Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-86b6f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T17:57:44.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Manipulation of arthropod pathogens for IPM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

By
Stephen P. Wraight  and
Ann E. Hajek
Edited by
Edward B. Radcliffe ,
William D. Hutchison  and
Rafael E. Cancelado
Edward B. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
William D. Hutchison
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A great number and diversity of naturally occurring microorganisms are capable of causing disease in insects and other arthropods, and these pathogens have been manipulated for the purpose of pest control for more than 130 years (Lord, 2005). These efforts in applied invertebrate pathology have given rise to the field known today as microbial biological control, or simply microbial control, which is broadly defined as “that part of biological control concerned with controlling insects (or other organisms) by the use of microorganisms” (Onstad et al., 2006). The term biological control does not have a universally accepted definition. The principal disagreement relates to whether or not the term should include control by non-organismal biological factors (e.g. toxic metabolites and other natural products). We believe that the term biological control should be restricted to use of living organisms, and in this context, the simplest definition of biological control is: the use of living organisms to reduce damage by pests to tolerable levels. This definition is similar to those presented by Van Driesche & Bellows (1996), Crump et al. (1999), Eilenberg et al. (2001) and Hajek (2004), all of which limit the definition to use of living organisms. Employing this definition, it follows that biological control agents are living organisms and microbial control agents are living microbes (including viruses, which some do not consider as living, and nematodes, whose inclusion will be explained below).

Most pathogenic microbes in general produce large numbers of propagules (e.g.bacterial and fungal spores and viral occlusion bodies) that function as the infectious units.

Type
Chapter
Information
Integrated Pest Management
Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
 , pp. 131 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boucias, D. G. & Pendland, J. C. (1998). Principles of Insect Pathology. Boston, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucias, D. G., Stokes, C., Storey, G. & Pendland, J. C. (1996). The effects of imidacloprid on the termite Reticulitermes flavipes and its interaction with the mycopathogen Beauveria bassiana. Pflanzenschutz Nachrichten Bayer, 49, 231–238.Google Scholar
Brown, G. C. (1987). Modeling. In Epizootiology of Insect Diseases, eds. Fuxa, J. R. & Tanada, Y., pp. 43–68. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Burges, H. D. (ed.) (1998). Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides: Beneficial Microorganisms, Nematodes, and Seed Treatments. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRef
Butt, T. M., Carreck, N. L., Ibrahim, L. & Williams, I. H. (1998). Honey bee-mediated infection of pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus Fab.) by the insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8, 533–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crump, N. S., Cother, E. J. & Ash, G. J. (1999). Clarifying the nomenclature in microbial weed control. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 9, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilenberg, J., Hajek, A. & Lomer, C. (2001). Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. BioControl, 46, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, J. D., Kabaluk, J. T., Goettel, M. S. & Myers, J. H. (2007). Spinosad interacts synergistically with the insect pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae against the exotic wireworms Agriotes lineatus and Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 100, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransen, J. J. & Lenteren, J. C. (1994). Survival of the parasitoid Encarsia formosa after treatment of parasitized whitefly larvae with fungal spores of Aschersonia aleyrodis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 71, 235–243.Google Scholar
Furlong, M. J. & Groden, E. (2001). Evaluation of synergistic interactions between the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) pathogen Beauveria bassiana and the insecticides, imidacloprid, and cyromazine. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94, 344–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, W. A., Oetting, R. D. & Storey, G. K. (1984). Scheduling of Verticillium lecanii and benomyl applications to maintain aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) control on chrysanthemums in greenhouses. Journal of Economic Entomology, 77, 514–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaugler, R. A. (ed.) (2002). Entomopathogenic Nematology. New York: CABI Publishing.CrossRef
Glare, T. R. & O'Callaghan, M. (2000). Bacillus thuringiensis: Biology, Ecology and Safety. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hajek, A. E. (1999). Pathology and epizootiology of the lepidoptera-specific mycopathogen Entomophaga maimaiga. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 63, 814–835.Google Scholar
Hajek, A. E. (2004). Natural Enemies: An Introduction to Biological Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajek, A. E., McManus, M. L. & DelaliberaJúnior, I. (2007). A review of introductions of pathogens and nematodes for classical biological control of insects and mites. Biological Control, 41, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. A. (1981). The fungus Verticillium lecanii as a microbial insecticide against aphids and scales. In Microbial Control of Pests and Plant Diseases: 1970–1980, ed. Burges, H. D., pp. 483–498. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H. M. T. & Hajek, A. E. (2003). Environmental Impacts of Microbial Insecticides. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huger, A. (2005). The Oryctes virus: its detection, identification and implementation in biological control of the coconut palm rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 89, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, L., Butt, T. M., Beckett, A. & Clark, S. J. (1999). The germination of oil-formulated conidia of the insect pathogen, Metarhizium anisopliae. Mycological Research, 103, 901–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, G. D., Duke, G. M., Kawchuk, L. M. & Goettel, M. S. (1999). Influence of oscillating temperatures on the competitive infection and colonization of the migratory grasshopper by Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium flavoviride. Biological Control, 14, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaros-Su, J., Groden, E. & Zhang, J. (1999). Effects of selected fungicides and the timing of fungicide application on Beauveria bassiana-induced mortality of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biological Control, 15, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, S., Schweizer, C., Keller, E. & Brenner, H. (1997). Control of white grubs (Melolontha melolontha L.) by treating adults with the fungus Beauveria brogniarta. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 7, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. G. (1995). Microbial control of turfgrass insects. In Handbook of Turfgrass Insect Pests, eds. Brandenburg, R. L. & Villani, M. G., pp. 95–100. Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
Koppenhöfer, A. M., Cowles, R. S., Cowles, E. A., Fuzy, E. M. & Baumgartner, L. (2002). Comparison of neonicotinoid insectides as synergists for entomopathogenic nematodes. Biological Control, 24, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, L. A. & Kaya, H. K. (eds.) (2007). Field Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology: Application and Evaluation of Pathogens for Control of Insects and Other Invertebrate Pests, 2nd edn. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
Lacey, L. A. & Neven, L. G. (2006). The potential of the fungus, Muscodor albus, as a microbial control agent of potato tuber moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in stored potatoes. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 91, 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, L. A., Frutos, R., Kaya, H. K. & Vail, P. (2001). Insect pathogens as biological control agents: do they have a future? Biological Control, 21, 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, J. C. (2005). From Metchnikoff to Monsanto and beyond: the path of microbial control. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 89, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majchrowicz, I. & Poprawski, T. J. (1993). Effects in vitro of nine fungicides on growth of entomopathogenic fungi. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 3, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCutchen, B. F. & Flexner, L. (1999). Joint action of baculoviruses and other control agents. In Biopesticides: Use and Delivery, eds. Hall, F. R. & Menn, J. J., pp. 341–355. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
Moore, D., Langewald, J. & Obognon, F. (1997). Effects of rehydration on the conidial viability of Metarhizium flavoviride mycopesticide formulations. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 7, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onstad, D. W., Fuxa, J. R., Humber, R. A.et al. (2006). An Abridged Glossary of Terms Used in Invertebrate Pathology. Knoxville, TN: Society for Invertebrate Pathology. Available at www.sipweb.org/glossaryGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, R. & Gill, A. (2006). The World Market for Microbial Biopesticides. Wallingford, UK: CPL Business Consultants, CAB International Centre.Google Scholar
Quintela, E. D. & McCoy, C. W. (1998). Conidial attachment of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana to the larval cuticle of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) treated with imidacloprid. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 72, 220–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, J. L., Russell, R. M., Preisler, H. K. & Savin, N. E. (2007). Bioassays with Arthropods, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Roy, H. E. & Pell, J. K. (2000). Interactions between entomopathogenic fungi and other natural enemies: implications for biological control. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 10, 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchis, V. (2000). Biotechnological improvement of Bacillus thuringiensis for agricultural control of insect pests: benefits and ecological implications. In Entomopathogenic Bacteria: From Laboratory to Field Application, eds.Charles, J.-F., Delécluse, A. & Nielsen-LeRoux, C., pp. 441–459. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M. (2000). Enhancement in activity of homologous and heterologous baculoviruses infectious to beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) by an optical brightener. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 572–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinkraus, D. C. (2007). Documentation of naturally occuring pathogens and their impact in agroecosystems. In Field Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology: Application and Evaluation of Pathogens for Control of Insects and Other Invertebrate Pests, 2nd edn, eds. Lacey, L. A. & Kaya, H. K., pp. 267–281. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, G. S., Kaya, H. K. & Gaugler, R. (1994). Characterizing the enhanced susceptibility of milky disease-infected scarabaeid grubs to entomopathogenic nematodes. Biological Control, 4, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesche, R. G. & Bellows, T. S. (1996). Biological Control. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wraight, S. P. (2003). Synergism between insect pathogens and entomophagous insects, and its potential to enhance biological control efficacy. In Predators and Parasitoids, eds. Koul, O. & Dhaliwal, G. S., pp. 139–161. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wraight, S. P. & Ramos, M. E. (2005). Synergistic interaction between Beauveria bassiana- and Bacillus thuringiensis tenebrionis-based biopesticides applied against field populations of Colorado potato beetle. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 90, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×