Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2023
Abstract
Commissioning portraits of Renaissance women was a more common practicethan is generally imagined. An impressive corpus was produced in Venice,although the sitters’ names are lost. Their identity is furtherclouded by the repetition of similar features, including elaboratelydressed blond hair, and similar luxurious attire. Rather than readingthese elements as an erasure of identity, they can be understood asmarkers of wealth and beauty of individual women within highlyrestrictive codes. Another device introduces partial nudity, which hasbeen interpreted as portrayals of courtesans. Evidence, however, showsthat in many cases the unveiling of a breast functions in the context ofbetrothal and marriage imagery; so far from creating a category of‘Courtesan Portraits’ the nudity, along with othersymbols, establishes iconography pertaining to the chaste sexuality ofvirtuous wives.
Keywords: courtesans in art; betrothal imagery; Early Modernportraits of women; Flora imagery; sexual imagery; Venetian Renaissanceart
Commissioning portraits of women in the Renaissance was a more commonpractice than is generally imagined. Ironically, while a large number ofrepresentations of women comes from the second half of the sixteenth centuryin Venice, this group of paintings has sustained considerable scholarlyargument about its relation to the genre of portraiture. The doubts stemfrom two concerns, which at times are intertwined. The first objectioncentres on the observable fact that the women, almost all unidentified,convey similar features conforming to the narrowly defined standards ofbeauty found in literary topoi. From this it is oftenconcluded that what we have are not portraits of real women, but abstractembodiments of beauty. The second objection is that many of therepresentations exhibit some degree of nudity, with the implicit or statedbelief that this would not be possible for a ‘respectable’woman. This moralising assumption has led to the belief that the womendelineated are prostitutes. I want to problematise both the perceivedabsence of living women and the categories of decent vs. indecent, whichhave been applied to Renaissance representations of women.
Removal of the binary opposition helps to clarify the identity of thesitters, although their names are not recoverable.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.