Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:54:07.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Mobility, Kinship, and Marriage in Indo-European Society

from Part V - Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2023

By
Tijmen Pronk
Edited by
Kristian Kristiansen ,
Guus Kroonen  and
Eske Willerslev
Kristian Kristiansen
Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Guus Kroonen
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Eske Willerslev
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

The purpose of this chapter is to explore one area in which comparative linguistic data can play a role in interpreting late Neolithic and early Bronze Age genetic and archaeological data from western Eurasia. The sharp rise in available samples of ancient DNA enables the establishment of kinship relations between individuals in prehistoric graveyards. It also makes it possible to establish where their ancestors came from. The analysis of strontium, oxygen, carbon, and lead isotopes in the tooth enamel of these same individuals provides information about movements during their lives. When these techniques are combined, we obtain a much better idea about who moved where and when in prehistory. Being able to establish the diet of prehistoric individuals and which diseases they may have suffered from allows archaeologists to set up hypotheses as to why some of the population movements that can be observed in the archaeological data might have taken place. Linguistics can offer a valuable contribution to the discussion of why people moved by shedding light on factors other than diet or disease; it may, for example, help to explain cases in which males appear to have migrated differently from females. In order to understand how, this chapter will take a closer look at the linguistic evidence for kinship relations and the role of gender and age in Indo-European society. At the end of the chapter, hypotheses about mobility, kinship, and marriage in early Indo-European society as based on the linguistic data will be compared to the findings of recent research into ancient DNA and isotope analysis.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
Integrating Archaeology, Genetics, and Linguistics
 , pp. 289 - 295
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, David W. & Brown, Dorcas R.. 2017. The dogs of war: A Bronze Age initiation ritual in the Russian steppes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 48: 134–148.Google Scholar
Barlau, Stephen B. 1976. An outline of Germanic kinship. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4: 97–129.Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. 1976. Uncle and nephew. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4: 43–63.Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. 1992. “Widow.” Historische Sprachforschung 105: 171–188.Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1969. Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. Tome I : Économie, parenté, société. Tome II : Pouvoir, droit, religion. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan. 1976. Avunculate and fosterage. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4: 65–78.Google Scholar
Damgaard, P. de B. et al. 2018. The first horse herders and the impact of Early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia. Science 360: 6396.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1889. Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen: Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Altertumskunde. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 11, 380–606.Google Scholar
Falk, Harry. 1986. Bruderschaft und Würfelspiel. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des vedischen Opfers. Freiburg: Hedwig Falk.Google Scholar
Falk, Harry. 1994. Das Reitpferd im vedischen Indien. In: Hänsel, Bernhard & Zimmer, Stefan (ed.), Die Indogermanen und das Pferd. Akten des internationalen interdisziplinären Kolloquiums. Freie Universität Berlin, 1.–3. Juli 1992, 91–101. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1966. Proto-Indo-European kinship. Ethnology 5(1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1980. Review of Szemerényi 1977. Language 56: 186–192.Google Scholar
García Ramón, José Luis. 1996 Lat. auēre “desear,” (ad)iuuāre “ayudar” e IE *h2eu̯h1- “dar preferencia, apreciar.” In: Bammesberger, Alfred & Heberlein, Friedrich (ed.), Akten des VIII. internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik, 32–49. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gates, Henry Phelps. 1971. The kinship terminology of Homeric Greek. Supplement. International Journal of American Linguistics 37(4).Google Scholar
Goedegebuure, Petra. 2004. Troonsopvolging in het Oud-Hethitische Rijk: Patrilineair, matrilineair of avunkulair? Phoenix 50(1):5–21.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Amy, et al. 2017. Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(10): 2657–2662.Google Scholar
Gräslund, Anne-Sofie. 2004. Dogs in graves: A question of symbolism? In: Frizell, Barbro Santillo (ed.), Pecus: Man and animal in antiquity, 171–180. Rome: Swedish Institute.Google Scholar
Greene, David H. 1998 Language and history in the early Germanic world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich. 1985. Indo-European kinship terminology in linguistics and anthropology. Anthropological Linguistics 27(4): 453–480.Google Scholar
Juras, Anna, et al. 2018 Mitochondrial genomes reveal an east to west cline of steppe ancestry in Corded Ware populations. Scientific Reports 8: 11603.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Kris. 2000. The one-eyed god: Odin and the (Indo-)Germanic Männerbünde. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Knipper, Corina, et al. 2017. Female exogamy and gene pool diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(38): 10083–10088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Kristian, et al. 2017 Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity 91(356): 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansing, J. Stephen, et al. 2017. Kinship structures create persistent channels for language transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(49): 12910-12915.Google Scholar
Lubotsky, Alexander. 2001. The Indo-Iranian substratum. In: Carpelan, Christian, Parpola, Asko, & Koskikallio, Petteri (ed.), Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and archaeological considerations. Papers presented at an international symposium held at the Tvärminne Research Station of the University of Helsinki 8–10 January 1999, 301–317. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P. 1998. A European perspective on Indo-Europeans in Asia. In: Mair, V. H. (ed.), The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age peoples of eastern Central Asia, 175–201. Washington, DC & Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Man & University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P., & Adams, Douglas Q. (ed.). 1997. Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P., & Adams, Douglas Q.. 2006. The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim R. 1987. Hund, Wolf und Krieger bei den Indogermanen. In: Meid, Wolfgang (ed.), Studien zum indogermanischen Wortschatz, 101–154. Innsbruck: IBS.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim R. 2002. Wolfsbessenheit, Nacktheit, Einäugigkeit und verwandte Aspekte des altkeltischen Männerbündes. In: Das, Rahul Peter & Meiser, Gerhard (ed.), Geregeltes Ungestüm: Bruderschaft und Jugendbünde bei indogermanischen Völkern, 43–67. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Mittnik, A., et al. 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366(6466): 731–734.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, Vagheesh M., et al. 2019. The formation of of human populations in South and Central Asia. Science 365(6457).Google Scholar
Ó Cathasaigh, Tomás. 1986. The sister’s son in early Irish literature. Peritia 5: 128–160.Google Scholar
Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2019. Aspects of family structure among the Indo-Europeans. In: Olsen, Birgit Anette, Olander, Thomas, & Kristiansen, Kristian (ed.), Tracing the Indo-Europeans. New evidence from archaeology and historical linguistics, 145–163. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2020. Kin, clan and community in Proto-Indo-European society. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, clan and community in prehistoric Europe, 39–180. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Petit, Daniel. 2010. Suffix transfer in Baltic. Baltistica 45(2): 173–184.Google Scholar
Pronk, Tijmen. 2013. Notes on Balto-Slavic etymology: Russian norov, mjat’, ruž’ë, dialectal xajat’ ‘to care’, xovat’ ‘to keep’ and their Slavic and Baltic cognates. Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch. Neue Folge 1: 294–303.Google Scholar
Risch, Ernst. 1944. Betrachtungen zu den indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen. Museum Helveticum: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für klassische Altertumswissenschaft 1(2): 115–122.Google Scholar
Rix, Helmut (ed.). 2001 2. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Sergent, Bernard. 2003. Les troupes de jeunes hommes et l’expansion indo-européenne. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 29(2): 9–27.Google Scholar
Sjörgen, Karl Göran et al. 2016. Diet and mobility in the Corded Ware of Central Europe. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0155083.Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, Dietrich. 1998. Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen und Erbrecht im althethitischen Königshaus vor Telipinu – ein erneuter Erklärungsversuch. Altorientalische Forschungen 25: 75–94.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1977. Studies in the kinship terminology of the Indo-European languages, with special reference to Indian, Iranian, Greek and Latin. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1912. Über einige antike Anredeformen. Göttingen: Officina academica Dieterichiani.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Stefan. 2003. Glimpses of Indo-European law. In: Feldbrugge, F. J. M. (ed.), The law’s beginnings, 115–136. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×