, and Monads
- Chapter 5 The 1781 Transcendental Deduction of the Pure Concepts of the Understanding
- Chapter 6 The Schematism of the Pure Understanding
- Chapter 7 Transcendental Reflection
- Chapter 8 Kant’s Projected System of Pure Reason
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index of Names
- Index of Subjects
Chapter 7 - Transcendental Reflection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 August 2020
- Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics
- Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Wolff, Crusius, and Kant
- Chapter 2 The “Thorny Paths of Critique”
- Chapter 3 Ontology, Metaphysics, and Transcendental Philosophy
- Chapter 4 Things in Themselves, Transcendental Objects, and Monads
- Chapter 5 The 1781 Transcendental Deduction of the Pure Concepts of the Understanding
- Chapter 6 The Schematism of the Pure Understanding
- Chapter 7 Transcendental Reflection
- Chapter 8 Kant’s Projected System of Pure Reason
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index of Names
- Index of Subjects
Summary
Chapter 7 analyzes the Appendix to the Transcendental Analytic entitled “On the Amphiboly of the Concepts of Reflection.” Using Leibniz’s monadology as a prism, Kant here seeks to account for the ultimate premises of his critique and intended reform of metaphysics. More specifically, the chapter conceives of this critique as a variety of transcendental reflection that is guided by four pairs of concepts, including sameness and difference. In order to contextualize this account, the chapter briefly discusses Wolff’s and Baumgarten’s treatment of these concepts. Commentators generally assume that the activity called transcendental reflection is carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason alone. The chapter argues, by contrast, that Kant distinguishes the version of transcendental reflection that informs the ontology of his predecessors from the critical version enacted in the Critique. On this basis, it outlines Kant’s understanding of the difference between a Leibnizian employment of the concepts of reflection and his own.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant's Reform of MetaphysicsThe <I>Critique of Pure Reason</I> Reconsidered, pp. 191 - 211Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020