Culture and Global Networks: Hope for a Global Ethics?

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498725.012

11 - Culture and Global Networks: Hope for a Global Ethics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2009

Charles Ess

Edited by

Jeroen van den Hoven and

John Weckert

Show author details

Charles Ess: Affiliation:
professor of philosophy and religion and Distinguished Professor of Interdisciplinary Studies Drury University in Springfield, Missouri
John Weckert: Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

From Global Village to Electronic Metropolis

At the height of 1990s, optimism regarding the rapidly expanding Internet and World Wide Web, Marshall McLuhan's vision of a global village seemed within more or less easy reach. By wiring the world, it was argued in many ways, we would enter into the ‘secondary orality of electronic culture’ (Ong 1988) and thereby open up an electronic information superhighway that would realize a genuinely global village – one whose citizens would enjoy the best possibilities of democratic politics, social and ethical equality, freedom of expression, and economic development.

This optimism, however, was countered by increasing tensions in the economic, political and social arenas between two contrasting developments. On the one hand, the phenomena of globalization – including, for example, growing internationalization and interdependencies of markets – appear to lead to increasing cultural homogenization. As terms for this homogenization such as ‘McWorld’ (Barber 1995) or ‘Disneyfication’ (Hamelink 2000) suggest, it is strongly shaped by the consumer and entertainment cultures of Western nations. On the other hand, and at least in part in reaction against real and perceived threats to given cultural traditions and identities, new (or renewed) efforts to defend and sustain these identities and traditions were seen by some to lead to fragmentation and indeed violence – most famously and disastrously, of course, in the attacks of September 11, 2001 against the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon.

Type: Chapter
Information: Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , pp. 195 - 225

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguilar, J. R. 2000. Over the rainbow: European and American consumer protection policy and remedy conflicts on the Internet and a possible solution. International Journal of Communications of Law and Policy, 4, 1–57.Google Scholar

Ames, R., and Rosemont, H. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Anderson, I.-E., and Jæger, B. 1997. Involving citizens in assessment and the public debate on information technology, in Feenberg, A., Nielsen, T. H., and Winner, L. (Eds.), Technology and Democracy: Technology in the Public Sphere – Proceedings from Workshop 1, Center for Technology and Culture, Oslo, pp. 149–172.Google Scholar

AoIR (Association of Internet Researchers) 2002. Decision-making and ethical Internet research. Retrieved January 10, 2006 from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.

Barber, B. 1995. Jihad versus McWorld. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar

Barney, D. 2004. The vanishing table, or community in a world that is no world, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (Eds.), Community in the digital age: Philosophy and practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Becker, B. 2000. Cyborg, agents and transhumanists. Leonardo, 33, 5, 361–365.CrossRef Google Scholar

Becker, B. 2001. The disappearance of materiality? in Lemecha, V. and Stone, R. (Eds.), The multiple and the mutable subject. Winnipeg: St. Norbert Arts Centre, pp. 58–77.Google Scholar

Becker, B. 2002. Sinn und Sinnlichkeit: Anmerkungen zur Eigendynamik und Fremdheit des eigenen Leibes, in Jäger, L. (Ed.), Mentalität und Medialität, München: Fink, pp. 35–46.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. 1986. Critique, norm and utopia: A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bizer, J. 2003. Grundrechte im Netz: Von der freien Meinungsäußerung bis zum Recht auf Eigentum [Basic rights on the net: from the free expression of opinion to property right], in Schulzki-Haddouti, C. (Ed.), Bürgerrechte im Netz [Civil rights online], Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, pp. 21–29. Available at http://www.bpb.de/publikationen/UZX6DW,0,B%fcrgerrechte_im_Netz.html.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blocker, H. G. 1999. World philosophy: An East-West comparative introduction to philosophy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bonevac, D., Boon, W., and Phillips, S. 1992. Beyond the Western tradition: Readings in moral and political philosophy. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar

Bonevac, D., and Phillips, S. 1993. Understanding non-Western philosophy: introductory readings. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar

Borgmann, A. 1999. Holding onto reality: The nature of information at the turn of the Millennium. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boss, J. A. 2004. Ethics for life: A text with readings. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Buchanan, E. (Ed.) 2003. Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, J., Thompson, P. B., and Peterson, T. R. 2002. The first European Congress on Agricultural and Food Ethics and follow-up Workshop on Ethics and Food Biotechnology: A US perspective, Agriculture and Human Values, 17, 4, 327–332.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burrell, D. 1973. Analogy and philosophical language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chan, J. 2003. Confucian attitudes towards ethical pluralism, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (Eds.), The many and the one: Religious and secular perspectives on ethical pluralism in the modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 129–153.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. 2005. Privacy in China. Unpublished Master's thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar

George, R. T. 1999. Business ethics (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Döring, O. 2003. China's struggle for practical regulations in medical ethics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 3, 233–239.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dreyfus, H. 2001. On the Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Elberfeld, R. 2002. Resonanz als Grundmotiv ostasiatischer Ethik [Resonance as a fundamental motif of East Asian ethics], in Elberfeld, R. and Wohlfart, G. (Eds.), Komparative Ethik: Das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen. München: Chora, pp. 131–141.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 1983. Analogy in the critical works: Kant's transcendental philosophy as analectical thought. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 1996. The political computer: democracy, CMC and Habermas, in Ess, C. (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 197–230.Google Scholar

Ess, C. (Ed.) 2001. Culture, technology, communication: Towards an intercultural global village, with Fay Sudweeks, foreword by Susan Herring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2002a. Cultures in collision: Philosophical lessons from computer-mediated communication, in Moor, J. H. and Bynum, T. W. (Eds.), CyberPhilosophy: The intersection of philosophy and computing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 219–242.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2002b. Liberation in cyberspace … or computer-mediated colonization? / Liberation en cyberspace, ou colonisation assistee par ordinateur?Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication, 12, 3 & 4. Available at: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v12n34.htm.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2003. The cathedral or the bazaar? The AoIR document on Internet research ethics as an exercise in open source ethics, in Consolvo, M. (Ed.), Internet Research Annual Volume 1: Selected papers from the Association of Internet Researchers Conferences 2000–2002. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2004a. Beyond Contemptus Mundi and Cartesian dualism: Western resurrection of the bodysubject and (re)new(ed) coherencies with Eastern approaches to life/death, in Wohlfart, G. and Georg-Moeller, H. (Eds), Philosophie des Todes: death philosophy east and west, Munich: Chora, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2004b. Discourse ethics. in Mitcham, C. et al. (Eds), Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics. New York: MacMillan Reference.Google Scholar

Ess, C., and Sudweeks, F. 2003. Introduction and special issue on liberatory potentials and practices of CMC in the Middle East. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, 2. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue2/essandsudweeks.html.Google Scholar

Ess, C., and Sudweeks, F. 2005. Culture and computer-mediated communication: Toward new understandings. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/ess.html.CrossRef Google Scholar

European Parliament 1995. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data. Retrieved 16 May 2006 from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31995L0046&model=guichett.

Fixdal, J. 1997. Consensus conferences as extended peer groups, in Feenberg, A., Nielsen, T. H., and Winner, L. (Eds), Technology and Democracy: Technology in the Public Sphere – Proceedings from Workshop 1. Oslo: Center for Technology and Culture, pp. 75–94.Google Scholar

Floridi, L., and Sanders, J. W. 2004. Internet ethics: The constructionist values of homo poeticus, in Cavalier, R. (Ed.), The Internet and our moral lives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

GVU Center (College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology) 1998. GVU's 10th WWW User Survey. Retrieved 25 November 2003 at: http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/user_surveys/survey-1998–10/.

Gupta, B. 2002. Ethical questions: East and West. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommuikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. Translated by T. McCarthy as The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984 (Vol. 1) and 1987 (Vol. 2).Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1983. Diskursethik: Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogram, in Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Translated by C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen, as Discourse ethics: Notes on philosophical justification, in Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990, pp. 43–115.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1989. Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage 6, in Wren, T. (Ed.), The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 224–251.Google Scholar

Halavais, A. 2000. National borders on the World Wide Web. New Media and Society, 2, 1, 7–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamelink, C. 2000. The ethics of cyberspace. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Hayles, K. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Herring, S. 1999. Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication, in Mayer, P. A. (Ed.), Computer media and communication: A reader, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–265.Google Scholar

Herring, S. 2001. Gender and power in online communication. Center for Social Informatics Working Papers, WP01–05B. Retrieved 15 December 2003 from: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/csi/WP/WP01–05B.html.

Hinman, L. M. 1998. Ethics: A pluralistic approach to moral theory. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Hjarvard, S. 2002. Mediated encounters: An essay on the role of communication media in the creation of trust in the global metropolis, in Stald, G. and Tufte, T. (Eds.), Global encounters: Media and cultural transformation. Luton: University of Luton Press, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organisations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., and Bond, M. H. 1988. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organisational Dynamics, 16, 4–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hongladarom, S. 2004. Personal communication, 20 January.

Jacoby, I. 1985 The Consensus Development Program of the National Institutes of Health. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1, 420–432.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johns, M.Chen, S., and Hall, J. (Eds.). 2003. Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. G. 2001. Computer ethics (3rd ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Jones, W. T. 1969. The Classical mind: A history of Western philosophy (2nd ed.), Vol. 1). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar

Kawasaki, L. T. 2003. Personal communication, December.

Kemerling, G. 2000. Kant: The moral order. Retrieved 13 June 2006 from: http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/5i.htm.

Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., and Swierstra, T. (Eds) (2002). Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kolko, B., Nakamura, L., and Rodman, G. B. (Eds.). 2000. Race in cyberspace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Li, C. 2002. Revisiting Confucian Jen ethics and feminist care ethics: A reply. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 17, 1, 130–140.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lü, Y. 2002. Xin Xi Lun Li Xue [Chinese information ethics]. Hunan: Middle South University.Google Scholar

Lundh, L. G. 2003. Personal communication, 15 December.

Madsen, R., and Strong, T. 2003. The many and the one: Religious and secular perspectives on ethical pluralism in the modern world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mall, R. A. 2000. Intercultural philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Michelfelder, D. 2001. The moral value of informational privacy in cyberspace. Ethics and information technology, 3, 2, 129–135.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1913. Utilitarianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Moon, J. D. 2003. Pluralisms compared, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (Eds.), The many and the one: Religious and secular perspectives on ethical pluralism in the modern world. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 343–359.Google Scholar

Nara, Y., and Iseda, T. 2004. An empirical study on the structure of Internet information ethics behaviors: Comparative research between Japan, US and Singapore, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (Eds.), Community in the digital age: Philosophy and practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 161–179.Google Scholar

National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (Den nasjonale forskningsetiske komité for samfunnsvitenskap og humaniora [NESH], Norway) 2001. Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, law and the humanities. Retrieved 15 May 2006 from http://www.etikkom.no/Engelsk/NESH/Publications/NESHguide.

National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (Den nasjonale forskningsetiske komité for samfunnsvitenskap og humaniora [NESH], Norway) 2003. Research ethics guidelines for Internet research. Translated by L. G. Lundh and C. Ess. Retrieved 15 May 2006 from http://www.etikkom.no/Engelsk/Publications/Internet03/.

National Institutes of Health, Office of Human Subjects Research. 2005. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Department of Health and Human Services, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved 15 May 2006 from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/45cfr46.html.

NUA Internet Surveys. 2003. How Many Online? Retrieved 15 December 2003 from http://www.nua.com/surveys/how_many_online/index.html.

O'Neill, O. 2001. Agents of justice, in Pogge, T. (Ed.), Global justice. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 188–203.Google Scholar

Ong, W. 1988. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Persondataloven [Personal Data Law, Denmark]. Lov. nr. 429 af 31. maj 2000 som ændret ved lov. nr. 280 af 25. april 2001. Retrieved 2 December 2003 from http://147.29.40.90/_GETDOC_/ACCN/A20000042930-REGL; English version: http://www.datatilsynet.dk/eng/index.html.

Plato, . 1991. The Republic of Plato. Translated by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pohl, K.-H. 2002. Chinese and Western values: Reflections on a cross-cultural dialogue on a universal ethics, in Elberfeld, R. and Wohlfart, G. (Eds.), Komparative Ethik: Das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen. München: Chora, pp. 213–232.Google Scholar

Rachels, J. 1999. The right thing to do: Basic readings in moral philosophy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Ramasoota, P. 2005. Thai Webmasters Association Code of Ethics. Second Asian-Pacific Computing and Philosophy Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 8 January 2005.

Reidenberg, J. R. 2000. Resolving conflicting international data privacy rules in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1315–1376.CrossRef Google Scholar

RESPECT Project. 2004. Institute for Employment Studies. Retrieved 16 May 2006 from http://www.respectproject.org/main/index.php.

Rosemont, H. 2001. Rationality and religious experience: The continuing relevance of the World's spiritual traditions (The First Master Hsüan Memorial Lecture), with a commentary by Huston Smith. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Sandberg, P., and Kraft, N. (Eds.). 1997. Fast salmon and technoburgers. Retrieved 15 May 2006 from http://www.etikkom.no/Etikkom/Etikkom/Engelsk/Publications/fast.

Scheffler, S. 2001. Boundaries and allegiances: Problems of justice and responsibility in liberal thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Serequeberhan, T. 1991. African philosophy: The essential readings. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Silverstone, R. 2002. Finding a voice: Minorities, media and the global commons, in Stald, G. and Tufte, T. (Eds.), Global encounters: Media and cultural transformation. Luton: Luton University Press, pp. 107–122.Google Scholar

Skorupinski, B., and Ott, K. 2002. Technology assessment and ethics, Poiesis and Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, 1, 2, 95–122.CrossRef Google Scholar

Solomon, R. C., and Higgins, K. M. 1995. World philosophy: A text with readings. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

S⊘ndergaard, M. 1994. Hofstede's Consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications. Organization Studies, 15, 3, 447–456.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stahl, B. C. 2004. Responsible management of information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoltze, L. 2001. Internet ret [Internet law]. Copenhagen: Nyt Juridisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Tang, R. 2002. Approaches to privacy – The Hong Kong experience. Retrieved 16 May 2006 from http://www.pco.org.hk/English/infocentre/speech_20020222.html.

Taylor, C. 2002. Democracy, inclusive and exclusive, in Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swiderl, A., and Tipton, S. M. (Eds.), Meaning and modernity: Religion, polity and self. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Thorseth, M. (Ed.). 2003. Applied ethics in Internet research. Programme for Applied Ethics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.Google Scholar

Torgersen, H., and Seifert, F. 1997. How to keep out what we don't want: On the assessment of ‘Sozialvergträglichkeit’ under the Austrian Genetic Engineering Act, in Feenberg, A., Nielsen, T. H., and Winner, L. (Eds.), Technology and democracy: technology in the public sphere – Proceedings from Workshop 1, Center for Technology and Culture, Oslo, pp. 115–148.Google Scholar

Tu, W.-M. 1999. Humanity as embodied love: Exploring filial piety as a global ethical perspective, in Zlomislic, M. and Goicoechea, D. (Eds.), Jen Agape Tao with Tu Wei-Ming. Binghamton, NY: Institute of Global Cultural Studies, pp. 28–37.Google Scholar

Tufte, T. 2002. Ethnic minority Danes between diaspora and locality – Social uses of mobile phones and Internet, in Stald, G. and Tufte, T. (Eds), Global encounters: Media and cultural transformation. Luton: Luton University Press, pp. 235–261.Google Scholar

United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved 16 May 2006 from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.

Veatch, H. 1971. A Critique of Benedict, in Weinberg, J. R. and Yandell, K. E. (Eds.), Theory of knowledge. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar

Warren, K. J. 1990. The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics. 12, 2, 123–146.Google Scholar

Weiner, N. 1948. Cybernetics, or Control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. 2002. Communication, organizations and diverse populations, in Sudweeks, F. and Ess, C. (Eds), Proceedings: Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology 2002, Université de Montréal, School of Information Technology, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, pp. 69–88. Available online: http://www.it.murdoch.edu.au/~sudweeks/catac.Google Scholar

Yu, J. Y. 2003. Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle, in Jiang, X. (Ed.) The examined life: The Chinese perspective. Binghamton,NY: Global Publications, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Yu, J. Y., and Bunnin, N. 2001. Saving the phenomena: An Aristotelian method in comparative philosophy, in Bo, M. (Ed.), Two roads to wisdom? – Chinese philosophy and analytical philosophy. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 293–312.Google Scholar