Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×

Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.

Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T02:44:12.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Why globalisation doesn't spell convergence: models of institutional variation and the comparative political economy of punishment

from PART 2 - Comparative penal policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2011

By
Nicola Lacey
Edited by
Adam Crawford
Nicola Lacey
Affiliation:
Oxford University
Adam Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

[W]e are confronted with results in comparative political economy which undermine the assumptions of mainstream comparative law about ‘convergence’ and ‘functional equivalence’… Against all expectations that globalization of the markets and computerization of the economy will lead to a convergence of legal regimes and to a functional equivalence of legal norms in responding to their identical problems, the opposite has turned out to be the case. Against all talk of ‘regulatory competition’ which is supposed to wipe out institutional differences, legal regimes under advanced capitalism have not converged.

Teubner 2001: 433

In the last decade, there has been a welcome revival of criminal justice scholarship which engages with the macro-level political–economic forces which are shaping criminal justice policy in western democracies. Many of these accounts are rooted in the global economic changes which began in the 1970s – recession, the contraction or even collapse of manufacturing industries, the growth of unemployment and the creation of a large sector of people either long-term unemployed or employed in insecure forms of work. These changes, it is argued, have eroded the consensus which sustained post-war penal welfarism. As significantly rising recorded crime across Western countries gradually produced a situation in which the experience of criminal victimisation, and of managing the risk and fear of crime, became normal features of everyday life for the economically secure, crime became an increasingly politicised issue, generating a ‘penal populism’ which brought in its wake a combination of repressive and managerial criminal justice strategies.

Type
Chapter
Information
International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance
Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings
 , pp. 214 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashworth, A. (2009) ‘The contours of English criminal law’ in McSherry, B., Norrie, A. and Bronitt, S. (eds.), Regulating Deviance: The Redirection of Criminalisation and the Futures of Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Barker, V. (2009) The Politics of Punishment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, K. (1997) Making Crime Pay, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, K. and Sasson, T. (2004) The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Beckett, K. and Western, B. (2001) ‘Governing social marginality’ in Garland, D. (ed.), Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences, London: Sage, pp. 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanden, J., Gregg, P. and Machin, S. (2005) Social Mobility in Britain: Low and Falling, Centre for Economic Performance Working Paper CP172, London: LSE.Google Scholar
Boggess, S. and Bound, J. (1993) ‘Did criminal activity increase during the 1980s? Comparisons across data sources’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 443.Google Scholar
Bondeson, U. (2005) ‘Levels of punitiveness in Scandinavia: descriptions and explanations’ in Pratt, J., Brown, D., Brown, M., Hallsworth, S. and Morrison, W. (eds.), The New Punitiveness, Cullompton, Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Carlen, P. (1983) Women's Imprisonment, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chevigny, P. (2003) ‘The populism of fear: politics of crime in the Americas’, Punishment and Society, 5(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. (1985) Visions of Social Control, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (1998) ‘Community safety and the quest for security: holding back the dynamics of social exclusion’, Policy Studies, 19, 237–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, D. (1988) Contrasts in Tolerance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downes, D. (2010) ‘Comparative criminology, globalisation and the “punitive turn”’ in Nelken, D. (ed.), Comparative Criminal Justice and Globalisation, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Downes, D. and Hansen, K. (2006) ‘Welfare and punishment in comparative perspective’ in Armstrong, S. and McAra, L. (eds.), Perspectives on Punishment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dubber, M. D. (2005) Police Power, Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, A. (2007) ‘Electoral cycles in the administration of criminal justice’, Public Choice, 133, 417–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1996) Welfare States in Transition, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2007) ‘High crime societies and cultures of control’ in L. Ostermeier and B. Paul (eds.), Special Issue, Kriminologisches Journal.
Garland, D. (2008) ‘A peculiar institution: capital punishment and American society’, paper delivered to the Harvard Criminal Justice Forum, May.
Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2002) The Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, A. de (2006) Rethinking the Political Economy of Punishment, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, M. (2007) The Prison and the Gallows, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. (2001) ‘Novus ordo saeclorum: a comment on Downes, and on Beckett and Western’, Punishment and Society, 3, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, C. (2005) ‘Economic marginalisation, social exclusion and crime’ in Hale, C., Hayward, K., Wahidin, A. and Wincup, E. (eds.), Criminology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 325–43.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (2007) ‘The evolution of varieties of capitalism in Europe’ in Hancké, B., Rhodes, M. and Thatcher, M. (eds.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001) ‘An introduction to the varieties of capitalism’ in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillyard, P. and Tombs, S. (2005) ‘Towards a political economy of harm: states, corporations and the production of inequality’ in Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S. and Gordon, D. (eds.), Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously, London: Pluto Press, pp. 30–54.Google Scholar
Husak, D. (2008) Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. (2007) ‘Economic shocks and varieties of government responses’ in Hancké, B., Rhodes, M. and Thatcher, M. (eds.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2006) ‘Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others’, American Political Science Review, 100, 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2009) ‘Distribution and redistribution: the shadow of the nineteenth century’, World Politics, 61(3), 438–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. (2008) The Prisoners' Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. (2009) ‘Historicising criminalisation: conceptual and empirical issues’, Modern Law Review, 72(6), 936–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. D. (1997) ‘Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime’, The American Economic Review, 87, 270–90.Google Scholar
Loader, I. (2006) ‘Fall of the Platonic guardians: liberalism, criminology and political responses to crime in England and Wales’, British Journal of Criminology, 46, 561–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAra, L. (2005) ‘Modelling penal transformation’, Punishment and Society, 7, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T. and Rosenthal, H. (2006) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marvell, T. B. (1995) ‘Sentencing guidelines and prison population growth’, Criminal Law and Criminology, 85, 696–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauer, M. and King, R. S. (2007) Uneven Justice: State Rates of Incarceration by Race and Ethnicity, Washington: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
Miller, L. L. (2008) The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, N. (2006) ‘Blair's “frenzied law-making”’, The Independent, 16 August.Google Scholar
Nelken, D. (1995) ‘Disclosing/invoking legal culture’, Social and Legal Studies, 4, 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, D. (1997) (ed.) Comparing Legal Cultures, Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Newburn, T. (2007) ‘“Tough on crime”: penal policy in England and Wales’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime, Punishment and Politics in Comparative Perspective: Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 36, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 425–70.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. (2007) Penal Populism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. (2008a) ‘Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess, Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism’, British Journal of Criminology, 48, 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. (2008b) ‘Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess, Part II: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future?’, British Journal of Criminology, 48, 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J., and Clark, M. C. (2005) ‘Penal populism in New Zealand’, Punishment and Society, 7(4), 303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J., Brown, D., Brown, M., Hallsworth, S. and Morrison, W. (2005) (eds.) The New Punitiveness, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Reiner, R. (2006) ‘Beyond risk: a lament for social democratic criminology' in Newburn, T. and Rock, P. (eds.), The Politics of Crime Control, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 7–49.Google Scholar
Reiner, R. (2007) Law and Order: An Honest Citizen's Guide to Crime and Control, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Reitz, K. (2005) ‘The enforceability of sentencing guidelines’, Stanford Law Review, 58, 155–73.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. and Hough, M. (2002) (eds.) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Rusche, G. and Kirchheimer, O. (1969) Punishment and Social Structure (first published in German, 1939), New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. (2003) Penal Policy and Political Culture in England and Wales, Winchester: Waterside.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, J. J. (1994) ‘Knowledge, domination, and criminal punishment’, American Journal of Sociology, 99, 911–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsberg, J. J (1999) ‘Knowledge, domination and criminal punishment revisited’, Punishment and Society, 1, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soskice, D. (2009) ‘American exceptionalism and comparative political economy’ in Brown, C., Eichengreen, B. and Reich, M. (eds.), Labor in the Era of Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuntz, W. J. (2001) ‘The pathological politics of criminal law’, Michigan Law Review, 100, 505–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuntz, W. J. (2006) ‘The political constitution of criminal justice’, Harvard Law Review, 119, 780–851.Google Scholar
Stuntz, W. J. (2008) ‘Unequal justice’, Harvard Law Review, 121, 1969–2040.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2004) ‘The political economy of imprisonment in affluent Western democracies, 1960–1990’, American Sociological Review, 69, 170–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. (2001) ‘Legal irritants: how unifying law ends up in new divergences’ in Hall, and Soskice, (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 417–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, M. (2004a) Punishment and Politics: Evidence and Emulation in the Making of English Crime Control Policy, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (2004b) ‘Why aren't German penal policies harsher and imprisonment rates higher?’, German Law Review, 5, 1187–206.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (2007) ‘Determinants of penal policies’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 36, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Unger, R. M. (1987) Social Theory: Its Situation and Task, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,US Department of Justice (2006) Prisoners in 2006, Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Useem, B., Liedka, R. V. and Morrison Piehl, A. (2003) ‘Popular support for the prison build-up’, Punishment and Society, 5(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, B. (2006) Punishment and Inequality in America, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Western, B. and Pettit, B. (2000) ‘Incarceration and racial inequality in men's employment’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 54, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J. Q. (2003) Harsh Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. (1999) The Exclusive Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, J. (2002) ‘Crime and social exclusion’ in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 457–90.Google Scholar
Zedner, L. (1995) ‘In pursuit of the vernacular: comparing law and order discourse in Britain and Germany’, Social and Legal Studies, 4, 517–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×