Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:25:03.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Input–Output Models at the Regional Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Ronald E. Miller  and
Peter D. Blair
Ronald E. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Peter D. Blair
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Get access

Summary

Chapter 3 extends the basic input–output framework to analysis of regions and the relationships between regions. First, “single-region” models are presented and the various assumptions employed in formulating regional models versus national models are explored. Next, the structure of an interregional input–output (IRIO) model, designed to expand the basic input–output framework to capture transactions between industrial sectors in regions, is presented. An important simplification of the IRIO model designed to deal with the most common of data limitations in constructing such models is known as the multiregional input–output (MRIO) model. The basic MRIO formulation is presented and the implications of the simplifying assumptions explored as well as the balanced regional model which captures the distinction between industrial production for regional versus national markets. Finally, the chapter summarizes the fast-growing range of applications of MRIO to multinational and global economic models and issues.

Keywords

regional input–outputinterregional input–outputmultiregional input–outputtrade coefficientsbalanced regional modelregional technical coefficientsregional input coefficients
Type
Chapter
Information
Input-Output Analysis
Foundations and Extensions
 , pp. 63 - 111
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akita, Takahiro. 1994. “Interregional Interdependence and Regional Economic Growth in Japan: An Input–Output Analysis,” International Regional Science Review, 16, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akita, Takahiro. 1999. “The Role of the Kanto Region in the Growth of Japanese Regional Economies 1965–1985: An Extended Growth-Factor Decomposition Analysis,” in Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., Sonis, Michael, Madden, Moss and Kimura, Yoshio (eds.), Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Berlin: Springer, pp. 155–166.Google Scholar
Akita, Takahiro and Kataoka, Mitsuhiko. 2002. “Interregional Interdependence and Regional Economic Growth: An Interregional Input–Output Analysis of the Kyushu Region,” Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 14, 18–40.Google Scholar
Batey, Peter W. J. and Madden, Moss. 1999. “Interrelational Employment Multipliers in an Extended Input–Output Modeling Framework,” in Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., Sonis, Michael, Madden, Moss and Kimura, Yoshio (eds.), Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Berlin: Springer, pp. 73–89.Google Scholar
Beyers, William B. 1980. “Migration and the Development of Multiregional Economic Systems,” Economic Geography, 56, 320–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyers, William B., Baldwin, Marc and Lin, Ta-Win. 2012. The 2007 Washington Input–Output Study. Olympia, WA: Washington State Office of Financial Management (Revised October 2015).Google Scholar
Beyers, William B., Bourque, Philip J., Seyfried, W. R. and Weeks, Eldon E.. 1970. “Input–Output Tables for the Washington Economy, 1967,” Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Beyers, William B., Lefberg, Irv and Lin, Ta-Win. 2011. The 2002 Washington Input–Output Study. Olympia, WA: Washington State Office of Financial Management (Updated April, 2011).Google Scholar
Blackwell, Jon. 1978. “Disaggregation of the Household Sector in Regional Input–Output Analysis: Some Models Specifying Previous Residence of Worker,” Regional Studies, 12, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bon, Ranko. 1984. “Comparative Stability Analysis of Multiregional Input–Output Models: Column, Row, and Leontief–Strout Gravity Coefficient Models,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 791–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, Piet and Oosterhaven, Jan. 1992. “A Double-Entry Method for the Construction of Bi-Regional Input–Output Tables,” Journal of Regional Science, 32, 269–284.Google Scholar
Bourque, Philip J. 1987. “The Washington Input–Output Study for 1982: A Summary of Findings,” Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Bourque, Philip J. and Conway, Richard S. Jr. 1977. “The 1972 Washington Input–Output Study,” Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Bourque, Philip J. and Weeks, Eldon E.. 1969. “Detailed Input–Output Tables for Washington State, 1963,” Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, Circular 508.Google Scholar
Chase, Robert A., Bourque, Philip J. and Conway, Richard S. Jr. 1993. The 1987 Washington State Input–Output Study. Report for Washington State Office of Financial Management, by Graduate School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, September.Google Scholar
Chenery, Hollis B. 1953. “Regional Analysis,” in Chenery, Hollis B., Clark, Paul G. and Pinna, VeraCao (eds.), The Structure and Growth of the Italian Economy. Rome: US Mutual Security Agency, pp. 97–129.Google Scholar
Cole, Sam. 1987. “Growth, Equity and Dependence in a De-Industrializing City Region,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 11, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Sam. 1999. “In the Spirit of Miyazawa: Multipliers and the Metropolis,” in Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., Sonis, Michael, Madden, Moss and Kimura, Yoshio (eds.), Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Berlin: Springer, pp. 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietzenbacher, Erik, Los, Bart, Stehrer, Robert, Timmer, Marcl and De Vries, Gaaitzen. 2013. “The Construction of World Input–Output Tables in the WIOD98 Project,” Economic Systems Research, 25, 71–98.Google Scholar
Duchin, Faye. 2004. “International Trade: Evolution in the Thought and Analysis of Wassily Leontief,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–64.Google Scholar
Fontela, Emilio. 2004. “Leontief and the Future of the World Economy,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,, pp. 30–46.Google Scholar
Gillen, William J. and Guccione, Antonio. 1980. “Interregional Feedbacks in Input–Output Models: Some Formal Results,” Journal of Regional Science, 20, 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter and Ledent, Jacques. 1981. “Towards an Interregional Demoeconomic Model,” Journal of Regional Science, 21, 79–87.Google Scholar
Guccione, Antonio, Gillen, William J., Blair, Peter D. and Miller, Ronald E.. 1988. “Interregional Feedbacks in Input–Output Models: The Least Upper Bound,” Journal of Regional Science, 28, 397–404.Google Scholar
Hartwick, John M. 1971. “Notes on the Isard and Chenery–Moses Interregional Input–Output Models,” Journal of Regional Science, 11, 73–86.Google Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., Okuyama, Yasuhide and Sonis, Michael. 2001. “Economic Interdependence within the Chicago Metropolitan Area: A Miyazawa Analysis,” Journal of Regional Science, 41, 195–217.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Werner Z. 1959. “Interindustry Relations of a Metropolitan Area,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 41, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, Walter. 1951. “Interregional and Regional Input–Output Analysis: A Model of a Space Economy,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 33, 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, Walter, Bramhall, David F., Carrothers, Gerald A. P., Cumberland, John H., Moses, Leon N., Price, Daniel O. and Schooler, Eugene W.. 1960. Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science. New York: The Technology Press of MIT and Wiley.Google Scholar
Isard, Walter and Kuenne, Robert E.. 1953. “The Impact of Steel upon the Greater New York–Philadelphia Industrial Region,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 35, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, Walter and Langford, Thomas. 1971. Regional Input–Output Study: Recollections, Reflections, and Diverse Notes on the Philadelphia Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. 1981–1983. Multiregional Input–Output Accounts, 1911. Vol. 1, Introduction and Summary (July, 1983); Vol. 2, State Estimates of Outputs, Employment and Payrolls (December, 1981); Vol. 3, Development of Value Added Estimates by MRIO Sector by State (December, 1981); Vol. 4, State Estimates of Final Demands (April, 1982); Vol. 5, State Estimates of Inputs to Industries (May, 1982); Vol. 6, Interregional Commodity Flows (August, 1982). Prepared for Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. Reproduced by the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Jackson, Randall W., Schwarm, Walter R., Okuyama, Yasuhide and Islam, Samia. 2006. “A Method for Constructing Commodity by Industry Flow Matrices,” Annals of Regional Science, 40, 909–920.Google Scholar
Joun, Richard Y. P. and Conway, Richard S. Jr. 1983. “Regional Economic–Demographic Forecasting Models: A Case Study of the Washington and Hawaii Models,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 17, 345–353.Google Scholar
Ledent, Jacques and Gordon, Peter. 1981. “A Framework for Modeling Interregional Population Distribution and Economic Growth,” International Regional Science Review, 6, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenzen, Manfred, Moran, Daniel, Kanemoto, Keiichiro and Geschke, Arne. 2013. “Building EORA: A Global Multi-Region Input–Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution,” Economic Systems Research, 25, 20–49.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1974. “Structure of the World Economy: Outline of a Simple Input–Output Formulation,” American Economic Review, 64, 823–834.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, Carter, Anne P. and Petri, Peter A.. 1977. The Future of the World Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, Chenery, Hollis B., Clark, Paul G., Duesenberry, James S., Ferguson, Allen R., Grosse, Anne P., Grosse, Robert H., Holzman, Mathilda, Isard, Walter and Kistin, Helen. 1953. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Science Press (Reprint, 1976).Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, Morgan, Alison, Polenske, Karen, Simpson, David and Tower, Edward. 1965. “The Economic Impact – Industrial and Regional – of an Arms Cut,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 217–241.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily and Strout, Alan. 1963. “Multiregional Input–Output Analysis,” in Barna, Tibor (ed.), Structural Interdependence and Economic Development. London: Macmillan (St. Martin’s Press), pp. 119–149. (Reprinted in Leontief, 1986, pp. 129–161.)Google Scholar
Madden, Moss and Batey, Peter W. J.. 1983. “Linked Population and Economic Models: Some Methodological Issues in Forecasting, Analysis, and Policy Optimization,” Journal of Regional Science, 23, 141–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mi, Zhifu, Meng, Jing, Guan, Dabo, Shan, Yuli, Song, Malin, Wei, Yi-Ming, Zhu, Liu and Hubacek, Klaus. 2017. “Chinese CO2 Emission Flows Have Reversed Since the Global Financial Crisis,” Nature Communications, 8, 1712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mi, Zhifu, Meng, Jing, Zheng, Heran, Shan, Yuli, Wei, Yi-Ming and Dabo, Gu. 2018. “A Multi-Regional Input–Output Table Mapping China’s Economic Outputs and Interdependencies in 2012,” Scientific Data, 5, 180155, 12pp.Google Scholar
Miernyk, William H. 1982. Regional Analysis and Regional Policy. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Inc.Google Scholar
Miernyk, William H., Bonner, Ernest R., Chapman, John H. Jr. and Shellhammer, Kenneth. 1967. Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input–Output Analysis. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Library.Google Scholar
Miernyk, William H., Shellhammer, Kenneth L., Brown, Douglas M., Coccari, Ronald L., Gallagher, Charles J. and Wineman, Wesley H.. 1970. Simulating Regional Economic Development: An Interindustry Analysis of the West Virginia Economy. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald E. 1957. “The Impact of the Aluminum Industry on the Pacific Northwest: A Regional Input–Output Analysis,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 200–209.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald E. 1966. “Interregional Feedback Effects in Input–Output Models: Some Preliminary Results,” Papers, Regional Science Association, 17, 105–125.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald E. 1969. “Interregional Feedbacks in Input–Output Models: Some Experimental Results,” Western Economic Journal, 7, 41–50.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald E. 1986. “Upper Bounds on the Sizes of Interregional Feedbacks in Multiregional Input–Output Models,” Journal of Regional Science, 26, 285–306.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald E. 1998. “Regional and Interregional Input–Output Analysis,” in Isard, Walter, Azis, Iwan J., Drennan, Matthew P., Miller, Ronald E., Saltzman, Sidney and Thorbecke, Erik (eds.). Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 41–133.Google Scholar
Ministry of International Trade and Industry. 1965, 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990. Interregional Input–Output Tables. Tokyo: Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI).Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1976. Input–Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Frederick T. and Petersen, James W.. 1955. “Regional Analysis: An Interindustry Model of Utah,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 368–383.Google Scholar
Moses, Leon N. 1955. “The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input–Output Analysis,” American Economic Review, 45, 803–832.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Nabuhiro and Ihara, Takeo (eds.). 2005. Spatial Structure and Regional Development in China. An Interregional Input–Output Approach. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oosterhaven, Jan. 1981. Interregional Input–Output Analysis and Dutch Regional Policy Problems. Aldershot, UK: Gower.Google Scholar
Oosterhaven, Jan. 2019. Rethinking Input–Output Analysis. A Spatial Perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
Oosterhaven, Jan and Hewings, Geoffrey J. D.. 2014. “Interregional Input–Output Models,” in Fischer, Manfred M. and Nijkamp, Peter (eds.), Handbook of Regional Science, Vol. 2. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 875–901.Google Scholar
Oosterhaven, Jan, Polenske, Karen R. and Hewings, Goeffrey J. D.. 2019. Modern Regional Input–Output and Impact Analysis,” in Capello, Roberta and Nijkamp, Peter (eds.), Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories (Revised and Extended Second Edition). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 505–525.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1970a. “An Empirical Test of Interregional Input–Output Models: Estimation of 1963 Japanese Production,” American Economic Review, 60(May), 76–82.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1970b. “Empirical Implementation of a Multiregional Input–Output Gravity Trade Model,” in Carter, Anne P. and Bródy, Andrew (eds.), Contributions to Input–Output Analysis. Vol. 1 of Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Input–Output Techniques. Geneva, 1968. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 143–163.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1980. The U.S. Multiregional Input–Output Accounts and Model. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books (D. C. Heath and Co.).Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1995. “Leontief’s Spatial Economic Analyses,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6, 309–318.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 2004. “Leontief’s ‘Magnificent Machine’ and Other Contributions to Applied Economics,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. and Hewings, Geoffrey J. D.. 2004. “Trade and Spatial Economic Interdependence,” Papers in Regional Science, 83, 269–289. [Also in Raymond J. G M. Florax and David A. Plane (eds.). 2004. Fifty Years of Regional Science. Advances in Spatial Science Series, No. 18. New York: Springer, pp. 269–289.]Google Scholar
Remond-Tiedrez, Isabelle and Rueda-Cantuche, José M. (eds.). 2019. EU Inter-Country Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables – Full International and Global Accounts for Research in Input-Output Analysis (FIGARO). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harry W., Gordon, Peter and Moore, James E. II (eds.). 2007. The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Fanny and Beyers, William B.. 2020. The 2012 Washington Input–Output Study. Olympia, WA: Washington State Office of Financial Management.Google Scholar
Robison, M. Henry. 1997. “Community Input–Output Models for Rural Area Analysis with an Example from Central Idaho,” Annals of Regional Science, 31, 325–351.Google Scholar
Robison, M. Henry and Miller, Jon R.. 1988. “Cross-Hauling and Nonsurvey Input–Output Models: Some Lessons from Small-Area Timber Economies,” Environment and Planning A, 20, 1523–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, M. Henry and Miller, Jon R.. 1991. “Central Place Theory and Intercommunity Input–Output Analysis,” Papers in Regional Science, 70, 399–417.Google Scholar
Rose, Adam Z. and Stevens, Benjamin H.. 1991. “Transboundary Income and Expenditure Flows in Regional Input–Output Models,” Journal of Regional Science, 31, 253–272.Google Scholar
Schinnar, Arie P. 1976. “A Multi-Dimensional Accounting Model for Demographic and Economic Planning Interactions,” Environment and Planning A, 8, 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarm, Walter R., Jackson, Randall W. and Okuyama, Yasuhide. 2006. “An Evaluation of Method [sic] for Constructing Commodity by Industry Flow Matrices,” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 36, 84–93.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. 1969. “An Empirical Regional Input–Output Projection Model: The State of Washington 1980,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 334–340.Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 1973. Brief Outline of the United Nations Study on the Impact of Prospective Environmental Issues and Policies on the International Development Strategy. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
West, Guy R. 1990. “Regional Trade Estimation: A Hybrid Approach,” International Regional Science Review, 13, 103–118.Google Scholar
Yamada, Mitsuo. 2015. “Construction of a Multi-Regional Input–Output Table for Nagoya Metropolitan Area, Japan,” Journal of Economic Structures, 4 (July), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×