Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:35:48.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Mark Jary  and
Mikhail Kissine
Mark Jary
Affiliation:
Roehampton University, London
Mikhail Kissine
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Imperatives , pp. 307 - 319
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2010). Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2014). On future in commands. Future Times, Future Tenses. De Brabanter, P., Kissine, M. and Sharifzadeh, S. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alapatov, V. (2001). Modern Japanese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 106–125.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (2000). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1971). ‘Meaning and communication’. Philosophical Review 80: 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2001). ‘Indirect speech acts’. Synthese 128: 183–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2003a). Imperatives in dialogue. The Semantics and the Pragmatics of Dialogue for the New Millennium. Kuehnlein, P., Rieser, H. and Zeevat, H. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1–24.Google Scholar
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2003b). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1956). ‘Ifs and cans’. Proceedings of the British Academy 42: 109–132.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Second edition, Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, M. (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avramides, A. (1989). Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bach, K. (1998). Standardization revisited. Pragmatics: Critical Assessment. Vol. IV. Kasher, A. (ed.). London: Routledge: 712–722.Google Scholar
Bach, K. (1999). ‘The myth of conventional implicature’. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2012). The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, S. (2004). Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, E. L. (1944). ‘Imperative sentences in relation to indicatives’. Philosophical Review 53: 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedell, G. and Kee Shein Mang, K. T. (2009). ‘Agreement in Laizo’. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 11–22.Google Scholar
Belnap, N. D. (1990). ‘Declaratives are not enough’. Philosophical Studies 59: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belnap, N. D., Perloff, M. and Xu, M. (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benbaji, Y. (2003). ‘Who needs semantics of quotation marks?’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 27–49.Google Scholar
Benbaji, Y. (2004). ‘A demonstrative analysis of “open quotation”’. Mind and Language 19(5): 534–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birjulin, L. A. and Xrakovski, V. S. (2001). Imperative sentences: theoretical problems. Typology of imperative constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 3–50.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). ‘Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?’. Journal of Pragmatics 11(2): 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeder, W. (2010). Mood in modern Georgian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 603–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisvert, D. and Ludwig, K. (2006). Semantics for nondeclaratives. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Lepore, E. and Smith, B. C. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 864–893.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1998). Intonation in American English. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 45–55.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Breheny, R. (2006). ‘Communication and folk psychology’. Mind and Language 21: 74–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breu, W. (2010). Mood in Albanian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, R. and Segerberg, K. (1984). Basic modal logic. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. III. Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 1–88.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D. and Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bystrov, I. S. and Stankevič, N. V. (2001). Imperative in Vietnamese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 461–474.Google Scholar
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. (1997). ‘Varieties of quotation’. Mind 106(423): 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. (2007). Language Turned on Itself: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Metalinguistic Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. (1988). Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Kempson, R. M. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–181.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlow, N. (2010). Restricting and embedding imperatives. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2009, LNAI 6042. Aloni, M. and Schultz, K. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer: 223–233.Google Scholar
Cherchi, M. (1999). Georgian. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, B. (1993). ‘Relevance and “pseudo-imperatives”’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1): 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Schunk, D. H. (1980). ‘Polite responses to polite requests’. Cognition 8(2): 111–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L. J. (1964). ‘Do illocutionary forces exist?’ Philosophical Quarterly 14(55): 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condoravdi, C. and Lauer, S. (2012). Imperatives: meaning and illocutionary force. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9. Piñon, C. (ed.) University of California, Santa Cruz: 37–58.Google Scholar
Cook, K. W. (2006). The Hawaiian passive/imperative particle. Voice and Grammatical Relations: In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani. Tsunoda, T. and Kageyama, T.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1–14.Google Scholar
Cornulier, B. d. (1985). Effets de sens. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Crnič, L. and Trinh, T. (2009). Embedding imperatives in English. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13. Riester, A. and Solstad, T. (eds.). University of Stuttgart: 113–127.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. (1997). ‘Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination’. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 195–217.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1979). Moods and Performances. Meaning and use. Margalit, A. (ed.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001a). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001b). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, E. (1986). The English Imperative. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
De Brabanter, P. (2005). Quotations and the intrusion of non-linguistic communication into utterances. Modeling and Using Context: Fifth International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2005. Dey, A. K., Kokinov, B. N., Leake, D. B. and Turner, R. M. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer: 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Clerck, B. (2006). ‘The imperative in English: a corpus-based, pragmatic analysis’, Ph.D. dissertation, Ghent, Ghent University.
De Haan, F. (2011). Tense, aspect, and modality systems. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Song, J. J. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 445–464.Google Scholar
Đình-Hoà, N. (1997). Vietnamese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dobronravin, N. A. and Smirnova, M. A. (2001). Imperative constructions in Hausa. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 329–351.Google Scholar
Dobrushina, N., Van der Auwera, J. and Goussev, V. (2005). The optative. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 298–301.Google Scholar
Dominicy, M. and Franken, N. (2002). Speech acts and Relevance theory. Essays in speech act theory. Vanderveken, D. and Kubo, S. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 263–283.Google Scholar
Du Feu, V. (1996). Rapanui. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1993). Mood, force and convention. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 202–223.Google Scholar
Dũng, Đ. T., Hưong, T. T. and Boulakia, G. (1998). Intonation in Vietnamese. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 395–416.Google Scholar
Elbert, S. H. and Pukui, M. K. (1979). Hawaiian Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. R. (2000). ‘Realis and irrealis: forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality’. Linguistic Typology 4: 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erelt, M. and Metslang, H. (2004). ‘Grammar and pragmatics: changes in the paradigm of the Estonian imperative’. Linguistica Uralica 40: 161–178.Google Scholar
Fiengo, R. (2007). Asking Questions: Using Meaningful Structures to Imply Ignorance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J., Grabe, E. and Warren, P. (2005). Intonational variation: the High Rising Tone. Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Jun, S.-A. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortuin, E. (2008). ‘Polisemia imperative v ruskom iazyke’. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 1: 3–23.Google Scholar
Fortuin, E. (2010). ‘Explicit second-person subjects in Russian imperatives: semantics, word-order, and a comparison with English’. Linguistics 48: 431–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortuin, E. and Boogaart, R. (2009). ‘Imperative as conditional: from constructional to compositional semantics’. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 641–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. (1918–1919/1997). Thought/Der Gedanke. The Frege Reader. Beaney, M. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell: 325–345.Google Scholar
Geis, M. L. and Zwicky, A. M. (1971). ‘On invited inferences’. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–566.Google Scholar
Geurts, B. (1998). ‘The mechanisms of denial’. Language 74: 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, B. (2005). ‘Entertaining alternatives: disjunctions as modals’. Natural Language Semantics 13(4): 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, B. (2011). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1978). ‘Response cries’. Language 54: 787–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golovko, E. V. (2001). Imperative in Aleut. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 300–314.Google Scholar
Grande Alija, F. J. (1997). ‘Los imperativos condicionales’. Contextos 15(29–30): 49–65.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. and Veltman, F. (1996). Coreference and modality. The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Lappin, S. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell: 179–213.Google Scholar
Gruzdeva, E. Y. (2001). Imperative sentences in Nivkh. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 59–77.Google Scholar
Gunlogson, C. (2008). ‘A question of commitment’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 101–136.Google Scholar
Hacquard, V. (2006). ‘Aspects of modality’, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Hamblin, C. (1987). Imperatives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Han, C.-H. (2000). The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1967). ‘Some alleged differences between imperatives and indicatives’. Mind 76: 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnish, R. M. (1994). Mood, meaning and speech acts. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Tsohatzidis, S. (ed.). London: Routledge: 407–459.Google Scholar
Heal, J. (1976–1977). ‘Insincerity and commands’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heal, J. (1984). Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Heim, I. and Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. (1998). Intonation in British English. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 56–77.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, A. and McKinsey, J. C. C. (1939). ‘On the logic of imperatives’. Philosophy of Science 6: 446–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, A. (2010). Mood in Latvian and Lithuanian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (2000). ‘From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M. J. (1996). A New Introduction to Modal Logic. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, M. (1984). ‘The semantics of English imperatives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jary, M. (2007). ‘Are explicit performatives assertions?’. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jary, M. (2009). Relevance, assertion and possible worlds: a cognitive approach to the Spanish subjunctive. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. De Brabanter, P. and Kissine, M. (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 235–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jary, M. (2010). Assertion. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jary, M. (2011). Assertion, relevance and the declarative mood. Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Escandell-Vidal, V., Leonetti, M. and Ahern, A. (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 267–289.Google Scholar
Jensen, B. (2003). ‘Syntax and semantics of imperative subjects’. Nordlyd 31: 150–164.Google Scholar
Jörgensen, J. (1937). ‘Imperatives and logic’. Erkenntnis 7: 288–296.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (2005). Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. Amog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. K. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 481–563.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M. (2012). Interpreting Imperatives. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, M. and Kaufmann, S. (forthcoming). ‘Epistemic particles and performativity’. Proceedings of SALT 22.
Kenesei, I., Vago, R. M. and Fenyvesi, A. (1998). Hungarian. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M. (2008a). ‘Locutionary, illocutionary, perlocutionary’. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M. (2008b). ‘Why will is not a modal’. Natural Language Semantics 16: 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M. (2009). ‘Illocutionary forces and what is said’. Mind and Language 24: 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M. (2011). ‘Misleading appearances: Searle, assertion, and meaning’. Erkenntnis 74: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M. (2012). Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Allan, K. and Jaszczolt, K. M. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M. (2013). From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, E. and Koehn, S. (1986). Apalaí. Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. . Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 33–127.Google Scholar
König, E. and Siemund, P. (2007). Speech act distinctions in grammar. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure. Second edition. Shopen, T. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 276–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kordi, E. E. (2001). Imperative sentences in French. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 372–389.Google Scholar
Kozintseva, N. A. (2001). Imperative sentences in Armenian. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 245–267.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1977). ‘What “must” and “can” must and can mean’. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. Words, Worlds, and Contexts. Eikmeyer, H.-J. and Rieser, H. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 38–74.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D. (eds.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 639–650.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K. and Segal, G. (1995). Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lepore, E. and Ludwig, K. (2003). Truth and meaning. Donald Davidson. Ludwig, K. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 15–63.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. and Evans, N. (2009). ‘The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 32: 429–448, 472–492.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1972). General semantics. Semantics of Natural Language. Harman, G. and Davidson, D. (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 169–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1979). ‘Score-keeping in a language game’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, J. (2010). Mood in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, P. (2005). A note on alleged cases of nonsentential assertion. Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Elugardo, R. and Stainton, R. J.. Dordrecht: Springer: 95–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, J. (2008). Truth in the garden of forking paths. Relative Truth. Kölbel, M. and García-Carpintero, M. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C. (1977). ‘Semantics for non-indicative sentences’. Philosophical Studies 12: 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, E. (2010). Quoted imperatives. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14. Prinzhorn, M., Schmitt, V. and Zobel, S. (eds.). Vienna: 289–304.Google Scholar
Malčukov, A. L. (2001). Even. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 159–180.Google Scholar
Malygina, L. V. (2001). Modern Hebrew. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 268–286.Google Scholar
Mastop, R. (2005). ‘What can you do? Imperative mood in semantic theory’. Ph.D. dissertation: Amsterdam University.
Mastop, R. (2011). ‘Imperatives as semantic primitives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauck, S. and Zanuttini, R. (2004). The subjects of English imperatives. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics.
Meeussen, A. E. (1959). Essai de grammaire rundi. Tervuren: Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge.Google Scholar
Merchant, J. (2004). ‘Fragments and ellipsis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metslang, H. and Sepper, M.-M. (2010). Mood in Estonian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R. (2010). Mood in Czach and Slovak. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (2004). Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. IX: Pragmatics. Cole, P. (ed.). New York: Academic Press: 261–280.Google Scholar
Nasilov, D. M., Isxakova, X. F., Safarov, Š. S. and Nevskaja, I. A. (2001). Imperative sentences in Turkic languages. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 181–220.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I. A. (2007). Constructional economy and nonfinite independent clauses. Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Nikolaeva, I. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 138–180.Google Scholar
Ninan, D. (2005). Two puzzles about deontic necessity. New Work on Modality. (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 51.)Gajewski, J., Hacquard, V., Nickel, B. and Yalcin, S. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 149–178.Google Scholar
Ó Baoill, D. (2010). Mood in Irish. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhiambo, N. and Malherbe, M. (2009). Parlons Luo: langue du Kenya. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A. K. (2001). Imperative sentences in Javanese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 221–242.Google Scholar
Pak, M., Portner, P. and Zanuttini, R. (forthcoming). ‘The syntax and semantics of jussive clauses in Korean’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
Papafragou, A. (2000). Modality: Issues in the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pérez Henrandez, L. and Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2002). ‘Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts’. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2007). ‘The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts’. Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C. and Rosengren, I. (1998). ‘On the subject of imperatives: a minimalist account of the imperative clause’. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. S. (2001). Maori. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 404–419.Google Scholar
Popjes, J. and Popjes, J. (1986). Canela-Krahô. Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. I. Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 128–199.Google Scholar
Portner, P. (2005). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV. Watanabe, K. and Young, R. B. (eds.). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Portner, P. (2007). ‘Imperatives and modals’. Natural Language Semantics 4: 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Portner, P. (forthcoming). Imperatives. Cambridge Handbook of Semantics. Aloni, M. and van Rooij, R. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Postma, G. and van der Wurff, W. (2007). How to say no and don’t: negative imperatives in Romance and Germanic. Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies in Honour of Frits Beukema. van der Wurff, W. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, C. (2005). The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (1987). Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (2001). ‘Open quotation’. Mind 110: 637–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. (2002). ‘Does linguistic communication rest on inference?’. Mind and Language 17: 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. (2003). The limits of expressibility. John Searle. Smith, B. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (2013). ‘Content, mood, and force’. Philosophical Compass: 622–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (1989). ‘Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse’. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 683–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. R. (1990). ‘Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages’. Journal of Linguistics 26: 363–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A. (1944). ‘Imperatives and logic’. Philosophy of Science 11: 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1970). On declarative sentences. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.). Waltham: Ginn: 222–277.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (2007). ‘Imperatives in conditional conjunction’. Natural Language Semantics 15: 131–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1974). Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. and Zwicky, A. M. (1985). Speech act distinctions in syntax. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure. Shopen, T. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–196.Google Scholar
Salim, A. (2001). Indonesian. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 420–437.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. and Otanes, F. T. (1972). Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, P. (2005). The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive (speculations on reference to worlds and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood). Proceedings of Going Romance XVII. Geerts, T., van Ginneken, I. and Jacobs, H. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 269–309.Google Scholar
Schmerling, S. F. (1982). ‘How imperatives are different, and how they aren’t’. Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Nondeclaratives: 202–218.
Schreiber, P. A. (1972). ‘Style disjuncts and the performative analysis’. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 321–347.Google Scholar
Scontras, G. and Gibson, E. (2011). ‘A quantitative investigation of the imperative-and-declarative construction in English’. Language 87: 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975a). Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.). New York: Academic Press: 59–82.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975b). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Language, Mind and Knowledge. Gunderson, K. (ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 344–369.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2001a). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2001b). ‘Unstable meanings, stable communication. Reply to Recanati’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2: 284–286.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. and Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, G. (1991). ‘In the mood for a semantic theory’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sémon, J.-P. (2006). L’impératif russe. Mode de la rupture. Études de Linguistique Contrastive. Soutet, O. (ed.). Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne: 149–164.Google Scholar
Shan, C.-C. (2007). Causal reference and inverse scope as mixed quotation. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium. Aloni, M., Dekker, P. and Roelofsen, F. (eds.). Amsterdam: ILLC: 199–204.Google Scholar
Sigurdðsson, H. Á. (2010). Mood in Icelandic. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 31–55.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnit, D. (1997). Eastern Kayah Li. Hawaii: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1982). Comments on Clark and Carlson’s paper. Mutual Knowledge. Smith, N. (ed.). London: Academic Press: 46–51.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stainton, R. J. (1997). ‘What assertion is not’. Philosophical Studies 85: 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainton, R. J. (1998). ‘Quantifier phrases, meaningfulness “in isolation”, and ellipsis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainton, R. J. (2005). In defense of non-sentential assertion. Semantics versus Pragmatics. Szabó, Z. G. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 383–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainton, R. J. (2006). Neither fragments nor ellipsis. The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Progovac, L., Paesani, K., Casielles, E. and Barton, E. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainton, R. J. and Elugardo, R. (2004). ‘Shorthand, syntactic ellipsis, and the pragmatic determinants of what is said’. Mind and Language 19: 442–471.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9. Cole, P. (ed.). New York: Academic Press: 315–322.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1999). Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (2002). ‘Common ground’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6): 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. (2002). ‘Making it articulated’. Mind and Language 17(1–2): 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanovic, I. (2014). Talking about the future: unsettled truth and assertion. Future Times, Future Tenses. De Brabanter, P., Kissine, M. and Sharifzadeh, S. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1964). ‘Intention and convention in speech acts’. Philosophical Review 73: 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussex, R. and Cubberley, P. V. (2006). The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, H. (2012). A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative. With Special Reference to Japanese Imperatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985). Nkore-Kiga. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2009). What use is what is said. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. De Brabanter, P. and Kissine, M. (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieroff, R. (2010). Mood in German. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornburg, K.-U. and Panther, L. (1998). ‘A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 30(6): 755–769.Google Scholar
Thorne, J. P. (1966). ‘English imperative sentences’. Journal of Linguistics 2: 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tosheva, A. (2006). L’impératif en bulgare. Études de linguistique contrastive. Soutet, O. (ed.). Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne: 191–212.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. (1986). Conditionals and speech acts. On Conditionals. Traugott, E. C., ter Meulen, A. G. B. and Reilly, J. S. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J. (1997). ‘Pragmatics in the last quarter century: the case of conditional perfection’. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J., Dobrushina, N. and Goussev, V. (2005). Imperative–hortative systems. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 294–296.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. and Lejeune, L. (2005a). The morphological imperative. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 286–289.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. and Lejeune, L. (2005b). The prohibitive. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 290–293.Google Scholar
van der Wurff, W., ed. (2007). Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies in Honour of Frits Beukema. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, D. (1991). Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanderveken, D. (2002). Universal grammar and speech act theory. Essays in Speech Act Theory. Vanderveken, D. and Kubo, S. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 25–62.Google Scholar
Vanderveken, D. (2005). Success, satisfaction and truth in speech acts and formal semantics. Semantics: A Reader. Davis, S. and Gillon, B. S. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 710–734.Google Scholar
Veltman, F. (1996). Data semantics and the pragmatics of indicative conditionals. On Conditionals. Traugott, E. C., ter Meulen, A., Reilly, J. S. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 147–168.Google Scholar
Verstraete, J.-C. (2005). ‘The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia’. Linguistic Typology 9: 223–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, K. and Iatridou, S. (2012). ‘Imperative puzzles’. Slides for the paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, Amherst.
Willis, E. W. (2002). ‘Is there a Spanish imperative intonation revisited: local consideration’. Linguistics 40: 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. (1998–1999). Non-truth conditional semantics: Mood indicators I. UCL Linguistics Dept. lecture notes.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1988). Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. Human Agency, Language, Duty and Value: Philosophical Essays in Honour of J. O. Urmson. Dancy, J., Moravcsik, J. M. and Taylor, C. C. W. (eds.). Stanford: Stanford University Press: 77–101.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R. (2008). ‘Encoding the addressee in the syntax: evidence from English imperative subjects’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R., Pak, M. and Portner, P. (2012). ‘A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30: 1231–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbian, S. (2010). ‘Developments in the study of intonational typology’. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 874–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S. (1990). ‘The status of imperatives in theories of grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.
Zimmermann, T. E. (2000). ‘Free choice disjunctions and epistemic possibility’. Natural Language Semantics 8: 255–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Mark Jary, Roehampton University, London, Mikhail Kissine, Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Book: Imperatives
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998126.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Mark Jary, Roehampton University, London, Mikhail Kissine, Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Book: Imperatives
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998126.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Mark Jary, Roehampton University, London, Mikhail Kissine, Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Book: Imperatives
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998126.015
Available formats
×