Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:37:34.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PART II - Landscape structure and multi-scale management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Jianguo Liu
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
William W. Taylor
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

Landscapes are often heterogeneous, hierarchically structured, and multi-scaled. Ecological responses to landscape structure are usually scale-dependent. Thus, to better manage landscapes, many important questions regarding landscape structure and scale need to be answered. For example, how can landscape structure and scale be incorporated into natural resource management? How can the study and management of landscapes be coordinated at multiple scales? How should small patches be managed in fragmented and human-dominated landscapes? Are landscape ecology concepts developed from studying terrestrial systems applicable to aquatic systems? It is generally agreed that studying and managing landscapes requires the integration of natural and social sciences, but how can the scaling issue be dealt with when integrating these sciences? These and other related questions regarding landscape structure and multi-scale management are elegantly addressed in the five chapters of Part II. The chapter by Wiens et al. gives a detailed discussion of the general need for the multi-scale approach to landscape ecology study and natural resource management, while the other four chapters recommend specific scales at which research and management should occur.

In Chapter 2, Wiens et al. stress that natural resource management takes place in a landscape context, the effects of management actions on organisms are scale-dependent, and the responses of organisms to spatial structure and configuration are often non-linear and have thresholds. After discussing several recurrent issues in natural resource management, they suggest that it is essential to understand which scales are important to the organisms and management goals and that the scale(s) of management should be modified to cover the range of these important scales.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×