Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:49:13.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - A New Measure of Expected Relationship Satisfaction, Alternatives, and Investment Supports an Expectations Model of Interdependence

from Part IV - Interdependence, Timing, and Expectations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

By
Levi R. Baker ,
James K. McNulty ,
Ashlyn Brady  and
Shae Montalvo
Edited by
Laura V. Machia ,
Christopher R. Agnew  and
Ximena B. Arriaga
Laura V. Machia
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Christopher R. Agnew
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Ximena B. Arriaga
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Contemporary interdependence perspectives posit that intimates are more likely to remain in a relationship to the extent that they are committed to that relationship, and that they tend to be more committed to the extent that they a) are currently satisfied with the relationship, b) believe they do not currently have more desirable alternatives to the relationship, and c) have previously invested resources into the relationship. At times, though, intimates may expect that their relationship satisfaction, alternatives, and investments will increase or decrease in the future, and research on decision-making suggests that such expectations may determine their relationship commitment more than their current or past experiences do. In this chapter, we first identify factors (e.g., plans to improve the relationship, personality, gender) that may cause intimates’ expected experiences to diverge from their current experiences. Next, we review theoretical and empirical work suggesting that intimates’ relationship commitment should be determined more by their expected experiences than by their current or past experiences. Finally, we introduce a new measure of expected relationship satisfaction, alternatives, and investments designed for future research into these ideas.

Keywords

ExpectationsInterdependence theorycommitmentclose relationships
Type
Chapter
Information
Interdependence, Interaction, and Close Relationships , pp. 293 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I., Czasch, C., & Flood, M. G. (2009). From intentions to behavior: Implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1356–1372.Google Scholar
Alarcon, G. M., Bowling, N. A., & Khazon, S. (2013). Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 821–827.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). Amos (Version 24.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., & Lewandowski, G. (2002). Shared participation in self-expanding activities: Positive effects on experienced martial quality. In Noller, P., Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Feeney, J. A. (Eds.), Understanding Marriage: Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction (pp. 177–194). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly-formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R., Cobb, R. A., McNulty, J. K., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2016). Remaining in a situationally aggressive relationship: The role of relationship self-efficacy. Personal Relationships, 23, 591–604.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R. & McNulty, J. K. (2010). Shyness and marriage: Does shyness shape even established relationships? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 665–676Google Scholar
Baker, L. R., McNulty, J. K., Overall, N. C., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). How do relationship maintenance behaviors affect individual well-being?: A contextual perspective. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 282–289.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R., McNulty, J.K., & VanderDrift, L.E. (2017). Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 700–721.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.Google Scholar
Biehle, S. N. & Mickelson, K. D. (2012). First-time parents’ expectations about the division of childcare and play. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, T. N. (1989). Cognition, emotion, and interaction in distressed and nondistressed marriages (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Brase, G. L. & Guy, E. C. (2004). The demographics of mate value and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 471–484.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Phillips, C. M. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 17–32.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Chester, D. S., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). How often does currently felt emotion predict social behavior and judgment? A meta-analytic test of two theories. Emotion Review, 8, 136–143.Google Scholar
Dion, K. K. & Dion, K. L. (1996). Cultural perspectives on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3, 5–17.Google Scholar
Doss, B. D., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, A. (2004). Why do couples seek marital therapy? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 608–614.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. G. & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectancy-value approaches: Present status and future directions. In Feather, N. T. (Ed.), Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Feeney, B. C. & Collins, N. L. (2014). A theoretical perspective on the importance of social connections for thriving. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of Social Connection: From Brain to Group (pp. 291–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Feeney, J. A. & Karantzas, G. C. (2017). Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J. & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Relationship science, 2015. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 5–9.Google Scholar
Freedman, J. L., Wallington, S. A., & Bless, E. (1967). Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 117–124.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–1354.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, W. & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1639–1652.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9, 1–26.Google Scholar
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291–305.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kirsner, B. R., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2003). Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75, 131–148.Google Scholar
Laner, M. R. & Russell, J. N. (1995). Marital expectations and level of premarital involvement: Does marriage education make a difference? Teaching Sociology, 23, 28–34.Google Scholar
Lawrence, E., Nylen, K., & Cobb, R. J. (2007). Prenatal expectations and marital satisfaction over the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 155–164.Google Scholar
Le, B. & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr. (2016). The forecast model of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 34–52.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr., Lin, J. L., & Muir, H. J. (2015). Daily affective and behavioral forecasts in romantic relationships: Seeing tomorrow through the lens of today. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1005–1019.Google Scholar
Little, K. C., McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). Sex buffers intimates against the negative implications of attachment insecurity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 484–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing, 8, 43–57.Google Scholar
Lynn, M. (1992). Scarcity’s enhancement of desirability: The role of naive economic theories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 67–78.Google Scholar
Manucia, G. K., Baumann, D. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism and interpersonal negativity: The independent contributions of perceptions and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1439–1450.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Fisher, T. D. (2008). Gender differences in response to sexual expectancies and changes in sexual frequency: A short-term longitudinal study of sexual satisfaction in newlywed married couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K. & Karney, B. R. (2001). Attributions in marriage: Integrating specific and global evaluations of a relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 943–955.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Karney, B. R. (2002). Expectancy confirmation in appraisals of marital interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 764–775.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Karney, B. R. (2004). Positive expectations in the early years of marriage: Should couples expect the best or brace for the worst? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 729–743.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff” but it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 631–646.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Olson, M. A., Jones, R. E., & Acosta, L. M. (2017). Automatic associations between one’s partner and one’s affect as the proximal mechanism of change in relationship satisfaction: Evidence from evaluative conditioning. Psychological Science, 28, 1031–1040.Google Scholar
Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345.Google Scholar
Neff, L. A. & Broady, E. F. (2011). Stress resilience in early marriage: Can practice make perfect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1050–1067.Google Scholar
Neff, L. A. & Geers, A. L. (2013). Optimistic expectations in early marriage: A resource or vulnerability for adaptive relationship functioning? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 38–60.Google Scholar
Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglan- ski, A. W. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639.Google Scholar
Poortman, A. & Mills, M. (2012). Investments in marriage and cohabitation: The role of legal and interpersonal commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. Science, 339, 96–98.Google Scholar
Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2009). Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461, 263–266.Google Scholar
Rosato, A. (2016). Selling substitute goods to loss-averse consumers: Limited availability, bargains, and rip-offs. RAND Journal of Economics, 47, 709–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Satisfaction and commitment in friendships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 11, 96–105.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Harvey, J. H. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close Romantic Relationships: Maintenance and Enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 119–141.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 4, 133–161.Google Scholar
Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87–98.Google Scholar
Silliman, B. & Schumm, W. R. (1999). Improving practice in marriage preparation. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 25, 23–43.Google Scholar
Silverman, I. W. (1967). Incidence of guilt reactions in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 338–340.Google Scholar
Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 278–303.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. Oxford: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53–67.Google Scholar
Tran, P., Judge, M., & Kashima, Y. (2019). Commitment in relationships: An updated meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 26, 158–180.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. L., Wester, S. R., Wei, M., & Boysen, G. A. (2005). The role of outcome expectations and attitudes on decisions to seek professional help. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 459–470.Google Scholar
Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In Wenzel, K. R., Wigfield, A., Wenzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 55–75). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×