Book contents
- Jan Tinbergen (1903–1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise
- Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics
- Jan Tinbergen (1903–1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures/Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Becoming an Economic Expert
- Part II The Years of High Expertise
- Part III Global Expertise
- Part IV The Limits of Expertise
- Bibliography
- Index
- Series page
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2021
Book contents
- Jan Tinbergen (1903–1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise
- Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics
- Jan Tinbergen (1903–1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures/Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Becoming an Economic Expert
- Part II The Years of High Expertise
- Part III Global Expertise
- Part IV The Limits of Expertise
- Bibliography
- Index
- Series page
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Jan Tinbergen (1903–1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise , pp. 431 - 454Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Abma, R. 1977. “Het Plan van de Arbeid en de SDAP.” Bijdragen en Mededelingen Betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 92: 37–68.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Akami, Tomoko. 2016. “A Quest to Be Global: The League of Nations Health Organization and Inter-Colonial Regional Governing Agendas of the Far Eastern Association of Tropical Medicine 1910–25.” International History Review 38 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Akkerboom, Broer. 2015. “De Tinbergennorm Bestaat Niet.” MeJudice, 2015. www.mejudice.nl/artikelen/detail/de-tinbergennorm-bestaat-niet.Google Scholar
Alberts, Gerard. 1994. “On Connecting Socialism and Mathematics: Dirk Struik, Jan Burgers, and Jan Tinbergen.” Historia Mathematica 21 (3): 280–305.Google Scholar
Alberts, Gerard, and Weeder, Pieter. 1988. Distantie en Engagement: Jan Tinbergen Autobiografisch. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Alexeyeva, Ludmilla, and Goldberg, Paul. 1993. The Thaw Generation: Coming of Age in the Post-Stalin Era. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Algemeene Nederlandsche Bond “Vrede door Recht.” 1913. Het Vredespaleis: Gedenkboek: Ten Dage van de Plechtige Opening op 28 Augustus 1913. ’s-Gravenhage: Belinfante.Google Scholar
Ames, Edward. 1965. “Review of Central Planning by Jan Tinbergen.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 361: 167–68.Google Scholar
Andvig, Jens Christopher. 1988. “From Macrodynamics to Macroeconomic Planning: A Basic Shift in Ragnar Frisch’s Thinking?” European Economic Review 32: 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. “Review of Shaping the World Economy by Jan Tinbergen.” 1963. The International Executive 5 (1): 27–30.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1927. A “Een Gesprek met Hendrik de Man, de Eerste Sekretaris Der Sosialistiese Jeugdinternationale.” 1927. Het Jonge Volk 14: 194.Google Scholar
Arndt, H. W. 1987. Economic Development: The History of an Idea. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Asbeck, F. M. Baron, Tinbergen, Jan, and Verzijl, J. H. W.. 1946. Bouwstof Voor de Oplossing van Na-Oorlogsche Vraagstukken. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Assous, Michaël, and Carret, Vincent. 2020. “(In)Stability at the Cowles Commission.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27: 1–39.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Bateman, Bradley W.. 2011. Capitalist Revolutionary: John Maynard Keynes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Giraud, Yann. 2010. “Circular Flow Diagrams.” In Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, edited by Blaug, Mark and Lloyd, Peter, 221–29. Northhampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Balabkins, Nicholas. 1968. “Soviet-American Convergence by A.D. 2000? An Analysis of the Trends of Two Social Orders.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 10: 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balabkins, Nicholas. 1992. “Measuring Soviet Economic Growth: Old Problems and New Complications. A Comment.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 148 (1): 93–97.Google Scholar
Balisciano, Márcia L. 1998. “Hope for America: American Notions of Economic Planning between Pluralism and Neoclassicism, 1930–1950.” History of Political Economy 30 (Annual Supplement): 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, T. 1964. “Education and Economic Growth: Comments on Professor Tinbergen’s Planning ‘Model.’” Kyklos 17: 261–74.Google Scholar
Baneke, David Maarten. 2008. Synthetisch Denken: Natuurwetenschappers over hun Rol in een Moderne Maatschappij 1900-1940. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Bank, Jan. 1978. Opkomst en Ondergang van de Nederlandse Volksbeweging. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Batenburg, Paul, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Income Distribution: A Correction and a Generalization.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 120 (2): 361–65.Google Scholar
Bauer, Otto. 1931. Kapitalismus und Sozialismus nach dem Weltkrieg. Wien: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bergstrand, J. H., and Egger, P.. 2013. “Gravity Equations and Economic Frictions in the World Economy.” In Palgrave Handbook of International Trade, edited by Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., and Kreickemeier, U., 532–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bijnsdorp, Ine, Ermers, Ria, and Kenkhuis, Hennie. 1985. De Wapens Neder 1. Nijmegen: De Haktol.Google Scholar
Bjerkholt, Olav. 1995. Foundations of Econometrics: The Selected Essays of Ragnar Frisch. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bockman, Johanna, and Bernstein, Michael A.. 2008. “Scientific Community in a Divided World: Economists, Planning, and Research Priority during the Cold War.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 50 (3): 581–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaard, Adrienne van den. 1999. “Past Measurements and Future Prediction.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Morgan, Mary S. and Morison, Margaret, 282–326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bogaard, Adrienne van den. 2001. “Economie als Wiskundige Abstractie of als Uitdrukking van Zingeving? Strijdende Visies bij het Ontstaan van het Centraal Planbureau.” Gewina 24: 225–41.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen. 1924. “Macht oder ökonomisch Gesetz.” In Gesammelte Schriften von Eugen von Böhm Bawerk, edited by Weiss, Franz X., 230–300. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Boianovsky, Mauro. 2019. “Arthur Lewis and the Classical Foundations of Development Economics.” Research in the History and Methodology of Economic Thought 37 (A): 103–43.Google Scholar
Boianovsky, Mauro, and Hoover, Kevin D.. 20019. “The Neoclassical Growth Model and Twentieth-Century Economics.” History of Political Economy 41 (Annual Supplement): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boianovsky, Mauro, and Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2006. “Haberler, the League of Nations, and the Quest for Consensus in Business Cycle Theory in the 1930s.” History of Political Economy 38 (1): 45–89.Google Scholar
Boomen, Gerard van den. 1983. Honderd Jaar Vredesbeweging in Nederland. Amstelveen: Uitgeverij Luyten.Google Scholar
Bouma, Nienke, Bernard, M. S. van Praag, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1976. “Testing and Applying a Theory of Utility: An Attempt to Decompose Income in Compensatory and Scarcity Rents.” European Economic Review 8: 181–91.Google Scholar
Boumans, Marcel. 1992. A Case of Limited Physics Transfer: Jan Tinbergen’s Resources for Re-shaping Economics. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar
Boumans, Marcel. 2003. “Jan Tinbergen.” In Biografisch Woordenboek van Het Socialisme en de Arbeidersbeweging in Nederland, 8: 296–301. Amsterdam: IISG. https://socialhistory.org/bwsa/biografie/tinbergen.Google Scholar
Boumans, Marcel. 2019. “Econometrics: The Keynes–Tinbergen Controversy.” In The Elgar Companion to John Maynard Keynes, edited by Dimand, Robert W. and Hagemann, Harald, 283–89. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Boumans, Marcel, and Dupont-Kieffer, Ariane. 2011. “A History of the Histories of Econometrics.” History of Political Economy 43 (Annual Supplement): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boumans, Marcel, and De Marchi, Neil. 2018. “Models, Measurement, and ‘Universal Patterns’: Jan Tinbergen and Development Planning without Theory.” History of Political Economy 50 (S1): 231–48.Google Scholar
Brolsma, Marjet. 2015. “‘Het Humanitaire Moment.’ Nederlandse Intellectuelen, de Eerste Wereldoorlog En de Crisis van de Europese Beschaving (1914–1930).” Dissertation, University of Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.477826.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1959. “Positive Economics, Welfare Economics, and Political Economy.” The Journal of Law and Economics 2: 124–38.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1979. “What Should Economists Do?” Southern Economic Journal 30: 213–22.Google Scholar
Bulutoğlu, K. 1967. “Financing Turkey’s Development.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 181–214. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar
Busch, Joel H. 1968. “Book Review of Gunnar Myrdal’s Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations.” The Australian Quarterly 40 (4): 118–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butter, Frank A. G., and Maas, Harro. 2011. “From Expert Judgment to Model Based Monetary Analysis: The Case of the Dutch Central Bank in the Postwar Period.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, no. 11–161/3.Google Scholar
Casimir, Hendrik B. G. 1983. Haphazard Reality: Half a Century of Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek. 2001. Tweehonderd Jaar Statistiek in Tijdreeksen 1800–1999. Amsterdam: IISG.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, Sukhamoy. 1989. “Nicholas Kaldor on Indian Economic Problems.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 13: 237–44.Google Scholar
Clavin, Patricia. 2015. Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clavin, Patricia, and Wessels, Jens Wilhelm. 2005. “Transnationalism and the League of Nations: Understanding the Work of Its Economic and Financial Organisation.” Contemporary European History 14 (4): 465–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleeff, Ed van. 1929. “Hendrik de Man’s Die Intellektuellen und der Sozialismus.” Regeneratie: Maandschrift Voor Praktisch-Idealisme 10 (10): 294–300.Google Scholar
Cleeff, Ed van. 1931. “Het Sociaal-Ekonomies Wereldkongres.” Regeneratie: Maandschrift voor Praktisch-Idealisme 12 (10): 306–9.Google Scholar
Cooper, Malcolm. 2000. “The Legacy of Atatürk: Turkish Political Structures and Policy-Making.” International Affairs 78 (1): 115–28.Google Scholar
Cornelisse, Peter A., and Tilanus, C. B.. 1966. “The Semi-Input-Output Method: With an Application to Turkish Data.” De Economist 114: 521–33.Google Scholar
Craver, Earlene. 1986. “Patronage and the Directions of Research in Economics: The Rockefeller Foundation in Europe, 1924–1938.” Minerva 24 (2): 205–22.Google Scholar
Dalen, Harry van, and Klamer, Arjo. 1996. Telgen van Tinbergen: Het Verhaal van de Nederlandse Economen. Amsterdam: Balans.Google Scholar
Dekker, Erwin. 2019. “Parallel Lives: Jan Tinbergen and Ragnar Frisch.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 12 (2): 65–85.Google Scholar
Dekker, Erwin. 2021. “Jan Tinbergen and the Construction of an International Economic Order.” In Political Economy and International Order in Interwar Europe, edited by Mendes de Cunha, Alexandre and Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo, 117–37. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Derksen, J. B. D. 1940. “Het Onderzoek van het Nationale Inkomen.” De Economist 89: 571–94.Google Scholar
Desrosières, Alain. 2002. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. 2005. “Fisher, Keynes, and the Corridor of Stability.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64: 185–99.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W., and Bateman, Bradley W.. 2016. “John Maynard Keynes Narrates the Great Depression: His Reports to the Philips Electronics Firm.” Charles Gide Conference, Strassbourg.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W., and Veloce, William. 2007. “Charles F. Roos, Harold T. Davis and the Quantitative Approach to Business Cycle Analysis at the Cowles Commission in the 1930s and Early 1940s.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 519–42.Google Scholar
DIW Berlin. 2015. Geschichte Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung 1925–2015. Berlin: DIW.Google Scholar
Dodge, Peter. 1979. Hendrik de Man, Socialist Critic of Marxism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Doel, J. C. van den. 1971. “Konvergentie en Evolutie: De Konvergentietheorie van Tinbergen en de Evolutie van Ekonomische Ordes in Oost en West.” Dissertation, Nederlandse Economische Hogeschool.Google Scholar
Doel, J. C., de Galan, C., and Tinbergen, Jan. 1976. “Pleidooi voor een Geleide Loonpolitiek.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 61 (3044): 264–68.Google Scholar
Don, F. J. H. 2019. “The Influence of Jan Tinbergen on Dutch Economic Policy.” De Economist 167 (3): 259–82.Google Scholar
Düppe, Till. 2016. “Koopmans in the Soviet Union: A Travel Report of the Summer of 1965.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 38 (1): 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfest, Anna Galinka. 1972. “De Ooievaarsregeling (Contra Mina).” Hollands Maandblad 13 (298): 13–16.Google Scholar
Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa, Tatjana. 1924. Wat Kan en Moet het Meetkunde-Onderwijs aan een Niet-Wiskundige Geven? Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar
Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa, Tatjana. 1960. Didactische Opstellen Wiskunde. Zutphen: N. V. W. J. Thieme.Google Scholar
Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa, Tatjana, and Freudenthal, Hans. 1951. Kan het Wiskundeonderwijs tot Opvoeding van het Denkvermogen Bijdragen? Purmerend: Muuses.Google Scholar
Ehrenfreund, Max. 2019. “The World Economy as Scientific Object, 1930–1939.” HSS Meetings 2019 Utrecht. Harvard.Google Scholar
Ellman, Michael. 1980. “Against Convergence.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 4: 199–210.Google Scholar
Emre, Yunus. 2014. The Emergence of Social Democracy in Turkey: The Left and the Transformation of the Republican People’s Party. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Ennerfelt, P. Göran. 1965. “Review of Central Planning by Jan Tinbergen.” The Swedish Journal of Economics 67 (3): 258–60.Google Scholar
Eralp, Atila. 1994. “Turkey in Changing Postwar World Order Strategies of Development and Westernization.” In Developmentalism and Beyond: Society and Politics in Egypt and Turkey, edited by Öncü, Ayşe, Keyder, Çağlar, and Ibrahim, Saad Eddin, 204–29. Cairo: American University Press.Google Scholar
Erder, Necat. 2003. Plânlı Kalkınma Serüveni: 1960’larda Türkiye’de Plânlama Deneyimi (Panel Discussion). Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Erickson, Paul, Klein, Judy L., Daston, Lorraine, Lemov, Rebecca, Sturm, Thomas, and Gordin, Michael D.. 2015. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eroğul, Cem. 1987. “The Establishment of Multiparty Rule: 1945–1971.” In Turkey in Transition, edited by Schick, Irvin C. and Tonak, Ertuğrul Ahmet, 101–43. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleddérus, Mary L., and van Kleeck, Mary. 1931. World Social Economic Planning: The Necessity for Planned Adjustment of Productive Capacity and Standards of Living. The Hague: International Industrial Relations Institute.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder. 1967. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Walter. 2013. Fortune Tellers: The Story of America’s First Economic Forecasters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1932. New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1934. Statistical Confluence Analysis by Means of Complete Regression Systems. Oslo: Universitetets økonomiske Institut.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1949. “Memorandum on Price-Wage-Tax Subsidy Policy as Instruments in Maintaining Optimal Employment.” United Nations Sub-commission on Employment and Economic Stability, 18 April. New York. Reprinted at www.maggs.com/departments/modern_books_and_manuscripts/all_categories/234346/.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1962. “Preface to the Oslo Channel Model.” In Europe’s Future in Figures, edited by Geary, R. C., 248–86. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1995. “Autonomy of Economic Relations: Statistical versus Theoretical Relations in Economic Macrodynamics.” In The Foundations of Econometric Analysis, edited by Hendry, David F. and Morgan, Mary S., 407–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1969. “Myrdal’s Mythology: ‘Modernism’ and the Third World.” Encounter 33 (July): 26–34.Google Scholar
Goedhart, Theo, Halberstadt, Victor, Kapteyn, Arie, and van Praag, Bernard M. S.. 1977. “The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement.” The Journal of Human Resources 12: 503–20.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Crauford D. 2014. Walter Lippmann: Public Economist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Group of Experts. 1960. Programming Techniques for Economic Development with Special Reference to Asia and the Far East. Bangkok: United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1937. Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Geneva: League of Nations: Economic Intelligence Service.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried, Meade, James E., Oliveira de Campos, Roberto, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1958. Trends in International Trade. Geneva: GATT.Google Scholar
Hahn, Hans, Neurath, Otto, and Carnap, Rudolf. 1979. “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis.” In Otto Neurath: Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, Sozialismus und logischer Empirismus, edited by Hegelsmann, Rainer, 79–101. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Hamburger, L. 1929. “Boekbespreking van J. Tinbergen’s Minimumproblemen in de Natuurkunde en de Economie.” De Economist 78: 623–25.Google Scholar
Hanau, Arthur. 1928. “Die Prognose der Schweinepreise.” Vierteljahreshefte zur Konjunkturforschung, Sonderheft no. 7.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bent. 1969. “Jan Tinbergen: An Appraisal of His Contributions to Economics.” The Swedish Journal of Economics 71 (4): 325–36.Google Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1970. “Harrod after Twenty-One Years: A Comment.” The Economic Journal 80 (319): 737–41.Google Scholar
Hart, Albert G., Kaldor, Nicholas, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. The Case for an International Commodity Reserve Currency. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
Hartmans, Rob. 1991. “Van ‘wetenschappelijk Socialisme’ naar Wetenschap en Socialisme. De Ideologische Heroriëntering van de SDAP in de Jaren Dertig.” In Het Twaalfde Jaarboek voor het Democratisch Socialisme, edited by Krop, Marnix, Ros, Martin, Stuiveling, Saskia, and Tromp, Bart, 17–46. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 2019. “The Race between Demand and Supply: Tinbergen’s Pioneering Studies of Earnings Inequality.” De Economist 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heering, G. J., Tjalsma, P. D., and de Heer-Cremer, A. L.. 1948. De Remonstrantste Broederschap: Wat zij is en Wat zij Wil. Lochem: De Tijdstroom.Google Scholar
Hendry, David F., and Morgan, Mary S.. 1995. The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hershlag, Zvi Yehuda. 1968. Economic Planning in Turkey. Istanbul: Economic Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 2013. “The Rise and Decline of Development Economics.” In The Essential Hirschman, edited by Adelman, Jeremy, 49–73. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hollestelle, Marijn. 2011. Paul Ehrenfest: Worstelingen met de Moderne Wetenschap, 1912–1933. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Hoover, Kevin D. 2004. “Lost Causes.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2): 149–64.Google Scholar
Horn, Gerd-Rainer. 1996. European Socialists Respond to Fascism: Ideology, Activism and Contingency in the 1930s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueting, Roefie. 1968. “Welvaartsparadoxen.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 53 (2636): 263–64.Google Scholar
Human Development Report Team. 2010. Human Development Report 2010. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. Population and Development Review. Vol. 21. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jansen van Galen, John. 1985. “Doorbraak: Het Plan in de Herinnering van Tijdgenoten.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, 156–93. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Johansen, Leif. 1974. “Establishing Preference Function for Macroeconomic Decision Models: Some Observations on Ragnar Frisch’s Contributions.” European Economic Review 5: 41–66.Google Scholar
Jolink, Albert, and Barendrecht-Tinbergen, Els. 1993. Gedeelde Herinneringen. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Jong, A. H. M., van Paridon, C. W. A. M., and Passenier, J.. 1988. “Jan Tinbergen over zijn Jaren op het CPB.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 73 (3664): 653–62.Google Scholar
Jong, Fr. de. 1961. “Naar een Socialistisch Plan.” Socialisme en Democratie 18 (1): 3–12.Google Scholar
Jong, J. J. P.. 1986. “De Nederlands-Indonesische Betrekkingen 1963–1985.” Internationale Spectator 40 (2): 129–38.Google Scholar
Jong, Loe. 1969. Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog 1939–1945, Deel 2: Neutraal. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Joor, Johan. 2013. “The Way of the Law above the Way of Violence.” In The Building of Peace: A Hundred Years of Work on Peace through Law, edited by Duynstee, Bob, Meijer, Daan, and Tilanus, Floris, 15–285. Den Haag: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
Juliana, Hare Majesteit Koninging. 1955. De Welvaart der Wereld als Gemeenschappelijke Verantwoordelijkheid. Amsterdam: De Nederlandse Jeugd Gemeenschap.Google Scholar
Kamp, J. E. van. 2005. Dien Hoetink: “Bij Benadering.” Biografie van een Landbouw-Juriste in Crisis en Oorlogstijd. Groningen: Nederlands Agronomisch Historisch Instituut.Google Scholar
Kansu, Günal. 2004. Planli Yillar: Anilarla DPT’nin Öyküsü. Istanbul: Türkiye Iş Bankasi.Google Scholar
Kayzel, Tom. 2019. “A Night Train in Broad Daylight: Changing Economic Expertise at the Dutch Central Planning Bureau 1945–1977.” Oeconomia 9 (2): 337–70.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. 1973. “The Soviet Debate on the Convergence of the American & Soviet Systems.” Polity 6: 174–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesik, Ahmet. 2015. “Development Planning in Turkey: An Assessment.” In Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy, edited by Yülek, Murat, 77–113. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Keulen, Sjoerd J. 2014. Monumenten van Beleid: De Wisselwerking tussen Nederlandse Rijksoverheid, Sociale Wetenschappen en Politieke Cultuur, 1945–2002. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Keuzenkamp, Hugo A. 1991. “A Precursor to Muth: Tinbergen’s 1932 Model of Rational Expectations.” The Economic Journal 101 (408): 1245–53.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. 1987. “Economic Development and Crisis: 1950–1980.” In Turkey in Transition, edited by Schick, Irvin C. and Tonak, Ertuğrul Ahmet, 293–308. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1920. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1939. “Professor Tinbergen’s Method.” The Economic Journal 49 (195): 558–77.Google Scholar
Klein, Martin J. 1981. “Not by Discoveries Alone: The Centennial of Paul Ehrenfest.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 106 (1–2): 3–14.Google Scholar
Klein, Martin J. 1985. Paul Ehrenfest: The Making of a Theoretical Physicist. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Klein, Martin J. 1989. “Physics in the Making in Leiden: Paul Ehrenfest as Teacher.” In Physics in the Making: Essays on Developments in 20th Century Physics, edited by Sarlemijn, A. and Sparnaay, M. J., 29–44. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Klomp, H. A. 1997. De Relativiteitstheorie in Nederland: Breekijzer voor Democratisering in het Interbellum. Amsterdam: Epsilon.Google Scholar
Knegtmans, Peter Jan. 2008. “Voor Wetenschap en Maatschappij. Het Zelfbeeld van Studenten in de Sociaal-Democratische Studentenclubs.” In Keurige Wereldbestormers, edited by Dorsman, L. J. and Knegtmans, Peter Jan, 39–52. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1935. The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Freeport.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1960. Intelligence and Democratic Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, J. G. 1932. “De Mogelijkheid van een Meervoudig Economisch Evenwicht I.” De Economist 81: 679–702.Google Scholar
Koopmans, J. G. 1932. “De Mogelijkheid van een Meervoudig Economisch Evenwicht II.” De Economist 81: 766–85.Google Scholar
Koopmans, J. G. 1932. “De Mogelijkheid van een Meervoudig Economisch Evenwicht III.” De Economist 81: 841–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1937. Linear Regression Analysis of Economic Time Series. Haarlem: Bohn.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1947. “Measurement without Theory.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (3): 161–72.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C., Tinbergen, Jan, Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas, and Orcutt, Guy H.. 1952. “Toward Partial Redirection of Econometrics: Comments.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 34 (3): 200–213.Google Scholar
Koppl, Roger. 2002. Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kröger, Marianne. 1999. “Vervolging, Verbanning en het Nazi-Regime in het Tijdschrift ‘Het Fundament.’” Tijdschrift voor Tijdschriftstudies 3 (5): 26–35.Google Scholar
Küçük, Y. 1967. “Sectoral Programming in the Plan.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 96–113. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar
Küçük, Y. 196b. “The Macro-Model of the Plan.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 78–95. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar
Kuitenbrouwer, Maarten. 1994. De Ontdekking van de Derde Wereld. Den Haag: SDU Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Walter, and Labedz, Leopold. 1962. Polycentrism: The New Factor in International Communism. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, Albert. 1976. “The ‘Convergence’ Controversy Revisited.” Kyklos 29: 733–54.Google Scholar
League of Nations. 1943. The Transition from War to Peace Economy. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar
League of Nations. 1945. Economic Stability in the Post-war World. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, Harvey. 1966. “Review of Shaping the World Economy by Jan Tinbergen.” The Economic Journal 76 (301): 92–95.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1967. “Keynes and the Keynesians: A Suggested Interpretation.” The American Economic Review 57 (2): 401–10.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2003. “‘More Merciful and Not Less Effective’: Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 687–712.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2016. Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, David M. 2002. How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Classical Economics and the Ur-Text of Racial Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lieftinck, Pieter, Bakker, Adri, and van Lent, M. M. P.. 1989. Pieter Lieftinck, 1902–1989: Een Leven in Vogelvlucht. Utrecht: Veen.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy. in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linneman, Hans. 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Louçã, Francisco. 1999. “The Econometric Challenge to Keynes: Arguments and Contradictions in the Early Debates about a Late Issue.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 6 (3): 404–38.Google Scholar
Louçã, Francisco. 2007. The Years of High Econometrics: A Short History of the Generation That Reinvented Economics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Louw, Andre Van der. 1974. Rood als je Hart: Geschiedenis van de AJC. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. 1976. “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1 (1): 19–46.Google Scholar
Lunteren, Frans H. van. 2006. “Wissenschaft internationalisieren: Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, Paul Ehrenfest und ihre Arbeit für die internationale Wissenschafts-Community.” In Einstein und Europa – Dimensionen moderner Forschung, edited by Claussen, A., 25–35. Düsseldorf: Wissenschaftszentrum NRW.Google Scholar
Lunteren, Frans H., and Hollestelle, Marijn J.. 2013. “Paul Ehrenfest and the Dilemmas of Modernity.” Isis 104: 504–36.Google Scholar
Luytelaer, Th., and Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “De Koffievalorisaties: Geschiedenis en Resultaten.” De Economist 81: 517–38.Google Scholar
Maarseveen, J. G. S. J., and Schreijnders, R.. 1999. Welgeteld Een Eeuw. Zeist: CBS/IISG.Google Scholar
Maas, Harro. 2005. William Stanley Jevons and the Making of Modern Economics. Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maas, Harro. 2014. Economic Methodology: A Historical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magnus, Jan R., and Morgan, Mary S.. 1987. “The ET Interview: Professor J. Tinbergen.” Econometric Theory 3: 117–42.Google Scholar
Maier, Charles S. 1970. “Between Taylorism and Technocracy: European Ideologies and the Vision of Industrial Productivity in the 1920s.” Journal of Contemporary History 5 (2): 27–61.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2007. “About the Role, in Older Days, of Econometrics in Quantitative Economics.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (3): 423–48.Google Scholar
Marchi, Neil. 1991. “League of Nations Economists and the Ideal of Peaceful Change in the Decade of the Thirties.” In Economics and National Security, edited by Goodwin, Crauford D., 143–78. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Marchi, Neil. 2016. “Models and Misperceptions: Chenery, Hirschman and Tinbergen on Development Planning.” Research in the History and Methodology of Economic Thought 34B: 91–99.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the World: The History of an Idea, 1815 to the Present. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Meade, James E. 1940. The Economic Basis of a Durable Peace. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Meadows, Donella H. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904.Google Scholar
Meyer, Alfred G. 1970. “Theories of Convergence.” In Change in Communist Systems, edited by Johnson, Chalmers, 313–41. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mıhçıoğlu, Cemal. 1983. “Devlet Planlama Örgütünün Kuruluş Günleri.” In Prof. Dr. Fadıl H. Sur’un Anısına Armağan, 229–57. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Mıhçıoğlu, Cemal. 1988. “Yi̇ ne Devlet Planlama Örgütünün Kuruluşu Üzeri̇ ne.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 43 (1): 113–46.Google Scholar
Milor, Vedat. 1990. “The Genesis of Planning in Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey 4: 1–30.Google Scholar
Mintzel, Alf. 1983. Die Volkspartei: Typus und Wirklichkeit. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mizen, Paul, Moggridge, Don, and Presley, John. 1998. “The Papers of Dennis Robertson: The Discovery of Unexpected Riches.” History of Political Economy 29 (4): 573–82.Google Scholar
Mok, R. J. M. 1999. “In de Ban van het Ras. Aardrijkskunde tussen Wetenschap en Samenleving 1876–1992.” University of Amsterdam. http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/34891.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 1990. History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 1991. “The Stamping out of Process Analysis in Econometrics.” In Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs, edited by de Marchi, Neil and Blaug, Mark, 237–63. Brookfield: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 2012. The World in a Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Oskar. 1928. Wirtschaftsprognose: Eine Untersuchung ihrer Voraussetzungen und Möglichkeiten. Wien: Julius Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Oskar. 1935. “Vollkommene Voraussicht und wirtschaftliches Gleichgewicht.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 6 (3): 337–57.Google Scholar
Moscati, Ivan. 2018. Measuring Utility: From the Marginal Revolution to Behavioral Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mrijen, Anne-Marie. 2015. De Rode Jonker: De Eeuw van Marinus van Goes van Naters (1900–2005). Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Nederhorst, G. 1936. “Vooruitzichten der Internationale Productie Ordening.” Fundament 3 (12): 30–46.Google Scholar
Nederlandse Volksbeweging. 1945. Program en Toelichting van de Nederlandse Volksbeweging. Amsterdam: Anderson.Google Scholar
Nehru, Jawaharlal. 1952. “Address.” In International Statistical Conferences: December 1951 India, 12–18. Calcutta: EKA Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1931. “Der Gegensatz von ‘anschaulich’ und ‘rational’ in der Geschichte der Volkswirtschaftslehre.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik 65 (2): 225–50.Google Scholar
Nekkers, Jan. 1985a. “Een Ingenieur in de Politiek: Hein Vos. En het Plan van de Arbeid.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, edited by van Galen, John Jansen, Nekkers, Jan, Pels, Dick, and Pronk, Jan P., 101–23. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Nekkers, Jan. 1985b. “Sentiment en Program.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, edited by van Galen, John Jansen, Nekkers, Jan, Pels, Dick, and Pronk, Jan P., 11–100. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Netherlands Economic Institute, Division of Balanced International Growth. 1957. “Economic Development, Transportation and the National Income Test.” Rotterdam: Netherlands Economics Institute.Google Scholar
Noble, David F. 1977. America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noordergraaf, Herman. 1994. Niet met de Wapenen der Barbaren: Het Christen-Socialisme van Bart de Ligt. Baarn: Ten Haave.Google Scholar
Noordman, Jan. 1989. Om de Kwaliteit van het Nageslacht: Eugenetica in Nederland 1900–1950. Nijmegen: Sun.Google Scholar
Oomens, C. A. 1985. “De Ontwikkeling van de Nationale Rekeningen in Nederland.” In Voor Praktijk of Wetenschap, edited by Begeer, W., Oomens, C. A., and De Vries, W. F. M., 23–46. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
Orcutt, Guy H. 1952. “Toward the Partial Redirection of Econometrics.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 34 (3): 195–200.Google Scholar
Övgün, Barış. 2009. Türkiye’de Kamu İktisadi Teşebbüsü Olgusu. Ankara: Mülkiyeliler Birliği Vakıf Yayınları.Google Scholar
Passenier, Jacques. 1994. Van Planning naar Scanning: Een Halve Eeuw Planbureau in Nederland. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Patinkin, Don. 1976. “Keynes and Econometrics: On the Interaction between the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period.” Econometrica 44 (6): 1091–1123.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. 1996. The League of Nations and the Foreshadowing of the International Monetary Fund. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pels, Dick. 1985. “Hendrik de Man en de Ideologie van het Planisme.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, edited by van Galen, John Jansen, Nekkers, Jan, Pels, Dick, and Pronk, Jan P., 124–55. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Pen, Jan. 1988. “Tussen Elitisme En Egalitarisme.” In Distantie En Engagement, edited by Alberts, Gerard and Weeder, P., 55–64. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Pen, Jan. 2006. Vandaag Staat Niet Alleen: Essays and Memoires. Amsterdam: Nieuwe Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pen, Jan, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1977. Naar een Rechtvaardiger Inkomensverdeling. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Peski-Tinbergen, Tineke, and van Peski, Adriaan M.. 1958. “Communistische Opvoeding en Gedachtenvorming bij de Jeugd in de D.D.R.” Wending 13 (3): 149–172.Google Scholar
Polak, Fred L. 1948. “De Problematiek der Welvaartsplanning en haar Ontwikkeling in de Buitenlandse Litteratuur.” De Economist 96 (1): 161–92.Google Scholar
Polak, Jacques J. 1937. “Publieke Werken als Vorm van Conjunctuurpolitiek.” Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Polak, Jacques J. 1939. “International Propagation of Business Cycles.” The Review of Economic Studies 6 (2): 79–99.Google Scholar
Polak, Jacques J. 1954. An International Economic System. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Polak, Jacques J. 1997. “The Contribution of the International Monetary Fund.” History of Political Economy 28 (Annual Supplement): 211–24.Google Scholar
Praag, Bernard M. S., and Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada. 2004. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pronk, Jan P. 2019. “Tinbergen, Idealist and Inspirer.” Tinbergen Today. 2019. www.janpronk.nl/essays/english-and-german/tinbergen-idealist-and-inspirer-by-jan-pronk-article.html.Google Scholar
Prybyla, Jan S. 1964. “The Convergence of Western and Communist Economic Systems: A Critical Estimate.” The Russian Review 23 (1): 3–17.Google Scholar
Publikaties van de Stadsbibliotheek en het Archief en Museum voor het Vlaamse Cultuurleven. 1985. Hendrik de Man: Een Portret, 1885–1953. Antwerpen: Archief en Museum voor het Vlaamse Cultuurleven.Google Scholar
Puttaswamaiah, K. 1996. Tinbergen and Modern Economics: The Noble Economist Saint. New Delhi: Indus Publishing.Google Scholar
Reinders, J. S. 1987. “Macht in Dienst van Recht. Gereformeerden over Oorlog en Vrede in de Periode 1918–1940.” In Een Land nog Niet in Kaart Gebracht, 241–58. Amsterdam: J. de Bruijn.Google Scholar
Reindersma, W., and van Lohuizen, Teunis. 1930. Nieuw Leerboek der Natuurkunde: Voor Hoogere Burgerscholen met 5-Jarigen Cursus, Lycea en Gymnasia. Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel R. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rodenburg, Peter. 2010. “The Goudriaan–Tinbergen Debate on Dynamics and Equilibrium: 1931–1952.” http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1615458.Google Scholar
Roelofsen, C. G. 1995. “Jan Hendrik Willem Verzijl.” In The Moulding of International Law: Ten Dutch Proponents, edited by Tanja, Gerard J., 335–66. The Hague: Asser Instituut.Google Scholar
Roos, Charles Frederick. 1948. Charting the Course of Your Business: Measuring the Effects of External Influences. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Röpke, Wilhelm. 1950. The Social Crisis of Our Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rugina, Anghel N. 1988. “The Unending Search for Universal and Lasting Peace, from Leon Walras to Jan Tinbergen and Beyond.” Review of Social Economy 46 (3): 283–306.Google Scholar
Sarlemijn, Andries. 1987. “Konvergenz in Bezug auf Planung der Forschung?” In Wissenschaftsforschung Im Internationalen Vergleich, edited by Burrichter, Clemens and Lauterbach, G., 227–81. Nuernberg: Erlangen.Google Scholar
Scheall, Scott, and Schumacher, Reinhard. 2018. “Karl Menger as Son of Carl Menger.” History of Political Economy 50: 649–78.Google Scholar
Schenk, M. G., and Van Herk, Magdaleen. 1980. Juliana: Vorstin naast de Rode Loper. Amsterdam: De Boekerij.Google Scholar
Schils, René. 2012. “Hendrik Antoon Lorentz.” In How James Watt Invented the Copier: Forgotten Inventions of Our Great Scientists, 95–101. New York: Springer New York.Google Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav. 1897. “Wechselnde Theorien und feststehende Wahrheiten im Gebiete der Staats- und Socialwissenschaften und die heutige Deutsche Volkswirtschaftslehre.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 21 (4): 243–64.Google Scholar
Schöll, Guus van. 1981. Dienstweigering in Nederland voor de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Zwolle: Stichting Voorlichting Aktieve Geweldloosheid.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1926. “Gustav v. Schmoller und die Probleme von Heute.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 50 (3): 337–88.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1949. “Science and Ideology.” The American Economic Review 39 (2): 346–59.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam, and Bartelsman, Eric. 2019. Conversations between Nobel Laureates and Policymakers. Den Haag: KVS.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 2008. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1976. “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality.” In 25 Years of Economic Theory, edited by Kastelein, T. J., Kuipers, Simon K., Nijenhuis, W. A., and Wagenaar, R. G., 65–86. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
Singer, H. W. 1949. “Economic Progress in Underdeveloped Countries.” Social Research 16 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Slobodian, Quinn. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sluga, Glenda. 2013. Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sociaal-Economische Raad. 1953. Advies inzake het Vraagstuk van de Huren. Den Haag: Sociaal-Economische Raad.Google Scholar
Somsen, Geert. 2001. “Waardevolle Wetenschap. Bespiegelingen over Natuurwetenschap, Moraal en Samenleving in de Aanloop naar de Doorbraakbeweging.” Gewina 24: 207–24.Google Scholar
Sönmez, A. 1967. “The Re-Emergence of the Idea of Planning and the Scope and Targets of the 1963–1967 Plan.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 28–43. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar
Staatscommissie Bevolkingsvraagstuk Muntendam. 1976. “Bevolking en Welzijn in Nederland.” ’s-Gravenhage.Google Scholar
Steenkamp, P. J. A. M. 1978. “Gespreide Verantwoordelijk. Een Christen-Democratische Bijdrage aan de Discussie over de Economische Orde.” Den Haag. https://d2vry01uvf8h31.cloudfront.net/Organisaties/WI/1978%20-%20Gespreide%20verantwoordelijkheid%20deel%201.pdf.Google Scholar
Steur, J. A. G. van der. 1914. Beschrijving, behoorende bij het Vredespaleis. Rotterdam: Nijgh & Van Ditmar.Google Scholar
Stichting van den Arbeid. 1952. Werkclassificatie als Hulpmiddel bij de Loonpolitiek. ’s-Gravenhage: Stichting van den Arbeid.Google Scholar
Sur, Fadil H. 1983. Prof. Dr. Fadıl H. Sur’un Anısına Armağan. Ankara: A. Ü. S. B. F. ve Basın-Yayın Yüksek Okulu Basımevi.Google Scholar
Svorenčík, Andrej. 2015. “The Experimental Turn in Economics: A History of Experimental Economics.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2560026.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Faze- en Energieverandering van een Slinger en een Snaar gedurende hun Brown’se Beweging.” Physica: Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde 5 (11–12): 361–63.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Opmerkingen over de Arbeidswaardeleer.” Kentering 2 (2): 25–28.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Gruwelike Armoe.” Het Volk, 8 December.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Het Leven van Werklozen: De ‘Zegen’ van een Groot Gezin.” Het Volk, 17 December.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Van een die Rust Nodig heeft.” Het Volk, 24 December.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Boekbespreking van H. Ford’s Productie en Welvaart.” Kentering 2 (3): 45–47.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Boekbespreking van R. Hilferding’s Das Finanzkapital.” Kentering 2 (7): 83–85.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Boekbespreking van L. Frank’s De Burger.” Kentering 2 (4): 92–93.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Het Leven van Werklozen: ‘De Luxe S.D.A.P.-er te Zijn.’” Het Volk, 7 January.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Een ‘Gewoon’ Geval.” Het Volk, 12 February.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1927. “Over de Mathematies-Statistiese Methoden voor Konjunktuuronderzoek.” De Economist 76: 711–23.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “In der Steden Donk’re Stegen is een Lichte Roep Ontwaakt …” Het Jonge Volk 15 (6): 99.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Opmerkingen over Ruiltheorie.” De Socialistische Gids 13 (5–6): 431–45, 539–48.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Opmerkingen over Ruiltheorie II.” De Socialistische Gids 13 (6): 539–48.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Werktijdverkorting een Middel tegen Werkloosheid.” Het Volk, 15 September.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Boekbespreking van O. Morgenstern’s Wirtschaftsprognose.” De Economist 78: 141–43.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Konjunkturforschung und Variationsrechnung.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik 61 (3): 533–41.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Minimumproblemen in de Natuurkunde en de Ekonomie.” Dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Vraagstukken van Socialistiese Ekonomie.” De Socialistische Gids 14 (6): 528–40.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Bestimmung und Deutung von Angebotskurven: Ein Beispiel.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1 (5): 669–79.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Review of R. Wedemeyer’s Konjunkturverslechterung durch Lohnerhöhungen.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1: 481–85.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Socialisten en Hoge Inkomens: Een Antwoord.” Het Volk, 28 July.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. “De Landbouwkrisis: Praeadvies Uitgebracht voor de Socialistiese Vereniging ter Bevordering van de Studie van Maatschappelike Vraagstukken.” De Socialistische Gids 16 (4–5): 300–13, 384–93.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. “Oorzaken en Bestrijding der Werkloosheid.” De Socialistische Gids 16 (3): 169–80.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. “Review of J. Marschak’s Die Lohndiskussion.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 2: 820.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Ein Problem der Dynamik.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3 (2): 169–84.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “In Hoeverre kan het Regelen van den Omvang der Voortbrenging of van het Aanbod van Bepaalde Goederen door Producenten, al dan Niet met Medewerking van de Overheid, Bevorderlijk worden Geacht voor de Volkswelvaart?” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 48–78.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Is het Einde van de Crisis in Zicht?” De Sociaal-Democraat 10 (September): 2.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Kapitaalvorming en Conjunctuur in Nederland 1880–1930.” De Nederlandsche Conjunctuur 3 (1): 8–16.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Prijsvorming op de Aandelenmarkt.” De Nederlandsche Conjunctuur 3 (3): 12–23.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Review of A. Ammon’s Das Lohnproblem.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3: 123–24.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. “De Invloed van de Werkloosheid op het Loonpeil.” De Nederlandsche Conjunctuur 4 (2): 10–13.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. “L’Utilisation des Équations fonctionnelles et des Nombres complexes dans les Recherches économiques.” Econometrica 1 (1): 36–51.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. Statistiek en Wiskunde in Dienst van het Konjunktuuronderzoek. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. “The Notions of Horizon and Expectancy in Dynamic Economics.” Econometrica 1 (3): 247–64.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1934. “Der Einfluß der Kaufkraftregulierung auf den Konjunkturverlauf.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 5 (3): 289–319.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1934. Praeadvies Nationale Vereeniging tegen de Werkloosheid: Is te Verwachten dat de Maatregelen van President Roosevelt zullen Bijdragen, en zo Ja in welke Mate, tot een Blijvende Vermindering der Werkloosheid in de Verenigde Staten van Noord-Amerika.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Annual Survey: Suggestions on Quantitative Business Cycle Theory.” Econometrica 3 (3): 241–308.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “De Economische Zijde van het Ordeningsvraagstuk.” In Ordening, 17–29. Delft: Delftsch Hogeschoolfonds.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “De Politiek van Roosevelt.” De Socialistische Gids 20 (2): 87–97.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Desiderata op het Punt van de Conjunctuurstatistiek.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 20 (1000): 199.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “La Politique des Salaires, les Cycles économiques et les mathématiques.” Revue des Sciences économiques 9 (1): 17–29.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Ordening: Een Arbeidersbelang.” De Groene Amsterdammer, no. 3012: 4.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Conjunctuurpolitiek en Prijsstabilisatie.” De Economist 85: 443–56.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “De Conjunctuurpolitiek in Zweden.” Hollandsche Revue 41 (8): 351–53.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Kan hier te Lande, al dan Niet na Overheidsingrijpen, een Verbetering van de Binnenlandse Conjunctuur Intreden, ook zonder Verbetering van onze Exportpositie?” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 62–108. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Review of Otto Neurath’s Was Bedeutet Rationale Wirtschaftsbetragtung.” Erkenntnis 7: 70–71.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Sur la Détermination statistique de la Position d’équilibre cyclique.” Revue de l’Institut international de Statistique 4 (2): 173–88.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1937. “Review of R. F. Harrod’s The Trade Cycle.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 51: 89–91.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1939. Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories: I. A Method and Its Application to Investment Activity. Geneva: League of Nations Economic Intelligence Service.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1939. Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories: II. Business Cycles in the United States. of America 1919–1932. Geneva: League of Nations Economic Intelligence Service.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1940. “Enkele Cijfers en Beschouwingen over de Algemeene Aspecten der Financieele Politiek.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 25 (1262): 174–76.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1940. “On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research. A Comment.” The Economic Journal 50 (197): 154–56.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1941. “Indifferente en Labiele Evenwichten in Economische Stelsels.” De Economist 90: 561–84.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1941. Technische Ontwikkeling en Werkgelegenheid. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1942. “Critical Remarks on Some Business-Cycle Theories.” Econometrica 10: 129–46.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1942. “Professor Douglas’ Production Function.” Revue de l’Institut international de Statistique 10: 37–48.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1942. “Zur Theorie der langfristigen Wirtschaftsentwicklung.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 55: 511–49.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1943. Economische Bewegingsleer. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1943. “Over Verschillende Soorten Evenwicht en de Conjunctuurbeweging.” De Economist 92 (1943): 129–47.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1944. “Colin Clark’s ‘Economics of 1960.’” Revue de l’Institut international de Statistique 12: 1–4.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1944. De Les van Dertig Jaar: Economische Ervaringen en Mogelijkheden. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1944. “Wagemann’s ‘Alternatiewet.’” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 29 (1443): 86–87.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1945. Enkele Problemen van Centrale Planning. ’s-Gravenhage: Nederlandsch Instituut voor Efficiency.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. Conjunctuurpolitiek. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “De Plaats van den Econoom in de Maatschappij.” Wording 2: 189–91.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Herstelbetalingen.” In Bouwstof voor de Oplossing van Na-Oorlogsche Vraagstukken, 44–53. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Het Nederlandsche Welvaartplan.” De Ingenieur 58 (31): A297–A305.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Nederland in de Twintigste Eeuw.” In Hecht Verbonden in Lief en Leed, 1–44. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Some Measurements of Elasticities of Substitution.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 28 (3): 109–16.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Unstable Equilibria in the Balance of Payments.” In Economic Research and the Development of Economic Science and Public Policy, 133–42. New York: NBER.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Deense Problemen.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 32 (1564): 352–53.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Dollarschaarste en Prijsaanpassing.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 32 (1588): 816.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Gesteld, dat men Tezijnertijd het Huidige Systeem van Geleide Economie weer Geheel of Gedeeltelijk door een Stelsel van Vrije Economie zal Willen Vervangen, welke Voorwaarden moeten dan zijn Vervuld en welke Maatregelen zullen daartoe moeten worden Genomen.” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 101–19. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Problems of Central Economic Planning in the Netherlands.” Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift 85: 96–104.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Review of C. Clark’s Economics of 1960.” Erasmus Speculum Scientiarum 1 (1): 54.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “The Significance of Keynes’ Theories from the Econometric Point of View.” In The New Economics: Keynes’ Influence on Theory and Public Policy, edited by Harris, Seymour E., 208–18. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1948. “Kern van Industrialisatie dient te Berusten bij Ondernemers.” Trouw, December 9, 1948.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. De Grenzen der Ordening. Voorburg: Comité ter Bestudering van Ordeningsvraagstukken.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. Government Budget and Central Economic Plan. Reprinted by CPB. The Hague: Centraal Planbureau.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Het Nederlandsch Economisch Instituut in 1949.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 34 (1680): 576–77.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Long-Term Foreign Trade Elasticities.” Metroeconomica 1: 174–85.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Some Remarks on the Problem of Dollar Scarcity.” Econometrica 17 (Supplement): 73–97.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Welke Mogelijkheden en Middelen Bestaan er tot het in Evenwicht Brengen van de Betalingsbalans van Nederland na Afloop van de Marshall-Hulp onder Gelijktijdig Streven naar een Overwegend Vrijer Internationaal Handels- en Betalingsverkeer?” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 1–53. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1950. De Betekenis van het Sparen voor het Herstel van de Volkswelvaart. Amersfoort: Nederlandse Spaarbankbond.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1950. “Het Evenwicht in de Dollarbalans.” Internationale Spectator 4 (17): 1–4.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “Boekbespreking van C. Clark’s The Conditions of Economic Progress.” De Economist 99: 540–41.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. Business Cycles in the United Kingdom 1870–1914. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “De Centrale Gedachte van de Correlatierekening.” Statistica Neerlandica 5: 3–6.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “Reformulation of Current Business Cycle Theories as Refutable Hypotheses.” In Conference on Business Cycles NBER, 131–48.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “Schumpeter and Quantitative Research in Economics.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 33 (2): 109–11.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “Actuele Economische Problemen van India.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 37 (1808): 41–43.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “De Economist En Het Sociale Vraagstuk.” De Economist 100: 1011–24.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “On the Theory of Economic Integration.” Les Cahiers de Bruges 2 (4): 292–309.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1953. “De Levensomstandigheden in India.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 38 (1882): 494–95.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1953. “The Analysis of Unemployment Figures and the Alleged Correspondence between Causes and Cures.” Metroeconomica 5 (2): 43–49.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. “Antwoord Prof. Tinbergen op Erepromotie.” Folia Civitatis 8 (2): 1–2.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. “De Voorspelling en de Beïnvloeding van de Conjunctuur.” Socialisme en Democratie 11 (3): 169–77.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. “Het Economisch Aspect.” In Het Deltaplan, Afdamming Zee-Armen: Prae-Adviezen voor de Jaarlijkse Algemene Vergadering te Maastricht op 17 Juni 1954, 29–54. Haarlem: Nederlandsche Maatschappij voor Nijverheid en Handel.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1955. “Algunas Técnicas de Planeación del Desarrollo.” El Trimestre Económico 22: 401–20.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1956. Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1956. “On the Theory of Income Distribution.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 77 (2): 155–75.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1956. “The Optimum Rate of Saving.” The Economic Journal 66 (264): 603–9.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1957. “De Internationale Taak van de Sociaal-Democratie.” Socialisme en Democratie 14 (2): 84–89.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1957. “Internationale Socialistische Politiek.” Socialisme en Democratie 14 (11): 666–71.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1957. “Welfare Economics and Income Distribution.” The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 47 (2): 490–503.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1958. “Meer Economisch Begrip tussen Oost en West.” Wending 13 (8): 523–31.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1958. The Design of Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1959. “Inflatie, Integratie en Maatschappelijke Orde: Antwoord aan Professor Witteveen.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 44 (2188): 476–77.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1959. “International Co-ordination of Stabilizaiton and Development Policies.” Kyklos 12 (3): 283–89.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1959. “The Theory of the Optimum Regime.” In Selected Papers, edited by Klaassen, L. H., Koyck, L. M., and Witteveen, H. J., 264–304. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. “Europe and the World.” In Sciences humaines et Intégration Européene, edited by Brugmans, H., Cerych, L., and Lory, M. J., 379–85. Leiden: A. W. Sythoff.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. “Optimum Savings and Utility Maximization over Time.” Econometrica 28 (2): 481–89.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. Regional Planning: Some Principles. Rotterdam: Netherlands Economic Institute.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. “The Impact of the European Economic Community on Third Countries.” In Sciences humaines et Intégration Européene, edited by Brugmans, H., Cerych, L., and Lory, M. J., 386–98. Leiden: A. W. Sythoff.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1961. “Do Communist and Free Economies Show a Converging Pattern?” Soviet Studies 12 (4): 333–41.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1961. “Oost-West-Gesprekken.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 46 (2279): 323.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1961. “Sociaal-Economische Aspecten van het Deltaplan.” In Rapport Deltacommissie, Dl. 6, 61–74. Den Haag: Staatsdrukkerij.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1962. “Voorspellingen in Politiek, Economie en Sociologie.” Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 17 (3): 193–97.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1963. “Economic Planning for Development.” In Ambassadors Days at the Netherlands Trade Promotion Centre, edited by van den Bergh, S. J., 8–12. The Hague: Netherlands Trade Promotion Centre.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1963. “Introductory Remarks on the ‘Ization Problem.’” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 119 (2): 328–33.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1963. “The Appraisal of Investment Projects.” Rotterdam: Netherlands Economic Institute.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. “Boekbespreking van M. Bornstein En D. R. Fusfeld’s The Soviet Economy: A Book of Readings & F. D. Holzman’s Readings on the Soviet Economy.” De Economist 112: 58–60.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. “Education and Economic Growth: A Reply.” Kyklos 17 (2): 274–75.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1965. “De Toekomstige Sociale Orde en onze Beweging.” Socialisme en Democratie 22 (11): 728–43.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1965. “Ideologies and Scientific Development.” Review of International Affairs 16 (372): 6–7.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1965. “International, National, Regional and Local Industries.” In Trade, Growth, and the Balance of Payments: Essays in Honor of Gottfried Haberler, edited by Caves, Richard E., Johnson, Harry G., and Kenen, Peter B., 116–25. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1966. “On the Optimal Social Order and a World Economic Policy: A Discussion with Professor Lev Leontiev.” Oost-West 5 (10): 242–44.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1966. “Ontwikkelingshulp in Wereldperspectief.” In 10 Jaar Novib. 10 Jaar Ontwikkelingshulp, 52–55. ’s-Gravenhage: NOVIB.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1972. “De Convergentietheorie: Antikritiek.” In Mens en Keuze, edited by de Haan, H., Kuipers, S. K., and Postma, J. K. T., 1–12. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1972. “How Should the Future Be Studied?” In Possible Futures of European Education, edited by Jensen, Stefan, 109–33. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1973. Komt er wel een Post-Economisch Tijdperk. Amsterdam: Agon Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1973. “Some Thoughts on Mature Socialism.” In Studies in Economic Planning over Space and Time, edited by Judge, George G. and Takayama, Takashi, 9–25. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1974. Hoe kunnen wij Machtsstructuren Veranderen? Zwolle: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1975. Het Leerproces der Openbare Mening. Groningen: H. D. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1975. Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1976. Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1982. “Kan de Economische Wetenschap Bijdragen tot de Ontwikkeling van het Recht?” In In Orde: Liber Amicorum Pieter Verloren van Themaat, 295–300. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Alternative Optimal Social Orders.” The Pakistan Development Review 23: 1–7.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Coexistence: From the Past to the Future.” Coexistence 21: 3–6.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Development Cooperation as a Learning Process.” In Pioneers of Development, edited by Meier, Gerald M., 315–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Ik Heb Geluk Gehad …” In Dienstweigeraars: Over Dienstweigering en Verzet tegen het Militarisme vanaf de Eeuwwisseling Tot Nu, edited by Termeer, Guus, 74–79. Amsterdam: LINK.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1985. “Measurability of Utility (or Welfare).” De Economist 133: 411–14.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1987. “Het Getal Twee is van Keynes.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 72 (3632): 1092.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1987. “Over Modellen.” In Lessen uit het Verleden: 125 Jaar Vereniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde, edited by Knoester, A., 99–112. ’s-Gravenhage: Vereniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1987. “The Tension Theory of Welfare.” In Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, edited by Feiwel, George R., 410–20. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1989. “Ideologische Harmonisatie tussen Oost en West?” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 74 (3736): 1203.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1990. “Conventional and New Thinking in Defence Economics.” Defence Economics 1 (2): 121–28.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1991. Entering the Third Millennium. Rotterdam: P. J. Fijan Publications.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan. 1992. “Solving the Most Urgent Problems First.” In Eminent Economists: Their Life Philosophies, edited by Szenberg, Michael, 275–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and Bos, Hendricus C.. 1962. Mathematical Models of Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and Bos, Hendricus C.. 1965. “Appraisal of the Model and Results of Its Application.” In Econometric Models of Education: Some Applications, 95–99. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and Derksen, J. B. D.. 1941. “Nederlandsch-Indië in Cijfers.” In Daar wèrd wat Groots Verricht …, edited by van Helsdingen, W. H. and Hoogenberk, H., 495–512. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and Fischer, Dietrich. 1987. Warfare and Welfare: Integrating Security into Socio-economic Policy. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and Hueting, Roefie. 1992. “GNP and Market Prices: Wrong Signals for Sustainable Economic Success That Mask Environmental Destruction.” In Population, Technology and Lifestyle: The Transition to Sustainability, edited by Goodland, Robert, Daly, Herman E., and El Serafy, Salah, 52–62. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and van der Mandele, K. P.. 1958. Redevoeringen Uitgesproken ter Gelegenheid van de Ere-Promotie van Mr. K. P. van der Mandele. Rotterdam: Nederlandse Economische Hoogeschool.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and Polak, Jacques J.. 1950. The Dynamics of Business Cycles: A Study in Economic Fluctuations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, and van der Werff, H. M. A.. 1953. “Four Alternative Policies to Restore Balance of Payments Equilibrium: A Comment and an Extension.” Econometrica 21 (2): 332–35.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, Linneman, Henk, and Pronk, Jan P.. 1966. “The Meeting of the Twain.” The Columbia Journal of World Business 2 (1): 139–49.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan, den Uyl, J. M., Pronk, Jan P., and Kok, Wim. 1981. “A New World Employment Plan.” Peace & Development 2: 10–20.Google Scholar
Tompitak, Marco, and Beckers, Danny. 2015. “Solide en Gedegen Onderwijs. Wiskunde en Natuurkunde Onderwijsdiscussies in de Jaren 1920 als Monitor voor Disciplinevorming.” Studium: Tijdschrift voor Wetenschaps- en Universiteitsgeschiedenis 8 (2): 84–100.Google Scholar
Tooze, Adam J. 2001. Statistics and the German. State, 1900–1945: The Making of Modern Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toporowski, Jan. 2013. Michał Kalecki: An Intellectual Biography. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Torun, O. N. 1967. “The Establishment and Structure of the State Planning Organization.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 44–70. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar
Türkcan, Ergun. 2010. Attila Sönmez’e Armağan: Türkiye’de Planlamanın Yükselişi ve Çöküşü 1960–1980. Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
Tworek, Heidi J. S. 2019. “Communicable Disease: Information, Health, and Globalization in the Interwar Period.” The American Historical Review 124 (3): 813–42.Google Scholar
Ünay, Sadik. 2006. The Political Economy of Development Planning in Turkey: Neoliberal Globalization and Institutional Reform. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1949. Maintenance of Full Employment. Publication no. 1949.II.A.2. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1951. “Measures for the Economic Development of Under-developed Countries.” New York.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. 1994. Human Development Report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vanek, Jaroslav. 1964. “Review of Shaping the World Economy by Jan Tinbergen.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 46 (1): 99–101.Google Scholar
Verwey-Jonker, Hilda. 1936. “Plan en Internationalisme.” In Handboek voor het Plan van de Arbeid, edited by Wibaut, Floor, 135–42. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Verwey-Jonker, Hilda. 1938. “Vijf en Twintig Jaar Socialistische Theorie.” In Ir. J. W. Albarda: Een Kwart Eeuw Parlementaire Werkzaamheid in Dienst van de Bevrijding der Nederlandse Arbeidersklasse: Een Beeld van de Groei der Nederlandse Volksgemeenschap, edited by Boekman, E., 330–48. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Vooys, C. G. N. de. 1916. “Iets over Woordvorming en Woordbetekenis in Kindertaal.” De Nieuwe Taalgids 10: 93–100.Google Scholar
Vooys, C. G. N., van den Bosch, J. H., and Tinbergen, Dirk Cornelis. 1919. Letterkundig Leesboek Voor Hoogere Burgerscholen, Gymnasia En Kweekscholen. Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar
Vos, Hein. 1936. Waar het op Staat: Het Plan van de Arbeid Verdedigd. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Vos, Hein. 1938. “Recente Literatuur over Openbare Werken en Conjunctuur.” De Economist 87: 290–315.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics: Constructing Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2005. “Roy F. Harrod and the Interwar Years.” History of Political Economy 37 (1): 133–55.Google Scholar
Wertheim, W. F. 1976. Tien Jaar Onrecht in Indonesië: Militaire Dictatuur en Internationale Steun. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
Wiles, Peter. 1965. “Review of Central Planning by Jan Tinbergen.” The American Economic Review 55 (4): 909–10.Google Scholar
Witte-Rang, M. E. 2008. Geen Recht de Moed te Verliezen. Leven en Werken van Dr. H.M. de Lange (1919–2001). Utrecht: Boekencentrum.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Aslı. 2012. “Türkiye’de Planlama Politikası ve Yönetimi.” PhD dissertation, Ankara University.Google Scholar
Zamora, Daniel, and Jager, Anton. 2020. “Free from Our Labors and Joined Back to Nature: Basic Income and the Politics of Post-Work in France and the Low Countries.” In Basic Income: An Intellectual History.Google Scholar
Ziliak, Steve T., and McCloskey, Deirdre N.. 2008. The Cult of Statistical Significance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar