Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:56:49.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: Indian princes and British imperialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Barbara N. Ramusack
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Get access

Summary

Air India, the overseas airline of the independent Government of India (GOI), chose a bowing, smiling, turbaned maharaja or prince as its mascot during the 1950s. Why did a democratic government choose this image as an icon for its most modern means of transportation when a decade earlier its prime minister had castigated the princes as rulers whose states were ‘very backward and manyof them… still in the feudal age’? This rotund, red-coated figure epitomises the profoundly ambivalent attitudes towards the Indian princes among successive governments in India. British colonial officials had claimed them as faithful military allies, denounced them as autocrats, praised them as natural leaders of their subjects, chided them as profligate playboys, and taken advantage of their lavish hospitality. During the struggle for independence, Indian nationalists had initially cited the princes as evidence of the ability of Indians to govern effectively; they had occasionally sought their financial patronage of political organisations and collaboration during constitutional negotiations, but ultimately had assailed them as arbitrary autocrats. In independent India and Pakistan, governments have appointed them to positions ranging from state governors to ambassadors; political parties have co-opted erstwhile princes as candidates for the central and state legislatures and appointed them as ministers; public corporations and private entrepreneurs have promoted former princely capitals as destinations for international and domestic tourists; and popular media have represented them as an integral part of Indian culture. In the public sphere, princes were and are portrayed in newspapers, magazines, novels, newsreels and feature films as benevolent paternalists, remnants of feudalism ensconced in romantic forts, sexually ravenous predators, fierce hunters, audacious sportsmen, especially in cricket and polo, and extravagant clients of jewellers and luxury hotels in India and Europe.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayly, C. A.Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars: Northern Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion 1770–1870 (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S.Political Systems in Eighteenth Century India: The Benares Region’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 83 (1962).Google Scholar
Copland, IanThe British Raj and the Indian Princes: Paramountcy in Western India 1857–1930 (Bombay, 1982).Google Scholar
Corfield, ConradThe Princely India I Knew: From Reading to Mountbatten (Madras, 1975).Google Scholar
,East India (Indian States). Report of the Indian States Committee 1928–1929 (London, 1929).
Haynes, EdwardRajput Ceremonial Interactions as a Mirror of a Dying Indian State System, 1820–1947’, Modern Asian Studies 4 (1990), n. 1.Google Scholar
,Imperial Gazetteer of India, The Indian Empire vol. 4, Administrative (Oxford, 1909).
Inden, RonaldRitual, Authority, and Cyclic Time in Hindu Kingship’. In Richards, J. F. (ed.), Kingship and Authority in South Asia (Madison, 1978).Google Scholar
Jawaharlal, NehruWhat are the Indian States? (Allahabad, n.d. 1939?).Google Scholar
Kaul, Daya KishanCare and Preservation of Old Records in Northern Indian States’, Indian Historical Records Commission, Proceedings, 2 (January 1920).Google Scholar
Manor, JamesThe Demise of the Princely Order: A Reassessment’. In Jeffrey, Robin (ed.), People, Princes and Paramount Power: Society and Politics in the Indian Princely States (Delhi, 1978).Google Scholar
Price, Pamela G.Kingship and Political Practice in Colonial India (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Ramusack, BarbaraThe Princely States of Punjab: A Bibliographic Essay’. In Gustafson, W. Eric and Jones, Kenneth W. (eds), Sources on Punjab History (New Delhi, 1975).Google Scholar
Rudolph, Lloyd I. and Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber, ‘The Subcontinental Empire and the Regional Kingdom in Indian State Formation’. In Wallace, Paul (ed.), Region and Nation in India (New Delhi, 1985).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×