Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:21:34.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Table of Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Ana Bobić
Ana Bobić
Affiliation:
Court of Justice of the European Union
Type
Chapter
Information
The Individual in the Economic and Monetary Union
A Study of Legal Accountability
 , pp. xiii - xx
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

European Union

Court of Justice

  • Case 9/56 Meroni EU:C:1958:7

  • Case 26/62 van Gend en Loos EU:C:1963:1

  • Case 13/63 Commission v Italy EU:C:1963:20

  • Case 6/64 Costa v ENEL EU:C:1964:66

  • Case 22/70 Commission v Council EU:C:1971:32

  • Case 39/72 Commission v Italy EU:C:1973:13

  • Case 128/78 Commission v United Kingdom EU:C:1979:32

  • Case 804/79 Commission v United Kingdom EU:C:1981:93

  • Case 244/80 Foglia v Novello EU:C:1981:302

  • Case 60/81 IBM v Commission EU:C:1981:264

  • Case 283/81 Cilfit EU:C:1982:335

  • Case 294/83 Les Verts EU:C:1986:166

  • Case 34/86 Council v Parliament EU:C:1986:291

  • Case 314/85 Foto-Frost EU:C:1987:452

  • Case 151/88 Italy v Commission EU:C:1989:201

  • Joined Cases C-181/88, C-182/88 and C-218/88 Deschamps EU:C:1989:642

  • Case C-322/88 Grimaldi EU:C:1989:646

  • Case C‑366/88 France v Commission EU:C:1990:348

  • Case C-128/89 Commission v Italy EU:C:1990:311

  • Case C-269/90 Technische Universität München EU:C:1991:438

  • Case C‑303/90 France v Commission EU:C:1991:424

  • Case C-282/90 Vreugdenhil v Commission EU:C:1992:124

  • Case C-343/90 Dias EU:C:1992:327

  • Case C-97/91 Borelli EU:C:1992:491

  • Case C‑325/91 France v Commission EU:C:1993:245

  • Case C-188/92 TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH EU:C:1994:90

  • Case C-415/93 Bosman EU:C:1995:463

  • Opinion 3/94 EU:C:1995:436

  • Case C‑57/95 France v Commission EU:C:1997:164

  • Case C‑147/96 Netherlands v Commission EU:C:2000:335

  • Case C-50/00 P UPA EU:C:2002:462

  • Case C-60/00 Carpenter EU:C:2002:434

  • Case C-491/01 BAT and Imperial Tobacco EU:C:2002:741

  • Case C-11/00 Commission v ECB EU:C:2003:395

  • Case C-27/04 Commission v Council EU:C:2004:436

  • Case C-392/02 Commission v Denmark EU:C:2005:683

  • Case C-12/03 P Tetra Laval EU:C:2005:87

  • Case C‑301/03 Italy v Commission EU:C:2005:727

  • Case C-64/05 P Sweden v Commission EU:C:2007:802

  • Case C‑521/06 P Athinaïki Techniki v Commission EU:C:2008:422

  • Case C-166/07 Parliament v Council EU:C:2009:499

  • Case C‑362/08 P Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission EU:C:2010:40

  • Joined Cases C‑188/10 and C‑189/10 Melki and Abdeli EU:C:2010:363

  • Joined Cases C-78/08 to C-80/08 Paint Graphos and Others EU:C:2011:550

  • Opinion 1/09 EU:C:2011:123

  • Case C-34/09 Ruiz Zambrano EU:C:2011:124

  • Case C-14/10 Nickel Institute EU:C:2011:503

  • Joined Cases C-463/10 and C-475/10 Deutsche Post and Germany v Commission EU:C:2011:656

  • Case C-434/11 Corpul National al Politistilor v MAI EU:C:2011:830

  • Case C-462/11 Cozman v Teatrul Municipal Targoviste EU:C:2011:831

  • Case C-134/12 MAI et al. v Corpul National al Politistilor EU:C:2012:288

  • Case C-369/12 Corpul National al Politistilor v MAI EU:C:2012:725

  • Case C-370/12 Pringle EU:C:2012:756

  • Case C-399/11 Melloni EU:C:2013:107

  • Case C-583/11 P Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami EU:C:2013:625

  • Case C-128/12 Sindicato dos Bancarios do Norte et al. v BPN EU:C:2013:149

  • Opinion 2/13 EU:C:2014:2454

  • Case C‑31/13 P Hungary v Commission EU:C:2014:70

  • Case C-264/12 Sindicato Nacional dos Profissionais de Seguros e Afins v Fidelitate Mundial EU:C:2014:2036

  • Case C-333/13 Dano EU:C:2014:2358

  • Case C-665/13 Sindicato Nacional dos Profissionais de Seguros e Afins v Via Directa EU:C:2014:2327

  • Case C-62/14 Gauweiler EU:C:2015:400

  • Case C-67/14 Alimanovic EU:C:2015:597

  • Case C-526/14 Kotnik EU:C:2016:570

  • Joined Cases C-8/15 P to C-10/15 P Ledra Advertising and Others v Commission EU:C:2016:701

  • Case C-41/15 Dowling EU:C:2016:836

  • Joined Cases C‑105/15 P to C‑109/15 P Mallis EU:C:2016:702

  • Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis EU:C:2016:972

  • Case C-243/15 Lesoochranáske zoskupenie EU:C:2016:838

  • Case C-258/14 Florescu EU:C:2017:448

  • Case C-589/15 P Anagnostakis EU:C:2017:663

  • Joined cases C-643/15 and C-647/15 Slovakia and Hungary v Council EU:C:2017:631

  • Case C-16/16 P Belgium v Commission EU:C:2018:79

  • Case C-64/16 Associação dos Juízes Portugueses EU:C:2018:117

  • Case C-219/17 Berlusconi EU:C:2018:1023

  • Case C-493/17 Weiss EU:C:2018:1000

  • Case C-621/18 Whigtman EU:C:2018:999

  • Case C-450/17 P Landeskreditbank EU:C:2019:372

  • Joined Cases C-663/17 P, C-665/17 P and C-669/17 P Trasta Komercbanka EU:C:2019:923

  • Joined Cases C-152/18 P and C-153/18 P Crédit Mutuel Arkéa EU:C:2019:810

  • Joined Cases C-202/18 and C-238/18 Rimšēvičs EU:2019:139

  • Case C-35/19 Belgian State (Indemnité pour personnes handicapées) EU:C:2019:894

  • Case C-686/18 OC and Others v Banca d’Italia and Others EU:C:2020:567

  • Case C-575/18 P Czech Republic v Commission EU:C:2020:530

  • Joined Cases C-597/18 P, C-598/18 P, C-603/18 P and C-604/18 P Chrysostomides EU:C:2020:1028

  • Case C-785/18 Jeanningross EU:C:2020:46

  • Case C‑148/19 P BTB Holding Investments and Duferco Participations Holding v Commission EU:C:2020:354

  • Joined Cases C‑225/19 and C‑226/19 R.N.N.S. & K.A. EU:C:2020:951

  • Case C‑316/19 Commission v Slovenia EU:C:2020:1030

  • Case C-571/19 P EMB Consulting SE v ECB EU:C:2020:208

  • Case C‑423/20 P(R) Council v Sharpston EU:C:2020:700

  • Case C‑424/20 P(R) Representatives of the Governments of the Member States v Sharpston EU:C:2020:705

  • Case C-501/18 Balgarska Narodna Banka EU:C:2021:249

  • Case C-848/19 P Germany v Poland EU:C:2021:598

  • Joined Cases C‑357/19, C‑379/19, C‑547/19, C‑811/19 and C‑840/19 Asociaţia ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’ EU:C:2021:1034

  • Case C-911/19 Fédération bancaire française EU:C:2021:599

  • Case C-408/20 P Poggiolini EU:C:2021:806

  • Case C‑817/19 Ligue des droits humains EU:C:2022:491

  • Case C-616/20 M2Beauté Cosmetics GmbH EU:C:2022:781

  • Case C-673/20 Préfet du Gers EU:C:2022:449

  • Case C-45/21 Banka Slovenije EU:C:2022:670

  • Case C-156/21 Hungary v Parliament and Council EU:C:2022:97

  • Case C-157/21 Poland v Parliament and Council EU:C:2022:98

  • Case C-397/21 HUMDA EU:C:2022:790

  • Case C-430/21 RS EU:C:2022:99

  • Case C‑443/21 Avicarvil Farms EU:C:2022:899

Advocate General Opinions

  • Opinion of Advocate General Maduro in Case C-141/02 P Commission v max-mobil EU:C:2004:646

  • Opinion of Advocate General Léger in Case C-40/03 P Rica Foods EU:C:2005:93

  • Opinion of Advocate General Maduro in Case C-411/06 Commission v Parliament and Council EU:C:2009:189

  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-13/07 Commission v Council EU:C:2009:190

  • Opinion of Advocate General Bot in Case C-166/07 Parliament v Council EU:C:2009:213

  • Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston in Case C-34/09 Ruiz Zambrano EU:C:2010:560

  • Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi in Case C‑401/09 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v ECB EU:C:2011:31

  • Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak in Case C-539/09 Commission v Germany EU:C:2011:345

  • View of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-370/12 Pringle EU:C:2012:675

  • Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Case C-113/14 Germany v Parliament and Council EU:C:2016:279

  • Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C‑526/14 Kotnik EU:C:2016:102

  • Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Joined Cases C‑8/15 P to C‑10/15 P Ledra EU:C:2016:290

  • Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet in Joined Cases C‑105/15 P to C‑109/15 P Mallis EU:C:2016:294

  • Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Joined Cases C‑360/15 and C‑31/16 College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amersfoort EU:C:2017:397

  • Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi in Case C-589/15 P Anagnostakis EU:C:2017:175

  • Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Case C-16/16 P Belgium v Commission EU:C:2017:959

  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona in Case C-219/17 Berlusconi EU:C:2018:502

  • Opinion of Advocate General Hogan in Case C-450/17 P Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg EU:C:2018:982

  • Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet in Case C-493/17 Weiss EU:C:2018:815

  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Joined Cases C-202/18 and C-238/18 Rimšēvičs EU:C:2018:1030

  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Joined Cases C-663/17 P, C-665/17 P and C-669/17 P Trasta Komercbanka EU:C:2019:323

  • Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella in Joined Cases C-597/18 P, C-598/18 P, C-603/18 P and C-604/18 P Chrysostomides EU:C:2020:390

  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sanchez-Bordona in Case C-848/19 P Germany v Poland EU:C:2021:218

  • Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Case C-911/19 Fédération bancaire française EU:C:2021:294

  • Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta in Case C-500/20 ÖBB-Infrastruktur Aktiengesellschaft EU:C:2022:79

  • Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour in Case C-624/20 E.K. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid EU:C:2022:194

  • Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta in Case C-721/20 DB Station & Service EU:C:2022:288

  • Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta in Case C-268/21 Norra Stockholm EU:C:2022:755

  • Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou in Case C-389/21 P ECB v Crédit Lyonnais EU:C:2022:844

Court of First Instance/General Court

  • Case T-139/99 AICS v Parliament EU:T:2000:182

  • Case T-18/10 Inuit EU:T:2011:419

  • Case T-262/10 Microban EU:T:2011:623

  • Case T-450/12 Anagnostakis v Commission EU:T:2015:739

  • Case T-79/13 Accorinti and Others v ECB EU:T:2015:756

  • Case T-122/15 Landeskreditbank EU:T:2017:337

  • Case T-247/16 Fursin and Others v ECB EU:T:2017:623

  • Case T‑680/13 Chrysostomides EU:T:2018:486

  • Case T-883/16 Poland v Commission EU:T:2019:567

  • Case T-107/17 Steinhoff EU:T:2019:353

  • Case T-504/19 Crédit lyonnais v ECB EU:T:2021:185

  • Case T-913/16 Fininvest and Berlusconi v ECB EU:T:2022:279

  • Case T-502/19 Corneli v ECB EU:T:2022:627

  • Case T-709/21 WhatsApp Ireland Ltd EU:T:2022:783

Member States

Estonia

Supreme Court

  • Constitutional Judgment 3-4-1-6-12 (ESM Treaty), 12 July 2012

Germany

Federal Constitutional Court

  • 2 BvR 2134/92 and 2159/92 Maastricht Treaty Judgment of 12 October 1993

  • 2 BvR 2/08 Lisbon Treaty Judgment of 30 June 2009

  • 2 BvR 2661/06 Honeywell Order of 06 July 2010

  • 2 BvR 987/10 ESM Treaty Judgment of 07 September 2011

  • 2 BvR 615/09 and 2 BvR 535/09 Judgment of 21 November 2011

  • 2 BvR 1390/12 ESM Treaty II Judgment of 12 September 2012

  • 2 BvR 2728/13 Gauweiler Order of 14 January 2014

  • 2 BvR 2735/14 Mr R. Order of 15 December 2015

  • 2 BvR 2728/13 Gauweiler Judgment of 21 June 2016

  • 2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 980/16, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 1651/15 Weiss Order of 18 July 2017

  • 2 BvR 1685/14 and 2 BvR 2631/14 Banking Union Judgment of 30 July 2019

  • 2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 980/16, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 1651/15 Weiss Judgment of 5 May 2020

  • 2 BvR 547/21 Decision of 26 March 2021

  • 2 BvR 547/21 Order of 15 April 2021

  • 2 BvR 1651/15 and 2 BvR 2006/15 Order of 29 April 2021

  • 2 BvR 547/21 and 2 BvR 798/21 Own Resources Decision Judgment of 6 December 2022

Portugal

Constitutional Tribunal

  • Ruling N. 353/12 of 5 July 2012

The Netherlands

Hague Civil Court

  • Wilders and Others v the Dutch State, case no. 419556 / KG ZA 12-523, Judgment in summary proceedings of 1 June 2012

Other Jurisdictions

United Kingdom

  • Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside MBC [1976] UKHL 6

  • Miller & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Rev 1) [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)

  • Miller & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Rev 3) [2017] UKSC 5

United States

  • James B. Beam Distilling Co. v Georgia 501 US 529 (1991), Concurring Opinion of Justice Scalia

  • Obergefell v Hodges 576 US 644 (2015), Dissenting Opinion of Justice Scalia

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Table of Cases
  • Ana Bobić, Court of Justice of the European Union
  • Book: The Individual in the Economic and Monetary Union
  • Online publication: 04 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207942.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Table of Cases
  • Ana Bobić, Court of Justice of the European Union
  • Book: The Individual in the Economic and Monetary Union
  • Online publication: 04 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207942.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Table of Cases
  • Ana Bobić, Court of Justice of the European Union
  • Book: The Individual in the Economic and Monetary Union
  • Online publication: 04 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207942.001
Available formats
×