Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-18T01:47:07.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Transformation of the Public Sphere: Political Authority, Communicative Freedom, and Internet Publics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

By
James Bohman
Edited by
Jeroen van den Hoven  and
John Weckert
James Bohman
Affiliation:
Danforth Professor of Philosophy Saint Louis University in the United States
John Weckert
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
Get access

Summary

Two relatively uncontroversial social conditions that have long been widely identified across many different modern theories of democracy: namely, the need for a rich associative life of civil society, and for the technological, institutional, and communicative infrastructure that permits the expression and diffusion of public opinion. Historically, the public sphere as a sphere of public opinion and communication has developed in interaction with a relatively unified structure of political authority: the state and its monopoly powers. Indeed, citizens of modern polities came to regard themselves as members or participants in various publics primarily through the attempts of states to censor and restrict public communication. Along with many other complex factors, the emergence of rights of communication and the democratization of state authority have emerged hand-in-hand. With the advent of new forms of political authority that directly impact the structure of communication across borders, new forms of publicity have also emerged and with them new public spheres.

If new forms of communication and structures of publicity do indeed exist across borders, this would give special salience to deliberation as an important basis for democratization, as well as for transnational institutional design. Given the differences between democratic arrangements that presuppose a singular demos and decentered ones that organize demoi, we should not expect that all democracies have exactly the same communicative infrastructure. This means that transnational civil society and public spheres face different difficulties with regard to independently constituted political authority from those faced by ‘strong,’ or state, public spheres.

Type
Chapter
Information
Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , pp. 66 - 92
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arrow, K. 1985. The economics of agency, in Pratt, J. and Zeckhauser, R. (Eds.), Principals and agents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. 1996. Democracy as inquiry, inquiry as democratic. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 590–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J. 2004. Expanding dialogue: The public sphere, the Internet, and transnational democracy, in Roberts, J. and Crossley, N. (Eds.), After Habermas: Perspectives on the public sphere. London: Blackwell, pp. 131–155.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., and Sabel, C. 2003. Sovereignty and solidarity: EU and US, in Zeitlin, J. and Trubek, D. (Eds.), Governing work and welfare in the new economy: European and American experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. 1999. Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic's view, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (Eds.), Democracy's edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1988. The public and its problems, in John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1927 (Vol. 2). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1991. Liberalism and social action, in John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1927 (Vol. 11). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dorf, M., and Sabel, C. 1996. The constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98, 2, 267–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. 1996. Democracy in capitalist times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ewig, C. 1999. Strengths and limits of the NGO Women's Movement Model, Latin American Research Review, 34, 3, 75–102.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 1989. Rethinking the public sphere, in Calhoun, C. (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–142.Google Scholar
Froomkin, M. 2003. [email protected]: Towards a critical theory of Cyberspace. Harvard Law Review, 116, 3, 751–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, N. 1995. The mass media, cultural identity, and the public sphere in the modern world. Public Culture, 5, 243–271.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. 1989. Natural reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. 1999. Rationality, democracy, and leaky boundaries, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (Eds.), Democracy's edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1999. Citizenship in an era of globalization, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (Eds.), Democracy's edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 1999. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K. 1930. Agency, in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Volume I. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. 1995. Explaining international human rights regimes: Liberal theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 2, 157–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, G. 1994. Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B. 1995. Who deliberates?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2000. Democracy, electoral and contestatory, in Shapiro, I. and Macedo, S. (Eds), Designing democratic institutions. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, G. 1996. Constructing the world polity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sabel, C., and Cohen, J. 1998. Directly-deliberative polyarchy, in Private governance, democratic constitutionalism, and supranationalism. Florence: European Commission, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 1998. Globalization and its discontents. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. 1999. The control revolution. New York: New Century Books.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 3, 623–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., and Smythe, E. 2001. Globalization, citizenship and technology: The Multilateral Agreement on Investment meets the Internet, in Webster, F. (Ed.), Culture and politics in the age of information. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soysal, Y. 1994. Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1995. Media and modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×