Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T02:13:26.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Liberty, equality and justice: democratic culture and punishment

from PART 2 - Comparative penal policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2011

By
Susanne Karstedt
Edited by
Adam Crawford
Susanne Karstedt
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Adam Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

Convergence and divergence: criminal punishment in contemporary democracies

Presently, imprisonment rates in the oldest of modern democracies, the United States are at historically high levels, and by far exceed those in other democracies. Imprisonment rates in the USA are affecting the social fabric of neighbourhoods and communities, and even impact on democratic elections in a way that changes their results (Manza and Uggen 2006). Even if this has often been seen as a case of ‘American exceptionalism’, as the exceptional scope and velocity of the increase of imprisonment rates in the USA was not matched in other Western democracies, it raises the question whether democratic societies are particularly susceptible to ‘penal excess’, which might endanger the very mechanisms of rule, law and justice on which democracies are founded. The exceptional rise of imprisonment rates in the USA took place against the backdrop of a less distinct increase in Canada (Webster and Doob in this volume; Tonry 2004), and most Western as well as Eastern European countries. The trend toward decreasing imprisonment rates that had defined the early decades of the second half of the twentieth century was reversed latest in the 1980s (see Tonry 2004; Tonry and Farrington 2005; Lacey 2008; Lappi-Seppälä 2008).

Type
Chapter
Information
International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance
Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings
 , pp. 356 - 386
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S. and Wacziarg, R. (2003) ‘Ethnic fractionalization’, Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, T. P. R. and Holston, J. (1999) ‘Democracy and violence in Brazil’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41(4), 691–729.Google Scholar
Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006a) ‘Penal policy and political economy’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(4), 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006b) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dijk, J. van (2006) ‘What goes up comes down: explaining falling crime rates’, Criminology in Europe, 5, 3(3), 17–18.Google Scholar
Downes, D. and Hansen, K. (2006) The Relationship between Welfare Spending and Imprisonment, Briefing, 2nd November 2006, London: Crime and Society Foundation.Google Scholar
Dünkel, F., Lappi-Seppälä, T., Morgenstern, T. and Zyl Smit, D. (2010) (eds.) Kriminalität, Kriminalpolitik, strafrechtliche Sanktionspraxis und Gefangenenraten im europäischen Vergleich, 2 vols., Godesberg: Forum.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1999) Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association (1981–2004) European and World Values Surveys four-wave integrated data file, 1981–2004, v.20060423, 2006, Surveys designed and executed by the European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association, File Producers: ASEP/JDS, Madrid, Spain and Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. File Distributors: ASEP/JDS and GESIS, Cologne, Germany, www.worldvaluessurvey.org.Google Scholar
,Freedom House (1973–2009) Freedom in the World: Country Ratings and Status by Region, FIW 1973–2009, Aggregate Data Excel File, www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/fiw09/CompHistData/FIW_ScoresByRegion.xls.
Harcourt, B. (2010) ‘Neoliberal penality: a brief genealogy’, Theoretical Criminology, 14(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. and Hofstede, G. J. (2005) (eds.) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2nd edn, New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggers, K. and Gurr, T. (1995) ‘Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data’, Journal of Peace Research, 32, 469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2001) ‘Comparing cultures, comparing crime: challenges, prospects and problems for a global criminology’, Crime, Law & Social Change, 36, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2002) ‘Emotions and criminal justice’, Theoretical Criminology, 6, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2003) ‘Moral und Skandal: Die Macht der öffentlichen Moral. Ein Vergleich der Kriminalitätsdiskurse in Deutschland und Großbritannien’ in Junge, M. (ed.), Macht und Moral, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2006a) ‘Emotions, crime and justice: exploring Durkheimian themes’ in Deflem, M. (ed.), Sociological Theory and Criminological Research: Views from Europe and the United States, Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, vol. 7, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2006b) ‘Democracy, values and violence: paradoxes, tensions, and comparative advantages of liberal inclusion’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 50–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2008) ‘Do trusted governments imprison less? Exploring the trust-punishment nexus with a cross-national sample’, Paper presented at the European Criminology Conference, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2010) ‘New institutionalism in criminology: approaches, theories and themes’ in McLaughlin, E. and Newburn, T. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Criminological Theory, London: Sage, pp. 337–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, S. and LaFree, G. (2006) ‘Democracy, crime and justice’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesteren, J. (2009) ‘Public attitudes and sentencing policies across the world’, European Journal of Criminal Policy Research, 15, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. (2008) The Prisoners' Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2008) ‘Trust, welfare and political culture: explaining differences in national penal policies’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 37, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 313–87.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Loader, I. (2006) ‘Policing, recognition and belonging’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 202–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manza, J. and Uggen, C. (2006) Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M. G. and Jaggers, K. (2005) Polity IV Data Set, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, College Park: University of Maryland, www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.htm (version: p4v2008).Google Scholar
Mead, H. (1964) ‘The psychology of punitive justice’ in Reck, A. J. (ed.), Selected Writings, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 212–39.Google Scholar
Mendez, J. E. (1999) ‘Problems of lawless violence: introduction’ in Mendez, J. E., O'Donnell, G. and Pinheiro, P. S. (eds.), The (UN) Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Neapolitano, J. L. (2001) ‘An examination of cross-national variation in punitiveness’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(6), 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, D. (2009) ‘Comparative criminal justice: beyond ethnocentrism and relativism’, European Journal of Criminology, 6(4), 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, R. and Messner, S. F. (2009) ‘The crime drop in comparative perspective: the impact of the economy and imprisonment on American and European burglary rates’, British Journal of Sociology, 60, 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. (2000 [1835 and 1840]) Democracy in America, Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, M. (2004) ‘Why aren't German penal policies harsher and imprisonment rates higher?’, German Law Journal, 5(10), 1187–206.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. and Farrington, D. (2005) (eds.) Crime and Punishment in Western Countries 1980–1999 (Crime and Justice: A Review of Research), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
,United Nations Development Program (2002) Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2002_EN_Complete.pdf.Google Scholar
Unnever, J. D. and Cullen, F. T. (2010) ‘The social sources of Americans' punitiveness: A test of three competing models’, Criminology, 48(1), 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Useem, B., Liedka, R. V. and Piehl, A. M. (2003) ‘Popular support for the prison build-up’, Punishment and Society, 5, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,US State Department (1999–2005) Human Rights: Country Reports, Washington DC, www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt.Google Scholar
Walmsley, R. (1999–2009) World Prison Population List, 1–8th edn, London: International Centre for Prison Studies, www.prisonstudies.org.Google Scholar
Whitman, J. (2003) Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, F., Hawkins, G. and Kamin, S. (2001) Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You are Out in California, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, F. and Johnson, D. T. (2006) ‘Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 266–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyl Smit, D. and Snacken, S. (2009) Principles of European Prison Law and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×