Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T18:44:33.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - The “why?” and the “so what?” of riverine landscapes

from PART V - Applications of landscape ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2009

By
Henri Décamps
Edited by
John A. Wiens  and
Michael R. Moss
Henri Décamps
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique France
John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC
Michael R. Moss
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Get access

Summary

Seeking to penetrate “the untranslatable dark,” the astronomer and poet Rebecca Elson (2001) observed that “explanation is not understanding.” This assertion was expanded by Ingrid Fiske (2001) in a review of the book: “Understanding comes through vigilant attention to the sensual world, through fidelity to the spirit and to the way our personal world interacts with the explanatory world of science.”

Accordingly, when studying riverine systems, a key question is to know what is the relevance of the “explanatory world” of landscape ecology to understand these systems. In other words, how to answer at the same time questions such as “why?” (the explanation) and “so what?” (the significance). O'Neill and Smith (2002) remind us that hierarchy theory provides a framework for that: the explanation is related to the next lower hierarchical level, and the significance to the next higher level of organization of the systems under study.

Perhaps more than others, riverine landscapes illustrate the need to address this distinction between explanation and significance. And perhaps more than in other landscapes, this distinction relates to the two realities of landscapes: they are at the same time natural and cultural. I'd like to illustrate this on the basis of two hypotheses:

  1. The hierarchical organization of riverine landscapes can be simplified to include two main levels – natural and cultural – the second level being higher than the first.

  2. The interacting structures and processes that characterize riverine landscapes can be explained at the lower natural hierarchical level, but they must be understood at the higher cultural hierarchical level.

Type
Chapter
Information
Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology , pp. 248 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berque, A. (1995). Les Raisons du Paysage de la Chine Antique aux Environnements de Synthèse. Paris: Hazan.Google Scholar
Burlaud, P. (2001). Danube Rhapsodie: Images, Mythes et Représentations. Paris: Grasset/Le Monde.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W., and Hanson, P. (1999). Ecological and social dynamics in simple models of ecosystem management. Conservation Ecology, 3, 4 (online). www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. S., Carpenter, S. R., Barber, M., et al. (2001). Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science, 293, 657–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Décamps, H. (1996). The renewal of floodplain forests along rivers: a landscape perspective. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung Limnologie, 26, 35–59.Google Scholar
Décamps, H. (2000). Demanding more of landscape research (and researchers). Landscape and Urban Planning, 47, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Décamps, H. (2001). How a riparian landscape finds form and comes alive. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elson, R. (2001). A Responsibility to Awe. Manchester: Carcanet.Google Scholar
Fiske, I. (2001). The poetic mystery of dark matter. Nature, 414, 845–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frissell, C. A., Liss, W. J., Warren, C. E., and Hurley, M. D. (1986). A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management, 10, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junk, W. J., Bayley, P. B., and Sparks, R. E. (1989). The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106, 110–127.Google Scholar
Lassus, B. (1998). The Landscape Approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Makhzoumi, J. and Pungetti, G. (1999). Ecological Landscape Design and Planning. London: Spon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malanson, G. P. (1993). Riparian Landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, R. J. (1996). Water, society, and landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, R. J. and Décamps, H. (1997). The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 621–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. (1992). The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology, 6, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 9, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. (1997). Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. In Placing Nature: Culture and Landscape Ecology, ed. Nassauer, J. I.. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
Naveh, Z. (2001). Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. and Smith, M. (2002). Scale and hierarchy theory. In Learning Landscape Ecology: a Practical Guide to Concepts and Techniques, ed. Gergel, S. E. and Turner, M. G.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinay, G., Décamps, H., Chauvet, E., and Fustec, E. (1990). Functions of ecotones in fluvial systems. In The Ecology and Management of Aquatic-Terrestrial Ecotones, ed. Naiman, R. J. and Décamps, H.. Paris: UNESCO and Parthenon, pp. 141–169.Google Scholar
Risser, P. G. (1999). Landscape ecology: does the science only need to change at the margin? In Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications, ed. Klopatek, J. M. and Gardner, R. H.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salo, J., Kalliola, R., Häkkinen, I., et al. (1986). River dynamics and the diversity of Amazon lowland forest. Nature, 322, 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and Memory. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. A., Ward, J. V., Liss, W. J., et al. (1996). A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers, 12, 391–413.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tress, B. and Tress, G. (2001). Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twain, M. (1883). Life on the Mississippi. Boston, MA: Osgood.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C. (1969). The Mediterranean Valleys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, J. V. (1998). Riverine landscape: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation, 83, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. (1999). The science and practice of landscape ecology. In Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications, ed. Klopatek, J. M. and Gardner, R. H.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×