Book contents
- Islamic Law in Context
- Islamic Law in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Islamic Legal Theory (Uṣūl al-Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Part I
- Chapter 2 The Foundation of Analogy
- Chapter 3 The Insufficiency of Concomitance Alone
- Chapter 4 Selections from al-Manthūr fī l-Qawāʿid of Badr al-Dīn al-Zarkashī (d. 794/1392)
- Chapter 5 ‘Is Every Mujtahid Correct?’ and the Implications of Holding Incorrect Theological Beliefs for one’s Fate in the Hereafter, from the Qawānīn al-Uṣūl of Mīrzā al-Qummī (d. 1231/1816)
- Chapter 6 The ‘Innovation’ of Legal School Affiliation
- Part II Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Part III Legal Opinions (Fatwās)
- Part IV Court Judgments and Other Court Documentation
- Part V Judicial Manuals and Reference Books
- Part VI Alternative Sources for Islamic Legal Studies
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Chapter 3 - The Insufficiency of Concomitance Alone
‘Co-Presence and Co-Absence’ in the Mukhtaṣar of Ibn al-Ḥājib (d. 646/1249), with Commentary from the Sharḥ of al-Ījī (d. 756/1355) and the Ḥāshiya of al-Taftāzānī (d. 793/1390)
from Part I - Islamic Legal Theory (Uṣūl al-Fiqh) and Related Genres
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2024
Book contents
- Islamic Law in Context
- Islamic Law in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Islamic Legal Theory (Uṣūl al-Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Part I
- Chapter 2 The Foundation of Analogy
- Chapter 3 The Insufficiency of Concomitance Alone
- Chapter 4 Selections from al-Manthūr fī l-Qawāʿid of Badr al-Dīn al-Zarkashī (d. 794/1392)
- Chapter 5 ‘Is Every Mujtahid Correct?’ and the Implications of Holding Incorrect Theological Beliefs for one’s Fate in the Hereafter, from the Qawānīn al-Uṣūl of Mīrzā al-Qummī (d. 1231/1816)
- Chapter 6 The ‘Innovation’ of Legal School Affiliation
- Part II Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Part III Legal Opinions (Fatwās)
- Part IV Court Judgments and Other Court Documentation
- Part V Judicial Manuals and Reference Books
- Part VI Alternative Sources for Islamic Legal Studies
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores the discussion of the utility of co-presence and co-absence (al-ṭard wa-l-ʿaks) - a.k.a. concomitance (dawarān) - in determining whether a property is a cause (ʿilla) of its associated ruling (ḥukm) in the famous Mukhtaṣar of Ibn al-Ḥājib (d. 646/1249), as well as in the commentary of ʿAḍud al-Dīn al-Ījī (d. 756/1355) and its gloss by Saʿd al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī (d. 793/1390). This issue, while seemingly abstract, is vitally important to the proper application of causal qiyās. For this type of qiyās to be a legitimate method for deriving legal norms, one first needs to determine the cause of the rule in an authoritatively established case (called the ‘root-case,’ or aṣl). Only then can that rule be transferred to the disputed case (the ‘branch-case,’ or farʿ) in which the self-same cause exists. Arguments from concomitance (dawarān) are based on a knowledge that wherever the presumed causal property exists the legal norm exists (‘co-presence’), and wherever this property does not exist the legal norm does not exist (‘co-absence’).
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Islamic Law in ContextA Primary Source Reader, pp. 33 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Primary Sources
Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar. Mukhtaṣar Muntahā al-Suʾl wa-l-ʿAmal fī ʿIlmay al-Uṣūl wa-l-Jadal, ed. Ḥamādū, Nadhīr, 2 vols. (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2006).Google Scholar
Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar. Muntahā al-Wuṣūl wa-l-ʿAmal fī ʿIlmay al-Uṣūl wa-l-Jadal (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1985).Google Scholar
Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar. Muntahā al-Wuṣūl wa-l-ʿAmal fī ʿIlmay al-Uṣūl wa-l-Jadal (n.p. [Egypt]: Maṭbaʿat al-Saʿādah, 1326 [1908]).Google Scholar
al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn. Sharḥ al-ʿAḍud ʿalā Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā al-Uṣūlī li-l-Imām Abī ʿAmr Jamāl al-Dīn ʿUthmān ibn ʿUmar ibn Abī Bakr al-Maʿrūf bi-Ibn al-Ḥājib al-Mālikī, ed. Naṣīf, Fādī and Yaḥyā, Ṭāriq (Beirut: Manshūrāt Muḥammad ʿAlī Bayḍūn/Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2000).Google Scholar
al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn, Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar, al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn, al-Jurjānī, al-Sayyid al-Sharīf, al-Fanārī, Ḥasan al-Harawī and al-Warrāqī al-Jīzāwī, Muḥammad Abū al-Faḍl. Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā al-Uṣūlī li-Abī ʿUmar ʿUthmān ibn al-Ḥājib al-Mālikī ; sharaḥahu ʿAḍud al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ījī ; wa-ʿalā al-mukhtaṣar wa-l-sharḥ Ḥāshiyat Saʿd al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī ; wa-Ḥāshiyat al-Sayyid al-Sharīf al-Jurjānī ; wa-ʿalā Ḥāshiyat al-Jurjānī Ḥāshiyat Ḥasan al-Harawī al-Fanārī ; wa-ʿalā al-Mukhtaṣar wa-sharḥihi wa-Ḥāshiyat al-Saʿd wa-l-Jurjānī Ḥāshiyat Muḥammad Abū al-Faḍl al-Warrāqī al-Jīzāwī, ed. Ismāʿīl, Muḥammad Ḥasan Muḥammad Ḥasan, 3 vols. (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2004).Google Scholar
al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn. Sharḥ al-Sharḥ li-l-Mukhtaṣar fī l-Uṣūl. MS Berlin, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Petermann I 524, fol. 144a–b.Google Scholar
al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn, al-Jurjānī, al-Sayyid al-Sharīf, al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn, Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar and al-Fanārī, Ḥasan al-Harawī. Ḥāshiyat al-Taftāzānī wa-Ḥāshiyat al-Muḥaqqiq al-Jurjānī ʿalā Sharḥ al-Qāḍī ʿAḍud al-Milla wa-l-Dīn li-Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā maʿa Ḥāshiyat al-Harawī, ed. Ismāʿīl, Shaʿbān Muḥammad, 2 vols. (Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyyāt al-Azhariyya, 1973).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Brunschvig, Robert. ‘Valeur et fondement du raisonnement juridique par analogie d’après al-Ġazālī’, Studia Islamica 34 (1971), 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. al-Ghazālī’s Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridical Principle of Qiyās (Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, 1986).Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘The Conditions of Legal Cause in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 20 (1981), 303–42.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘The Definition of Qiyās in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 19 (1980), 1–28.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘Methods of Finding the Cause of a Legal Injunction in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 25 (1986), 11–44.Google Scholar
Miller, Larry Benjamin. Islamic Disputation Theory: The Uses and Rules of Argument in Medieval Islam (Cham: Springer, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Walter Edward. ‘Concomitance to Causation: Arguing Dawarān in the Proto-Ādāb al-Baḥth’, in Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Islamic World, ed. Adamson, Peter (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2019), 205–81.Google Scholar
Young, Walter Edward. The Dialectical Forge: Juridical Disputation and the Evolution of Islamic Law (Cham: Springer, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Walter Edward. ‘Mulāzama in Action in the Early Ādāb al-Baḥth’, Oriens 44 (2016), 332–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zysow, Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory (Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar