Norbert Wiener and the Rise of Information Ethics

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498725.002

1 - Norbert Wiener and the Rise of Information Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2009

Terrell Ward Bynum

Edited by

Jeroen van den Hoven and

John Weckert

Show author details

Terrell Ward Bynum: Affiliation:
Professor of philosophy and Director Research Center on Computing and Society, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven
John Weckert: Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales

Book contents

Get access

Summary

To live effectively is to live with adequate information. Thus, communication and control belong to the essence of man's inner life, even as they belong to his life in society.

Norbert Wiener

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND ETHICS

Major scientific and technological innovations often have profound social and ethical effects. For example, in Europe during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Copernicus, Newton, and other scientists developed a powerful new model of the universe. This stunning scientific achievement led to increased respect for science and for the power of human reasoning. During that same era, recently invented printing-press technology made it possible to spread knowledge far and wide across Europe, instead of leaving it, as before, in the hands of a privileged minority of scholars. Inspired by these scientific and technological achievements, philosophers, such as Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, re-examined human nature and the idea of a good society. They viewed human beings as rational agents capable of thinking for themselves and acquiring knowledge through science and books. In addition, they interpreted society as a creation of informed, rational citizens working together through social contracts. These philosophical developments laid foundations for ethical theories such as those of Bentham and Kant, and for political changes such as the American Revolution and the French Revolution.

Today, after far-reaching scientific achievements in physics, biology, and cybernetics – and after recent technological advances in digital computing and information networks – philosophers are again rethinking the nature of human beings and of society.

Type: Chapter
Information: Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , pp. 8 - 25

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bekenstein, J. D. 2003. Information in the holographic universe. Scientific American, August. Retrieved January 7, 2005, http://sufizmveinsan.com/fizik/holographic.html.

Brey, P. 2000. Disclosive computer ethics. Computers and Society, 30, 4, 10–16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 1986. Aristotle's theory of human action. University Microfilms. Doctoral dissertation, Graduate Center of the City University of New York.Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 1993. Computer ethics in the computer science curriculum, in Bynum, T. W., Maner, W., and Fodor, J. L. (Eds.), Teaching computer ethics. New Haven, CT: Research Center on Computing and Society (also at http://www.computerethics.org).Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2000. The foundation of computer ethics. Computers and Society, 30, 2, 6–13.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2004. Ethical challenges to citizens of ‘The Automatic Age’: Norbert Wiener on the information society'. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 2, 2, 65–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2005. The impact of the ‘Automatic Age’ on our moral lives in Cavalier, R. (Ed.), The impact of the Internet on our moral lives. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2007. The Copernican revolution in ethics, in Crnkovic, G. Dodig and Stuart, S. (Eds), Computation, information, cognition: the nexus and the liminal. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. 1999. Information ethics: on the theoretical foundations of computer ethics, Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 1, 37–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Floridi, L., and Sanders, J. W. 2004. The foundationalist debate in computer ethics, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar

Friedman, B. (Ed.). 1997. Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, B., and Nissenbaum, H. 1996. Bias in computer systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14, 3, 330–347.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gorniak-Kocikowska, K. 1996. The computer revolution and the problem of global ethics, in Bynum, T. W. and Rogerson, S. (Eds.), Global information ethics, a special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics, 2, 2, 177–190.

Gotterbarn, D. 1991. Computer ethics: Responsibility regained. National Forum: The Phi Beta Kappa Journal, 71, 26–31.Google Scholar

Introna, L. D. and Nissenbaum, H. 2000. Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters, The Information Society, 16, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. G. 1997. Is the global information infrastructure a democratic technology?Computers and Society, 27, 3, 20–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maner, W. 1996. Unique ethical problems in information technology, in Bynum, T. W. and Rogerson, S. (Eds.), Global information ethics, A special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics, 2, 2, 137–154.

Moor, J. H. 1985. What is computer ethics?, in Bynum, T. W. (Ed.), Computers and ethics, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 263–275. Also published as the October 1985 special issue of Metaphilosophy.Google Scholar

Moor, J. H. 1996. Reason, relativity and responsibility in computer ethics', a keynote address at ETHICOMP96 in Madrid, Spain. Later published in Computers and Society, 28, 1.Google Scholar

Renteln, P. 2002. Review of L. Smolin, Three roads to quantum gravity. American Scientist, 90, 1.Google Scholar

Smolin, L. 2001. Three roads to quantum gravity. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. 1948. Cybernetics: or Control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. 1950–1954. The Human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1950. (2nd ed. rev., Doubleday Anchor, 1954.)Google Scholar

Wiener, N. 1964. God & Golem, Inc.: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar