Book contents
- ASCL Studies In Comparative Law
- Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Advances in Lay Participation
- Part II Enduring Systems of Lay Participation
- 7 “… And My Right”
- 8 “In the Name of the People”
- 9 The Jury in Canada
- Part III Challenges to Lay Participation in Law
- Part IV Global Perspectives on Lay Participation
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
7 - “… And My Right”
The Magistrates’ Courts in England and Wales
from Part II - Enduring Systems of Lay Participation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2021
Book contents
- ASCL Studies In Comparative Law
- Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Advances in Lay Participation
- Part II Enduring Systems of Lay Participation
- 7 “… And My Right”
- 8 “In the Name of the People”
- 9 The Jury in Canada
- Part III Challenges to Lay Participation in Law
- Part IV Global Perspectives on Lay Participation
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Lay magistrates are involved in most of the criminal cases in England and Wales. They typically sit in panels, but in minor cases they sit as single decision-makers. In both situations, they are assisted by a legal adviser. Lay magistrates also hear appeals as part of a mixed court presided over by a professional judge. Lay magistrates are more diverse in personal characteristics than professional judges, but the level of commitment required results in an overrepresentation of older, middle-class people. The lay magistrate is defined by law, professional work patterns, budget constraints, and the traditional legal culture. In addition, the architecture of the courtroom, as well as the use of video links, often impedes interaction between lay magistrates and defendants. These constraints at times threaten justice and procedural fairness. The number of lay magistrates has been declining for years. To dispose of cases more quickly, professional judges have taken a slice of the caseload. A different work pattern can be found at the youth court where magistrates engage actively with the defendant and are not confined to a narrow decision-making function.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed CourtsA Global Perspective, pp. 131 - 151Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Ames, A., Szyndler, R., Burston, K., Phillips, R. Keith, J., Gaunt, R., Davies, S., & Mottram, C. (2011). The strengths and skills of the judiciary in the magistrates’ courts. London: Ministry of Justice/Ipsos Mori.Google Scholar
Bowcott, O., & Duncan, P. (2019, January 17). Half of magistrates’ courts in England and Wales closed since 2010. Guardian. www.theguardian.com/law/2019/jan/27/half-of-magistrates-courts-in-england-and-wales-closed-since-tories-electedGoogle Scholar
Bundesamt für Justiz [Federal Office of Justice (Ger.)]. (2016). Zahl der richter, richterinnen, staatsanwälte, staatsanwältinnen und vertreter, vertreterinnen des ӧffentlichen interesses in der Rechtspflege der Bundesrepublik Deutschland am 31. Dezember 2014 [Number of judges, public prosecutors, and representatives of public interest in the administration of justice in the Federal Republic of Germany on December 31, 2014]. www.bundesjustizamt.de/DE/SharedDocs/Publikationen/Justizstatistik/Gesamtstatistik.pdf?__blob=publicationFileGoogle Scholar
Cammiss, S., & Cunningham, S. K. (2015). Swift and sure justice? Mode of trial for causing death by driving offences. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15, 321–339.Google Scholar
Carlile, Alex, Lord of Berriew (2014). Independent parliamentarians’ inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the youth court. http://michaelsieff-foundation.org.uk/content/inquiry_into_the_operation_and_effectiveness_of_the_youth_court-uk-carlile-inquiry.pdfGoogle Scholar
Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (UK). (n.d.-a). District judge (magistrates’ courts). www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/who-are-the-judiciary/judicial-roles/judges/district-judge-mags-ct/Google Scholar
Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (UK). (n.d.-b). Magistrates. www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/who-are-the-judiciary/judicial-roles/magistrates/Google Scholar
Cownie, F., Bradney, A., & Burton, M. (2013). English legal system in context. 6th ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, P. (1999). A comment on the powers of magistrates’ clerks. Criminal Law Review, May, 377–386.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, P.(2017). Darbyshire on the English legal system. 12th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S. (1990). Revising images of public punitiveness: Sentencing by lay and professional English magistrates. Law and Social Inquiry, 15, 191–221.Google Scholar
Donoghue, J. C. (2014). Reforming the role of magistrates: Implications for summary justice in England and Wales. Modern Law Review, 77, 928–963.Google Scholar
Gibb, F. (2018, July 12). Dwindling number of magistrates. Sunday Times. www.thetimes.co.uk/article/dwindling-number-of-magistrates-sm9wr8tjzGoogle Scholar
Gov.UK. (2019). Work out who qualifies for criminal legal aid. www.gov.uk/guidance/work-out-who-qualifies-for-criminal-legal-aidGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., & Moore, C. (2006). Beyond welfare versus justice: Juvenile justice in England and Wales. In Junger-Tas, J & Decker, S. H. (Eds.), International handbook of juvenile justice (pp. 65–92). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Green, C., Sprott, J. B., Madon, N. S., & Jung, M. (2010). Punishing processes in youth court: Procedural justice, court atmosphere and youths’ views of the legitimacy of the justice system. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52, 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, V., & Machura, S. (1995). Procedural justice at German courts as seen by defendants and juvenile prisoners. Social Justice Research, 8, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, A. (2004). Mode of trial and the influence of local justice. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 65–78.Google Scholar
Holvast, N. (2016). The power of the judicial assistant/law clerk: Looking behind the scenes at courts in the United States, England and Wales, and the Netherlands. International Journal for Court Administration, 7, 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley-Binns, R., & Martin, J. (2010). Unlocking the English legal system. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Independent Commission on Youth Crime and Antisocial Behaviour. (2010). Time for a new hearing. A comparative study of alternative criminal proceedings for children and young people. London: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Kutnjak Ivković, S. (1999). Lay participation in criminal trials: The case of Croatia. Lanham, MD: Austin & Winfield.Google Scholar
Lauermann, A. (1987). Strafrechtspflege am englischen Magistrates’ Court [Administration of justice at the English magistrates’ court]. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Machura, S. (2001). Fairneß und legitimität [Fairness and legitimacy]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Machura, S.(2016a). Civil justice: Lay judges in the EU countries. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6(2).Google Scholar
Machura, S.(2016b). Understanding the German mixed tribunal. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 36, 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magistrates Association. (2016). Written evidence from the Magistrates Association. http://data.parliament.uk/WrittenEvidence/CommitteeEvidence.svc/EvidenceDocument/Justice/Role%20of%20the%20magistracy/written/27965.htmlGoogle Scholar
McConville, M., Hodgson, J., Bridges, L., & Pavlovic, A. (2013). Standing accused. Reprint. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Millie, A., Tombs, J., & Hough, M. (2007). Borderline sentencing. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Justice (UK). (2013). Youth justice: Seventh report of session 2012–13 (Vol. 1). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (UK).(2016). Review of the youth justice system. An interim report of emerging findings. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (UK).(2018a). Criminal justice statistics quarterly, England and Wales, September 2016 to September 2017 (provisional). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/681336/criminal-justice-statistics-quarterly-sept-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Justice (UK).(2018b). Judicial diversity statistics 2018. www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/judicial-diversity-statistics-2018–1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R., & Russell, N. (n.d.). The judiciary in the magistrates’ courts. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.629.5296&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar
Newman, D. (2012). Still standing accused: Addressing the gap between work and talk in firms of criminal justice lawyers. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 19, 3–27.Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics (UK). (2012). Ethnicity and national identity in England and Wales: 2011. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/articles/ethnicityandnationalidentityinenglandandwales/2012–12-11Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics (UK).(2017). Crime in England and Wales: Bulletin tables. Year ending June 2017. Table 1. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/crimeinenglandandwalesbulletintablesGoogle Scholar
Office of National Statistics (UK).(2018). Population estimates. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimatesGoogle Scholar
Robin-D’Cruz, C., & Whitehead, S. (2019). Pre-court diversion for adults: An evidence briefing. London: Centre for Justice Innovation. https://justiceinnovation.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/2019–06/cji_pre-court_diversion_d.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rossner, M., Tait, D., McKimmie, B., & Sarre, R. (2017). The dock on trial: Courtroom design and the presumption of innocence. Journal of Law and Society, 44, 317–344.Google Scholar
Sherwin, R. K. (2000). When the law goes pop: The vanishing line between law and popular culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office (Ger.)]. (2019). Bevölkerungsstand [Population statistics]. www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/Bevoelkerungsstand.htmlGoogle Scholar
Stone, N. (2017). Sentencing children: Overarching principles revisited. Youth Justice, 17, 171–180.Google Scholar
Sturge, G. (2018). Court statistics for England and Wales. London: House of Commons Library. http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8372/CBP-8372.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tarling, R. (2006). Sentencing practice in magistrates’ courts revisited. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 29–41.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Ely, C., & Estep, B. (2018). A fairer way: Procedural fairness for young adults in court. London: Centre for Justice Innovation.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, J. (2015). Transforming “summary justice” through police-led prosecution and virtual courts: Is procedural due process undermined? British Journal of Criminology, 55, 341–358.Google Scholar
Ward, J.(2017). Transforming summary justice: Modernisation in the lower criminal courts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Welsh, L. (2013). Are magistrates’ courts really a “law free zone”? Participant observation and specialist use of language. Papers from the British Criminology Conference, 13, 3–16.Google Scholar
Welsh, L.(2017). The effects of changes to legal aid on lawyers’ professional identity and behaviour in summary criminal cases: A case study. Journal of Law and Society, 44, 559–585.Google Scholar