Book contents
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 171
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Treaties
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Regulation through Contract and Litigation
- Part II Regulation through Treaty and Arbitration
- 6 Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals over Sovereign Debt Disputes
- 7 Admissibility of Sovereign Bond Claims
- 8 Checks and Balances at the Stage of Merits
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
6 - Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals over Sovereign Debt Disputes
from Part II - Regulation through Treaty and Arbitration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2022
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 171
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Treaties
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Regulation through Contract and Litigation
- Part II Regulation through Treaty and Arbitration
- 6 Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals over Sovereign Debt Disputes
- 7 Admissibility of Sovereign Bond Claims
- 8 Checks and Balances at the Stage of Merits
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
Summary
The jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals to entertain sovereign bond disputes, which is primarily governed by the definition of investment as provided in applicable investment treaties, is the first stage at which such an appropriate balance is to be explored. This study has found that both the inclusion and exclusion of sovereign bonds as a protected investment reflect the policy decisions of contracting parties, and the ‘negotiated restructuring’ exception may embody a possible balance between bondholder protection and respect for negotiated debt restructuring. In the absence of an explicit reference to sovereign bond instruments, interpretative yardsticks, such as contribution, risk and territoriality as identified either in investment treaties or in the ICSID Convention may afford a balanced consideration taking into account of both the modern development of financial markets and policy decisions regarding the extent to which treaty protection should be provided.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement , pp. 169 - 201Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022