Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:04:18.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2021

Robert Morstein-Marx
Robert Morstein-Marx
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Julius Caesar and the Roman People , pp. 647 - 674
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adcock, F. E. 1956. Caesar as Man of Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. 1990. Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Toronto.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. 2002. The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Alföldi, A. 1985. Caesar in 44 v. Chr. Vol. 1: Studien zu Caesars Monarchie und ihren Wurzeln. Bonn.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, A. G., and Bruner, J.. 2000. Minding the Law. Cambridge and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J., and Nisbet, R. G. M.. 1979. “Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm.” JRS 69: 125–155.Google Scholar
Andreau, J. 1999. Banking and Business in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Angius, A. 2014. “Le fonti dell’opinione pubblica nella tarda Repubblica Romana.” Diss. U. Roma III.Google Scholar
Angius, A. 2015. “Graffiti e pamphlet. Lessico e sociologia di un fenomeno politico.” BIDR 109: 247–277.Google Scholar
Angius, A. 2018. La Repubblica delle opinioni. Informazione politica e partecipazione popolare a Roma tra II e I secolo a. C. Milan.Google Scholar
Arena, V. 2012. Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ashrafian, H., and Galassi, F. M.. 2016. Julius Caesar’s Disease: A New Diagnosis. South Yorkshire.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. 1958. The lex annalis before Sulla. Coll. Latomus 32. Brussels.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E 1967. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. 1960. Cicero: Pro M. Caelio Oratio. 3rd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1959. “The Early Career of A. Gabinius (cos. 58 BC).” Philologus 103: 87–99.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1964. Studies in Greek and Roman History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1968. Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1972. “Tiberius Gracchus and the Roman Revolution.” ANRW 1.1: 668–731.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1974. “The Attempt to Try Caesar.” In Evans, J. A. S (ed.), Polis and imperium. Studies in Honour of Edward Togo Salmon. Amsterdam. 145–166.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1977. “Mamurra’s Fourth Fortune.” CPh 72: 320–322.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1990. Rev. of Meier, Caesar. Gnomon 62: 22–39.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 2009. “From the Iulii to Caesar.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 11–22.Google Scholar
Baehr, P. 1998. Caesar and the Fading of the Roman World: A Study in Republicanism and Caesarism. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1939. “Consular Provinces under the Late Republic – II. Caesar’s Gallic Command.” JRS 29: 167–183.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1962. “Roman History, 65–50 B.C.: Five Problems.” JRS 52: 134–141.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1967. Rev. of Dobesch, Caesars Apotheose. Gnomon 39: 150–156.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1967a. Julius Caesar: A Political Biography. New York.Google Scholar
Bardt, C. 1910. “Die Übergabe des Schwertes an Pompeius im December 50 v. Chr.” Hermes 45: 337–346.Google Scholar
Barwick, K. 1938. Caesars Commentarii und das Corpus Caesarianum. Mainz.Google Scholar
Bastien, J.-L. 2007. Le triomphe romain et son utilisation politique à Rome aux trois derniers siècles de la république. Rome.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. 1991. “A Narrative Gestalt and the Force of Caesar’s Style.” Mnemosyne 44: 126–136.Google Scholar
Batstone, W., and Damon, C.. 2006. Caesar’s Civil War. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. A. 1963. A Study of the Crimen Maiestatis Imminutae in the Roman Republic. Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. 2005. The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal. Natural History Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2007. The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Beard, M., and Crawford., M. 1985. Rome in the Late Republic: Problems and Interpretations. London. 2nd ed. 1999.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S.. 1998. Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bearzot, C. 2000. “Cesare e Corinto.” In Urso, G (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome. 35–53.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 2005. Karriere und Hierarchie. Die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des cursus honorum in der mittleren Republik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. (eds.) 2011. Consuls and Res Publica. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellemore, J. 2005. “Cato’s Opposition to Caesar in 59 B.C.” In Welch, K and Hillard, T (eds.), Roman Crossings. Swansea. 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneker, J. 2011. “The Crossing of the Rubicon and the Outbreak of Civil War in Cicero, Lucan, Plutarch, and Suetonius.” Phoenix 65: 74–99.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. 2003–2012. “Roman Dates.” www.instonebrewer.com/TyndaleSites/Egypt/ptolemies/chron/roman/roman_civil.htm. [Accessed February 13, 2021.]Google Scholar
Bennett, M. 2006. Oliver Cromwell. London and New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., and Feldman, M. S.. 1981. Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 2010. Der Kranz des Kaisers. Genese und Bedeutung einer römischen Insignie. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Bernstein, F. 1998. Ludi publici. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Historia Einzelschriften 119. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. 1996. Cicero: Pro P. Sulla Oratio. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bicknell, P., and Nielsen., D 1998. “Five Cohorts against the World.” In Deroux, C (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History IX. Collection Latomus 244. Brussels. 138–166.Google Scholar
Billows, R. 2009. Julius Caesar: The Colossus of Rome. London.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2015. “Why All the Fuss? The Many Aspects of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.” In Peterson, M (ed.), The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Cambridge. 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleicken, J. 1998. “Gedanken zum Untergang der römischen Republik.” Gesammelte Schriften 2 (Stuttgart): 683–704.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der. 2016. Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, H. van der, Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.) 2018. Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. 2016. “Provincial Commands and Money in the Late Roman Republic.” In Beck, H., Jehne, M., and Serrati, J. (eds.), Money and Power in the Roman Republic. Coll. Latomus v. 355. Brussels. 68–81.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. 1953. “Der Commentarius: Zur Vorgeschichte und literarischen Form der Schriften Caesars.” Hermes 81: 210–250.Google Scholar
Bonnefond-Coudry, M. 1989. Le sénat de la République romaine de la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste. Pratiques délibératives et prise de décision. Rome.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1972. “Asinius Pollio and Augustus.” Historia 21: 441–473.Google Scholar
Botermann, H. 1989. “Cato und die sogenannte Schwertübergabe im Dezember 50 v. Chr. Ein übersehenes Zeugnis für die Vorgeschichte des Bürgerkrieges (Sen. ep. mor. 14, 12 f.; 95.69 f; 104, 29–33).” Hermes 117: 62–85.Google Scholar
Botermann, H. 1989a. “Denkmodelle am Vorabend des Bürgerkrieges (Cic. Att. 7.9): Handelsspielraum oder unausweichliche Notwendigkeit?” Historia 38: 410–430.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. J. D.. 2002. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. 2009. Seneca, de Clementia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. 2012. “The Anger of Tyrants and the Forgiveness of Kings.” In Griswold, C. L. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Cambridge. 79–96.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. 2000. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brind’Amour, P. 1983. Le Calendrier Romain. Recherches Chronologiques. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. 2008. A Commentary on Livy, Books 38–40. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brooks, P., and Gewirtz, P. D.. 1996. Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. New Haven.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. 1946. “Notes on Roman Magistrates.” TAPhA 77: 35–43.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. 1948. “More Notes on Roman Magistrates.” TAPhA 79: 63–78.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. 1991. “Candidates Defeated in Roman Elections: Some Ancient Roman ‘Also Rans.’” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 81.4.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H. 1978. Caesar und die römische Oberschicht in den Jahren 49–44. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 1957. “Three Passages from Asconius.” CR 71: 193–195.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 1971. Social Conflicts in the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 1971a. Italian Manpower: 225 B.C.–A.D. 14. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 1979. “Laus Imperii.” In Garnsey, P. D. A. and Whittaker (eds.), C. R, Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge. 159–191.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 1986. “Cicero’s Officium in the Civil War.” JRS 76: 12–32.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 1988. The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. 2018. “Reconstructing Republican Oratory in Cassius Dio’s Roman History.” In Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford. 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, H. E., and Cary, M.. 1924. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio ad Senatum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E., and Cary, M. 1927/1982. Suetonius: Divus Iulius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Buttrey, T. V. 2015. “Caesar at Play: Some Preparations for the Parthian Campaign, 44 BCE.” JAH 3: 220–241.Google Scholar
Cadario, M. 2006. “Le statue di Cesare a Roma tra il 46 e il 44 a.C.: la celebrazione della vittoria e il cofronto con Alessandro e Romolo.” Acme 59: 25–70.Google Scholar
Cairns, F., and Fantham, E. (eds.) 2003. Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 2007. Julius Caesar: The Life and Times of the People’s Dictator. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cape, R. 1995. “The Rhetoric of Politics in Cicero’s Fourth Catilinarian.” AJPh 116: 255–277.Google Scholar
Cape, R. 2002. “Cicero’s Consular Speeches.” In May, J. M (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden. 113–158.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. 1911. On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. Ed. Wherry, by G.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carsana, C. 2007. Commento storico al libro II delle Guerre Civili di Appiano (parte I). Pisa.Google Scholar
Carter, J. M. 1991. Julius Caesar: The Civil War, Books I & II. Warminster.Google Scholar
Carter, J. M. 1993. Julius Caesar: The Civil War, Book III. Warminster.Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A. 1994. “Note alla In Pisonem di Cicerone.” MD 33: 157–176.Google Scholar
Chrissanthos, S. 2001. “Caesar and the Mutiny of 47 B.C.” JRS 91: 63–75.Google Scholar
Chrissanthos, S. 2019. The Year of Julius and Caesar: 59 BC and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Christ, K. 1974. “Caesar und Ariovistus.” Chiron 4: 251–292.Google Scholar
Christ, K. 1994. Caesar. Annäherungen an einen Diktator. Munich.Google Scholar
Clarendon, Edward Hyde, Earl of, 1857. The Life of Edward, Earl of Clarendon, in Which Is Included a Continuation of His History of the Grand Rebellion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, C. 2013. The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. New York.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1992. Il Foro Romano: periodo arcaico. 3rd ed. Rome.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1992a. Il Foro Romano: periodo repubblicano e augusteo. 2nd ed. Rome.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1997. Il Campo Marzio dalle origini alla fine della Repubblica. Rome.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 2013. Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Collins, J. H. 1972. “Caesar as Political Propagandist.” ANRW 1. 1: 922–966.Google Scholar
Conroy, J. 2014. Our One Common Country: Abraham Lincoln and the Hampton Roads Peace Conference of 1865. Guildford, CT.Google Scholar
Cornwell, H. 2018. Rev. of Wiseman 2016, Mouritsen 2017, and Haake and Harders (eds.) 2017. JRS 108: 200–202.Google Scholar
Cordier, P. 1994. “M. Caelius Rufus, le préteur récalcitrant.” MEFRA 106: 533–577.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) 2014. Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Costa-García, J. M. 2018. “Rediscovering the Roman Conquest of the North-western Iberian Peninsula.” In Fernández-Götz, M. and Roymans, N. (eds.), Conflict Archaeology: Materialities of Collective Violence from Prehistory to Late Antiquity. London and New York. 141–151.Google Scholar
Courrier, C. 2014. La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin de IIe siècle av. J.-C.-fin du Ier siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar
Craig, C. 1986. “Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena.” TAPhA 116: 229–239.Google Scholar
Craig, C. 2004. “Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof.” In Powell, J. and Patterson (eds.), J., Cicero the Advocate. Oxford. 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. 1994. M. Tullius Cicero, the Fragmentary Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. 1976. “Hamlet without the Prince” (rev. of Gruen 1974). JRS 66: 214–217.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. 1989. “The lex Iulia Agraria.” Athenaeum 67: 179–190.Google Scholar
Cristofoli, R. 2011. Cicerone e l’ultima vittoria di Cesare. Analisi storica del XIV libro delle Epistole ad Attico. Bari.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 2018. Studies on the text of Caesar’s Bellum civile. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Damon, C., and Mackay, C.. 1995. “On the Prosecution of C. Antonius in 76 BC.” Historia 44: 37–55.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. 1992. Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la république romaine. Rome.Google Scholar
Davies, P. J. E. 2017. Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Libero, L. 1992. Obstruktion. Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik (70–49 v. Chr.), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
De Libero, L. 1998. “Der Raub des Staatsschatzes durch Caesar.” Klio 80: 111–133.Google Scholar
De Ligt, L. 2012. Peasants, Citizens, and Soldiers: Studies in the Demographic History of Roman Italy, 225 BC–AD 100. Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Ligt, L., and Northwood, S. (eds.) 2008. People, Land, and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 BC–AD 14. Boston.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. 1947. Inscriptiones Italiae 13/1: Fasti Consulares et Triumphales. Rome.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, M. H. 1992. Perdita Iuventus. Zwischen den Generationen von Caesar und Augustus. Munich.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. E. 1914. “The Year of Caesar’s Birth.” TAPhA 45: 17–28.Google Scholar
Devillers, O., and Sion-Jenkis, K. (eds.) 2012. César sous Auguste. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Dighton, A. 2017. “Mutatio Vestis: Clothing and Political Protest in the Late Roman Republic.” Phoenix 71: 345–369.Google Scholar
Dobesch, E. 1966. Caesars Apotheose zu Lebzeiten und sein Ringen um den Königstitel. Untersuchungen über Caesars Alleinherrschaft. Vienna.Google Scholar
Dobesch, E. 1980. Die Kelten in Österreich nach den ältesten Berichten der Antike. Vienna.Google Scholar
Dobesch, E. 1994. “Zur Chronologie des Dakerkönigs Burebista.” In Göbl, R. (ed.), Die Hexadrachmenprägung der Gross-Boier. Vienna. 51–68.Google Scholar
Dobesch, E. 1998. “Der Weltreichsgedanke bei Caesar.” In L’ecumenismo politico nella coscienza dell’occidente. Rome. 195–263.Google Scholar
Dobesch, E. 2000. “Caesars monarchische Ideologie.” In Urso, G (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome. 89–123.Google Scholar
Dobesch, E. 2001. Ausgewählte Schriften. Cologne.Google Scholar
Dowling, M. B. 2006. Clemency and Cruelty in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Driediger-Murphy, L. G. 2018. “Falsifying the Auspices in Republican Politics.” In van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge. 183–202.Google Scholar
Driediger-Murphy, L. G. 2019. Roman Republican Augury. Freedom and Control. Oxford.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. 2015. Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. 2019. Cato the Younger: Life and Death at the End of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Drumann, W., and Groebe, P.. 1906. Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von der republikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung. Vol. 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. 1978. “Some Observations on the Order of Consuls’ Names.” Athenaeum 56: 80–108.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. 1994. Rev. of Libero, Obstruktion.CR 44: 123–124.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. 1995. Law, Politics and Power: Sallust and the Execution of the Catilinarian Conspirators. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. 1999. “Tribunes and Tribunician Programs in 63 B.C.” Athenaeum 87: 121–167.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. 2013. “C. Asinius Pollio.” In Cornell, T. J. (ed.), Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 vols. Oxford. 1 :430–435.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2013. “Cicero and the Politics of Ambiguity: Interpreting the Pro Marcello.” In Steel, C and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 211–225.Google Scholar
Duplá, A., Fatás, G., and Pina, F.. 1994. Rem publicam restituere: una propuesta popularis para la crisis republicana: las Epistulae ad Caesarem de Salustio. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 2008. Cicero: Catilinarians. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dyer, R. R. 1990. “Rhetoric and Intention in Cicero’s Pro Marcello.” JRS 80: 17–30.Google Scholar
Dyson, S. L. 1985. The Creation of the Roman Frontier. Princeton.Google Scholar
Dyson, S. L. 2010. Rome. A Living Portrait of an Ancient City. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Dzino, D. 2010. Illyricum in Roman Politics, 229 BC–AD 68. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eberle, L. P. 2018. Rev. of Hölkeskamp 2017. JRS 108: 204–205.Google Scholar
Ebert, C. 1909. Über die Entstehung von Caesars “Bellum Gallicum.” Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. 1987. Senate and General: Individual Decision-Making and Roman Foreign Relations, 264–194. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, C. 1987. “Caesar’s First Triumph?” Prudentia 19: 50–58.Google Scholar
Elkins, N. T. 2007. Rev. of Hölkeskamp 2004. JRS 97: 268–270.Google Scholar
Elster, M. 2003. Die Gesetze der mittleren römischen Republik: Text und Kommentar. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. 2001. Troy between Greece and Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. D. 1990. “Statues of the Kings and Brutus on the Capitoline.” Opuscula Romana 18: 99–105.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. 1994. Gaius Marius: A Political Biography. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Farney, G. 2007. Ethnic Identity and Aristocratic Competition in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feig Vishnia, R. 1996. State, Society, and Popular Leaders in Mid-Republican Rome: 241–167 B.C. London.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. 1997. “Virtual History: Towards a ‘Chaotic’ Theory of the Past.” In Ferguson, N. (ed.), Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. London. 1–90.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. 1999. The Pity of War. London.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. 2006. “Political Risk and the International Bond Market between the 1848 Revolution and the Outbreak of the First World War.” Economic History Review 59: 70–112.Google Scholar
Fernández-Götz, M., and Roymans, N. (eds.) 2018. Conflict Archaeology: Materialities of Collective Violence from Prehistory to Late Antiquity. London and New York.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1988. “Rogatio Servilia Agraria.” Athenaeum 66: 141–164.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1996. “Princeps legis et adscriptores: la collégialité des magistrats romains dans la procedure de proposition des lois.” RevPhil 70: 217–246.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 2010. “À propos des pouvoirs et des honneurs décernés à César entre 48 et 44.” In Urso, G (ed.), Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa. 9–30.Google Scholar
Fezzi, L. 1997. “Lex Clodia de iure et tempore legum rogandarum.” Studi Classici e Orientali 45: 297–328.Google Scholar
Fezzi, L. 2019. Crossing the Rubicon: Caesar’s Decision and the Fate of Rome. Tr. R. Dixon. New Haven.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 1985. “Caesar und die Helvetier.” Bonner Jahrbücher 185: 1–26.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 2004. “Caesars strategische Planung für Gallien. Zum Verhältnis von Darstellung und Wirklichkeit.” In Heftner, H and Tomaschitz, K (eds.), Ad Fontes! Festschrift G. Dobesch. Vienna. 305–315.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 2009. “Caesars Griff nach Gallien.” Klio 91: 435–442.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 1995. “Entscheidung und Konsens. Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs.” In Jehne, M. (ed.), Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Stuttgart. 77–127.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 2002. Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Flamerie de Lachapelle, G. 2011. Clementia. Recherches sur la notion de clémence à Rome, du début du Ier siècle a.C. à la mort d’Auguste. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2010. Roman Republics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2013. “Beyond the Contio: Political Communication in the Tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus.” In Steel, C and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 85–100.Google Scholar
Foxley, R. 2013. “Democracy in 1659: Harrington and the Good Old Cause.” In Taylor, S. and Tapsell (eds.), G., The Nature of the English Revolution Revisited. Woodbridge. 175–196.Google Scholar
Fränkel, E. 1956. “Eine Form römischer Kriegsbulletins.” Eranos 54: 189–194.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M. W. 1966. “Caesar, Cicero and the Problem of Debt.” JRS 56: 128–141.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1967. Appiani Bellorum civilium liber primus. 2nd ed. Florence.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, L. 2011. Cesare, Pompeo e la lotta per le magistrature, anni 52–50 a.C. Milan.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P. 2014. “Il poeta, Cesare, il trionfo.” Papyrologica Lupiensia 23: 31–52.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. 2018. Telling It Like It Wasn’t: The Counterfactual Imagination in History and Fiction. Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. F. 2009. “The Dictator.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 57–71.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. 2011. Who’s In Charge? New York.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. 1963. “Die lex Vatinia de imperio Caesaris.” Kleine Schriften 2: 206–228. (= Hermes 63 [1928] 113–137.)Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. 1968. Caesar: Politician and Statesman. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. 2008. Caesar: Der Politiker und Staatsmann. New ed. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gentles, I. J. 2011. Oliver Cromwell: God’s Warrior and the English Revolution. Basingstoke and New York.Google Scholar
Gesche, H. 1976. Caesar. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2006. “Reckoning with Tyranny: Greek Thoughts on Caesar in Cicero’s Letters to Atticus in Early 49.” In Lewis, S. (ed.), Ancient Tyranny. Edinburgh: 197–209.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1983. “The Question of Character-Development: Plutarch and Tacitus.” CQ 33: 469–487.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. 1983. Consulare Imperium. Basel.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. 1995. “Catilina et le problème des dettes.” In Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn (eds.), Z. W, Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavez. Leiden. 15–34.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 2000. “Caesars Konsulatsplan für das Jahr 49: Gründe und Scheitern.” Chiron 30: 679–710. (= Rom auf dem Weg von der Republik zum Prinzipat [Bonn 2007] 121–158.)Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 2001. “Imperia und provinciae des Pompeius 82 bis 48 v. Chr.” Chiron 31: 153–209.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 2017. Januar 49 v. Chr.: Vorgeschichte, Rechtslage, politische Aspekte. Bonn.Google Scholar
Göbl, R. (ed.) 1994. R. Die Hexadrachmenprägung der Gross-Boier. Vienna.Google Scholar
Golden, G. 2013. Crisis Management during the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, A. 2006. Caesar: Life of a Colossus. New Haven.Google Scholar
Goltz, A. 2000. “Maiestas sine viribus: Die Bedeutung der Lictoren für die Konfliktbewältigungsstrategien römischer Magistrate.” In Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos Maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik. Historia ES 141. Stuttgart. 237–267.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W., and Sandbach., F. H 1973. Menander: A Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. 1996. Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des zweiten Triumvirats. Historia ES 110. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Goudineau, C. 1990. César et la Gaule. Paris.Google Scholar
Goudineau, C., and Peyre, C.. 1993. Bibracte et les Eduens: à la découverte d’un peuple gaulois. Paris.Google Scholar
Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W.. 2018. Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Greenidge, A. H. J. 1901. The Criminal Procedure of Cicero’s Time. Oxford.Google Scholar
Greenidge, A. H. J., and Clay, A. M.. 1960. Sources for Roman History 133–70 B.C. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gregori, G. L. 2015. “Forgeries and Fakes: Historical and Documentary Forgeries.” In Bruun, C. and Edmondson, J. C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy. Oxford. 54–65.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2013. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: “Futures Past” from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. 1976. Seneca, a Philosopher in Politics. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. 2003. “Clementia after Caesar: From Politics to Philosophy.” In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds. 154–182.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (ed.) 2009. A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T., and Atkins, E. M. (eds.) 1991. Marcus Tullius Cicero: On Duties. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. M. 2008. “Changing Life Expectancy throughout History.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101: 577.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. 2012. The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. 2015. Cicero’s De provinciis consularibus oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grillo, L., and Krebs, C. (eds.) 2018. The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grisart, A. 1981. “L’Atuatuca césarienne au Fort de Chaudfontaine?” L’antiquité classique 50: 367–381.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L., and Konstan, D. (eds.) 2012. Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1966. “Publius Clodius, Instrument or Independent Agent?” Phoenix 20: 120–130.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1968. “Pompey and the Pisones.” CSCA 1: 155–170.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1969. “Notes on the ‘First Catilinarian Conspiracy.’” CPh 64: 20–24.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1969a. “Pompey, the Roman Aristocracy, and the Conference of Luca.” Historia 28: 71–108.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1973. “The Trial of C. Antonius.” Latomus 32: 301–310.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1995. “The ‘Fall’ of the Scipios.” In Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn (eds.), Z. W, Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavez. Leiden. 59–90.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1996. “The Expansion of the Empire under Augustus.” CAH2 10: 147–197.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 2009. “Caesar as a Politician.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 23–36.Google Scholar
Haake, M., and Harders, A.-C. (eds.) 2017. Politische Kultur und Soziale Struktur der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. 1990. Cicero the Politician. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Halkin, L. 1953. La supplication d’action de grâces chez les Romains (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège 128). Paris.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2009a. “Serving the Times: Cicero and Caesar the Dictator.” In Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden. 89–110.Google Scholar
Haller, B. 1967. “C. Asinius Pollio als Politiker und zeitkritischer Historiker. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Übergangs von der Republik zum Prinzipat in Rom (60 bis 30 v. Chr.).” Diss. Münster.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. 2014. Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammersley, R. 2012. “James Harrington’s The Commonwealth of Oceana and the Republican Tradition.” In Lunger Knoppers, L. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Literature and the English Revolution. Oxford. 534–550.Google Scholar
Hardy, E. G. 1924. The Catilinarian Conspiracy in Its Context. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hargreaves Heap, S. P., and Varoufakis, Y.. 1995. Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. London and New York.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. 1656/1992. The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics. Ed. by Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 1979. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 2001. Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 2009. Dreams and Experience in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harrison, I. 2008. “Catiline, Clodius, and Popular Politics at Rome during the 60s and 50s BC.” BICS 51: 95–118.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. 2017. Horace, Odes Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haselgrove, C. 1984. “Warfare and Its Aftermath as Reflected in the Precious Metal Coinage of Belgic Gaul.” OJA 3: 81–105.Google Scholar
Hastrup, T. 1957. “On the Date of Caesar’s Commentaries of the Gallic War.” C&M 18: 59–74.Google Scholar
Havener, W. 2014. “A Ritual against the Rule? The Representation of Civil War Victory in the Late Republican Triumph.” In Lange, C. H. and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 165–179.Google Scholar
Heftner, H. 1995. Plutarch und der Aufstieg des Pompeius. Ein historischer Kommentar zu Plutarchs Pompeiusvita Teil I: Kap. 1–45. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1847/2001. The Philosophy of History. Tr. J. Sebree. Kitchener.Google Scholar
Heikkilä, K. 1993. “Lex non iure rogata: Senate and the Annulment of the Laws in the Republic.” In Paananen (ed.), U., Senatus Populusque Romanus: Studies in Roman Republican Legislation. Helsinki. 117–142.Google Scholar
Hekster, H. 2012. “Kings and Regime Change in the Roman Republic.” In Smith, C and Yarrow, L. M. (eds.), Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius. Oxford. 184–204.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hickson-Hahn, F. 2000. “Pompey’s Supplicatio Duplicata: A Novel Form of Thanksgiving.” Phoenix 54: 244–254.Google Scholar
Hillard, T. 2013. “Graffiti’s Engagement: The Political Graffiti of the Late Roman Republic.” In Sears, G., Keegan, P., and Laurence (eds.), R., Written Space in the Latin West, 200 BC to AD 300. London. 105–122.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. P. 1988. “Strategic Reality and the Movements of Caesar, January, 49 BC.” Historia 37: 248–252.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. P. 1996. “Pompeius ad Parthos?” Klio 78: 380–399.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. 1985. Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine. Rome.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. 2008. Syllana Varia. Aux sources de la première guerre civile romaine. Paris.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L. 2017. Res Publica and the Roman Republic: “Without Body or Form.” Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, W. 1952. “Zur Vorgeschichte von Caesars Eingreifen in Gallien.” AU 4: 5–22.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2004. Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2008. Rev. of Pittenger, Contested Triumphs. Gnomon 82: 714–720.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2010. Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2017. Libera res publica. Die politische Kultur des antiken Rom – Positionen und Perspektiven. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.) 2009. Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Holzer, H. 2014. Lincoln and the Power of the Press: The War for Public Opinion. New York.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K., and Burton., G 1983. “Political Succession in the Late Republic” and “Ambition and Withdrawal: The Senatorial Aristocracy under the Emperors.” In Hopkins, K (ed.), Death and Renewal. Cambridge. 31–200.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1974. “The Ides of March. Some New Problems.” G&R 21: 191–199.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1778/1983. The History of England: From the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688. Vol. 5. London.Google Scholar
Humphreys, A. R. (ed.) 1984. Shakespeare: Julius Caesar. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 1998. Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study. Oxford.Google Scholar
Itgenshorst, T. 2005. Tota illa pompa: Der Triumph in der römischen Republik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Itgenshorst, T., and Le Doze, P. (eds.) 2017. Le norme sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains. Élaboration, diffusion et contournements. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Jahn, J. 1970. Interregnum und Wahldiktatur. Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Jal, P. 1961. “Remarques sur la cruauté à Rome pendant les guerres civiles (de Sylla à Vespasien).” BAGB 475–501.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 1987. “Caesars Bemühungen um die Reintegration der Pompeianer.” Chiron 17: 313–341.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 1987a. Der Staat des Dictators Caesar. Cologne.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2000. “Caesar und die Krise von 47 v. Chr.” In Urso, G (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome: 151–173.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2001. Caesar. Munich.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2005. “Über den Rubicon. Caesars Eröffnung des Bürgerkrieges am 10. Januar 49 v. Chr.” In W. Krieger (ed.), Und keine Schlacht bei Marathon. Große Ereignisse und Mythen der europäischen Geschichte. Stuttgart. 25–49, 325–336.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2006. “Who Attended Roman Assemblies? Some Remarks on Political Participation in the Roman Republic.” In Simón, F. M., Pina Polo, F., and Rodríguez, J. R. (eds.), Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo. Barcelona. 221–234.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2006a. “Methods, Models, and Historiography.” In Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 3–28.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2009. Der große Trend, der kleine Sachzwang und das handelnde Individuum: Caesars Entscheidungen. Munich.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2009a. “Caesars Alternative(n): das Ende der römischen Republik zwischen autonomem Prozess und Betriebsunfall.” In Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich. 141–160.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2010. “Erfahrungsraum und Erwartungshorizont bei Julius Caesar.” In Urso, G (ed.), Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa. 311–332.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2011. “Blaming the People in Front of the People.” In Smith, C and Covino (eds.), R, Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric. Swansea. 111–125.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2013. “Feeding the Plebs with Words: The Significance of Senatorial Public Oratory in the Small World of Roman Politics.” In Steel, C and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 49–62.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2017. “Why the Anti-Caesarians Failed: Political Communication on the Eve of Civil War (51 to 49 BC).” In Rosillo-López, C (ed.), Political Communication in the Roman World. Leiden and Boston. 201–227.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1970. “Cicero’s Cato.” RhM 113: 188–196.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York.Google Scholar
Kallet-Marx, R. M. 1995. Hegemony to Empire: The Development of the Roman Imperium in the East from 148 to 62 BC. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kantor, G. 2014. “Roman Treaty with Lycia (SEG LV 1452) and the Date of Caesar’s Third Dictatorship.” ZPE 190: 135–136.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2006. Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2016. Studies on the Text of Suetonius’ “De vita Caesarum.”’ Oxford.Google Scholar
Kay, P. 2014. Rome’s Economic Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. 1982. “Young Pompey, 106–79 B.C.” AC 51: 111–139.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. 1984. “Who Were the Sullani?” Klio 66: 114–150.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. 2005. Sulla: The Last Republican. Rev. ed. London.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. 2007. The Army in the Roman Revolution. London and New York.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. 2018. “Notes on the First Mithridatic War in Macedonia and Greece.” SyllClass 29: 29–65.Google Scholar
Keppie, L. G. F. 1983. Colonisation and Veteran Settlement in Italy, 47–14 B.C. London.Google Scholar
King, A. 1990. Roman Gaul and Germany. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Koestermann, E. 1970. “Ps.-Sall. Epistula ad Caesarem senem. I.” Historia 19: 216–223.Google Scholar
Koestermann, E. 1971. C. Sallustius Crispus: Bellum Iugurthinum. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2005. “Clemency as a Virtue.” CPh 100: 337–346.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2007. “The Contemporary Political Context.” In Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA. 108–144.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. 2013. The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kornemann, E. 1896. Die historische Schriftstellerei des Consuls Asinius Pollio. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kraft, K. 1969. Der goldene Kranz Caesars und der Kampf um die Entlarvung des “Tyrannen.” 2nd ed. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Kraner, F., Dittenberger, W., and Meusel, H.. 1964. C. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii de bello gallico. 20th ed. 3 vols. Zürich and Berlin.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. 2005. “Hair, Hegemony, and Historiography: Caesar’s Style and Its Earliest Critics.” PBA 129: 97–115.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. 2009. “Bellum Gallicum.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 159–175.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. 2006. “Imaginary Geography in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum.” AJPh 127: 111–136.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. 2013. “Caesar, Lucretius and the Dates of the De rerum natura and the Commentarii.” CQ 63: 751–758.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. 2017. “Caesar the Historian.” In Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York. Web Essay DD, pp. 210–213. http://thelandmarkcaesar.com/LandmarkCaesarWebEssays_5Jan2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. 2018. “More than Words: The Commentarii in Their Propagandistic Context.” In Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge. 29–42.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. 2018a. “A Style of Choice.” In Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge. 110–130.Google Scholar
Kumar, C. 2015. “Electoral Violence, Threats and Security: Problems and Prospects for Indian Democracy.” American Journal of Social Science Research 1: 38–51.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W., and Wittmann., R. 1995. Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der Römischen Republik. Munich.Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. 1961. “The Tribunate of Curio.” Historia 10: 318–329.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H., and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.) 2014. The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome.Google Scholar
Laurence, R. 1999. The Roads of Roman Italy: Mobility and Cultural Change. New York.Google Scholar
Laurence, R. 1999a. “Tourism, Townplanning and romanitas: Rimini’s Roman heritage.” In Biddiss, M. D. and Wyke, M. (eds.), The Uses and Abuses of Antiquity. Bern and Berlin. 187–205.Google Scholar
Le Bohec, Y. 1998. “Vercingétorix.” RSA 28: 85–120.Google Scholar
Levick, B. 1998. “The Veneti Revisited: C. E. Stevens and the Tradition on Caesar the Propagandist.” In Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Caesar as Artful Reporter. Swansea. 61–83.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S., and Ziblatt, D. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York.Google Scholar
Levithan, J. 2013. Roman Siege Warfare. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. (ed.) 2006. Ancient Tyranny. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. 1965. “Constitutional Aspects of the Consular Elections in 59 B.C.” Historia 14: 423–442.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. 1966. “Were Pompey and Crassus Elected in Absence to Their First Consulship?” In Bernhard, M.-L. (ed.), Mélanges offerts à Kazimierz Michalowski. Warsaw. 523–526.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. 1995. Roman Questions: Selected Papers 1958–1993. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lindley, D. V. 2012. Understanding Uncertainty. Hoboken.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1968/1999. Violence in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1972. “Provocatio: From the Struggle of the Orders to the Principate.” ANRW 1.2: 226–267.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1990. “Electoral Bribery in the Roman Republic.” JRS 80: 1–16.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1993. Imperium Romanum: Politics and Administration. London.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1999. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 2008. Cicero as Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 2009. “The Assassination.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 72–82.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 2013. Plutarch: Demosthenes and Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 2008. “Cesare urbanista.” In Gentili, G. (ed.), Giulio Cesare: L’uomo, le imprese, il mito. Milan. 42–51.Google Scholar
Lott, J. B. 2001. The Neighborhoods of Augustan Rome. New York.Google Scholar
Lundgreen, C. 2011. Regelkonflikte in der römischen Republik. Geltung und Gewichtung von Normen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, R. T. 1996. “Ab inimicis incitatus: On Dating the Composition of Caesar’s Bellum Civile.” SyllClass 7: 107–132.Google Scholar
MacGillivray, R. 1974. Restoration Historians and the English Civil War. The Hague.Google Scholar
Mackay, C. 2000. “Sulla and the Monuments: Studies in His Public Persona.” Historia 49: 161–210.Google Scholar
Mackie, N. 1992. “Popularis Ideology and Popular Politics at Rome in the First Century BC.” RhM 135: 49–73.Google Scholar
Maier, U. 1978. Caesars Feldzüge in Gallien (58–51 v. Chr.) in ihrem Zusammenhang mit der stadtrömischen Politik. Bonn.Google Scholar
Malitz, J. 1984. “Caesar’s Partherkrieg.” Historia 33: 21–59.Google Scholar
Malitz, J. 1987. “ Die Kanzlei Caesars: Herrschaftsorganisation zwischen Republik und Prinzipat.” Historia 36: 51–72.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2007. Cicero: Philippics 3–9. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 1974. “Cicero and Sallust on Crassus and Catiline.” Latomus 33: 804–813.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 1975. “The Date of the Delivery of Cicero’s in Pisonem.” CQ 25: 88–93.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 1985. A Historical Commentary on Asconius. Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 1987. “Pompeius’ Fear of Assassination.” Chiron 17: 119–133.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. 1970. “In Ligarianam.” TAPhA 101: 317–347.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. 1972. “Cicero’s Publication of His Consular Orations.” Philologus 116: 277–284.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. 1982/1983. “Caesar’s Projected Dacian-Parthian Expedition.” AncSoc 13/14: 223–231.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. 2006. Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McGushin, P. 1977. Bellum Catilinae: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
McGushin, P. 1992–1994. Sallust: The Histories. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1961. “Zur Chronologie und Politik in Caesars erstem Konsulat.” Historia 10: 68–98.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1965. “Populares.” RE Suppl. 10: 549–615.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1970. “Caesars Bürgerkrieg.” In Meier, C., Entstehung des Begriffs “Demokratie.” Vier Prolegomena zu einer historischen Theorie. Frankfurt. 70–150.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1975. “Das Kompromiss-Angebot an Caesar i. J. 59 v. Chr., ein Beispiel senatorischer ‘Verfassungspolitik.’” MH 32: 197–208.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1982. Caesar. English tr. D. McClintock. New York.Google Scholar
Mensching, E. 1984. “Zu den Auseinandersetzungen um den Gallischen Krieg und der Considius-Episode (BG I 21–22).” Hermes 112: 53–65.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. 1919. Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompeius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meyer, P. N. 2014. Storytelling for Lawyers. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Miles, G. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Millar, F. 1998. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Millar, F. 2002. Rome, the Greek World, and the East. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2012. “Gender and Forgiveness in the Early Roman Empire.” In Griswold, C. L. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Cambridge. 97–114.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. 1979. Cicero: The Ascending Years. New Haven.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. 1991. Cicero: The Senior Statesman. New Haven.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. 2017. “Res publica, forma rei publicae and SPQR.” Essays in Honour of Fergus Millar. BICS 60: 34–48.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. 2018. Res publica. Histoire romaine de la chose publique. Paris.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1982. “Plutarch, Crassus 13.4–5 and Cicero’s De Consiliis Suis.” LCM 7: 136–137.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1988. The Life of Cicero. Warminster.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1997. “Plutarch, Brutus and Brutus’ Greek and Latin Letters.” In Mossman, J. M. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World: Essays on Plutarch. London. 141–168.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1887. Römisches Staatsrecht. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1894/1996. The History of Rome. 5 vols. Tr. W. P. Dickson. London.Google Scholar
Montlahuc, P. 2019. Le pouvoir des bons mots. “Faire rire” et politique à Rome du milieu du IIIe siècle a.C. à l’avènement des Antonins. Rome.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat (Baron de). 1734/1965. Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline. Tr. D. Lowenthal. New York.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 1997. “Julius Caesar as Tyrant and Pedant.” JRS 87: 23–40.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 2000. “The Autopsy of C. Asinius Pollio.” JRS 90: 51–69.Google Scholar
Morrell, K. 2017. Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morrell, K. 2018. “‘Certain Gentlemen Say … .’: Cicero, Cato, and the Debate on the Validity of Clodius’ Laws.” In Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford. 191–210.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 1998. “Publicity, Popularity and Patronage in the Commentariolum Petitionis.” CA 17: 259–288.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2007. “Caesar’s Alleged Fear of Prosecution and His ratio absentis in the Approach to the Civil War.” Historia 56: 159–178.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2009. “Dignitas and res publica: Caesar and Republican Legitimacy.” In Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich. 115–140.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2011. “Consular Appeals to the Army in 88 and 87: The Locus of Legitimacy in Late-Republican Rome.” In Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica. Cambridge. 259–278.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2012. “Political Graffiti in the Late Roman Republic: Hidden Transcripts and Common Knowledge.”, C. Kuhn, (ed.), Politische Kommunikation und öffentliche Meinung in der antiken Welt. Heidelberg. 191–217.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2013. “‘Cultural Hegemony’ and the Communicative Power of the Roman Elite.” In Steel, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 29–48.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2014. Rev. of Arena 2012. CJ-Online 2014.03.07.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2015. “Persuading the People in the Roman Participatory Context.” In Hammer (ed.), D., A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 294–309.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2019. “Fear of the People.” RSI 131: 515–533.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. Forthcoming. “Values and Ideology.” In Arena, V. and Prag, J. (eds.), Companion to Roman Republican Political Culture.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R., and Rosenstein, N.. 2006. “The Transformation of the Republic.” In Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 625–637.Google Scholar
Mouristen, H. 2001. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouristen, H. 2017. Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Muccioli, F. 1994. “Dopo la vittoria dei Campi Raudi: Mario Terzo Fondatore di Rome? (Su Plut., Mar. 27, 8–10).” Atene e Roma 39: 192–205.Google Scholar
Müller, C. 1972. Untersuchungen zu Caesars italischem Feldzug 49 v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Mundt, F. 2004. “Cicero’s ‘Commentarioli belli Ciliciensis’: Fam. 15.4 and other letters from Cilicia.” Philologus 148: 255–273.Google Scholar
Muntz, C. E. 2017. Diodorus Siculus and the World of the Late Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1966/1974. L’ordre équestre à l’époque républicaine (312–43 av. J.-C.). 2 vols. BEFAR 207. Paris.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. 1995. Public Order in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1961. Cicero in L. Calpurnium Pisonem. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M., and Hubbard, M.. 1978. A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nissen, H. 1881. “Der Ausbruch des Bürgerkriegs 49 v. Chr.” HZ 46: 48–105.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. 2011. Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar
North, J. A. 1990. “Politics and Aristocracy in the Roman Republic.” CPh 85: 277–287.Google Scholar
North, J. A. 2008. “Caesar at the Lupercalia.” JRS 98: 144–160.Google Scholar
North, J. A. 2010. Rev. of Flower, Roman Republics. JRA 23: 469–472.Google Scholar
North, J. A. 2011. “Lex Domitia Revisited.” In Richardson, J. H. and Santangelo, F. (eds.), Priests and State in the Roman World. Stuttgart. 39–61.Google Scholar
Nousek, D. 2018. “Genres and Generic Contaminations: The Commentarii.” In Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge. 97–109.Google Scholar
Odelman, E. 1972. “Études sur quelques reflets du style administratif chez César.” Diss. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy, Books I–V. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M., and Richmond., I. A 1967. Tacitus: De vita Agricolae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2007. Rev. of Wyke (ed.) 2006, Kamm, Julius Caesar, and Goldsworthy 2006. CR 57: 466–469.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2008. “Caesar and Nicomedes.” CQ 58: 687–691.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2009. “The Pen and the Sword: Writing and Conquest in Caesar’s Gaul.” ClAnt 28: 328–358.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2014. “Julius Caesar and Spanish Triumph-Hunting.” In C. H. Lange and F. J. Vervaet (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 149–162.Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford.Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. 2014. “Triumph and Spectacle. Victory Celebrations in the Late Republican Civil Wars.” In Lange, C. H. and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 181–193.Google Scholar
Ottmer, H. M. 1979. Die Rubikon-Legende. Untersuchungen zu Caesars und Pompeius’ Strategie vor und nach Ausbruch des Bürgerkrieges. Boppard.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 2010. Decimus Laberius: The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Parkin, T. G. 1992. Demography and Roman Society. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Pascucci, C. 2007. “Fluvius Rubico, quondam finis Italiae. Osservazioni sul corso del Rubicone in epoca romana.” Orizzonti 8: 79–85.Google Scholar
Peer, A. 2015. Julius Caesar’s Bellum Civile and the Composition of a New Reality. Dorchester.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 1982. Rev. of Ottmer 1979. Gnomon 54: 212–213.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 1988. Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2002. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. Swansea.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2004. “Plutarch on the Outbreak of the Roman Civil War.” In Heftner, H. and Tomaschitz, K. (eds.), Ad Fontes! Festschrift für G. Dobesch. Vienna. 317–327.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2006. “Judging Julius Caesar.” In Wyke, M. (ed.), Julius Caesar in Western Culture. Malden, MA. 3–26.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2006a. “Breaking the Bounds: Writing about Julius Caesar.” In McGing, B. C. and Mossman, J. M. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography. 255–280.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2011. Plutarch: Caesar. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pennacini, A. (ed.) 1993. Gaio Giulio Cesare, Opera omnia. Tr. A. La Penna and A. Pennacini. Commentary by M. Faraguna, A. Garzetti, and D. Vottero. Turin.Google Scholar
Pepe, C. 2018. “Fragments of Epideictic Oratory: The Exemplary Case of the Laudatio Funebris for Women.” In Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford. 281–296.Google Scholar
Petersmann, G. 1983. “Cornelius Gallus und der Papyrus von Qasr Ibrim.” ANRW II.30.3: 1649–1655.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. (ed.) 2015. The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pettinger, A. 2012. The Republic in Danger. Oxford.Google Scholar
Phillips, E. J. 1974. “The Prosecution of C. Rabirius in 63 BC.” Klio 56: 87–101.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 1989. “Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma.” Diss. Saragossa.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2006. “The Tyrant Must Die: Preventive Tyrannicide in Roman Political Thought.” In Simón, F. M., Pina Polo, F., and Rodríguez, J. R. (eds.), Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo. Barcelona. 71–101.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2011. The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2017. “The ‘Tyranny’ of the Gracchi and the Concordia of the Optimates: An Ideological Construct.” In Cristofori, R., Galimberti, A., and Vio, F. R. (eds.), Costruire la memoria. Rome. 5–33.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2018. “Political Alliances and Rivalries in Contiones in the Late Roman Republic.” In van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge. 107–127.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2018a. “Magistrates without Pedigree: The Consules Suffecti of the Triumviral Age.” JRS 108: 99–114.Google Scholar
Pittenger, M. R. Pelikan. 2008. Contested Triumphs: Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy’s Republican Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Pocock, L. G. 1926/1967. A Commentary on Cicero in Vatinium. London. (Repr. Amsterdam 1967.)Google Scholar
Powell, A. 1998. “Julius Caesar and the Presentation of Massacre.” In Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Caesar as Artful Reporter. Swansea. 111–137.Google Scholar
Powell, A. (ed.) 2013. Hindsight in Greek and Roman History. Swansea.Google Scholar
Powell, H. J. 2016. Targeting Americans: The Constitutionality of the U.S. Drone War. Oxford.Google Scholar
Price, S. R. F. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pucci Ben Zeev, M. 1996. “When Was the Title ‘Dictator perpetuus’ Given to Caesar?” AC 65: 251–253.Google Scholar
Pucci Ben Zeev, M. 1996a. “Caesar’s Decrees in the Antiquities: Josephus’ Forgeries or Authentic Roman senatus consulta?” Athenaeum 84: 71–91.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1993. “Atrium Libertatis.” PBSR 61: 125–155.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1980. “Propertius and the New Gallus Fragment.” ZPE 39: 49–56.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1974. Dignitatis contentio. Studien zur Motivation und politischen Taktik im Bürgerkrieg zwischen Caesar und Pompeius. Munich.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1974a. “Zum politischen Wirken der caesarfreundlichen Volkstribunen am Vorabend des Bürgerkrieges.” Chiron 4: 293–326.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1975. “Caesar und die Friedensverhandlungen zu Beginn des Bürgerkrieges von 49 v. Chr.” Chiron 5: 247–300.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2003. “Caesar as Liberator? Factional Politics, Civil War, and Ideology.” In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds. 35–67.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2010. “Creating a Grand Coalition of True Roman Citizens.” In Breed, B., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord. Oxford. 159–170.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2010a. “Between Tradition and Innovation: Shifts in Caesar’s Political Propaganda and Self-Representation.” In Urso, G (ed.), Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa. 141–157.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2017. “The Roman Commentarius and Caesar’s Commentaries.” In Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York. Web Essay CC, pp. 203–209. http://thelandmarkcaesar.com/LandmarkCaesarWebEssays_5Jan2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (ed.) 2017. The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K., and Ramsey, J. T.. 2017. “Reconstructing the Chronology of Caesar’s Gallic Wars.” Histos 11: 1–74.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K., and Ramsey, J. T.. 2017a. “The Chronology of Caesar’s Campaigns.” In Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York. Web Essay BB. http://thelandmarkcaesar.com/LandmarkCaesarWebEssays_5Jan2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Racine, F. 2012. “Review of Billows 2009, Gelzer 2008, and Canfora 2007.” CR 62: 241–243.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. 1966. “Note sur l’armée des gaules de 58 à 54.” IL 18: 21–25.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. 1966a. L’art de la déformation historique dans les commentaires de César. 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2000. “‘Beware the Ides of March’: An Astronomical Prediction?” CQ 50: 440–454.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2003. Cicero: Philippics I–II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2004. “Did Julius Caesar Temporarily Banish Mark Antony from His Inner Circle?” CQ 54: 161–173.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2007. Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2009. “The Proconsular Years: Politics at a Distance.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 37–56.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2013. Sallust: The War with Catiline, the War with Jugurtha. (Rev. Loeb ed.) Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2016. “How and Why Was Pompey Made Sole Consul in 52 B.C.?” Historia 65: 298–324.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. 2019. “The Date of the Consular Elections in 63 and the Inception of Catiline’s Conspiracy.” HSCPh 110: 213–269.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. Forthcoming. Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero (rev.). Oxford.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T., and Lewis Licht, A.. 1997. The Comet of 44 B.C. and Caesar’s Funeral Games. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T., and Raaflaub, K.. 2017. “Chronological Tables for Caesar’s Wars (58–45 BCE).” Histos 11: 162–217.Google Scholar
Rauh, S. 2012. “Suicide in the Roman Republic.” Diss. UCSB.Google Scholar
Rauh, S. 2018. “Cato at Utica: The Emergence of a Roman Suicide Tradition.” AJPh 139: 59–91.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1975. “Caesar’s Heritage. Hellenistic Kings and Their Roman Equals.”JRS 65: 148–159.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1982. “History, Historiography, and Cicero, Expositio Consiliorum Suorum.” LCM 7: 121–124.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1991. Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. Oxford.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. 1969. Greek Textual Criticism: A Reader. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rice Holmes, T. 1911. Caesar’s Conquest of Gaul. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rice Holmes, T. 1923. The Roman Republic and the Founder of the Empire. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. 1976. Declaring War in the Roman Republic in the Period of Transmarine Expansion. Coll. Latomus 149. Brussels.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. 2014. “The Triumph in the Roman Republic: Frequency, Fluctuation and Policy.” In Lang, C. H. and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 197–258.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S. 1996. The Romans in Spain. Oxford and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S. 2008. The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century BC to the Second Century AD. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rickman, G. 1980. The Corn Supply of Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 1996. The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. 2000. “The Dictator’s Mistake. Caesar’s Escape from Sulla.” Historia 49: 211–229.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. 2004. “Attacking the World with Five Cohorts.” AS 34: 127–152.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. 2006. Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Rising, T. 2013. “Senatorial Opposition to Pompey’s Eastern Settlement. A Storm in a Teacup?” Historia 62: 196–221.Google Scholar
Rising, T. 2015. “Caesar’s Offer, Cicero’s Rebuff, and the Two Land Commissions of 59 B.C.” Historia 64: 419–427.Google Scholar
Robb, M. A. 2010. Beyond Populares and Optimates: Political Language in the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. 1992. Ancient Rome: City Planning and Administration. New York.Google Scholar
Rodgers, B. S. 2008. “Catulus’ Speech in Cassius Dio 36.31–36.” GRBS 48: 295–318.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Rondholz, A. 2009. “Crossing the Rubicon: A Historiographical Study.” Mnemosyne 62: 432–450.Google Scholar
Roselaar, S. T. 2010. Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of Ager Publicus in Italy, 396–89 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rosenblitt, J. A. 2016. “Hostile Politics: Sallust and the Rhetoric of Popular Champions in the Late Republic.” AJPh 137: 655–688.Google Scholar
Rosenblitt, J. A. 2019. Rome after Sulla. London and New York.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 1995. “Sorting Out the Lot in Republican Rome.” AJPh 116: 43–75.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2004. Rome at War: Farms, Families, and Death in the Middle Republic. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2006. “Aristocratic Values.” In Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 365–382.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2011. “War, Wealth and Consuls.” In Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica. Cambridge. 133–158.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2012. Rome and the Mediterranean, 290 to 146 BC: The Imperial Republic. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.) 2006. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Rosillo López, C. 2010. La corruption à la fin de la République romaine (IIe-Ier s. av. J.-C.) aspects politiques et financiers. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rosillo López, C. 2017. Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rotondi, G. 1912. Leges publicae populi Romani. Milan.Google Scholar
Roymans, N. 2018. “A Roman Massacre in the Far North: Caesar’s Annihilation of the Tencteri and Usipetes in the Dutch River Area.” In Fernández-Götz, M. and Roymans, N. (eds.), Conflict Archaeology: Materialities of Collective Violence from Prehistory to Late Antiquity. London and New York. 167–181.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2005. Fasti Sacerdotum: Die Mitglieder der Priesterschaften und das sakrale Funktionspersonal römischer, griechischer, orientalischer und jüdisch-christlicher Kulte in der Stadt Rom von 300 v. Chr. bis 499 n. Chr. 3 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X. 1996. “Bibulus as President of the Senate.” Latomus 55: 384–388.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X. 1996a. “Four Republican Senators.” C&M 47: 207–215.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X. 1996b. “C. Vibius Pansa Caetronianus and His Fathers.” Mnemosyne 49: 186–188.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X. 1997. “The Praetorship of L. Roscius Otho.” Hermes 125: 236–240.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X. 1998. Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sanford, F. W. 1911. “The Narrative in the Eighth Book of the ‘Gallic War,’ Chapters 50–55; A Study in Chronology.” University of Nebraska Studies 11: 293–342.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2006. “Sulla and the Senate: A Reconsideration.” CCG 17: 7–22.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2010. Rev. of Tatum 2008. JRS 100: 253–254.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2012. “‘Sullanus’ and ‘Sullani.’” Arctos 46: 187–191.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2013. Divination, Prediction and the End of the Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2014. “Roman Politics in the 70s B.C.: A Story of Realignments?” JRS 104: 1–27.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2016. “Caesar’s Aims in Northeast Italy.” PBSR 84: 101–129.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2018. “Theophanes of Mytilene, Cicero and Pompey’s Inner Circle.” In van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge. 128–146.Google Scholar
Schleussner, B. 1978. Die Legaten der römischen Republik; decem legati und ständige Hilfsgesandte. Munich.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 1993. Frühschriften Sallusts im Horizont des Gesamtwerkes. Neustadt.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. C. 2004. “A ‘Neque’ and the Roman Republic: A Text-Critically Abridged Compromise Proposal of the Senate of June 50 in a Letter of the Caelius Rufus.” WS 117: 115–150.Google Scholar
Scholz, P. 2011. Den Vätern folgen: Sozialisation und Erziehung der republikanischen Senatsaristokratie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. 2002. “Caesars Statthalterschaft in Spanien.” In Spielvogel, J. (ed.), Res publica reperta: zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats : Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag. Stuttgart. 263–278.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. 1981. Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 1964. “The First Catilinarian Conspiracy.” Historia 13: 338–347.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 1972. “Cicero and the Word Popularis.” CQ 1972: 328–338.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 1973. “Iusta Catilinae.” Historia 22: 240–248.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 1994. “Sulla.” CAH2 9: 165–207.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 2002. Pompey the Great: A Political Biography. 2nd ed. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 2003. “Caesar and Gaul: Some Perspectives on the Bellum Gallicum.” In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds. 19–34.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1997. “The Ethics of Brutus and Cassius.” JRS 87: 41–53.Google Scholar
Segal, N. 2019. “Military Achievement and Late-Republican Aristocratic Values, 81–49 B.C.E.” Diss. UCSB.Google Scholar
Sehlmeyer, M. 1999. Stadtrömische Ehrenstatuen der republikanischen Zeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1960. “The Roman Nobility in the Second Civil War.” CQ 10: 253–267.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1965. Cicero: Letters to Atticus. 7 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1971. Cicero. New York.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1977. Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1980. Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1986. Cicero: Philippics. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1991. Two Studies in Roman Nomenclature. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1998. “Caesar’s Men in Cicero’s Correspondence.” Ciceroniana 10: 107–118.Google Scholar
Sharpe, K. 2013. Rebranding Rule: The Restoration and Revolution Monarchy, 1660–1714. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Shatzman, I. 1975. Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics. Coll. Latomus 142. Brussels.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. 1983. Roman Foreign Policy in the East, 168 B.C. to A.D. 1. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Siani-Davies, M. 1996. “Gaius Rabirius Postumus: A Roman Financier and Caesar’s Political Ally.” Arctos 30: 207–240.Google Scholar
Siani-Davies, M. 2001. Marcus Tullius Cicero: Pro Rabirio Postumo. Oxford.Google Scholar
Silver, N. 2012, The Signal and the Noise, New York.Google Scholar
Simón, F. M., Pina Polo, F., and Rodríguez, J. R. (eds.) 2006. Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Sklenář, R. 1998. “La République des Signes: Caesar, Cato and the Language of Sallustian Morality.” TAPhA 128: 205–220.Google Scholar
Skořepa, M. 2011. Decision-Making: A Behavioral Economic Approach. New York.Google Scholar
Smith, C., and Yarrow, L. M.. 2012. Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. H. 1977. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton.Google Scholar
Sommer, M. 2010. “Le ragioni della guerra: Roma, i Parti e l’ultimo imperativo di Cesare.” In Urso, G (ed.), Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa. 123–140.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. 1969. “Ottaviano patrono di Taranto nel 43 a.C.” Epigraphica 31: 79–83.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. 1999. “L’opposizione a Cesare e i Lupercali.” CISA 25: 151–160.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. 2000. “I poteri dell’ultimo Cesare.” In Urso, G (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome. 305–313.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. 2003. “Caesar’s Powers in His Last Phase.” In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds. 190–199. (English trans. of Sordi 2000.)Google Scholar
Stacey, P. 2014. “The Princely Republic.” JRS 104: 133–154.Google Scholar
Staniland, P. 2014. “Violence and Democracy (Review Article).” Comparative Politics 47: 99–118.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2001. Cicero, Rhetoric, and Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2010. “Tribunician Sacrosanctity and Oratorical Performance in the Late Republic.” In Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (eds.), Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Cambridge. 37–50.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2012. “The Lex Pompeia de Provinciis of 52 B.C.: A Reconsideration.” Historia 61: 83–93.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2013. The End of the Roman Republic, 146 to 44 B.C. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2014. “Rethinking Sulla: The Case of the Roman Senate.” CQ 64: 657–668.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2014a. Rev. of Arena 2012. CPh 109: 86–88.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2014b. “The Roman Senate and the Post-Sullan res publica.” Historia 63: 323–339.Google Scholar
Steel, C., and van der Blom, H. (eds.) 2013. Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1930. “Die Senatssitzungen der Ciceronischen Zeit (68–43).” Diss. Münster.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. E. 1938. “The Terminal Date of Caesar’s Command.” AJPh 59: 169–208.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. E. 1953. “Britain and the Lex Pompeia Licinia.” Latomus 12: 14–21.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. 2015. Julius Caesar and the Transformation of the Republic. London and New York.Google Scholar
Stockton, D. L. 1977. Rev. of Gruen, Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Gnomon 49: 216–218.Google Scholar
Stone, M. 2018. “Gaius Verres Troubleshooter.” In van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge. 299–313.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 1938. Caesars Eintritt in die Geschichte. Munich.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 1968. Caesar im Urteil seiner Zeitgenossen. 2nd ed. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. 2016. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Strauss, B. 2015. The Death of Caesar: The Story of History’s Most Famous Assassination. New York.Google Scholar
Sumi, G. 2011. “Ceremony and the Emergence of Court Society in the Augustan Principate.” AJPh 132: 81–102.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. 1971. “The lex annalis under Caesar.” Phoenix 25: 246–271, 357–371.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. 1976. “A Note on Julius Caesar’s Great-Grandfather.” CPh 71: 341–344.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1938. “The Allegiance of Labienus.” JRS 28: 113–125 = Roman Papers 1.62–75.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1958. “Pseudo-Sallust.” MH 15: 46–55 = Roman Papers 6.55–64.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1958a. Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1961. “Who Was Vedius Pollio?” JRS 51: 23–30 = Roman Papers 2.518–529.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1964. Sallust. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1980. “No Son for Caesar?” Historia 29: 422–437 = Roman Papers 3.1236–1250.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1980a. “The Sons of Crassus.” Latomus 39: 403–408 = Roman Papers 3.1220–1225.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1986. The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2010. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 1999. The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 2008. Always I Am Caesar. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 2018. Quintus Cicero: A Brief Handbook on Canvassing for Office. Oxford.Google Scholar
Täubler, E. 1924. Bellum Helveticum, eine Caesarstudie. Zürich.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1941. “Caesar’s Early Career.” CPh 36: 113–132.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1942. “Caesar’s Colleagues in the Pontifical College.” AJPh 63: 385–412.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1942a. “The Election of the Pontifex Maximus in the Late Roman Republic.” CPh 37: 421–424.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1942b. “Caesar and the Roman Nobility.” TAPhA 73: 1–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1951. “On the Chronology of Caesar’s First Consulship.” AJPh 72: 254–268.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1957. “The Rise of Julius Caesar.” G & R 4: 10–18.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1966. Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1968. “The Dating of Major Legislation and Elections in Caesar’s First Consulship.” Historia 17: 173–193.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R., and Broughton, T. R. S.. 1949. “The Order of the Two Consuls’ Names in the Yearly Lists.” MAAR 19: 3–14.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. 2017. Brutus: The Noble Conspirator. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Thein, A. 2006. “Sulla the Weak Tyrant.” In Lewis, S. (ed.), Ancient Tyranny. Edinburgh: 238–249.Google Scholar
Thein, A. 2014. “Reflecting on Sulla’s Clemency.” Historia 63: 166–186.Google Scholar
Thommen, L. 1989. Das Volkstribunat der späten römischen Republik. Historia ES 59. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. 1997. Catullus. Toronto.Google Scholar
Thorne, J. 2007. “The Chronology of the Campaign against the Helvetii: A Clue to Caesar’s Intentions?” Historia 56: 27–36.Google Scholar
Tiersch, C. 2018. “Political Communication in the Late Republic.” In van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge. 35–68.Google Scholar
Till, C. 2003. Die republikanischen Grundlagen der Ehrungen und der Selbstdarstellung Caesars. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Timpe, D. 1965. “Caesars Gallischer Krieg und das Problem des römischen Imperialismus.” Historia 14: 189–214.Google Scholar
Toher, M. 2017. Nicolaus of Damascus: The Life of Augustus and The Autobiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Toland, J. (ed.) 1700/1737. Oceana of James Harrington and His Other Works. Dublin.Google Scholar
Townend, B. G. 1987. “C. Oppius on Julius Caesar.” AJPh 108: 325–342.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 2007. Terentia, Tullia and Publilia: The Women of Cicero’s Family. London and New York.Google Scholar
Treu, M. 1948. “Zur Clementia Caesaris.” MH 5: 197–217.Google Scholar
Tschiedel, H. J. 1981. Caesars Anticato. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, W. B. 1978. A Legal and Historical Commentary to Cicero’s Oratio pro C. Rabirio perduellionis reo. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Uggeri, G. 1984. “La via Popilia e i collegamenti stradali tra Rimini e Ravenna in età romana.” In Delbianco, P. (ed.), Culture figurative e materiali tra Emilia e Marche. Rimini. 401–417.Google Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, J. 1970. Untersuchungen zum spätrepublikanischen Notstandsrecht. Munich.Google Scholar
Urso, G. (ed.) 2000. L’ultimo Cesare. Rome.Google Scholar
Urso, G. 2010. Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa.Google Scholar
Vanderbroeck, P. J. J. 1987. Popular Leadership and Collective Behavior in the Late Roman Republic (ca. 80–50 BC). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Várhely, Z. 2012. “‘To Forgive Is Divine.’” In Griswold, C. L. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Cambridge. 115–133.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J. 2006. “The Scope of the Lex Sempronia concerning the Assignment of the Consular Provinces (123 BCE).” Athenaeum 94: 625–654.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J. 2014. The High Command in the Roman Republic. The Principle of the summum imperium auspiciumque from 509 to 19 BCE. (Historia ES 232) Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Von Fritz, K. 1941. “The Mission of L. Caesar and L. Roscius in January 49 BC.” TAPhA 72: 125–156.Google Scholar
Vretska, K. 1976. De Catilinae Coniuratione. 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica: zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2009. “Struktur, Zufall, Kontingenz? Überlegungen zum Ende der römischen Republik.” In Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich. 27–51.Google Scholar
Walter, U., Geisweid, J., Hellweg, G., Pollpeter, S., Reiz, T., van Ross, A., and Siemoneit, G.. 2013. Cicero: Zweite Rede an das Volk gegen den Volkstribunen Publius Servilius Rullus über das Ackergesetz. Einführung, Kommentar zu §§1–46, Appendices. Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. 2009. “Caesar and Religion.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 100–111.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. 2014. Suetonius: Life of Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Watkins, O. D. 1987. “Caesar Solus? Senatorial Support for the Lex Gabinia.” Historia 36: 120–121.Google Scholar
Weggen, K. 2011. Der lange Schatten von Carrhae: Studien zu M. Licinius Crassus. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. 1971. Divus Julius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Welch, K. 1995. “Antony, Fulvia, and the Ghost of Clodius in 47 B.C.” G&R 42: 182–201.Google Scholar
Welch, K. 2012. Magnus Pius: Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Swansea.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (ed.) 2015. Appian’s Roman History: Empire and Civil War. Swansea.Google Scholar
Welch, K., and Powell, A. (eds.) 1998. Caesar as Artful Reporter. Swansea.Google Scholar
Welwei, K.-W. 2000. “Lucius Iunius Brutus: ein fiktiver Revolutionsheld.” In Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. (eds.), Von Romulus zu Augustus: große Gestalten der römischen Republik. Munich. 48–57.Google Scholar
Wensler, A. F. 1989. “Lucan und Livius zum Januar 49 v. Chr.: Quellenkundliche Beobachtungen.” Historia 38: 250–254.Google Scholar
Westall, R. W. 1996. “The Forum Iulium as Representation of Imperator Caesar.” MDAIR 103: 198–224.Google Scholar
Westall, R. W. 2018. Caesar’s Civil War: Historical Reality and Fabrication. Mnemosyne Suppl. 410. Leiden.Google Scholar
White, P. 1995. “Postumus, Curtius Postumus, and Rabirius Postumus.” CPh 90: 151–161.Google Scholar
White, P. 2003. “Tactics in Caesar’s Correspondence with Cicero.” In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds. 68–95.Google Scholar
White, P. 2010. Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilcken, U. 1940. Zur Entwicklung der römischen Diktatur. Berlin.Google Scholar
Will, W. 1992. Julius Caesar: eine Bilanz. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Williams, J. H. C. 2001. Beyond the Rubicon: Romans and Gauls in Republican Italy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 B.C.–A.D. 14. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1974. Cinna the Poet and Other Roman Essays. Leicester.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1985. Catullus and His World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1998. “The Publication of the De Bello Gallico.” In Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Caesar as Artful Reporter. Swansea. 1–9.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1998a. Roman Drama and Roman History. Exeter.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2008. Unwritten Rome. Exeter.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2009. Remembering the Roman People. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2016. Julius Caesar. Stroud.Google Scholar
Wistrand, M. 1979. Cicero Imperator: Studies in Cicero’s Correspondence 51–47 B.C. Göteborg.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2003. “Poems to Historians: Catullus 1 and Horace, Odes 2.1.” In Braund, D. C. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History, and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter. 191–216.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 1998. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, G. 2007. Et tu, Brute? The Murder of Caesar and Political Assassination. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wootten, D. (ed.) 1994. Republicanism, Liberty, and Commercial Society, 1649–1776. Stanford.Google Scholar
Worden, B. 1994. “Harrington’s ‘Oceana’: Origins and Aftermath, 1651–1660.” In Wootton, D. (ed.), Republicanism, Liberty, and Commercial Society, 1649–1776. Stanford. 111–138.Google Scholar
Worden, B. 1994a. “Republicanism and the Restoration, 1660–1683.” In Wootton, D. (ed.), Republicanism, Liberty, and Commercial Society, 1649–1776. Stanford. 139–193.Google Scholar
Woytek, B. 2003. Arma et nummi. Forschungen zur römischen Finanzgeschichte und Münzprägung der Jahre 49 bis 42 v. Chr. Vienna.Google Scholar
Woytek, , E. 2004. “Klärendes zu den pseudo-sallustischen ‘epistulae’.” In Heftner, H and Tomaschitz, K (eds.), Ad fontes: Festschrift für G. Dobesch. Vienna. 329–341.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 2008. Caesar: A Life in Western Culture. Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (ed.) 2006. Julius Caesar in Western Culture. Malden, MA, and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakobson, A. 1999. Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2004. Rev. of Mouritsen 2001 and Morstein-Marx 2004. SCI 23: 201–206.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2006. “Popular Power in the Roman Republic.” In Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 383–400.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2009. “Public Opinion, Foreign Policy and “Just War” in the Late Republic.” In Eilers, C. (ed.), Diplomats and Diplomacy in the Roman World. Mnemosyne Suppl. 304. Leiden and Boston. 45–72.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2010. “Traditional Political Culture and the People’s Role in the Roman Republic.” Historia 59: 282–302.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2011. Review of Flower, Roman Republics. AJPh 132: 153–156.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2012. Review of Robb, Beyond Populares and Optimates, SCI 31: 212–214.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2014. “Marius Speaks to the People: ‘New Man,’ Roman Nobility and Roman Political Culture.” SCI 33: 283–300.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2017. “Optimates, populares.” OCD (updated August 22, 2017).Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. M. 2012. “Decem Legati: A Flexible Institution, Rigidly Perceived.” In Yarrow, L. M and Smith, C. J. (eds.), Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius. Oxford. 168–183.Google Scholar
Yavetz, Z. 1983. Julius Caesar and His Public Image. London.Google Scholar
Zampieri, E. 2016. Rev. of Stevenson 2015. CR 66: 210–212.Google Scholar
Zarecki, J. 2014. Cicero’s Ideal Statesman in Theory and Practice. London.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. 1982. “Asinio Pollione: Dall’attività politica alla riflessione storiografica.” ANRW II.30.2: 1265–1296.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. 2000. “Cesare e Cartagine.” In Urso, G. (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome. 353–362.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. 2001. Cesare e il mos maiorum. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1995. Cicero: De re publica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2013. “Political Philosophy.” In Steel, C. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge. 181–195.Google Scholar
Zevi, F., and Cassola, F. 2016. “I Fasti di Privernum.” ZPE 197: 287–309.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, A. 1993. “Urbs Disrepta or How the Romans Sacked Cities.” In Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.), War and Society in the Roman World. London. 69–91.Google Scholar
Zippel, G. 1877. Die römische Herrschaft in Illyrien bis auf Augustus. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Robert Morstein-Marx, University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Book: Julius Caesar and the Roman People
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943260.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Robert Morstein-Marx, University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Book: Julius Caesar and the Roman People
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943260.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Robert Morstein-Marx, University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Book: Julius Caesar and the Roman People
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943260.012
Available formats
×