Book contents
- Islamic Law in Context
- Islamic Law in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Islamic Legal Theory (Uṣūl al-Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Part II Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Part III Legal Opinions (Fatwās)
- Chapter 17 Introduction to Part III
- Chapter 18 Ottoman Fatwās on the Substitution of Defunct Endowment Properties, from al-Aqwāl al-Marḍiyya of Qāḍīzādah Muḥammad Ṭāhir (d. 1254/1834)
- Chapter 19 Settling Disputes among Nomads
- Chapter 20 Fatwās on Aspects of Modern Life
- Chapter 21 ‘According to the Qaul Muʿtamad it is Unlawful and Invalid’
- Chapter 22 An Online Fatwā from the Dār al-Iftāʾ al-Miṣriyya on Women’s Leadership
- Chapter 23 ‘His Doctrine is Deviant’
- Part IV Court Judgments and Other Court Documentation
- Part V Judicial Manuals and Reference Books
- Part VI Alternative Sources for Islamic Legal Studies
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Chapter 21 - ‘According to the Qaul Muʿtamad it is Unlawful and Invalid’
The 2005 Majelis Ulama Indonesia Fatwā on Interreligious Marriage
from Part III - Legal Opinions (Fatwās)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2024
Book contents
- Islamic Law in Context
- Islamic Law in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Islamic Legal Theory (Uṣūl al-Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Part II Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) and Related Genres
- Part III Legal Opinions (Fatwās)
- Chapter 17 Introduction to Part III
- Chapter 18 Ottoman Fatwās on the Substitution of Defunct Endowment Properties, from al-Aqwāl al-Marḍiyya of Qāḍīzādah Muḥammad Ṭāhir (d. 1254/1834)
- Chapter 19 Settling Disputes among Nomads
- Chapter 20 Fatwās on Aspects of Modern Life
- Chapter 21 ‘According to the Qaul Muʿtamad it is Unlawful and Invalid’
- Chapter 22 An Online Fatwā from the Dār al-Iftāʾ al-Miṣriyya on Women’s Leadership
- Chapter 23 ‘His Doctrine is Deviant’
- Part IV Court Judgments and Other Court Documentation
- Part V Judicial Manuals and Reference Books
- Part VI Alternative Sources for Islamic Legal Studies
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores a controversial 2005 legal opinion (fatwā) of the MUI—the Indonesian Ulama Council (Majelis Ulama Indonesia) empowered by President Suharto in 1975 to serve as a semi-official religious authority—on the subject of interreligious marriage, and specifically, marriage to so-called ‘People of the Book.’ The MUI finds such marriages to be unlawful, based on the preponderance of harm over benefit therein. This is somewhat surprising given the general permissibility of such unions according to the four Sunnī schools. The logic of the arguments produced in favour of the prohibition are discussed, as well as the political and social contexts of the debate.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Islamic Law in ContextA Primary Source Reader, pp. 223 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Primary Sources
Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwā on Interreligious Marriage (1980), available at http://mui.or.id/wp-content/uploads/files/fatwa/05.-Perkawinan-Campuran.pdf.Google Scholar
Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwā on Interreligious Marriage (2005), available at https://mui.or.id/wp-content/uploads/files/fatwa/38.-Perkawinan-Beda-Agama.pdf.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abdun Nasir, Mohamad. ‘Religion, Law, and Identity: Contending Authorities on Interfaith Marriage in Lombok, Indonesia’, Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 31 (2019), 131–50.Google Scholar
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women (Oxford: Oneworld, 2001).Google Scholar
Atho’ Mudzhar, M. Fatwa-fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Pemikiran Hukum Islam di Indonesia 1975–1988 (Jakarta: INIS, 1993).Google Scholar
Atho’ Mudzhar, M. ‘Fatwās of the Council of Indonesian Ulama: A Study of Islamic Legal Thought in Indonesia, 1975–1988’, PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1990.Google Scholar
Bowen, John. Islam, Law and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feener, Michael. ‘Constructions of Religious Authority in Indonesian Islamism: “The Way and the Community” Reimagined’, in Islamic Legitimacy in a Plural Asia, ed. Reid, A. and Gilsenan, M. (London: Routledge, 2007), 139–53.Google Scholar
Feener, Michael. Muslim Legal Thought in Modern Indonesia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Yohanan. Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasyim, Syafiq. ‘Council of Indonesian Ulama (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI) and its Role in the Shariatisation of Indonesia’, PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, 2013.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. B. Indonesian Islam: Social Change through Contemporary Fatāwā (London: Allen & Unwin, 2003).Google Scholar
Ichwan, Moch Nur. ‘Menuju Islam Moderat Puritan: Majelis Ulama Indonesia dan Politik Ortodoksi Keagamaan’, in Conservative Turn: Islam Indonesia dalam Ancaman Fundamentalisme, ed. van Bruinessen, M. (Bandung: Mizan, 2014), 101–56.Google Scholar
Ichwan, Moch Nur. ‘Towards a Puritanical Moderate Islam: The Majelis Ulama Indonesia and the Politics of Religious Orthodoxy’, in Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the ‘Conservative’ Turn, ed. van Bruinessen, M. (Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, 2013), 60–104.Google Scholar
Ichwan, Moch Nur. ‘Ulamāʾ, State and Politics: Majelis Ulama Indonesia after Suharto’, Islamic Law and Society 12 (2005), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschorke, Judith. ‘Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: The Case of Interfaith Marriage Involving Muslims’, in Legal Pluralism in Muslim Contexts, ed. Oberauer, Norbert, Prief, Yvonne and Qubaja, Ulrike (Leiden: Brill, 2019), 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Himpunan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (Jakarta: Dirjen Bimas Islam dan Penyelenggaraan Haji Depag RI, 2003).Google Scholar
Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Himpunan Keputusan dan Fatwa MUI (Jakarta: Sekretariat MUI Masjid Istiqlal, n.d.).Google Scholar
Muhamad, Nova Effenty. ‘Perkawinan Beda Agama: Studi terhadap Fatwa MUI Tahun 2005’, in Mozaik Kajian Islam di Indonesia, ed. Salim, Arhanuddin et al. (Jakarta: Pustaka Alvabet, 2018), 49–113.Google Scholar
Rosyid, Maskur. ‘Reading Fatwas of MUI: A Perspective of Maṣlaḥah Concept’, Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 19 (2019), 91–117.Google Scholar
Sirry, Mun’im. ‘Fatwas and their Controversy: The Case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI)’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 44 (2013), 100–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasin, Raden. ‘The Fatwa of the Council of the Indonesian Ulama on Inter-Religious Marriage’, Journal de Jure 1 (2009), 1–19.Google Scholar
van Bruinessen, M. (ed.). Conservative Turn: Islam Indonesia dalam Ancaman Fundamentalisme (Bandung: Mizan, 2014) [Indonesian].Google Scholar
van Bruinessen, M. (ed.). Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the ‘Conservative’ Turn (Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar