Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:35:47.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

Jonathan Culpeper
Jonathan Culpeper
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Impoliteness
Using Language to Cause Offence
 , pp. 263 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, Roger D. (1962) Playing the dozens. Journal of American Folklore 75: 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James S. (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz, Leonard (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. II. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afifi, Walid. A. and Burgoon, Judee K. (2000) Behavioral violations in interactions: The combined consequences of valence and change in uncertainty on interaction outcomes. Human Communication Research 26: 203–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin (1996) Conversational Routines in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, Janet (2008) Linguistic features of police culture and the coercive impact of police officer swearing in police-citizen street interaction. Register and Context 1 (downloaded 10 January 2009 from www.registerandcontext.de/ainsworth1.html).
Alexander, C. Norman and Knight, Gordon W. (1971) Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Sociometry 34: 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith and Burridge, Kate (1991) Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith and Burridge, Kate (2006) Forbidden words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, Jens S. (1976) Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation: A Study In Pragmatics. Göteborg University: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Andersen, Susan M., Klatsky, Roberta L. and Murray, John (1990) Traits and social stereotypes: Efficiency differences in social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (2): 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Craig A. and Bushman, Brad J. (2002) Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology 53: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Craig A., Deuser, William E. and DeNeve, Kristina M. (1995) Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21: 434–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth (2000) Beyond homo economicus: New developments in theories of social norms. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (2): 170–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lynne and Pearson, Christine (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 452–71.CrossRef
Archer, Dane and Akert, Robin M. (1977) Words and everything else: Verbal and nonverbal cues in social interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 443–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dane and Akert, Robin M. (1980) The encoding of meaning: A test of three theories of social interaction. Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 393–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn E. (2008) Verbal aggression in the historical courtroom: Sanctioned but not necessarily impolite? In: Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Arndt, Horst and Janney, Richard Wayne (1985) Politeness revisited: Cross-modal supportive strategies. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 23 (4): 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, Horst and Janney, Richard Wayne (1987) Intergrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. (1999) An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics 9 (1): 119–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. (2006) Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 2 (2): 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. (2008) Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2): 229–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, Soloman E. (1946) Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41: 1230–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Augoustinos, Martha and Walker, Iain (1995) Social Cognition: An Integrated Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Austin, J.Paddy, M. (1987) The Dark Side of Politeness: A Pragmatic Analysis of Non-cooperative Communication. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
Austin, J.Paddy, M. (1990) Politeness revisited – the dark side. In: Bell, Alan and Holmes, Janet (eds.) New Zealand Ways of Speaking English. Clevedon and Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, pp. 277–93.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent (1975) Performatives are statements too. Philosophical Studies 28: 229–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent (1995) Standardization vs. conventionalization. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 677–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent (1998) Standardisation revisited. In: Kasher, Asa (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. London: Routledge, pp. 712–22.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent and Harnish, Robert M. (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern W. McGee; edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Banse, Rainer and Scherer, Klaus (1996) Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 14–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca (2003) Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John A. (1982) Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 43 (3): 425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Chris (2000) Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Baron, Robert A. and Richardson, Deborah R. (1994) Human Aggression. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland (1970) Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Frederic C. (1995 [1932]) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, Susan, Burman, Michele and Brown, Jane (2001) Discussing violence: Let's hear it from the girls. Probation Journal 48: 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet B. and Chovil, Nicole (2000) Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19 (2): 163–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Leslie A. (1984) An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research 10: 427–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, Michael J. and Pence, Michelle E. (2010) Verbal aggressiveness as an expression of selected biological influences. In: Theodore A. Avtgis and Andrew S. Rancer (eds.) Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research, pp. 3–25. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M. (1995) Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence. In: Alatis, James E., Straehle, Carolyn A., Gallenberger, Brent and Ronkin, Maggie (eds.) Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistic Aspects. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, pp. 154–68.Google Scholar
Bell, David M. (1997) Innuendo. Journal of Pragmatics 27 (1): 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Eugene C. and Blakeney, Roger N. (1977) Personality correlates of conflicts modes. Human Relations, 30 (9): 849–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Charles R. (1994) Power, dominance, and social interaction. In: Knapp, Mark L. and Miller, Gerald R. (eds.) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 450–507.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1911 [1900]) Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, Leonard (1984) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 17: Theorizing in Social Psychology: Special Topics. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Leonard (1993) Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bernal, Maria (2008) Do insults always insult? Genuine politeness versus non-genuine politeness in colloquial Spanish [¿Insultan los insultos? Descortesía auténtica vs. descortesía no auténtica en el español coloquial]. Pragmatics 18 (4): 775–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettenhausen, Kenneth and Keith Murnighan, J. (1985) The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (3): 350–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan and Reppen, Randi (1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas (2009) A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (3): 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane (1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blasko, Dawn G. and Connine, Cynthia M. (1993) Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (2): 295–308.Google ScholarPubMed
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1987) Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1990) You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: Parental politeness in family discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 259–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and House, Juliane (1989) Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior. In: Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele (eds.) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Vol. XXXI: Advances in Discourse Processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 123–54.Google Scholar
Borg, Emma (2004) Minimal Semantics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek (2007a) Impoliteness, preference organization and conducivity. Multilingua 26 (1–2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek (2007b) Beginnings, middles, and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12): 2185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek (2008) Impoliteness in Interaction. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam (eds.) (2008) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bowers, John W. (1963) Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change. Speech Monographs 30: 345–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradac, James J., Cargile, Aaron Castelan and Hallett, Jennifer S. (2001) Language Attitudes: Retrospect, Conspect, and Prospect. In: Robinson, W. Peter and Giles, Howard (eds.) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 137–55.Google Scholar
Brenneis, Donald and Lein, Laura (1977) ‘You fruithead’: A sociolinguistic approach to children's dispute settlement. In: Ervin-Tripp, Susan and Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia (eds.) Child Discourse. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. and Gardner, Wendi (1996) Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1): 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, Joel, Wiesenfeld, Batia M. and Martin, Christopher (1995) Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivors' reactions to job layoffs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 (1): 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broomfield, Nicholas and Churchill, Joan (1981) Soldier Girls. Channel 4 Television.
Brown, Bert R. (1970) Face-saving following experimentally induced embarrassment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6: 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope (1995) Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: The case of Tzeltal irony. In: Goody, Esther N. (ed.) Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert C. and Tedeschi, James T. (1976) Determinants of perceived aggression. Journal of Social Psychology 100: 77–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert (1989) Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society 18: 159–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckner, Elke and Knaup, Karin (1993) Women's and men's friendships in a comparative perspective. European Sociological Review 9 (3): 249–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Gregory A. and Fox Tree, Jean E. (2005) Is there an ironic tone of voice?Language and Speech 48: 257–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burman, Michele, Brown, Jane, Tisdall, Kay and Batchelor, Susan (2002) A View from the Girls: Exploring Violence and Violent Behaviour. British Economic and Social Research Council Research Report.Google Scholar
Buss, Arnold H. (1961) The Psychology of Aggression. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, Arnold H. (1980) Self-consciousness and Social Anxiety. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Buss, David M. (1990) The evolution of anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 9: 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, David M. (1999) Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. In: Rosen, David H. and Luebbert, Michael C. (eds.) Evolution of the Psyche. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia and Janney, Richard Wayne (1994) The pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 325–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, Dudley D. (1997) Conflict communication: An emerging communication theory of interpersonal conflict. In: Kovacic, Branislov (ed.) Emerging Theories of Human Communication. New York: State University Press, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (2004) Out of the bottle: The social life of metalanguage. In: Jaworski, Adam, Coupland, Nikolas and Galasiński, Dariusz (eds.) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 311–21.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (2007) Redefining rudeness: From polite social intercourse to ‘good communication’. In: Mina Gorji (ed.) Rude Britannia. London: Routledge, pp. 127–38.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman and Lepore, Ernie (2005) Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Michael, Marcus-Newhall, Amy and Miller, Norman (1989) Evidence for a general construct of aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15: 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald (2004) Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Charles S. and Glass, David C. (1978) Coronary-prone behavior pattern and interpersonal aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 361–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catalano, Ralph, Novaco, Raymond and McConnell, William (1997) A model of the net effect of job loss on violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 1440–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashman, Holly (2006) Impoliteness in children's interactions in a Spanish/English bilingual community of practice. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 2 (2): 217–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheang, Henry S. and Pell, Marc D. (2008) The sound of sarcasm. Speech Communication 50: 366–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Serena, Boucher, Helen C. and Tapias, Molly Parker (2006) The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin 132 (2): 151–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam (1962) Paper given at Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English, 1958. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Chory, Rebecca M. (2010) Media entertainment and verbal aggression: Contents, effects, and correlates. In: Theodore A. Avtgis and Andrew S. Rancer (eds.) Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 176–97.Google Scholar
Chovil, Nicole (1991–1992) Discourse-oriented facial displays in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 25: 163–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, Chris (2005) Editorial. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., Cacioppo, John T., Bassett, Rodney and Miller, John A. (1978) Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 463–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary (1987) [1st edn.] Edited by Sinclair, John, Hanks, Patrick, Fox, Gwyneth, Moon, Rosamund and Stock, Penny. London and Glasgow: Collins.
Colston, Herbert L. (1997) I've never heard anything like it: Overstatement, understatement, and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 12 (1): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, Martin A. and Bekerian, Debra A. (1987) Situational knowledge and emotions. Cognition and Emotion 1: 145–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1996) The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In: Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margaret (eds.) Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2007) Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas and Jaworski, Adam (2004) Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation and ideology. Language, Power and Social Process 11: 15–52.Google Scholar
Cowell, Tony (2006) I Hate to be Rude, but… Simon Cowell's Book of Nasty Comments. London: Blake Publishing.Google Scholar
Craig, Robert, Tracy, Karen and Spisak, Frances (1986) The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research 12: 437–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Tony (2007) When Saturday comes: The boundaries of football rudeness. In: Gorji, Mina (ed.) Rude Britannia. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 115–26.Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan D. (2000) Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (1998) (Im)politeness in drama. In: Culpeper, Jonathan, Short, Mick and Verdonk, Peter (eds.) Studying Drama: From Text to Context. London: Routledge, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (2001) Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and other Texts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1: 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (2008) Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In: Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (2009) The metalanguage of impoliteness: Explorations in the Oxford English Corpus. In: Baker, Paul (ed.) Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (forthcoming a) Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics.
Culpeper, Jonathan (forthcoming b) ‘It's not what he said, it's how he said it!’: Prosody and impoliteness. In: Members of the Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds.) Politeness Now: A Collection of Essays by the Linguistic Politeness Research Group. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Bousfield, Derek and Wichmann, Anne (2003) Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Crawshaw, Robert and Davies, Julia (2008) ‘Activity types’ and ‘discourse types’: Mediating ‘advice’ in interactions between foreign language assistants and their supervisors in schools in France and England. Multilingua 27: 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Marti, Leyla, Nevala, Minna, Mei, Meilian and Schauer, Gila (forthcoming) The cross-cultural variation of impoliteness: A study of face-attack in impoliteness events reported by students in Britain, China, Finland, Germany and Turkey. Intercultural Pragmatics.
Cupach, William R. (2007) ‘You're bugging me!’: Complaints and criticism from a partner. In: Spitzburg, Brian H. and Cupach, William R. (eds.) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication (2nd edn). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
Cupach, William R. and Metts, Sandra (1994) Facework. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupach, William R. and Spitzberg, Brian H. (eds.) (1994) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication (1st edn). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dailey, René, Lee, Carmen M. and Spitzberg, Brian H. (2007) Communicative aggression: Toward a more interactional view of psychological abuse. In: Spitzburg, Brian H. and Cupach, William R. (eds.) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication (2nd edn). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 297–326.Google Scholar
Daly, Nicola, Holmes, Janet, Newton, Jonathan and Stubbe, Maria (2004) Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 945–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles R. (1872) Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo (1983) Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Mind, Vol. I: Thought in Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, Bella M. and Friedman, Howard S. (1998) Nonverbal communication. In: Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T. and Lindzey, Gardner (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II (4th edn). Berkshire and New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Morton (1975) Equity, equality, and need: What determines which values will be used as a basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues 31: 137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Kaplan, Joan and Winner, Ellen (1995) Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes 19: 347–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly and Winner, Ellen (1995) Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly and Winner, Ellen (1997) Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances. In: Mandell, Charlotte and McCabe, Allyssa (eds.) The Problem of Meaning: Behavioral and Cognitive Perspectives. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science, pp. 377–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, John, Doob, Leonard W., Miller, Neal E., Mowrer, Orval Hobart and Sears, Robert R. (1939) Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domenici, Kathy and Littlejohn, Stephen W. (2006) Facework. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (1987) Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25: 219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (2006) The social ontology of intentions. Discourse Studies 8 (31): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles (eds.) (1992) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Donald G., Boyanowsky, Ehor O. and Bond, Michael Harris (2005) Extreme mass homicide: From military massacre to genocide. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 10: 437–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, Donna (1990) Serious and playful disputes: Variation in conflict talk among female adolescents. In: Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.) Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments and Conversations. Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek and Potter, Jonathan (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul (1979) About brows: Emotional and conversational signals. In: Carnach, Mario, Foppa, Klaus, Lepenies, Wolf and Plogg, Detlev (eds.) Human Ethology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–202.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V. and Tomkins, Silvan S. (1971) Facial affect scoring technique: A first validity study. Semiotica 3: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe C., Carlsmith, Merrill J. and Henson, Alexander (1972) The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: A series of field experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 19: 302–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M., Bell, Nancy, Lampert, Martin and Strage, Amy (1987) Understanding requests. Linguistics 25 (1): 107–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, Michael W. and Keane, Mark T. (2010) Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook. (6th edn). Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1989) Language and Power (1st edn). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Feeney, Judith A. (2004) Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Towards integrative models of the negative effects of hurtful events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21: 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, Fischbacher, Urs and Gachter, Simon (2002) Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature 13: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, Tamara J. and Rule, Brendan G. (1983) An attributional perspective on anger and aggression. In: Geen, Russell G. and Donnerstein, Edward I. (eds.) Aggression: Theoretical and Empirical Reviews, Vol. I. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Neuberg, Steven L. (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In: Zanna, Mark P. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 23. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Taylor, Shelley E. (1984) Social Cognition (1st edn). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Taylor, Shelley E. (1991) Social Cognition (2nd edn). Berkshire and New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Flynn, Charles P. (1977) Insult and Society: Patterns of Comparative Action. London and New York: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Iván and Magdics, Klara (1963) Emotional patterns in intonation and music. Zeitschrift für Phonetik 16: 293–326.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan and Manning, Elizabeth (eds.) (1996) Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan and Manning, Elizabeth (eds) (1998) Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.
Fraser, Bruce (1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce (1999) Wither politeness. Plenory lecture. International Symposium for Linguistic Politeness, Bangkok, Thailand.
Fraser, Bruce and Nolen, William (1981) The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93–109.Google Scholar
Frick, Robert W. (1985) Communicating emotion: The role of prosodic features. Psychological Bulletin 97 (4): 412–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Yiannis (1998) An introduction to the social psychology of insults in organizations. Human Relations 51 (11): 1329–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gard, Stephen W. (1980) Fighting words as free speech. Washington University Law Quarterly 58 (3): 531–81.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul (2008 [1999]) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology on Discourses (3rd edn). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geen, Russel G. (2001) Human Aggression. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (1984) Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (2): 256–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, Raymond W. (1981) Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 431–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. (1983) Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9: 524–33.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. (1999) Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T. and Jones, Edward E. (1986) Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 269–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret (1989) On Social Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel (2003) On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1956) Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology 62 (3): 264–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1997 [1958]) The characteristics of total institutions. Extracts in: Lemert, Charles and Branaman, Ann (eds.) The Goffman Reader. Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1967) Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1978) Response cries. Language 54 (4): 787–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gorji, Mina (2007) Rude Britannia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25 (2): 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Bradley S. (1976) The effects of language intensity modification on perceived verbal aggressiveness. Communication Monographs 43: 130–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwell, J. and Dengerink, Harold A. (1973) The role of perceived versus actual attack in human physical aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26: 66–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, H. Paul (1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66: 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1969) Utterer's Meaning and Intentions. The Philosophical Review 68: 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo (1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudykunst, William B. and Kim, Young Y. (2003) Communicating with Strangers (4th edn). Berkshire and New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982a) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982b) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1992a) Interviewing in intercultural situations. In: Drew, Paul and Heritage, John (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge University Press, pp. 302–27.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1992b) Contextualization and understanding. In: Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles (eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–52.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory and Vonwiller, Julie (1989) The High Rise Tones. In: Collins, Peter and Blair, David (eds.) Australian English: The Language of a New Society. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan (2003) The moral emotion. In: Davidson, Richard J., Scherer, Klaus R. and Goldsmith, H. Hill (eds.) Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford University Press, pp. 852–70.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David L. and Sherman, Jeffrey W. (1994) Stereotypes. In: Wyer, Robert S. and Srull, Thomas K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Cognition, Volume II: Applications (2nd edn). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. (1966) The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Harris, Christine R. (2001) Cardiovascular responses of embarrassment and effects of emotional suppression in a social setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (5): 886–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Mary B. (1993) How provoking! What makes men and women angry?Aggressive Behavior 19: 199–211.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra (2001) Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse and Society 12 (4): 451–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael (2007) The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael (2008) Intention in pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2): 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael and Hinze, Carl (2003) A metalinguistics approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1581–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Christopher (2005) ‘Why the fuck do people write on desks?’: Exploring impoliteness in the social event of a graffiti dialogue. Unpublished MA dissertation. Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Hecht, Michael L. (1993) 2002 – A research odyssey: Toward the development of a communication theory of identity. Communication Monographs 60: 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, Michael, Warren, Jennifer R., Jung, Eura and Krieger, Janice L. (2005) A communication theory of identity. In: Gudykunst, William B. (ed.) Theorizing About Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 257–78.Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, David R. and Calhan, Cassandra (1995) Emotion norms in interpersonal events. Social Psychology Quarterly 58 (4): 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisel, Alan D. (2010) Verbal aggression and prefrontal cortex asymmetry: Verbal aggressiveness as an expression of selected biological influences. In: Theodore A. Avtgis and Andrew S. Rancer (eds.) Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 26–43.Google Scholar
Ho, David Yau-fai (1976) On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology 81: 867–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1946 [1651]) Leviathan: or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael (2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Berkshire and New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert (1994) Cultures and Organizations: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1996) Women's role in language change: A place for quantification. In: Warner, Natasha, Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Oliver, Monica, Wertheim, Suzanne and Chen, Melinda (eds.) Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference. University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, pp. 313–30.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (2000) Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2 (2): 159–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet (2005) Politeness and postmodernism – an appropriate approach to the analysis of language and gender? Journal of Sociolinguistics 9 (1): 108–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Marra, Meredith and Schnurr, Stephanie (2008) Impoliteness and ethnicity: Māori and Pākehā discourse in New Zealand workplaces. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (2): 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet and Schnurr, Stephanie (2005) Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 121–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas (1986) Language structure in social interaction: Perceptions of direct and indirect speech acts and interactants who use them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas (1994) Communication in context: The effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20: 1205–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Holtgraves, Thomas (1997) Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks. Memory and Cognition 25: 106–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtgraves, Thomas (2005) Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas and Yang, Joong-Nam (1990) Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 719–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Hsien Chin (1944) The Chinese concepts of ‘face’. American Anthropologist 46: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huesmann, L. Rowell (1988) An information processing model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior 14: 13–24.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Geoffrey (1998 [1991]) Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hughes, Geoffrey (2006) An Encyclopedia of Swearing: The Social History of Oaths, Profanity, Foul Language, and Ethnic Slurs in the English-speaking World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hummert, Mary L. and Ryan, Ellen B. (2001) Patronizing communication. In: Robinson, William P. and Giles, Howard (eds.) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 253–69.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Francis, Gill (2000) Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian (2008) Participants' orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (3): 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Kuang-kuo (1987) Face and favor: The Chinese power game. The American Journal of Sociology 92 (4): 944–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko, Hill, Beverly, Carnes, Yukiko M., Ogino, Tsunao and Kawasaki, Akiko (1992) The concept of politeness: An empirical study of American English and Japanese. In: Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281–98.Google Scholar
Infante Dominic, A. and J. Wigley, Charles (1986) Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communications Monographs 53: 61–9.CrossRef
Jakobson, Roman (1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.) Style and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 350–77.Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. (forthcoming) Semantics and pragmatics: The boundary issue. In: Heusinger, Klaus, Portner, Paul and Maienborn, Claudia (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaworski, Adam, Coupland, Nikolas and Galasiński, Dariusz (eds.) (2004a) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, Coupland, Nikolas and Galasiński, Dariusz (eds.) (2004b) Metalanguage: Why now? In: Jaworski, Adam, Coupland, Nikolas and Galasiński, Dariusz (eds.) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy (1992) Cursing in America: a Psycholinguistic Study of Dirty Language in the Courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyards and on the Streets. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy (2000) Why We Curse: A Neuro-psycho-social Theory of Speech. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jay, Timothy and Janschewitz, Kristin (2008) The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4: 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. (1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Edward E. (1990) Interpersonal Perception. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Jones, Edward E. and Nisbett, Richard E. (1972) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In: Jones, Edward E., Kanouse, David E., Kelley, Harold H., Nisbett, Richard E., Valins, Stuart and Weiner, Bernard (eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press Jones, pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
Kakavá, Christina (2003 [2001]) Discourse and conflict. In: Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah and Hamilton, Heidi E. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Blackwell, pp. 650–70.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna (1999) Culture, context and writing. In: Hinkel, Eli (ed.) Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–89.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele (1990) Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele (2008) Data collection in pragmatics research. In: Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd edn). London: Continuum, pp. 279–303.Google Scholar
Kassing, Jeffrey W. and Sanderson, Jimmy (2010) Trash talk and beyond: Aggressive communication in the context of sports. In: Theodore A. Avtgis and Andrew S. Rancer (eds.) Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 253–66.Google Scholar
Kaul de Marlangeon, Silvia (2008) Impoliteness in institutional and non-institutional contexts. Pragmatics 18(4): 735–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, Eric (1995) Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15: 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, Kathy and Reynolds, Rodney (1990) When ignorance is bliss: The role of motivation to reduce uncertainty in Uncertainty Reduction Theory. Human Communication Research 17: 5–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Harold H. (1973) The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28: 107–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Capps, Lisa, Kring, Ann M., Young, Randall C. and Heerey, Erin A. (2001) Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin 127 (2): 229–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, Dacher, Young, Randall C., Heerey, Erin A., Oemig, Carmen and Monarch, Natalie D. (1998) Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (5): 1231–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempson, Ruth M. (1977) Semantic Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred (1997) Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language 4 (2): 251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred (2008) Impoliteness and emotional arguments. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (2): 243–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihlstrom, John F. and Cantor, Nancy (1984) Mental representations of the self. In: Berkowitz, Leonard (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 17: Theorizing in Social Psychology: Special Topics. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel and Tugwell, David (2004) The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of the EURALEX conference. Lorient, France, pp. 105–16.
Kipnis, David (1976) The Powerholders. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kipnis, David and Schmidt, Stuart M. (1983) An influence perspective on bargaining within organizations. In: Bazerman, Max H. and Lewicki, Roy J. (eds.) Negotiating in Organizations. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 179–210.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Betty (1998) Roget's Thesaurus. New Edition. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Knowles, Gerald (1984) Variable strategies in intonation. In: Gibbon, Dafydd and Richter, Helmut (eds.) Intonation, Accent and Rhythm: Studies in Discourse Phonology. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, pp. 226–42.Google Scholar
Kochman, Thomas (1983) The boundary between play and nonplay in black verbal duelling. Language in Society 12: 329–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochman, Thomas (1984) The politics of niceness: Social warrants in mainstream American public etiquette. In: Schiffrin, Deborah (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 200–9.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga (1996) Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica 30 (3–4): 299–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, Zobin M. (2000) ‘I was only kidding!’: Victims' and perpetrators' perceptions of teasing. Personality and Social Psycholosy Bulletin 26: 231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. and Kluckhohn, Clyde (1952) A Critical View of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972) Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lachenicht, Lance G. (1980) Aggravating language: A study of abusive and insulting language. International Journal of Human Communication 13 (4): 607–88.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, E. Heikki Ikaheimo and Kotkavirta, Jussi (eds.) (2001) On the Nature of Social and Institutional Reality. Finland: SoPhi.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1973) The logic of politeness, or minding your p's and q's. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: 292–305.
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1989) The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua 8 (2–3): 101–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, Mark R., Springer, Carrie, Negel, Laura, Ansell, Emily and Evans, Kelly (1998) The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1969) A Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1981 [1974]) Semantics: The Study of Meaning (2nd edn). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1985) Stylistics. In: Dijk, Teun A. (ed.) Discourse and Literature. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (2003) Towards an Anatomy of Politeness in Communication. International Journal of Pragmatics 14: 101–23.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (2007) Politeness: Is there an East-West divide?Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 3 (2): 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leichty, Greg and Applegate, James L. (1991) Social cognitive and situational influences on the use of face-saving persuasive strategies. Human Communication Research 17 (3): 451–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lein, Laura and Brenneis, Donald (1978) Children's disputes in three speech communities. Language in Society 7: 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Robert B. and Tabouret-Keller, Andree (1985) Acts of Identity: Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Melvin J. (1980) The Belief in a Just World. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1992 [1979a]) Activity types and language. In: Drew, Paul and Heritage, John (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–100.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1979b) Activity types and language. Linguistics 17 (5–6): 356–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1995) Interactional biases in human thinking. In: Goody, Esther N. (ed.) Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2002) Contextualizing ‘contextualization cues’. In: Eerdmans, Susan, Prevignano, Carlo and Thibault, Paul J. (eds.) Language and Interaction: Discussions with John Gumperz. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 31–9.Google Scholar
Lewis, David K. (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lim, Tae-Seop and Bowers, John Waite (1991) Facework: Solidarity, approbation and tact. Human Communication Research 17 (3): 415–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Dekang (1998) Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. COLING-ACL. Montreal, pp. 768–74.Google Scholar
Liu, Runquig (1986) The Politeness Principle and ‘A Dream of Red Mansions’. Unpublished M.Phil. dissertation. Lancaster University.
Locher, Miriam A. (2004) Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. (2006) Polite behaviour within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25 (3): 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. and Bousfield, Derek (2008) Introduction: Impoliteness and power in language. In: Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam A. (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. and Watts, Richard J. (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. and Watts, Richard J. (2008) Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In: Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam A. (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad (1966) On Aggression. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Lucretius, Titus Carus (1947 [1st century B.C.]) De Rerum Natura. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. (1992) Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. (1993) Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In: Lucy, John A. (ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, David (2008) Kinds of conversational cooperation. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (11): 1896–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, Bertram F. and Knobe, Joshua (1997) The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3: 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, LuMing Robert (1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (5): 451–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Hazel and Nurius, Paula S. (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist 41 (9): 954–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Gordon (2000) Global Culture/Individual Identity: Searching for Home in the Cultural Supermarket. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Anthony M. (2006) Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McEwen, William J. and Greenberg, Bradley S. (1970) The effects of message intensity on receiver evaluations of source, message, and topic. Journal of Communication 20: 340–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Ardith J. (1995) Defining politeness: Universality in appropriateness. Language Sciences, 17 (4): 345–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Merriam-Webster Thesaurus, The (1991) Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Incorporated.
,Merriam-Webster's Online Thesaurus (2009) Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. See: www.merriam-webster.com/
Mertz, Elizabeth (1998) Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. law school classrooms. In: Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A. and Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.) Language Ideologies: Practices and Theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–62.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara (2002) Rethinking politeness, impoliteness and gender identity. In: Litoselliti, Lia and Sunderland, Jane (eds.) Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara (2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara (2005) Gender and impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (2): 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara (2008) Language and Sexism. Cambridge University Press.
Mills, Sara (2009) Politeness and culture. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1047–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millwood-Hargrave, Andrea (2000) Delete expletives?: Research undertaken jointly by the Advertising Standards Authority, British Broadcasting Corporation, Broadcasting Standards Commission and the Independent Television Commission. London: ASA, BBC, BSC and ITC.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston, Patrick H. (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision. Berkshire and New York: McGraw-Hill, 211–77.Google Scholar
Montagu, Ashley (2001 [1967]) Anatomy of Swearing. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin (1999) Talk as entertainment: The case of The Mrs Merton Show. In: Haarman, Louann (ed.) Talk about Shows: La Parola e lo Spettacolo. Bologna: CLUEB, pp. 101–50.Google Scholar
Montry, Jill A. (2002) How To Be Rude! A Training Manual for Mastering the Art of Rudeness (2nd edn). Irving, TX: Rapid Random, Ltd.Google Scholar
Mooney, Annabelle (2004) Co-operation, Violation and Making Sense. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1601–23.Google Scholar
Morris, Desmond J. (1967) The Naked Ape. London: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan (1970) Standard language and poetic language, ed. and trans. by Paul L. Garvin. In: Freeman, Donald C. (ed.) Linguistics and Literary Style. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 40–56.Google Scholar
Mummenday, Amélie and Otten, Sabine (2001) Aggressive behaviour. In: Hewstone, Miles and Stroebe, Wolfgang (eds.) Introduction to Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 315–40.Google Scholar
Murray, Iain R. and Arnott, John L. (1993) Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (2): 1097–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, Greg (2001) ‘I'm out of it; you guys argue’: Making an issue of it on The Jerry Springer Show. In: Tolson, Andrew (ed.) Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 173–91.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott A. and Rittenour, Christine E. (2010) Student aggressive communication in the K-12 classroom. In: Theodore A. Avtgis and Andrew S. Rancer (eds.) Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 139–58.Google Scholar
Nansel, Tonja R., Overpeck, Mary, Pilla, Ramani S., Ruan, June W., Simons-Morton, Bruce and Scheidt, Peter (2001) Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychological adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association 285(16): 2094–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Ulric (1976) Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Nwoye, Onuigbo G. (1992) Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (4): 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Driscoll, Jim (2007) What's in an FTA? Reflections on a chance meeting with Claudine. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 3 (2): 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofuka, Etsuko, Denis McKeown, J., Waterman, Mitch G. and Roach, Peter J. (2000) Prosodic cues for rated politeness in Japanese speech. Speech Communication 32 (3): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohbuchi, Kennichi and Kambara, Toshihiro (1985) Attacker's intent and awareness of outcome, impression management and retaliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 321–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter (1982) The evolutionary emergence of norms. British Journal of Social Psychology 21: 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, Andrew, Clore, Gerald and Collins, Allan (1988) The Cognitive Structure of the Emotions. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Charles E. (1962) Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist 17 (1): 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Charles E., Suci, George J. and Tannenbaum, Percy H. (1957) The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. (1981 [1976]) Semantics (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia (1991) Cooperation and the Choice of Linguistic Means: Some evidence from the use of the subjunctive in modern Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, W. Barnett (1989) Communication and the Human Condition. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, W. Barnett and Cronen, Vernon E. (1980) Communication, Action, and Meaning: The Creation of Social Realities. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pearce, W. Barnett and Littlejohn, Stephen W. (1997) Moral Conflict. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Perry, David G., Perry, Louise C. and Boldizar, Janet P. (1990) Learning of aggression. In: Lewis, Michael and Miller, Suzanne M. (eds.) Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology. New York: Plenum, pp. 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, Robyn (1990) Facework and politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9: 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, Robyn (1994) Facework in communication: Conceptual and moral challenges. In: Ting-Toomey, Stella W. C. (ed.) The Challenge of Facework. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 15–46.Google Scholar
Pexman, Penny M. and Olineck, Kara M. (2002) Does Sarcasm Always Sting? Investigating the Impact of Ironic Insults and Ironic Compliments. Discourse Processes 33 (3): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, Arja (2005) Managing adversarial questions in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (2): 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratto, Felicia and John, Oliver P. (1991) Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 380–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratto, Felicia and John, Oliver P. (2005 [1991]) Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. In: Hamilton, David L. (ed.) Social Cognition. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 250–65.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rancer, Andrew S., Lin, Yang, Durbin, James M. and Faulkner, Emily C. (2010) Nonverbal ‘verbal’ aggression: Its forms and its relation to trait verbal aggressiveness. In: Theodore A. Avtgis and Andrew S. Rancer (eds.) Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 267–84.Google Scholar
Recanati, François (2004) Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kay and Meinhof, Ulrike Hanna (1999) Worlds in Common? Television Discourse in a Changing Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia (2004) The sarcastive: A linguistic and paralinguistic analysis. Language and Social Interaction Division, International Communication Association Annual Convention, May 2004. New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus (3rd edn) (2008) Philip Lief Group. See: http://dictionary.reference.com/ or http://thesaurus.reference.com/
Rohrer, John H., Baron, Seymour H., Hoffman, E. L. and Swander, D. V. (1954) The stability of autokinetic judgments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49: 595–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rondina, Catherine and Workman, Dan (2005) Rudeness: Deal With It If You Please. Toronto, Ontario: Lorimer.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor (1978) Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, Eleanor and Lloyd, Barbara B. (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B., Gray, Wayne D., Johnson, David M. and Boyes-Braem, Penny (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Ray H. and Friedman, Meyer (1974) Neurogenic factors in pathogenesis of coronary heart disease. Medical Clinics of North America 58: 269–79.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In: Berkowitz, Leonard (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 173–220.Google Scholar
Rozin, Paul, Lowery, Laura, Imada, Sumio and Haidt, Jonathan (1999) The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (4): 574–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani (2006) Aggravated impoliteness and two types of speaker intention in an episode in Shakespeare's Timon of Athens. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (6): 829–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggiero, Thomas E. and Lattin, Kristi S. (2008) Intercollegiate female coaches' use of verbally aggressive communication toward African American female athletes. The Howard Journal of Communications 19: 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhi, Şükriye (2008) Intentionality, communicative intentions and the implication of politeness. Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (3): 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. (1984) Schemata and the cognitive system. In: Wyer, Robert S. and Srull, Thomas K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Cognition. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 161–88.Google Scholar
Russell, James A. (1991) In defense of a prototype approach to emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1): 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant and Slembrouck, Stefaun (1992) Non-cooperation in communication: A reassessment of Gricean pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 17(2): 117–54.CrossRef
Sarangi, Srikant and Slembrouck, Stefaan (1997) Confrontational asymmetries in institutional discourse: A socio-pragmatic view of information exchange and face management. In: Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris (eds.) Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255–75.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. and Abelson, Robert P. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R. (1986) Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin 99 (2): 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron and Scollon, Suzanne W. (2001) Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1975) A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. In: Gunderson, Keith (ed.) Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 344–69.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1990) Collective intentions and actions. In: Cohen, Philip R., Morgan, Jerry L. and Pollack, Martha E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, pp. 401–15.Google Scholar
Sedikides, Constantine and Brewer, Marilynn B. (2001) Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. Philadelphia: Psychological Press.Google Scholar
Shaver, Phillip, Schwartz, Judith, Kirson, Donald and O'Connor, Cary (1987) Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6): 1061–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherif, Muzafer (1936) The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
,Shisanjing zhushu (Qing Ruanyuan jiaokeban) (1998) Hangzhou: Zhejiang Guji Chubanshe. Explanations of Thirteen Lections (The version published under Ruanyuan's direction in Qing dynasty). Hangzhou: Zhejiang Ancient Books Publishing House.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In: Lucy, John A. (ed.) Reflexive language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1998) The uses and utility of ideology: A commentary. In: Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A. and Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.) Language Ideologies: Practices and Theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–45.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jeffry A. and Kenrick, Douglas T. (eds.) (1997) Evolutionary Social Psychology. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul (1994) ‘Nothing new under the sun’: Can stylistics be radical?Paper presented at the Poetics and Linguistics Association conference. Sheffield Hallam University, April 1994.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. (2004) Trust the Text: Language Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slugoski, Ben and Turnbull, William (1988) Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7: 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. (2000) Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In: Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 11–46.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. (2002) Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5): 529–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. (2005) (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. (2007) Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. (2008) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures (2nd edn). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. and Jiang, Wenying (2003) Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: Moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1633–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (1981) Irony and the use-mention distinction. In: Cole, Peter (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 295–318.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (1995 [1986]) Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn). Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spitzburg, Brian H. and Cupach, William R. (eds.) (2007) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication (2nd edn). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stamp, Glen H. and Knapp, Mark L. (1990) The construct of intention in interpersonal communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 76: 282–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, Margaret S., Joag-Dev, Chitra and Andersen, Richard C. (1979) A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 15: 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, Anne-Brita, Andersen, Gisle and Hasund, Kristine (2002) Trends in Teenage Talk. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storms, Michael D. (1973) Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27: 165–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strube, Michael J., Turner, Charles W., Cerro, Dan, Stevens, John and Hinchley, Frances (1984) Interpersonal aggression and the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern: A theoretical distinctiona and practical implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 839–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stubbs, Michael (2001) On inference theories and code theories: Corpus evidence for semantic schemas. Text 21 (3): 437–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1995) Problems with rules. California Law Review 83: 953–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, June Price, Stuewig, Jeff and Mashek, Debra J. (2007) Moral emotions and moral behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 345–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Shelley E., and Fiske, Susan J. (1975) Point-of-view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedeschi, James T. and Felson, Richard B. (1994) Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (2001) Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Cambridge.
Terkourafi, Marina (2002) Politeness and formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 3: 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (2003) Generalised and particularised implicatures of politeness. In: Kühnlein, Peter, Rieser, Hannes and Zeevat, Henk (eds.) Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 151–66.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (2005a) Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (2): 237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (2005b) Pragmatic correlates of frequency of use: The case for a notion of ‘minimal context’. In: Marmaridou, Sophia, Nikiforidou, Kiki and Antonopoulou, Eleni (eds.) Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 209–33.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (2005c) Identity and semantic change: Aspects of T/V usage in Cyprus. Journal of Historical Pragmetics 6(2): 283–306.
Terkourafi, Marina (2008) Towards a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In: Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 45–74.Google Scholar
Tetreault, Chantal (2009) Reflecting respect: Transcultural communicative practices of Muslim French youth. Pragmatics 19 (1): 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, John and Walker, Laurens (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny (1986) The dynamics of discource: A pragmatic analysis of confrontational interaction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Lancaster University.
Thomas, Jenny (1995) Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Thomson, Donald F. (1935) The joking relationship and organised obscenity in North Queensland. American Anthropologist 37 (3): 460–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella W. C. (1985) Toward a theory of conflict and culture. In: Gudykunst, William B., Stewart, Leah P. and Ting-Toomey, Stella W. C. (eds.) Communication, Culture and Organizational Processes. New York: Sage, pp. 71–87.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella W. C. (1988a) Intercultural conflicts: A face-negotiation theory. In: Kim, Young Y. and Gudykunst, William B. (eds.) Theories In Intercultural Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 213–35.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella W. C. (1988b) Rhetorical sensitivity style in three cultures: France, Japan and the United States. Central States Speech Communication Journal 38: 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella W. C. (1988c) Intergroup communication and intergroup simulation in low context and high context cultures. In: Crookall, David and Saunders, Danny (eds.) Communication and Simulation: From Two Fields to One Theme. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 169–76.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella W. C. and Kurogi, Atsuko (1998) Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22: 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toch, Hans H. (1969) Violent Men: An Inquiry Into The Psychology of Violence. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Tolson, Andrew (1991) Televised chat and the synthetic personality. In: Scannel, Paul (ed.) Broadcast Talk. London: Sage, pp. 178–200.Google Scholar
Tomada, Giovanna and Schneider, Barry H. (1997) Relational aggression, gender, and peer acceptance: Invariance across culture, stability over time, and concordance among informants. Developmental Psychology 33: 601–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toplak, Maggie and Katz, Albert (2000) On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen (1990) The many faces of facework. In: Giles, Howard and Robinson, William P. (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 209–26.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen (2008) ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (2): 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen and Tracy, Sarah J. (1998) Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack. Human Communication Research 25 (2): 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. (1999) The role of pragmatics in a theory of semantic change. In: Verschueren, Jef (ed.) Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2004) Historical pragmatics. In: Horn, Lawrence R. and Ward, Gregory (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 538–61.Google Scholar
Truss, Lynne (2005) Talk to the Hand: The Utter Bloody Rudeness of Everyday Life (or Six Good Reasons to Stay Home and Bolt the Door). London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Tulving, Endeland (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving, Endeland and Donaldson, Wayne (eds.) Organisation of Memory. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 382–403.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urdang, Laurence (1991) The Oxford Thesaurus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Urdang, Laurence (1995) The Macmillan Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, Tracy, McDougall, Patricia, Hymel, Shelley, Krygsman, Amanda, Miller, Jessie, Stiver, Kelley and Clinton, David (2008) Bullying: Are researchers children/ youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioural Development 32: 486–95.CrossRef
Vandello, Joseph A. and Cohen, Dov (2003) Male honour and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84: 997–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. (1987) Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. (1988a) News as Discourse. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. (1988b) News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. (1989) Structures of discourse and structures of power. In: Anderson, James A. (ed.) Communication Yearbook 12. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 18–59.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. (1990) Discourse & Society: A new journal for a new research focus. Discourse & Society 1: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. (2008) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. (2009) Society and Discourse: How Context Controls Text and Talk. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. and Kintsch, Walter (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vangelisti, Anita L. (1994) Messages that hurt. In: Cupach, William R. and Spitzberg, Brian H. (eds.) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication (1st edn). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
Vangelisti, Anita L. (2001) Making sense of hurtful interactions in close relationships: When hurt feelings create distance. In: Valerie, L. Manusov and John Harvey, H. (eds.) Attribution, Communication Behavior, and Close Relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–58.Google Scholar
Vangelisti, Anita L. (2007) Communicating hurt. In: Brian H. Spitzberg and William R. Cupach (eds.) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication (2nd edn). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 121–42.Google Scholar
Vangelisti, Anita L. and Young, Stacy L. (2000) When words hurt: The effects of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 17: 393–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef (1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef (2004) Identity as denial of diversity. In: Frank Brisard, Michael Meeuwis and Bart Vandenabeele (eds.) Seduction, Community, Speech. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, Maurice (ed.) (2001) The Oxford Paperback Thesaurus (2nd edn). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wartenberg, Thomas E. (1990) The Forms of Power: From Domination to Transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (1989) Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua 8: 131–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (1991) Power in Family Discourse. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2005) Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis? In: Richard, J. Watts, Sachiko Konrad, Ide Ehlich (eds.) (2005) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice (2nd edn). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. xi–xlvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2008) Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (2): 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.) (2005) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice (2nd edn). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda (1985) Towards an analysis of opaque utterances: Hints as a request strategy. Theoretical Linguistics 12 (1): 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda (1989) Requestive hints. In: Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Gabriele Kasper and Juliane House (eds.) Cross Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne (1998) Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Anne (2000a) Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles and Ends. London: (Longman) Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne (2000b) The attitudinal effects of prosody, and how they relate to emotion. In: Proceedings of the ISCA workshop on Speech and Emotion. Newcastle, N. Ireland.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna (2003) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction (2nd edn). Berlin and London: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Young, Stacy L. (2004) Factors that influence recipients' appraisals of hurtful communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21: 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco (2000) On reaching the intended ironic interpretation. International Journal of Communication 10 (1–2): 22–78.Google Scholar
Zebrowitz, Leslie A. (1990) Social Perception. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, Goerge K. (1965 [1935]) The Psycho-Biology of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Jonathan Culpeper, Lancaster University
  • Book: Impoliteness
  • Online publication: 16 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Jonathan Culpeper, Lancaster University
  • Book: Impoliteness
  • Online publication: 16 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Jonathan Culpeper, Lancaster University
  • Book: Impoliteness
  • Online publication: 16 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752.012
Available formats
×