International Law and the Significance of Disciplinary Boundaries Special Regimes as Communities of Practice
Book contents
- International Law and the Significance of Disciplinary Boundaries
- International Law and the Significance of Disciplinary Boundaries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Author Notes
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Concept of a Special Regime
- 2 Special Regimes as Communities of Practice
- 3 A Mutual Engagement
- 4 A Joint Enterprise
- 5 A Shared Repertoire
- 6 Special Regimes and the Fragmentation of International Law
- List of Sources
- Index
- References
List of Sources
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2024
Book contents
- International Law and the Significance of Disciplinary Boundaries
- International Law and the Significance of Disciplinary Boundaries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Author Notes
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Concept of a Special Regime
- 2 Special Regimes as Communities of Practice
- 3 A Mutual Engagement
- 4 A Joint Enterprise
- 5 A Shared Repertoire
- 6 Special Regimes and the Fragmentation of International Law
- List of Sources
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Law and the Significance of Disciplinary BoundariesSpecial Regimes as Communities of Practice, pp. 183 - 205Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Primary Sources
Adinolfi, Giovana, ‘Soft Law in International Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2021) 1 The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law 86–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammann, Odile, Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law: Methods and Reasoning Based on the Swiss Example (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenäs, Mads & Björge, Eirik (eds.), A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade Lage, Délber & Brant, Leonardo Nemer Caldeira, ‘The Growing Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations: Chances and Risks’ (2008) III-1 Anuário Brasileiro de Direito Internacional 79–93.Google Scholar
Bacchus, James, ‘Not in Clinical Isolation’, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Barker, J. Craig, ‘International Court of Justice: “Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy)” Judgment of 3 February 2012’ (2013) 62 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 741–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhoorn, L. & Wellens, Karel (eds.), Diversity in Secondary Rules and the Unity of International Law (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar
Bartsch, Kerstin & Elberling, Björn, ‘Jus Cogens vs. Immunity, Round Two: The Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kalogeropoulou et al. v. Greece and Germany Decision’ (2003) 4 German Law Journal 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeley, Mark, ‘Approaches to the Award of Interest’, in Beharry, Christina (ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2018).Google Scholar
Beharry, Christina (ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘Thoughts on the Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties’, in Matscher, Franz & Petzold, Herbert (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension: Studies in Honour of Gérard J Wiarda (Cologne: Heymanns, 1988).Google Scholar
Beyerlin, Ulrich, ‘Sustainable Development’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Beyerlin, Ulrich & Marauhn, Thilo, International Environmental Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Gazing at the Crystal Ball (Again): State Immunity and Jus Cogens beyond Germany v. Italy’ (2013) 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Dianne, Understanding Utterances: Introduction to Pragmatics (Hoboken: Wiley, 1992).Google Scholar
Boudreault, François, ‘Identifying Conflicts of Norms: The ICJ Approach in the Case of the “Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening)”’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 1003–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Alan & Chinkin, Christine, The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brack, Duncan, ‘Reconciling the GATT and Multilateral Environmental Agreements with Trade Provisions: The Latest Debate’ (1997) 6 Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Stefan, ‘Ryle on Knowing How: Some Clarifications and Corrections’ (2020) 29 European Journal of Philosophy 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, ‘Problems concerning the Unity of International Law’, in Giuffrè, A. (ed.), Le droit international à l’heure de sa codification: Études en l’honneur de Roberto Ago, 4 vols., vol. I (Milan: Dott, 1987).Google Scholar
Cançado Trindade, Antônio Augusto, International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cançado Trindade, Antônio Augusto, ‘Prologue: An Overview of the Contribution of International Tribunals to the Rule of Law’, in De Baere, Geert & Wouters, Jan (eds.), The Contribution of International and Supranational Courts to the Rule of Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014).Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Enzo, ‘The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 889–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Multilateral Environmental Agreements and Trade Rules’ (1996) 26 Environmental Policy & Law 163–169.Google Scholar
Chi, Manjiao, Integrating Sustainable Development in International Investment Law: Normative Incompatibility, System Integration and Governance Implications (New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Christoffersen, Jonas, Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, Robin & Lowe, Alan, The Law of the Sea, 3rd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Clark, Tim, ‘The Teleological Turn in the Law of International Organisations’ (2021) 70 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 533–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordero Moss, Giuditta, ‘Tribunal’s Powers versus Party Autonomy’, in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Frederico, & Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Coyle, Sean, ‘Positivism, Idealism and the Rule of Law’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, Matthew, ‘The Genocide Case, the Law of Treaties and State Succession’ (1997) 68 British Yearbook of International Law 127–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘State Responsibility’, in Wolfrüm, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dam-de Jong, Daniëlla, ‘Who Is Targeted by the Council’s Sanctions? The UN Security Council and the Principle of Proportionality’ (2020) 89 Nordic Journal of International Law 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, ‘Arbitral Decisions as a Source of International Investment Law’, in Gazzini, Tarcisio & De Brabandere, Eric (eds.), International Investment Law (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2012).Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law: Procedural Aspects and Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, ‘(Re)Calibration, Standard-Setting and the Shaping of Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2018) 59 Boston College Law Review 2607–2634.Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, ‘Coherence, Consistency, and the Reform of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Franchini, Daniel, Buchan, Russell & Tsagourias, Nicholas (eds.), The Changing Character of International Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge Academic, 2023).Google Scholar
de la Rasilla, Ignacio, ‘A Very Short History of International Law Journals (1869–2018)’ (2018) 29 European Journal of International Law 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Londras, Fiona & Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, ‘Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, A, B & C v. Ireland, Decision of 17 December 2010’ (2013) 62 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 250–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, Oliver, ‘Article 31’, in Dörr, Oliver & Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Heidelberg: Springer, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, ‘European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1730–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, Tatyana, ‘Selling the Pass: Habeas Corpus, Diplomatic Relations and the Protection of Liberty and Security of Persons Detained Abroad’ (2013) 62 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 727–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espósito, Carlos, ‘Jus Cogens and Jurisdictional Immunities of States at the International Court of Justice: A Conflict Does Exist’ (2011) 21 Italian Yearbook of International Law 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espósito, Carlos, ‘Of Plumbers and Social Architects: Elements and Problems of the Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State’ (2013) 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtner, Isabel, ‘Realizing Utopia Through the Practice of International Law’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 1143–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, Mark & Wrbka, Stefan, ‘The Shifting Meaning of Legal Certainty’, in Fenwick, Mark & Wrbka, Stefan (eds.), Legal Certainty in a Contemporary Context (Singapore: Springer, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher-Lescano, Andreas & Teubner, Gunther, ‘Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’ (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999–1046.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald, ‘Hersch Lauterpacht – The Scholar as Judge’ (1961) 37 British Yearbook of International Law 1–71.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, Filippo & Björge, Eirik, ‘International Court of Justice, “Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v. Greece)” Judgment of 5 December 2011’ (2012) 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 775–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Hazel, The Law of State Immunity, 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Gagliani, Gabriele, ‘The International Court of Justice and Cultural Heritage: International Cultural Heritage Law Through the Lens of World Court Jurisprudence?’, in Carstens, Anne-Marie & Varner, Elizabeth (eds.), Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Richard, Treaty Interpretation, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Gehring, Markus & Kent, Avidan, ‘International Investment Agreements and the Emerging Green Economy: Rising to the Challenge’, in Baetens, Freya (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Genin, Vincent, Le laboratoire belge du droit international (Brussels: Académie royale de Belgique, 2018).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexander, Conservation, Biodiversity and International Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgetti, Chiara & Pollack, Mark (eds.), Beyond Fragmentation: Cross-Fertilization, Co-operation and Competition among International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Michael, ‘Hans Kelsen and the Logic of Legal Systems’ (2003) 54 Alabama Law Review 365–413.Google Scholar
Green, Michael, ‘Legal Realism as a Theory of Law’ (2005) 46 William and Mary Law Review 1915–2000.Google Scholar
Hafner, Gerhard, ‘Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law’ (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 849–863.Google Scholar
Heere, Wybo (ed.), From Government to Governance: The Growing Impact of Non-State Actors on the International and European Legal System (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennebel, Ludovic, ‘Le rôle des Amici Curiae Devant la Cour Européenne des Droits de L’Homme’ (2007) 71 Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme 641–668.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘“The Rule of Law: Some Sceptical Thoughts” Lecture Given at the British Institute for International and Comparative Law 16 October 2007’, in Higgins, Rosalyn (ed.), Themes and Theories, vol. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Himma, Kenneth, ‘Legal Positivism’, in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://iep.utm.edu/legalpos.Google Scholar
Hjørland, Birger, ‘Concept Theory’ (2009) 60 Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 1519–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Jodi, ‘Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet: Universal Jurisdiction and Sovereign Immunity for Jus Cogens Violations’ (1999) 23 Fordham International Law Journal 489–527.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, ‘The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 9–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudnall, Shannon, ‘Towards a Greener International Trade System: Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the World Trade Organization’ (1996) 29 Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems 175–216.Google Scholar
Hughes, Valerie, ‘The Institutional Dimension’, in Bethlehem, Daniel, Van Damme, Isabelle, McRae, Donald, & Neufeld, Rodney (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Humphreys, Stephen, ‘Climate Change: Too Complex for a Special Regime’ (2016) 34 Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, J. J. & Steup, Matthias, ‘The Analysis of Knowledge’, in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis.Google Scholar
Jeutner, Valentin, The Reasonable Person: A Legal Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Sarah, ‘Pharmaceutical Corporations and Access to Drugs: The “Fourth Wave” of Corporate Human Rights Scrutiny’ (2003) 25 Human Rights Quarterly 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, Daniel & Roscini, Marco (eds.), Non-Proliferation Law as a Special Regime: A Contribution to Fragmentation Theory in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jorg, ‘International Legal Positivism’, in Hoffmann, Florian & Orford, Anne (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamminga, Menno, ‘State Succession in Respect of Human Rights Treaties’ (1996) 7 European Journal of International Law 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?’ (2007) 23 Arbitration International 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law, Knight, Max (translator), 2nd edition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David, ‘The Sources of International Law’ (1987) 2 American University International Law Review 1–97.Google Scholar
Kinley, David & Tadaki, Junko, ‘From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law’ (2004) 44 Virginia Journal of International Law 931–1023.Google Scholar
Kooijmans, Pieter, ‘The ICJ in the 21st Century: Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism, or Proactive Judicial Policy’ (2007) 56 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 741–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Politics of International Law’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti & Leino, Päivi, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Post-Modern Anxieties’ (2005) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 553–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenc, Frédéric, ‘“Dire le droit”, “rendre la justice”. Quelle Cour européenne des droits de l’homme?’ (2018) 2 Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 311–346.Google Scholar
Laird, Ian & Askew, Rebecca, ‘Finality Versus Consistency: Does Investor-State Arbitration Need an Appellate System’ (2005) 7 Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 285–302.Google Scholar
Lanquetin, Marie-Thérèse, ‘L’égalité entre hommes et femmes dans le régime spécial de retraite de fonctionnaires’ (2002) 2 Droit Social 178–199.Google Scholar
Laurence, Stephen & Margolis, Eric, ‘Concepts and Cognitive Science’, in Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Legg, Andrew, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian, ‘Rethinking Legal Realism: Towards a Naturalized Jurisprudence’ (1997) 76 Texas Law Review 267–315.Google Scholar
Letsas, George, ‘The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifante-Vidaln, Isabel, ‘Is Legal Certainty a Formal Value?’ (2020) 11 Jurisprudence 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, On the Interpretation of Treaties (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Application of International Legal Norms Over Time: The Second Branch of Intertemporal Law’ (2011) 58 Netherlands International Law Review 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Principle of Rational Decision-Making: As Applied to the Identification of Normative Conflicts in International Law’ (2013) 73 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 591–614.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘Cross-Fertilisation in International Law’ (2015) 84 Nordic Journal of International Law 428–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘Philip Morris Asia Ltd. v. Australia: Abuse of Rights in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2017) 86 Nordic Journal of International Law 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘What Are the Functions of the General Principles? Good Faith and International Legal Pragmatics’ (2018) 78 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1–32.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Exercise of Discretion In International Law – Why Constraining Criteria Have a Proper Place in the Analysis of Legal Decision-Making’ (2019) 62 German Yearbook of International Law 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘Proportionality and International Legal Pragmatics’ (2020) 89 Nordic Journal of International Law 422–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Legal Consequences of Jus Cogens and the Individuation of Norms’ (2020) 33 Leiden Journal of International Law 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, Understanding Jus Cogens in International Law and International Legal Discourse (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘Rational Reconstruction and International Legal Reasoning’ (December 13, 2022) SSRN, Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, The International Legal System as a System of Knowledge (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Concept of an International Legal Concept’ (2023) 12 Cambridge International Law Journal 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroos, Anja, ‘Addressing Norm Conflicts in a Fragmented Legal System: The Doctrine of Lex Specialis’ (2005) 74 Nordic Journal of International Law 27–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logister, Louis, ‘Global Governance and Civil Society. Some Reflections on NGO Legitimacy’ (2007) 3 Journal of Global Ethics 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas, ‘The ICSID Convention: Origins and Transformation’ (2009) 38 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 47–61.Google Scholar
Maher, Julie, ‘Eweida and Others: A New Era for Article 9?’ (2014) 63 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoudi, Said, The Law of Deep Sea-Bed Mining (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1987).Google Scholar
Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, 7th edition (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Marboe, Irmgard, ‘Reparation Cases: Applicable Principles in International Investment Arbitration’, in Fabri, Hélène & Stoppioni, Edoardo (eds.), International Investment Law: An Analysis of the Major Decisions (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022).Google Scholar
Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen, ‘The Ontology of Concepts: Abstract Objects or Mental Representations?’ (2007) 41 Noûs 561–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen, ‘Concepts’, in Zalta, Edward & Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/concepts.Google Scholar
Matscher, Franz, ‘Methods of Interpretation of the Convention’, in Macdonald, Ronald St. J., Matscher, Franz, & Petzold, Herbert (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993).Google Scholar
Maxeiner, James, ‘Legal Certainty and Legal Methods: A European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?’ (2007) 15 Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law 541–607.Google Scholar
McCaffrey, Stephen, The Law of International Watercourses: Non-Navigational Uses (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres, ‘Law as a Process of Decision: A Policy-Oriented Approach to Legal Study’ (1956) Natural Law Forum, Paper 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 279–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew, ‘Leave Your Hat On: Head of State Immunity and Pinochet’ (1999) 25 Monash University Law Review 225–256.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew, ‘Proportionality and Remedies in WTO Disputes’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 985–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeckli, Daniel, ‘The Emergence of Terrorism as a Distinct Category of International Law’ (2008) 44 Texas International Law Journal 157–183.Google Scholar
Möschel, Mathias, ‘Jura Novit Curia and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2022) 33 European Journal of International Law 631–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Sean, ‘The United States and the International Court of Justice: Coping with Antinomies’, in Romano, Cesare (ed.), The Sword and the Scales: The United States and International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger & Tams, Christian (eds.), The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘The Classification of International Legal Rules: A Reply to Stefan Talmon’ (2013) 26 Leiden Journal of International Law 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovey, Clare & White, Robin, Jacobs & White, European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Parker, Matthew, ‘The Origin of LL.M. Programs: A Case Study of the University of Pennsylvania Law School’ (2018) 39 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 825–887.Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, International Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms: Treaty Arbitration and International Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007).Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, ‘Jus Cogens in a Time of Hegemony and Fragmentation’ (2005) 74 Nordic Journal of International Law 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘Article 19: Formulation of a Reservation’, in Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Realizing Utopia as a Scholarly Endeavour’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirker, Benedikt, Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review: A Theoretical and Comparative Study (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Raible, Lea, ‘Incidental Jurisdiction in Human Rights Litigation: Surprising Absence and Rival Techniques’ (2022) 116 AJIL Unbound 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasulov, Akbar, ‘Revisiting State Succession to Humanitarian Treaties: Is There a Case for Automaticity?’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayfuse, Rosemary, ‘Countermeasures and High Seas Fisheries Enforcement’ (2004) 51 Netherlands International Law Review 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayfuse, Rosemary, Non-Flag State Enforcement in High Seas Fisheries (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, Jane, ‘On “Knowing How” and “Knowing That”’ (1958) 67 The Philosophical Review 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, ‘Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address’ (1945–1946) 46 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William, ‘International Criminal Courts’, in Romano, Cesare, Alter, Karen, & Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Three Generations of ICSID Annulment Proceedings’, in Gaillard, Emmanuel & Banifatemi, Yas (eds.), Annulment of ICSID Awards (New York: Juris Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, ‘Towards a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 907–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm, International Law, 7th edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, ‘The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings’ (1994) 88 American Journal of International Law 611–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, ‘Normative Hierarchy in International Law’ (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, ‘Jura Novit Curia in International Human Rights Tribunals’, in Boschiero, Nerina, Scovazzi, Tullio, Pitea, Cesare, & Ragni, Chiara (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Siehr, Kurt, ‘A Special Regime for Cultural Objects in Europe’ (2003) 8 Uniform Law Review 551–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno & Hernández, Gleider, ‘Legal Consequences of an Impermissible Reservation to a Human Rights Treaty: Where Do We Stand?’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno & Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 483–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, David, ‘The Oil Platforms Case: Jurisdiction Through the—Closed—Eye of the Needle’ (2004) 3 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, A., ‘Kelsen Lives’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaak, Torben, ‘Realism About the Nature of Law’ (2017) 30 Ratio Juris 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoorenberg, Frank & Viñuales, Jorge, ‘Conflicting Decisions in International Arbitration’ (2009) 8 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 91–113.Google Scholar
St John, Taylor, The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law and Unintended Consequences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahn, Carsten & De Brabandere, Eric, ‘The Future of International Legal Scholarship: Some Thoughts on “Practice”, “Growth”, and “Dissemination”’ (2014) 27 Leiden Journal of International Law 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steer, Cassandra & Hersch, Matthew (eds.), War and Peace in Outer Space (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Stephens, Tim, ‘International Courts and Sustainable Development: Using Old Tools to Shape a New Discourse’, in Jessup, Brad & Rubenstein, Kim (eds.), Environmental Discourses in Public and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steup, Matthias & Neta, Ram, ‘Epistemology’, in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/epistemology.Google Scholar
Sugihara, Takane, ‘The Principle of Jura Novit Curia in the International Court of Justice: With Reference to Recent Decisions’ (2012) 55 Japanese Yearbook of International Law 77–109.Google Scholar
Sur, Serge, ‘The State between Fragmentation and Globalization’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taekema, Sanne, The Concept of Ideals in Legal Theory (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, ‘Jus Cogens After Germany v. Italy: Substantive and Procedural Rules Distinguished’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 979–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, Christian, Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Roger, ‘Pinochet, Confusion, and Justice: The Denial of Immunity in U.S. Courts to Alleged Torturers Who Are Former Heads of State’ (2001) 24 Thomas Jefferson Law Review 101–120.Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, ‘Judicial Activism and the International Court of Justice’, in Ando, Nisuke, McWhinney, Edward, & Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, 2 vols., vol. 1 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar
Thrilway, Hugh, The International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael & Trachtman, Joel, Advanced Introduction to International Trade Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020).Google Scholar
Tzeng, Peter, ‘Incidental Jurisdiction’, in Fabri, Hélène (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Valencia-Ospina, Eduardo, ‘Non-Governmental Organizations and the International Court of Justice’, in Treves, Tulio, Fodella, Alessandro, Tanzi, Attila, & Frigessi di Rattalma, Marco (eds.), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005).Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne & Lehman, Tobias, ‘Sustainable Development and International Investment Law: A Harmonious View From Economics’, in Echandi, Roberto & Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
van den Bossche, Peter & Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 4th edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Van den Eynde, Laura, ‘Amicus Curiae: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)’, in Fabri, Hélène (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Van Hoof, G. J. H., Rethinking the Source of International Law (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1983).Google Scholar
Van Meerbeeck, Jérémie, ‘The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: From Certainty to Trust’ (2016) 41 European Law Review 275–288.Google Scholar
van Steenberghe, Raphaël, Droit international humanitaire: Un regime special de droit international? (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2013).Google Scholar
Venzke, Ingo, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidmar, Jure, ‘Rethinking Jus Cogens After Germany v. Italy: Back to Article 53?’ (2013) 60 Netherlands International Law Review 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, Jukka, ‘The Role of the European Court of Human Rights as a Developer of International Human Rights Law’ (2008) 62/63 Cuadernos constitutucionales de la Catedra Fadrique Furio Ceriol 249–265.Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge, ‘Cartographies imaginaires: Observations sur la portée juridique du concept de “régime spécial” en droit international’ (2013) 140 Journal du droit international 405–425.Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge, ‘Sustainable Development in International Law’, in Rajamani, Lavanya & Peel, Jacqueline (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Voigt, Christina, Sustainable Development as a Principle of International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar
Vöneky, Silja, ‘Analogy in International Law’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 374–380.Google Scholar
Vranes, Erich, ‘The Definition of “Norm Conflict” in International Law and Legal Theory’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, Thomas, ‘Jus Cogens and Sovereign Immunity: Reconciling Divergence in Contemporary Jurisprudence’ (2014–2015) 46 Georgetown Journal of International Law 1151–1212.Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David & Kruger, Muria, ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’ (2003) 97 The American Journal of International Law 901–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger & Matz, Nele, Conflicts in International Environmental Law (Berlin: Springer, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Wróblewski, Jerzy, ‘Legal Language and Legal Interpretation’ (1985) 4 Law and Philosophy 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Margaret (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarbiyev, Fuad, ‘Judicial Activism in International Law – A Conceptual Framework for Analysis’ (2012) 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 247–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas, ‘Sovereign Immunity and Violations of International Jus Cogens’ (1995) 16 Michigan Journal of International Law 433–440.Google Scholar
Zyberi, Gentian, ‘The Role and Contribution of International Courts in Furthering Peace as an Essential Community Interest’, in Bailliet, Cecilia (ed.), Research Handbook on International Law and Peace (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019), pp 424–448.Google Scholar