Book contents
- Injury and Injustice
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Injury and Injustice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Injury and the Construction of Legal Subjects
- Part II Constructing Injury and Imagining Remedies
- Part III Inequality and/as Injury
- Conclusion
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2018
Book contents
- Injury and Injustice
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Injury and Injustice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Injury and the Construction of Legal Subjects
- Part II Constructing Injury and Imagining Remedies
- Part III Inequality and/as Injury
- Conclusion
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Injury and InjusticeThe Cultural Politics of Harm and Redress, pp. 1 - 24Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Baker, Tom. (2001). “Blood Money, New Money and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in Action.” Law and Society Review 35:275–319.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. (1995). States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M. (1984). “The Oven-Bird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community.” Law and Society Review 18:551–82.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. (2009). “Injury, Causation, and Responsibility: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Tort Law and Society,” in Fault Lines: Tort Law and Cultural Practice, edited by Engel, David M., and McCann, Michael. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. (2016). The Myth of the Litigious Society: Why We Don't Sue. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M., and McCann, Michael, eds. (2009). Fault Lines: Tort Law as Cultural Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Munger, Frank W.. (2003). Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Nora Freeman. (2011). “Sunlight and Settlement Mills.” New York University Law Review 86:805–86.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. (1974). “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9(1):95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol. (1986). Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Community in an American Town. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haltom, William, and McCann, Michael. (2004). Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Jean E. (2011). “Bodies and Pain.” Pp. 370–87 in A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Mascia-Lees, Frances E.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jain, Sarah S. Løchlann. (2006). Injury: The Politics of Product Design and Safety Law in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Whittlesey House.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, Haltom, William, and Bloom, Anne. (2001). “Java Jive: Genealogy of a Juridical Icon.” University of Miami Law Review 56:113–78.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, Haltom, William, and Fisher, Shauna. (2013). “Criminalizing Big Tobacco: Legal Mobilization and the Politics of Responsibility for Health Risks in the United States.” Law and Social Inquiry 38(2):288–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. (1990). Getting Justice, Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, Janice, and McConnell, Mary-Hunter. (2012). “Moral Character, Motive, and the Psychology of Blame.” Cornell Law Review 97:255–304. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3290andcontext=clr (accessed October 21, 2017).Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. (1972). Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael. (1992). “Do We Really Know Anything About the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System – And Why Not?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140:1147–291.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. (2001). The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scales, Ann. (2009). “‘Nobody Broke It, It Just Broke’: Causation as an Instrument of Obfuscation and Oppression.” Pp. 269–86 in Fault Lines, edited by Engel, David M. and McCann, Michael. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. (1986). Injustice, Injury, and Inequality: An Introduction. Pp. 13–34 in Justice and Equality Here and Now, edited by Lucash, Frank S. and Shklar, Judith N.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, John F., with Issacharoff, Samuel. (2004). “The Inevitability of Aggregated Settlement: An Institutional Account of American Tort Law.” Vanderbilt Law Review 57:1571–636.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. (1993). Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by