Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:37:27.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2019

Edited by
Courtney D. Fugate
Courtney D. Fugate
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Lectures on Metaphysics
A Critical Guide
 , pp. 233 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaci, Uygar. 2008. “Kant’s theses on existence.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16(3): 559–93.Google Scholar
Abaci, Uygar. 2014. “Kant’s only possible argument and Chignell’s real harmony.” Kantian Review, 19(1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Adler, Hans. 1988. “Fundus animae – der Grund der Seele: Zur Gnoseologie des Dunklen in der Aufklärung.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, 62: 197–220.Google Scholar
Adler, Hans. 1990. Die Prägnanz des Dunklen: Gnoseologie, Ästhetik, Geschichtsphilosophie bei Herder. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. 2005. “Metaphysics as a transcendental science.” Questio, 5: 376–89.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. 2012. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Alexander, H. G. (ed.) The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 1982. Kant’s Theory of Mind. 2nd edition 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 1992. “The critique of metaphysics: Kant and traditional ontology.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–79.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier. 2005. “The Wolffian paradigm and its discontents: Kant’s containment definition of analyticity in historical context.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 87: 22–74.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier. 2015. The Poverty of Conceptual Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anselm, . 2000. Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises. Translated by Hopkins, Jasper and Richardson, Herbert. Minneapolis: Arthur J. Banning Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1997. The Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Vol. 1. Edited and annotated with an Introduction by Pegis, Anton C. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Arnoldt, Emil. 1892. “Characteristik von Kant’s Vorlesungen über Metaphysik und möglichst vollständiges Verzeichniss aller von ihm gehaltener oder auch nur angekündigter Vorlesungen.” Altpreussische Monatsschrift neue Folge, 29: 400–46, 465–564.Google Scholar
Audi, Paul. 2012. “Grounding: Toward a theory of the in-virtue-of relation.” Journal of Philosophy, 109(12): 685–711.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1998. The City of God against the Pagans. Translated by Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred. 1987. “Herder’s essay on being.” In: Herder Today. Edited by Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt. Berlin: De Gruyter, 126–37.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1757. Metaphysica. 4th edition. Halle.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1773. Acroasis logica. Edited by Tollnero, Joanne Gottlieb. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1964. Reflections on Aesthetics. Translated by Aschenbrenner, Karl and Holther, H.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1983. Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poem pertinentibus. Edited by Heinz Paetzold. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2007. Aesthetica/Ästhetik. Translated and edited by Mirbach, Dagmar, 2 vols. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2011. Metaphysica/Metaphysik. Translated and edited by Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2013. Metaphysics. A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. Translated and edited with an Introduction by Courtney, D. Fugate and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 1969. Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 1978. “Lambert and Hume on Kant’s Development.” In: Beck, Lewis White. Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven: Yale University Press, 101–10.Google Scholar
Birken-Bertsch, Hanno. 2006. Subreption und Dialektik bei Kant: Der Begriff des Fehlers der Erschleichung in der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Richard. 1961. “Christian Wolff’s doctrine of the soul.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 22: 339–54.Google Scholar
Bliss, R. and Trogdon, K. 2014. “Metaphysical Grounding.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, E. N.. URL= https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/grounding/.Google Scholar
Bock., 1846. “Was mir von dem Anfange der literarischen Laufbahn des verewigten Herder bekannt ist.” In: Herder, Emil Gottfried von (ed.) Johann Gottfried Herder’s Lebensbild. Erlangen: Bläsing, vol. 1, 133–6.Google Scholar
Boehm, Omri. 2014. Kant’s Critique of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, Omri. 2016. “The principle of sufficient reason, the ontological argument and the is/ought distinction.” European Journal of Philosophy, 24(3): 556–79.Google Scholar
Bonaccini, Juan A. 2015. “Kant’s account of miracles in his Lectures on Metaphysics.” In: Kant’s Lectures/Kant’s Vorlesungen. Edited by Dörflinger, Bernd, La Rocca, Claudio, Louden, Robert and Racan de Azevedo Marques, Ubirajara. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Borowski, L. E. 1912. Darstellung des Lebens und Charakters Immanuel Kants. In: Groß, Felix (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Sein Leben in Darstellungen von Zeitgenossen/ Die Biographien von L. E. Borowski, R. B. Jachmann und A. Ch. Wasianski. Berlin: Deutsche Bibliothek, 93ff.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. 1994. “Rousseau und Kants ‘Ich denke.’” In: Brandt, Reinhard, and Stark, Werner (eds.) Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte. Zu Edition, Amtsgeschäften und Werk Immanuel Kants, Hamburg: Meiner, 1–18.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1981. Kant’s Life and Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chance, Brian A. 2018a. “Pure Understanding, the Categories, and Kant’s Critique of Wolff.” In: Moran, Kate (ed.) Freedom and Spontaneity in Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30–47.Google Scholar
Chance, Brian A. 2018b. “Wolff’s Empirical Psychology and the Structure of the Transcendental Logic.” In: Dyck, C. and Wunderlich, F. (eds.) Kant and His German Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–34.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2009. “Kant, modality, and the most real being.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 91(2): 157–92.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2014. “Can Kantian laws be broken?” Res Philosophica, 91: 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. Forthcoming. “Leibniz and Kant on miracles: Rationalism, religion and the laws.” In: Look, Brandon (ed.) Leibniz and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. (ed.) 2015. Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix. 2012. “Kant’s ‘curious catalogue of human frailties’ and the great portrait of nature.” In: Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144–62.Google Scholar
Corr, Charles. 1972. “Christian Wolff’s treatment of scientific discovery.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10: 323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, Fabrice, and Schnieder, Benjamin (eds.) 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Correia, Fabrice. 2014. “Logical grounds.” The Review of Symbolic Logic, 7: 31–59.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. 1744. Ausführliche Abhandlung von dem rechten Gebrauche und der Einschränkung des sogenannten Satzes vom zureichenden oder besser determinierenden Grunde. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. 1745. Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten. Reprinted in: Crusius, Christian August. 1964. Die philosophischen Hauptwerke. Edited by Tonelli, Giorgio. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. 1747 . Weg zur Gewißheit und Zuverläßigkeit der menschlichen Erkenntniß. Reprinted in: Crusius, Christian August. 1964. Die philosophischen Hauptwerke. Edited by Tonelli, Giorgio. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, vol. 3.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. 1766. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den Zufälligen entgegen gesetzet werden. Leipzig.Google Scholar
De Boer, Karin, 2011. “Transformations of transcendental philosophy: Wolff, Kant, and Hegel.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 32 (1–2): 50–79.Google Scholar
De Boer, Karin, 2018. “Kant’s account of sensible concepts in the Inaugural Dissertation and the Critique of Pure Reason.” In: Waibel, Violetta and Ruffing, Margit (eds.) Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin: De Gruyter, 247–60.Google Scholar
Devaux, Michaël, and Lamanna, Marco. 2009. “The rise and early history of the term ontology (1606–1730).” Questio 9: 173–208.Google Scholar
Dobbek, Wilhelm. 1961. Herders Jugendzeit in Mohrungen und Königsberg 1744–1764. Würzburg: Holzner.Google Scholar
Dörflinger, Bernd, et al. (eds.) 2015. Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey. 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey. 2015. “Beyond the Parologisms: The proofs of immortality in the Lectures on Metaphysics.” In: Clewis, Robert R. (ed.) Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter, 115–34.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey. 2016. “Spontaneity before the Critical turn: The spontaneity of the mind in Crusius, the Pre-Critical Kant, and Tetens.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54: 625–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August, and Kant, Immanuel. 2016. Preparation for Natural Theology: With Kant’s Notes and the Danzig Rational Theology Transcript. Edited and translated with an introduction by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Ficara, Elena. 2006. Die Ontologie in der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 1994. “Essence and modality.” Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2001. “The question of realism.” Philosophers’ Imprint, 1(2): 1–30.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2012. “Guide to ground.” In: Fabrice, Correia and Schnieder, Benjamin (eds.) 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–80.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney D. 2014a. “Alexander Baumgarten on the principle of sufficient reason.” Philosophica – Revista Do Departamento de Filosofia da Faculdade de Letras de Lisboa, 44: 127–47.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney D. 2014b. The Teleology of Reason: A Study of the Structure of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney. 2015. “The unity of metaphysics in Kant’s lectures.” In: Clewis, Robert R. (ed.) Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter, 64–87.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney. 2019. “Kant’s world concept of philosophy and cosmopolitanism.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugate, Courtney and Hymers, John (eds.) 2018. Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaier, Ulrich. 1985. “Commentary.” In: Gaier, Ulrich (ed.) Johann Gottfried Herder: Frühe Schriften 1764–1772. Frankfurt: Deutsche Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Gawlick, Günter. 1983. “Christian Wolff und der Deismus.” In: Schneiders, Werner (ed.). Christian Wolff: 1679–1754. Interpretationen zu seiner Philosophie und deren Wirkung. Studien zum achtzehnten Jahrhundert, vol. 4. Hamburg: Meiner, 139–47.Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rudolph. 1613. Lexicon philosophicum. Frankfurt. Reprint 1964. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Gottsched, Johann Christoph. 1733. Erste Gründe der Gesamten Weltweisheit. Leipzig: Breitkopfen.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle. 2001. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gulyga, Arsenji. 1987. Immanuel Kant: His Life and Thought. Boston: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1991. “Mendelssohn and Kant: One source of the critical philosophy.” Philosophical Topic, 19: 119–52.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Original publication 1979: Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2003. “Beauty, freedom and morality: Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology and the development of his aesthetic theory.” In: Jacobs, Brian, and Kain, Patrick (eds.) Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–63. Reprinted in:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2018. “Baumgarten, Kant, and the refutation of idealism.” In: Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hahmann, A. Forthcoming. Crusius’ Critique of Wolffian Ontology and Cosmology. In: Hahmann, A. and Grunert, F. (eds.) Christian August Crusius (1715–1775). Philosophy between Reason and Revelation. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haym, Rudolf. 1954. Herder. 2 vols. Berlin: Aufbau.Google Scholar
Heimsoeth, H. 1966–1971. Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. 4 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion. 1994. Sensualistischer Idealismus: Untersuchungen zur Erkenntnistheorie des jungen Herder. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 1967. “Kants Denken 1762/3: Über den Ursprung der Unterscheidung analytischer und synthetischer Urteile.” In: Heimsoeth, Heinz, Henrich, Dieter and Tonelli, Giorgio (eds.) Studien zu Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Hildesheim: Olms, 9–38.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 1877–1913. Sämtliche Werke. 33 vols. Edited by Suphan, Bernhard. Berlin: Weidmann. Reprinted 1994. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 1985. “Versuch über das Sein.” In: Gaier, Ulrich (ed.) Johann Gottfried Herder: Frühe Schriften 1764–1772. Frankfurt: Deutsche Klassiker Verlag, 9–21.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 1977–1996. Briefe: Gesamtausgabe. 10 vols. Edited by Dobbek, Wilhelm and Arnold, Günter. Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 2002. “On the cognition and the sensation of the human soul.” In: Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . Herder: Philosophical Writings. Edited and translated by Forster, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–243.Google Scholar
Herz, Markus. 1773. “Ernst Platners Anthropologie für Ärzte und Weltweise. Leipzig, 1772.” Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek, 20: 25–51.Google Scholar
Heßbruggen-Walter, Stefan. 2014. “Putting our soul in place.” Kant Yearbook 6, 23–42.Google Scholar
Hettche, Matt. 2016. “Christian Wolff.” In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/wolff-christian/>..>Google Scholar
Hinske, Norbert. 1970. Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Hinske, Norbert. 1990. “Die tragende Grundideen der deutschen Aufkärung.” In: Ciafardone, Raffaele (ed.) Die Philosophie der deutschen Aufkärung. Stuttgart: Reclam, 407–58.Google Scholar
Hinske, Norbert. 1998. Zwischen Aufklärung und Vernunftkritik: Studien zum Kantischen Logikcorpus. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Hinske, Norbert. 2009. “Ontologie oder Analytik des Verstandes? Kants langer Abschied von der Ontologie.” Questio, 9: 303–9.Google Scholar
Hogan, Desmond. 2010. “Kant’s Copernican Turn and the Rationalist Tradition.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollmann, Samuel Christian. 1776. Zufällige Gedanken über verschiedene wichtige Materien. Sechste und Letzte Sammlung. Frankfurt, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, Ludger. 2003. “Metaphysics as a discipline: From the ‘Transcendental Philosophy of the Ancients’ to Kant’s notion of transcendental philosophy.” In: Friedman, Russell and Nielsen, Lauge (eds.) The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 53–74.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 2002. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense. Edited, with an introduction by Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C. 2011. “Is metaphysical grounding irreflexive?” The Monist, 94: 267–76.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1902–. Kants gesammelte Schriften. 29 vols. Issued by the Preuβischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (vols. 1–21), the deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften (vol. 23) and the Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (vols. 24–9). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. Bemerkungen in den “Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen. Edited by Rischmüller, Marie. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. Translated and edited by Walford, Daniel and Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. Translated and edited by Wood, Allen W and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Lectures on Metaphysics. Edited by Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve. Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood., Allen Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kanzian, Christian, 1993. “Kant und Crusius 1763.” Kant-Studien, 84(4): 399–407.Google Scholar
Kawamura, Katsutoshi. 1996. Spontaneität und Willkür. Der Freiheitsbegriff in Kants Antinomielehre und seine historischen Wurzeln. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Kim, Chan Won. 2004 . Der Begriff der Welt bei Wolff, Baumgarten, Crusius und Kant. Studien zur Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, Band 10. Edited by Hinske, Norbert. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 1996. Kants Philosophie des Subjekts. Systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Selbstbewußtsein und Selbsterkenntnis. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 1999. “Kants Wende zum Ich. Zum Einfluß von Herz und Mendelssohn auf die Entwicklung der kritischen Subjekttheorie.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 53: 507–29.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2018. “How is moral obligation possible? Kant’s principle of autonomy in historical context.” In: Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver (eds.) The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korcz, Keith. 2015. “The epistemic basing relation.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, E. N.. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/basing-epistemic/.Google Scholar
Krouglov, Alexei N. 2004. “Der Begriff transzendental bei J.N. Tetens. Historischer Kontext und Hintergründe.” Aufklärung. Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte, 16: 35–75.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 1987. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Lamanna, Marco. 2014. “Ontology between Goclenius and Suárez.” In: Novák, Lukáš (ed.) Suárez’s Metaphysics in Its Historical and Systematic Context. Berlin: De Gruyter, 135–51.Google Scholar
Laywine, Alison. 1993, Kant’s Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Gerhard. 1967. “Kants Entwicklung im Spiegel der Vorlesungen.” In: Heimsoeth, Heinz, Henrich, Dieter and Tonelli, Giorgio (eds.) Studien zu Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Hildesheim: Olms, 144–58.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1990. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and The Origin of Evil. Edited with an introduction by Farrer, Austin and translated by Huggard, E. M.. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Litland, Jon. 2013. “On Some counterexamples to the transitivity of grounding.” Essays in Philosophy, 14: 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1998. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Woolhouse, Roger. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 2001. “Kant’s deconstruction of the principle of sufficient reason.” The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 9(1): 67–87.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 2007. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Translated by Simek, Nicole J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorini, Gualtiero, 2013. “Die Rolle der Vorlesungen über Metaphysik in Kants stillem Jahrzehnt (1770–1781): Der Begriff Ontologie.” Estudos Kantianos, 1: 105–24.Google Scholar
Lorini, Gualtiero, 2015. “The contribution of Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics to a better comprehension of the architectonic.” In: Dörflinger, Bernd, et al. (eds.) Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 233–46.Google Scholar
Lorini, Gualtiero. 2015. “Kant’s metaphor by analogy between ontology and transcendental philosophy.” In: Kauark-Leite, Patricia, et al. (eds.) Kant and the Metaphors of Reason. Hildesheim: Olms, 71–85.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert. 2012. “National character via the beautiful and sublime?” In: Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198–216.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1752. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1755. Metaphysik. Vol. 1. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
Melamedoff, Damian. (Manuscript). “Ground in Kant’s New Elucidation.”Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. 1971–. Gesammelte Schriften: Jubiläumsausgabe. 35 vols. Edited by Altmann, Alexander, Brocke, Michael, Engel, Eva J. and Krochmalnik, Daniel. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. 2012. Morning Hours. In: Mendelssohn, Moses. Last Works. Translated by Rosenstock, Bruce. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. 2013. Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. 2017. “Caught between character and race: ‘Temperament’ in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology.” Australian Feminist Law Journal, 43: 125–44.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. 2018. “Kant and the skull collectors: German anthropology from Blumenbach to Kant.” In: Dyck, Corey and Wunderlich, Falk (eds.) Kant and his German Contemporaries, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 192–210.Google Scholar
Milz, Bernhard. 2014. “Kants Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs in entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Perspektive.” In: Puls, Heiko von (ed.) Kants Rechtfertigung des Sittengesetzes in Grundlegung III. Deduktion oder Faktum? Berlin: De Gruyter, 133–65.Google Scholar
Moledo, Fernando. 2016. “Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Kant-Studien, 107(3): 485–95.Google Scholar
Mora, José Ferrater. 1963. “On the early history of ‘ontology’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 24: 36–47.Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. 2000. “The metaphysics lectures in the Academy Edition of Kants Gesammelte Schriften.” In: Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner (eds.) Zustand und Zukunft der Akademie-Ausgabe von Kants Gesammelten Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter, 189–215.Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. 2015. “Reading Kant in Herder’s lecture notes.” In: Clewis, Robert R. Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter, 37–62.Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. 2018. Kant in the Classroom. URL = <http://users.manchester.edu/kant>..>Google Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 1992. “The transcendental aesthetic.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perin, Adriano. 2015. “The proof of the principle of sufficient reason: Wolff, Crusius and the Early Kant on the search for a foundation of metaphysics.” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 71(2/3): 515–29.Google Scholar
Platner, Ernst. 2000. Anthropologie für Ärzte und Weltweise. Originally published 1772. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Raven, Michael J. 2012. “In defence of ground.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90: 687–701.Google Scholar
Raven, Michael. J. 2015. “Ground.” Philosophy Compass, 10(5): 322–33.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 1980. “Christian Wolff’s prolegomena to empirical and rational psychology: Translation and commentary.” American Philosophical Society, 124: 22–239.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 2010. “Metaphysical dependence: Grounding and reduction.” In: Hale, Bob, and Hoffman, Aviv (eds.) Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–36.Google Scholar
Rosenkoetter, Timothy. 2010. “Absolute positing, the Frege anticipation thesis, and Kant’s definitions of judgment.” European Journal of Philosophy, 18(4): 539–66.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. 2005. The Gathering of Reason. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2009. “On what grounds what.” In: Chalmers, David, Manley, David and Wasserman, Ryan (eds.) Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–83.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2012. “Grounding, transitivity, and contrastivity.” In: Correia, Fabrice, and Schnieder, Benjamin (eds.) 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122–38.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter. 2005. Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens. 1999. Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens. 2011. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten – Ein Intellektuelles Porträt. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns. 1997. Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle by John Duns Scotus, Volume I: Books One–Five. Translated by Etzkorn, Girard J and Wolter, Allan B, OFM. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) 2012. Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smit, Houston. 2009. “Kant on a priority and the spontaneity of cognition.” In: Newlands, Samuel, and Jorgenson, Larry (eds.) Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 188–251.Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas. 2016. Kant’s Modal Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1984. “Kritische Fragen und Anmerkungen zu einem neuen Band der Akademie-Ausgabe von Kant’s Vorlesungen.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 38: 292–310.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1985. “Antwort auf die Erwiderung ‘Zum Streit um die Akademie-Ausgabe Kants’ von G. Lehmann.” Zeitschrift für philosophisches Forschung, 39: 630–3.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1995. “Kant als akademischer Lehrer.” In: Königsberg und Riga. Edited by Ischreyt, Heinz. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 51–68.Google Scholar
Sturm, Thomas. 2009. Kant und die Wissenschaften vom Menschen. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
Suphan, Bernhard. 1872. “Herder als Schüler Kants.” Zeitschrift für deutsche Philosophie, 4: 225–37.Google Scholar
Tahko, Tuomas. 2013. “Truth-grounding and transitivity.” Thought, 2: 332–40.Google Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nikolaus. 1775. Über die allgemeine spekulativische Philosophie. Bützow:, Berger und Boednerschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nikolaus. 1775. Über die allgemeine spekulativische Philosophie. Bützow:, Berger und Boednerschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nikolaus. 1777. Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung. 2 vols. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erben und Reich.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. 1966. “Die Anfänge von Kants Kritik der Kausalbeziehungen und ihre Voraussetzungen im 18. Jahrhundert.” Kant-Studien, 57: 417–60.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. 1976. “Analysis and synthesis in XVIIIth century philosophy prior to Kant.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 20: 178–213.Google Scholar
Uebele, Wilhelm. 1911. Johann Nicolaus Tetens nach seiner Gesamtentwicklung betrachtet, mit besonderer Berücksichtingung des Verhältnisses zu Kant. Berlin: Reuther and Reichard.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 1995. “Kant’s theory of physical influx.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 77: 286–324.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2001. “Kant on rational cosmology.” In: Watkins, Eric (ed.) Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 70–91.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2004. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2006. “On the necessity and nature of simples: Leibniz, Wolff and Baumgarten, and the Pre-Critical Kant.” In: Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven (eds.) Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy. Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 261–314.Google Scholar
Westlinning, Margot. 1995. “Der junge Herder in Königsberg.” In: Ischreyt, Heinz (ed.) Königsberg und Riga. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 69–86.Google Scholar
Wilson, Holly. 2006. Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology: Its Origin, Meaning, and Critical Significance. Albany: SUNY University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jessica M. 2014. “No work for a theory of grounding.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 57(5–6): 535–79.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1710. Anfangs-Gründe aller mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 1. Halle: Rengerische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1719. Vernunftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt, und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1728. Philosophia rationalis sive logica. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1736. Philosophia prima sive ontologia. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1737a. Cosmologia generalis. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1737b. Theologia naturalis. Vol. 2. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1740. Philosophia rationalis sive logica. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1741. Vernünfftige Gedancken von den Absichten der natürlichen Dinge. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1744. Natürliche Gottesgelahrheit nach beweisender Lehrart abgefasset. Part 2, vol. 1. Translated by Hagen, Gottlieb Friedrich. Halle (Saale): Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1747. Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1754. Vernünfftige Gedancken von den Kräfften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkäntnis der Wahrheit. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1770. Logic, or Rational Thoughts on the Powers of the Human Understanding; with Their Use and Application in the Knowledge and Search of Truth. London: Printed for Hawes, Clarke, and Collins.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1936. Philosophia prima sive ontologia, methodo scientifica pertractata qua omnis cognitionis humanae principia continentur. Revised edition. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1963. Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General. Translated by Blackwell, Richard. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1996. Discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere. Einleitende Abhandlung über Philosophie im allgemeinen. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Edited by Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 2005. Erste Philosophie oder Ontologie: Lateinisch-Deutsch. Translated and edited by Effertz, Dirk. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. 1991a. “Kant’s Deism.” In: Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Edited by Rossi, Philip J and Wreen, Michael J. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. 1991b. “Unsocial sociability: The anthropological basis of Kantian ethics.” Philosophical Topics, 19: 325–51.Google Scholar
Wuerth, Julian. 2010. “The paralogisms of pure reason.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210–44.Google Scholar
Wuerth, Julian. 2014. Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. Michael. 1992. “Translator’s introduction.” In: Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by Young, J. Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xv–xxxii.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 127–46.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 2017. “Herder between Reimarus and Tetens.” In Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology. Edited by Waldow, Anik and Nigel, DeSouza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 2018. The Gestation of German Biology: Philosophy and Physiology from Stahl to Schelling. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zelanzy, Miroslaw, and Stark, Werner. 1987. “Zu Kryzstof Celestyn Mrongovius und seinen Kollegheften nach Kant’s Vorlesungen.” Kant-Forschungen, 1: 279–92.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günther. 2001. “‘Die Seele des Systems’: Systembegriff und Begriffssystem in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie.” In: Fulda, Hans Friedrich and Stolzenberg, Jürgen (eds.) Architektonik und System in der Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner, 54–72.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Courtney D. Fugate, American University of Beirut
  • Book: Kant's <I>Lectures on Metaphysics</I>
  • Online publication: 17 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819142.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Courtney D. Fugate, American University of Beirut
  • Book: Kant's <I>Lectures on Metaphysics</I>
  • Online publication: 17 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819142.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Courtney D. Fugate, American University of Beirut
  • Book: Kant's <I>Lectures on Metaphysics</I>
  • Online publication: 17 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819142.012
Available formats
×