Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Australia: The Search for Property in the Labyrinth of the Discretionary Trust
- Brazil: Intuitu Personae Adoption in the Brazilian Legal System
- Canada: Family Law at the Supreme Court of Canada
- China: Reform of the Marriage and Family Part of the Civil Code in China
- England and Wales: Beware of International Relationships
- European Court of Human Rights: Challenging Paternity under Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights
- France: A Chronicle of French Family Law: 2019
- Germany: Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation and Parentage: Family Law Lagging Behind
- Hong Kong: Hong Kong Family Law Today: Drowning not Waving?
- Korea: Full Guardianship in Korean Law: An Evaluation Over Seven Years from the Perspective of Family Court Practices and the Constitution
- Norway: The New Norwegian Adoption Act
- Poland: Discussion and Reform of Family Law in Poland
- Scotland: Making Scotland ‘The Best Place in the World to Grow Up’?
- Serbia: Child Maintenance and Welfare in Serbian Law
- Slovenia: New Regulation on Guardianship for Adults in Slovenia
- South Africa: Aspects of Dutch Colonial Family Law Related to the Indonesian Rajah of Tambora’s Exile at the Cape
- Sweden and California: On Children’s Rights to be Heard in Custody and Support Matters
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child: Continued Reflections on Family Law Issues in the Jurisprudence of the CRC Committee: The Convention on the Rights of the Child @ 30
- Index
England and Wales: Beware of International Relationships
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2021
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Australia: The Search for Property in the Labyrinth of the Discretionary Trust
- Brazil: Intuitu Personae Adoption in the Brazilian Legal System
- Canada: Family Law at the Supreme Court of Canada
- China: Reform of the Marriage and Family Part of the Civil Code in China
- England and Wales: Beware of International Relationships
- European Court of Human Rights: Challenging Paternity under Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights
- France: A Chronicle of French Family Law: 2019
- Germany: Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation and Parentage: Family Law Lagging Behind
- Hong Kong: Hong Kong Family Law Today: Drowning not Waving?
- Korea: Full Guardianship in Korean Law: An Evaluation Over Seven Years from the Perspective of Family Court Practices and the Constitution
- Norway: The New Norwegian Adoption Act
- Poland: Discussion and Reform of Family Law in Poland
- Scotland: Making Scotland ‘The Best Place in the World to Grow Up’?
- Serbia: Child Maintenance and Welfare in Serbian Law
- Slovenia: New Regulation on Guardianship for Adults in Slovenia
- South Africa: Aspects of Dutch Colonial Family Law Related to the Indonesian Rajah of Tambora’s Exile at the Cape
- Sweden and California: On Children’s Rights to be Heard in Custody and Support Matters
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child: Continued Reflections on Family Law Issues in the Jurisprudence of the CRC Committee: The Convention on the Rights of the Child @ 30
- Index
Summary
Résumé
En 2017, le ministère de la Justice de la République du Kazakhstan a publié une note à l’intention de ses citoyens les informant des dangers inhérents aux relations internationales lorsqu’ils fondent une famille et, plus précisément, lorsqu’un mariage et des enfants sont envisagés. C’est un avertissement qui pourrait bien être étendu à tous ceux qui envisagent de nouer une telle relation. Dans ce chapitre, cinq situations et leurs conséquences pour les parents et les enfants seront envisages en cas d’échec de la relation entre des personnes de nationalités différentes, un sujet abordé pour la première fois dans l’ISFL Survey de 2012.
Dans un monde de plus en plus globalisé, les relations dites mixtes sont devenues très courantes. Les sites internationaux de rencontres sur Internet, la popularité des voyages à l’étranger et les missions professionnelles internationales ont tous joué un rôle important dans la multiplication des relations familiales internationales. Cependant, comme le ministère de la Justice du Kazakhstan l’a reconnu, il peut y avoir des problèmes considérables lorsque de telles relations se rompent, en particulier lorsque le couple a des enfants et que les parents ne s’entendent pas sur le lieu du futur domicile des enfants et sur celui avec qui ils vivront.
Les cinq cas sélectionnés illustrent les circonstances difficiles dans lesquelles les parents et leurs enfants se trouvent en cas de séparation du couple. Le choix a été fait de limiter l’analyse à ces cinq cas particuliers, car ils ne relèvent pas du champ de la Convention de La Haye sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants de 1980 (la Convention de La Haye de 1980). Le rôle de cette convention est procédural et ordonne simplement le retour d’un enfant sur le territoire de sa résidence habituelle, donnant compétence aux tribunaux de ce pays pour prendre la décision sur le fond.
In 2017, the Ministry of Justice in the Republic of Kazakhstan issued a memo to its citizens advising them of the dangers of international relationships and, more specifically those where marriage and children were contemplated:
Dear citizens!
Citizens of Kazakhstan who marry foreigners should be warned and aware of possible legal and social consequences of conclusion of such alliance. First of all, before the marriage with foreigners, we recommend you familiarise yourselves with the peculiarities of civil and family law of a country, in which your future spouse is a citizen.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Survey of Family Law 20202020 Edition, pp. 71 - 98Publisher: IntersentiaPrint publication year: 2020