Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Integrated InferencesCausal Models for Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research, pp. 413 - 419Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5):1369–1401.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Angrist, J. D. and Imbens, G. W. (1995). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Technical working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. W. and Samuels, D. J. (2014). Inequality and Democratization. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Aronow, P. M. and Miller, B. T. (2019). Foundations of Agnostic Statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bareinboim, E. and Pearl, J. (2016). Causal inference and the data-fusion problem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27):7345–7352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayarri, M. and Berger, J. O. (2000). P values for composite null models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(452):1127–1142.Google Scholar
Beach, D. and Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. (2008). Process tracing: A Bayesian perspective. In Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E., and Collier, D., editors, The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, pages 702–721. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. (2015). Appendix. In Bennett, A. and Checkel, J., editors, Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, pages 276–298. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. and Checkel, J. (2015a). Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. In Bennett, A. and Checkel, J., editors, Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, pages 3–37. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. and Checkel, J. T. (2015b). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Blair, G., Coppock, A., and Humphreys, M. (2023). Research Design: Declaration, Diagnosis, Redesign. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A. and Jackman, R. W. (1985). Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review, 50(4):438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, H. and Collier, D. (2010). Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (2007). Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., and Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2):67–101.Google Scholar
Chickering, D. M. and Pearl, J. (1996). A clinician’s tool for analyzing non-compliance. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1269–1276.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. A. and Primo, D. M. (2012). A Model Discipline: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4):823–830.Google Scholar
Collier, D., Brady, H. E., and Seawright, J. (2010). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In Collier, D. and Brady, H. E., editors, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pages 161–199. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D. (2018). Twenty -six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant “gold standard” status: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright. Social Science & Medicine, 210:37–40.Google Scholar
Copas, J. (1973). Randomization models for the matched and unmatched 2 × 2 tables. Biometrika, 60(3):467–476.Google Scholar
Coppock, A. and Kaur, D. (2022). Qualitative imputation of missing potential outcomes. American Journal of Political Science, 66(3):681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell, R. G., Dawid, P., Lauritzen, S. L., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1999). Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. and Garrett, A. L. (2008). The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, 28:321–333.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Dawid, P. (2010). Beware of the DAG! Proceedings of Workshop on Causality: Objectives and Assessment. PMLR: 6:59–86.Google Scholar
Dawid, P., Humphreys, M., and Musio, M. (2022). Bounding causes of effects with mediators. Sociological Methods and Research, OnlineFirst, https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211036161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (2011). Experimentation in political science. In Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A., editors, Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pages 3–14. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Strategies for Social Inquiry Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fairfield, T. and Charman, A. (2017). Explicit Bayesian analysis for process tracing: Guidelines, opportunities, and caveats. Political Analysis, 25(3):363–380.Google Scholar
Fairfield, T. and Charman, A. E. (2022). Social Inquiry and Bayesian Inference: Rethinking Qualitative Research. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. and Laitin, D. (2008). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. In Box-Steffenmeier, J. M., Collier, D., and Brady, H. E., editors, Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, pages 756–776. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Frangakis, C. E. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics, 58(1):21–29.Google Scholar
Gabry, J., Simpson, D., Vehtari, A., Betancourt, M., and Gelman, A. (2019). Visualization in Bayesian workflow. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 182(2):389–402.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K., et al. (2016). The University of Texas inequality project global inequality data sets, 1963–2008: Updates, revisions and quality checks. In Basu, K. and Stiglitz, J.E., editors, Inequality and Growth: Patterns and Policy: Volume II: Regions and Regularities, pages 98–135. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Galles, D. and Pearl, J. (1998). An axiomatic characterization of causal counterfactuals. Foundations of Science, 3(1):151–182.Google Scholar
García, F. M. and Wantchekon, L. (2015). A graphical approximation to generalization: Definitions and diagrams. Journal of Globalization and Development, 6(1):71–86.Google Scholar
Gardner, M. (1961). The Second Scientific American Book of Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Gelman, A. (2013). Two simple examples for understanding posterior p-values whose distributions are far from uniform. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 7:2595–2602.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., and Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
George, A. L. and Bennett, A. A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
George, A. L. and McKeown, T. J. (1985). Case studies and theories of organizational decision making. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, 2(1):21–58.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., and Kaplan, E. H. (2004). The illusion of learning from observational research. In Shapiro, I., Smith, R. M., and Masoud, T. E., editors, Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, pages 251–273. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. and Amisano, G. (2014). Analysis of variance for Bayesian inference. Econometric Reviews, 33(1–4):270–288.Google Scholar
Glymour, C., Zhang, K., and Spirtes, P. (2019). Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models. Frontiers in Genetics, 10:524.Google Scholar
Glynn, A. and Quinn, K. (2007). Non-parametric mechanisms and causal modeling. Technical report, working paper.Google Scholar
Glynn, A. and Quinn, K. (2011). Why process matters for causal inference. Political Analysis, 19:273–286.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. and Mahoney, J. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Good, I. J. (1984). The best explicatum for weight of evidence (C197). Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 19(4):294–299.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. C. and Smith, A. (2004). Quantitative leverage through qualitative knowledge: Augmenting the statistical analysis of complex causes. Political Analysis, 12(3):233–255.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R. R. (2012). Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule. American Political Science Review, 106(3):495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S., Kaufman, R. R., and Teo, T. (2012). Distributive conflict and regime change: A qualitative dataset. Political Science Publications, 5.Google Scholar
Hall, N. (2004). Two concepts of causation. In Collins, J., Hall, N., Paul, L. A., editors, Causation and Counterfactuals, pages 225–276. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research. In Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D., editors, Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, pages 373–404. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. Y. (2015). A modification of the Halpern-Pearl definition of causality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00162.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. Y. and Pearl, J. (2005). Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(4):843–887.Google Scholar
Heckerman, D. E., Horvitz, E. J., and Nathwani, B. N. (1991). Toward normative expert systems: The pathfinder project. Methods of Information in Medicine, 31:90–105.Google Scholar
Hernán, M. A. and Robins, J. M. (2006). Instruments for causal inference: An epidemiologist’s dream? Epidemiology, 17(4):360–372.Google Scholar
Herron, M. C. and Quinn, K. M. (2016). A careful look at modern case selection methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3):458–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffrage, U. and Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Academic Medicine, 73(5):538–540.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396):945–960.Google Scholar
Hume, D. and Beauchamp, T. L. (2000). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: A Critical Edition, volume 3. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. and Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Mixing methods: A Bayesian approach. American Political Science Review, 109(4):653–673.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. and Weinstein, J. M. (2009). Field experiments and the political economy of development. Annual Review of Political Science, 12:367–378.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., and Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4):309.Google Scholar
Kaye, D. H. and Koehler, J. J. (2003). The misquantification of probative value. Law and Human Behavior, 27(6):645–659.Google Scholar
King, G. (1998). Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R., and Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Knox, D., Lowe, W., and Mummolo, J. (2020). Administrative records mask racially biased policing. American Political Science Review, 114(3):619–637.Google Scholar
Knox, D., Yamamoto, T., Baum, M. A., and Berinsky, A. J. (2019). Design , identification, and sensitivity analysis for patient preference trials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114(528): 1–27.Google Scholar
Laplace, P.-S. (1901). A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, volume 166. Cosimo, New York, translated by F. W. Truscott and F. I. Emory edition.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals and comparative possibility. In Harper, W.L., Stalnaker, R., and Pearce, G., editors, Ifs: Conditionals, Beliefs, Decision, Chance, and Time, pages 57–85. Springer, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. S. (2003). Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3):435–452.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. S. (2010). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Best practices in the development of historically oriented replication databases. Annual Review of Political Science, 13:37–59.Google Scholar
Lindley, D. V. (1956). On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27(4):986–1005.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. and Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Maclaren, O. J. and Nicholson, R. (2019). What can be estimated? Identifiability, estimability, causal inference and ill-posed inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02826.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000). Strategies of causal inference in small-n analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 28(4):387–424.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2008). Toward a unified theory of causality. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5):412–436.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2010). After KKV: The new methodology of qualitative research. World Politics, 62(1):120–147.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4):570–597.Google Scholar
Manski, C. F. (1995). Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5):914–927.Google Scholar
Menzies, P. (1989). Probabilistic causation and causal processes: A critique of Lewis. Philosophy of Science, 56(4):642–663.Google Scholar
Méon, P.-G. and Sekkat, K. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122(1):69–97.Google Scholar
Mosley, L. (2013). Interview Research in Political Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Palfrey, T. R. (2009). Laboratory experiments in political economy. Annual Review of Political Science, 12:379–388.Google Scholar
Parsons, S. (2001). Qualitative Methods for Reasoning under Uncertainty, volume 13. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2010). An introduction to causal inference. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(2):1–62.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2012). The causal foundations of structural equation modeling. In Holye, R.H., editor, Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, pages 68–91. The Guildord Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. and Bareinboim, E. (2014). External validity: From do-calculus to transportability across populations. Statistical Science, 29(4):579–595.Google Scholar
Peressini, A. (1999). Applying pure mathematics. Philosophy of Science, 66(S3):S1–S13.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization : Theories and facts. World Politics, 49(2):155–183.Google Scholar
Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied Statistical Decision Theory. Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2):131–165.Google Scholar
Rohlfing, I. (2012). Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Rohlfing, I. (2013). Comparative hypothesis testing via process tracing. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(4):606–642.Google Scholar
Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1):27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5):688–701.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D. (2001). Tropical Underdevelopment. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8119.Google Scholar
Saunders, E. N. (2011). Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Scharf, L. L. (1991). Statistical Signal Processing: Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. (2016). Multi-method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. and Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2):294–308.Google Scholar
Small, M. L. (2011). How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37:57–86.Google Scholar
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., Scheines, R., and Heckerman, D. (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Splawa-Neyman, J., Dabrowska, D., Speed, T., et al. (1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Statistical Science, 5(4):465–472.Google Scholar
Stan Development Team. (2020). Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual. Technical report.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. (2001). Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Swank, D. (2002). Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Tamer, E. (2010). Partial identification in econometrics. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1):167–195.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. and Mahoney, J. (2015). Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science. In Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K., editors, Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, pages 1–36. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Waldner, D. (2015). What makes process tracing good? Causal mechanisms, causal inference, and the completeness standard in comparative politics. In Bennett, A. and Checkel, J., editors, Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, pages 126–152. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Weller, N. and Barnes, J. (2014). Finding Pathways: Mixed-method Research for Studying Causal Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Western, B. and Jackman, S. (1994). Bayesian inference for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 88(2):412–423.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (1979). Scientific explanation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 30(1):41–67.Google Scholar