Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:58:43.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Consanguineous marriages and their genetical consequences in some Indian populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

D. P. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
University of Calcutta
Derek F. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
N. Fujiki
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Genetics, Fukui Medical School, Japan
K. Torizuka
Affiliation:
Fukui Medical School, Japan
Get access

Summary

Introduction

With the microevolutionary theory emerged the concept of a population as an isolated group of conspecific interbreeding individuals who share a gene pool. But human populations present a hierarchy of further isolations. Consanguinity in marriage, where it occurs, serves as an isolating mechanism at the lowest level. Such marriages have important implications for the health and wellbeing of the subsequent generation, and recognition of this led to systematic studies on the rates and patterns of marital consanguinity in different countries. The highest rates so far have been found in Japan, India, Israel and Brazil. But there is wide variability within each country and within local populations. The variability and the trends of consanguineous marriage in Indian populations are mainly determined by the marriage regulations and cultural traditions.

Marriage regulations

The first level of breeding isolation in Indian populations is determined by religious and sect affiliations and linguistic-cultural diversities and traditions. About 75% of the people make up the traditional Hindu society with its network of varnas and endogamous jatis, about 8% belong to more isolated and relatively tradition-bound groups called the scheduled tribes near forests and hills, about 13% belong to Muslim communities, and the rest to Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Jain, Parsee and Jewish. All of them are distributed over the different provinces and states, with different linguistic or other traditions. These populations originated mainly from indigenous peoples (Hindus) and are divided and subdivided into endogamous occupational, local and cultural units (Mukherjee, 1971).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×