Migration and Crime

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511762116.007

3 - Migration and Crime

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2014

Roberta Belli ,

Joshua D. Freilich and

Graeme R. Newman

Edited by

Mangai Natarajan

Show author details

Roberta Belli: Affiliation:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, USA
Joshua D. Freilich: Affiliation:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, USA
Graeme R. Newman: Affiliation:
The State University of New York at Albany, USA
Mangai Natarajan: Affiliation:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The relationship between migration and crime is a controversial issue that has received considerable attention from academics, media pundits, and politicians. This chapter discusses the extant literature and summarizes its major research findings. It must be noted though that some matters – in particular measurement related issues – remain unresolved. Researchers must determine, for instance, if they wish to study legal migrants, illegal immigrants, or both. The term “migrant” may be operationalized by researchers and nations as foreign-born (counting naturalized citizens as migrants) or noncitizens (counting native born noncitizens as migrants). These differences may make it difficult to compare studies and arrive at general conclusions, since different measurement decisions could lead to contradictory results.

In this chapter we examine current understandings as to whether migration leads to increases in criminal offending, victimization, or both. Under this conception, migration is the independent variable – the cause and crime is the dependent variable – the effect. We would be remiss, if we did not note that the reverse occurs, unfortunately, all too often. Numerous persons migrate to host countries to flee harsh living conditions, war crimes, and other human rights violations occurring in their country of origin. In other instances, criminal syndicates deceive or kidnap vulnerable individuals and transfer them to the host country to work in servitude or to be sexually abused (Aronowitz, 2009). In these cases, crime is the independent variable – the cause, and migration is the dependent variable – the effect.

Type: Chapter
Information: International Crime and Justice , pp. 19 - 25

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762116.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aronowitz, Alexis A. (2009). Human Trafficking, Human Misery: The Global Trade in Human Beings. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Beutin, R., Canoy, M., Horvath, A., Hubert, A., Lerais, F., & Sochacki, M., (2007). Reassessing the Link between Public Perception and Migration Policy. European Journal of Migration & Law, 9(4), 389–418.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clarke, R. V. (2002). Protecting Immigrants from Victimization: The Scope for Situational Crime Prevention. In Freilich, J. D., Newman, G., Shoham, S.G., & Addad, M. (Eds.), Migration, Culture Conflict and Crime. Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 103–19.Google Scholar

Finckenauer, J. & Voronin, Y.. The Threat of Russian Organized Crime. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 2001, NCJ 187085.

Franko Aas, K. (2007). Globalization & Crime. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Guerette, R. T. (2007). Immigration Policy, Border Security and Migrant Deaths: An Impact Evaluation of Life Saving Efforts under the Border Safety Initiative. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(2), 201–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Howard, G. J., Newman, G., & Freilich, J. D. (2002). Further Evidence on the Relationship between Population and Diversity and Violent Crime. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 26(2), 203–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Melossi, D., De Giorgi, A., & Massa, E. (2009). The “Normality” of “Second Generations” in Italy and the Importance of Legal Status: A Self-Report Delinquency Study. Sociology of Crime, Law & Deviance, 13, 47–65.CrossRef Google Scholar

Natarajan, M. (2005). Dealing with Domestic Violence in India: A Problem Solving Model for Police. In Freilich, J. D. and Guerette, R. (Eds.), Migration, Culture Conflict, Crime and Terrorism. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Newman, G., Freilich, J. D., & Howard, G. J. (2002). Exporting and Importing Criminality: Incarceration of the Foreign Born. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 26(2), 143–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Freilich, J. D., Opesso, M., & Newman, G. (2005). Immigration, Security and Civil Liberties: A Comparison of Post 9/11 Legislative and Policy Responses to Noncitizens in Australia, Canada and the United States. In Freilich, J. D. and Guerette, R. (Eds.), Migration, Culture Conflict, Crime and Terrorism. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Tonry, M. (Ed.) (1997). Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Welch, M. (2007). Deadly Consequences: Crime-Control Discourse and Unwelcome Migrants. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(2), 275–82.CrossRef Google Scholar