from CONCLUSION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 September 2018
Truth never damages a cause that is just.
– Mohandas (Mahatma) K. GandhiPopular enthusiasm for transparency abounds. Many readers might therefore expect the authors of a book on transparency to conclude with an unadulterated endorsement of transparency and its zealous supporters. Indeed, our original measure of transparency, focusing on data disclosure, could even be used as a metric to shame and pressure governments that lag behind in the quest to produce ever-increasing amounts of data on the functioning of their economies.
Instead, however,we caution readers against the wholesale embrace of transparency as a goal in and of itself. Data disclosure offers many benefits – economic and political. It also entails costs. In this chapter, we consider, in a methodical fashion, the benefits and costs of transparency identified by our research. For democracies, we do recommend transparency. For autocracies, however, our conclusions are nuanced.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Economically, data disclosure appears to benefit society. Broadly speaking, transparency increases investment. The effect of transparency on foreign direct investment (FDI) holds across both democracies and autocracies. Interestingly, the effect on domestic investment – while evident when we examine both political regimes together – is weaker under authoritarianism. We suggest in Chapter 8 that this weaker effect on domestic gross capital formation results from the privileged position of economic elites under autocratic political regimes. Because of their especially intimate ties to the ruling leadership, wealthy investors under autocracy may have access to economic data even in the absence of full public disclosure. The effect of making economic data public is lessened, therefore, because key economic actors have access to the relevant information either way.
This is not to say that transparency has no effect on investment under autocracy, but rather that the economic benefits of data disclosure appear, overall, more convincing for democracies. Even as we focus on the economic benefits of transparency, differences emerge across political regimes.
TRANSPARENCY AND DEMOCRACY
Of course, the logic of political survival differs across regime types. Unlike their autocratic counterparts, who survive by cultivating a loyal elite constituency, democrats survive in office by winning elections. Pursuing policies that promote the welfare of large segments of society therefore serves to help keep them in power.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.