Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:55:25.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2019

Stephen J. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth
Katrin Bohn
Affiliation:
Natural England
Louise B. Firth
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth
Gray A. Williams
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

At the end of the 2015 Aquatic Biodiversity and Ecosystems Conference, a day was set aside for a workshop following up on the 1990 Plant–Animal Interactions meeting and its associated Systematics Association book – Plant–Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos (John et al., 1992). Talks given throughout the 2015 conference also informed the present volume and its chapters. The 2015 workshop took a comparative approach with a series of informal presentations and discussion sessions from selected participants from around the world. The general aim was to take a regionally based view of the role of interactions in setting distribution patterns, community structure and functioning of shallow-water marine ecosystems. The coverage was predominantly coastal, down to the limit of light penetration. Most contributions were from those working on rocky intertidal and subtidal habitats, reflecting the size (and willingness to contribute) of the research community coupled with the greater tradition of experimental approaches to examine interactions on more tractable hard substrata. In addition, mangroves, biofilms and the deep sea were also considered as special systems that are ubiquitous across several oceans where significant advances have been made and, therefore, warranted inclusion. Recent advances in remotely operated vehicles, for example, have increased the scope for observation and experiment in the deep sea (Johnson et al., 2013); whereas mangroves are important ecosystem engineers which provide important ecosystem services, but are declining globally (Polidoro et al., 2010; Chee et al., 2017). Biofilms were also included as a subject given their global distribution and importance as the site of first settlement of macrobenthic organisms and as a food source for grazers (Abreu et al., 2007). While this volume does not feature any chapters specifically on artificial structures, ocean sprawl or eco-engineering, a large number of talks and posters at the conference dealt with these emerging issues, reflecting their global importance (see Firth et al., 2016; Bishop et al., 2017 and Strain et al., 2018 for reviews). A notable omission is coral reefs, which were not covered because they already have a well-established community of research workers and deserve a volume in their own right. Inevitably, there are gaps in coverage reflecting difficulties in soliciting and delivering input, especially on soft shores as well as certain geographic locations. Coverage in 1992 and 2018 is shown on the maps in Figure 1.1.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interactions in the Marine Benthos
Global Patterns and Processes
, pp. 1 - 6
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abreu, P. C., Ballester, E. L., Odebrecht, C. et al. (2007). Importance of biofilm as food source for shrimp (Farfantepenaeus paulensis) evaluated by stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 347, 8896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airoldi, L. (2000). Effects of disturbance, life histories, and overgrowth on coexistence of algal crusts and turfs. Ecology, 81, 798814.Google Scholar
Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Airoldi, L., Abbiati, M. and Cinelli, F. (1996). Estimating the abundance of benthic invertebrates: a comparison of procedures and variability between observers. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 138, 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, M. J., Mayer-Pinto, M., Airoldi, L. et al. (2017). Effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity: impacts and solutions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 730.Google Scholar
Bohn, K., Richardson, C. A. and Jenkins, S. R. (2013). Larval microhabitat associations of the non-native gastropod Crepidula fornicata and effects on recruitment success in the intertidal zone. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 448, 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsje, B. W., van Wesenbeeck, B. K., Dekker, F. et al. (2011). How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecological Engineering, 37, 113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Brito Simith, D. D. J., Abrunhosa, F. A. and Diele, K. (2017). Metamorphosis of the edible mangrove crab Ucides cordatus (Ucididae) in response to benthic microbial biofilms. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 132–40.Google Scholar
Bulleri, F., Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Acunto, S., Cinelli, F. and Hawkins, S. J. (2002). The influence of canopy algae on vertical patterns of distribution of low-shore assemblages on rocky coasts in the northwest Mediterranean. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 267, 89106.Google Scholar
Chapman, M. G. (2017). Intertidal boulder-fields: A much neglected, but ecologically important, intertidal habitat. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 55: 3554.Google Scholar
Chee, S. Y., Othman, A. G., Sim, Y. K., Adam, A. N. M. and Firth, L. B. (2017). Land reclamation and artificial islands: Walking the tightrope between development and conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation, 12, 8095.Google Scholar
Crowe, T. P. and Underwood, A. J. (1999). Differences in dispersal of an intertidal gastropod in two habitats: the need for and design of repeated experimental transplantation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 237, 3160.Google Scholar
Edelist, D., Rilov, G., Golani, D., Carlton, J. T. and Spanier, E. (2013). Restructuring the sea: profound shifts in the world’s most invaded marine ecosystem. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 6977.Google Scholar
Enge, S., Sagerman, J., Wikstrom, S. A. and Pavia, H. (2017). A review of herbivore effects on seaweed invasions. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 55, 421–40.Google Scholar
Epstein, G. (2017). Invasive alien species management: a personal impasse. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 5, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, J. (2003). A critique for phytosociology. Journal of Vegetation Science 14, 291–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, L. B., Grant, L. M., Crowe, T. P. et al. (2017). Factors affecting the prevalence of the trematode parasite Echinostephilla patellae (Lebour, 1911) in the limpet Patella vulgata (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 99104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, L. B. and Crowe, T. P. (2008). Large-scale coexistence and small-scale segregation of key species on rocky shores. Hydrobiologia, 614, 233–41.Google Scholar
Firth, L. B. and Crowe, T. P. (2010). Competition and habitat suitability: small-scale segregation underpins large-scale coexistence of key species on temperate rocky shores. Oecologia, 162, 163–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firth, L. B., Knights, A. M., Bridger, D. et al. (2016). Ocean sprawl: challenges and opportunities for biodiversity management in a changing world. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 54, 201–78.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. J., Hartnoll, R. G., Kain, J. M. and Norton, T. A. (1992). Plant–Animal Interactions on Hard Substrata in the Northeast Atlantic. In John, D. M., Hawkins, S. J. and Price, J. H., eds. Plant–Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 132.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. J., Mieszkowska, N., Firth, L. B. et al. (2016). Looking backwards to look forwards: the role of natural history in temperate reef ecology. Marine and Freshwater Research, 67, 113.Google Scholar
Heery, E. C., Bishop, M. J., Critchley, L. P. et al. (2017). Identifying the consequences of ocean sprawl for sedimentary habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 3148.Google Scholar
Iveša, L., Chapman, M. G., Underwood, A. J. and Murphy, R. J. (2010). Differential patterns of distribution of limpets on intertidal seawalls: experimental investigation of the roles of recruitment, survival and competition. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 407, 5569.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. C., Murphy, R. J. and Underwood, A. J. (2013). Biofilms on rocky shores: Influences of rockpools, local moisture and temperature. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 443, 4655.Google Scholar
John, D. M., Hawkins, S. J. and Price, J. H., eds. (1992). Plant–Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P., White, M., Wilson, A. et al. (2013). A vertical wall dominated by Acesta excavata and Neopycnodonte zibrowii, part of an undersampled group of deep-sea habitats. PLoS ONE, 8, e79917.Google Scholar
Johnston, E. L., Dafforn, K. A., Clark, G. F., Rius, M. and Floerl, O. (2017). How anthropogenic activities affect the establishment and spread of non-indigenous species post-arrival. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 55, 389420.Google Scholar
Knights, A. M. (2012). Spatial variation in body size and reproductive condition of subtidal mussels: considerations for sustainable management. Fisheries Research, 113, 4554.Google Scholar
Knights, A. M., Crowe, T. P. and Burnell, G. (2006). Mechanisms of larval transport: vertical distribution of bivalve larvae varies with tidal conditions. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 326, 167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, A. M., Firth, L. B. and Walters, K. (2012). Interactions between multiple recruitment drivers: post-settlement predation mortality and flow-mediated recruitment. PLoS ONE, 7, e35096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavender, J. T., Dafforn, K. A., Bishop, M. J. and Johnston, E. L. (2017). Small-scale habitat complexity of artificial turf influences the development of associated invertebrate assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemasson, A. J., Fletcher, S., Hall-Spencer, J. M. and Knights, A. M. (2017). Linking the biological impacts of ocean acidification on oysters to changes in ecosystem services: a review. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 4962.Google Scholar
Loke, L. H., Bouma, T. J. and Todd, P. A. (2017). The effects of manipulating microhabitat size and variability on tropical seawall biodiversity: field and flume experiments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, A. S., Byrne, M. and Coleman, R. A. (2017). Filling in the grazing puzzle: a synthesis of herbivory in starfish. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 55, 134.Google Scholar
Marzinelli, E. M., Underwood, A. J. and Coleman, R. A. (2011). Modified habitats influence kelp epibiota via direct and indirect effects. PLoS ONE, 6, e21936.Google Scholar
McManus, R. S., Archibald, N., Comber, S. et al. (2017). Partial replacement of cement for waste aggregates in concrete coastal and marine infrastructure: a foundation for ecological enhancement? Ecological Engineering, 120, 655–67.Google Scholar
Moss, B. (2017). Marine reptiles, birds and mammals and nutrient transfers among the seas and the land: an appraisal of current knowledge. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 6380.Google Scholar
Neo, M. L., Wabnitz, C. C. C., Braley, R. D. et al. (2017). Giant clams (Bivalvia: Cardiidae: Tridacninae): a comprehensive update of species and their distribution, current threats and conservation status. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 55, 87388.Google Scholar
Ng, T. P., Lau, S. L., Seuront, L. et al. (2017). Linking behaviour and climate change in intertidal ectotherms: insights from littorinid snails. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 121–31.Google Scholar
O’Connor, N. E., Crowe, T. P. and McGrath, D. (2006). Effects of epibiotic algae on the survival, biomass and recruitment of mussels, Mytilus L. (Bivalvia: Mollusca). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 328, 265–76.Google Scholar
Polidoro, B. A., Carpenter, K. E., Collins, L. et al. (2010). The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10095.Google Scholar
Reise, K., Olenin, S. and Thieltges, D. W. (2006). Are aliens threatening European aquatic coastal ecosystems? Helgoland Marine Research, 60(2), 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rilov, G., Peleg, O., Yeruham, E. et al. (2018). Alien turf: overfishing, overgrazing and invader domination in south‐eastern Levant reef ecosystems. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 28, 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rius, M., Teske, P. R., Manriquez, P. H. et al. (2017). Ecological dominance along rocky shores, with a focus on intertidal ascidians. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 55, 5586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaepfer, M. A., Sax, D. F. and Olden, J. D. (2011). The potential conservation value of non‐native species. Conservation Biology, 25, 428–37.Google Scholar
Strain, E. M., Olabarria, C., Mayer‐Pinto, M. et al. (2018). Eco‐engineering urban infrastructure for marine and coastal biodiversity: Which interventions have the greatest ecological benefit? Journal of Applied Ecology, 55, 426–41.Google Scholar
Teagle, H., Hawkins, S. J., Moore, P. J. and Smale, D. A. (2017). The role of kelp species as biogenic habitat formers in coastal marine ecosystems. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 492, 8198.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J. (1991). The logic of ecological experiments: a case history from studies of the distribution of macro-algae on rocky intertidal shores. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 841–66.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J. (1994). On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications, 4, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J. (1997). Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J. (2000). Experimental ecology of rocky intertidal habitats: what are we learning?. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 250, 5176.Google Scholar
Williams, G. A. and Morritt, D. (1995). Habitat partitioning and thermal tolerance in a tropical limpet, Cellana grata. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 124, 89103.Google Scholar
Zwerschke, N., Emmerson, M. C., Roberts, D. and O’Connor, N. E. (2016). Benthic assemblages associated with native and non-native oysters are similar. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 111, 305–10.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×