Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T11:04:03.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Use of the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model in arid and semi-arid regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

By
B. F. W. Croke  and
A. J. Jakeman
Edited by
Howard Wheater ,
Soroosh Sorooshian  and
K. D. Sharma
B. F. W. Croke
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
A. J. Jakeman
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Howard Wheater
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Soroosh Sorooshian
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
K. D. Sharma
Affiliation:
National Institute of Hydrology, India
Get access

Summary

Streamflow in arid and semi-arid regions tends to be dominated by rapid responses to intense rainfall events. Such events frequently have a high degree of spatial variability, coupled with poorly gauged rainfall data. This sets a fundamental limit on the capacity of any rainfall-runoff model to reproduce the observed flow. The IHACRES model is a parameterically efficient rainfall-runoff model that has been applied to a large number of catchments covering a diverse range of climatologies. While originally designed for more temperate climates, the model has been successfully applied to a number of ephemeral streams in Australia. The recently released Java-based version of IHACRES (Croke et al., 2005, 2006) includes a modified loss module, as well as a cross-correlation analysis tool, new fit indicators and visualization tools. Additional advances that will be included in future releases of the IHACRES model include: an alternative non-linear loss module which has a stronger physical basis, at the cost of a slightly more complicated calibration procedure; a baseflow filtering approach that uses the SRIV algorithm to estimate the parameter values; a modified routing module that includes the influence of groundwater losses (subsurface outflow and extraction of groundwater); and a technique to estimate the response curve directly from observed streamflow data.

INTRODUCTION

Successful management of water resources requires qualitative analysis of the effects of changes in climate and land-use practices on streamflow and water quality.

Type
Chapter
Information
Hydrological Modelling in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas , pp. 41 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Croke, B. F. W. (2004). A technique for deriving the average event unit hydrograph from streamflow-only data for quick-flow-dominant catchments. Adv. Water Resour., 29, 493–502 (doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.06.005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croke, B. F. W., Andrews, F., Jakeman, A. J., Cuddy, S. M., and Luddy, A. (2005). Redesign of the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. 29th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Water Capital. Canberra: Engineers Australia, 21–23 February, 2005 (ISBN 085 825 8439).Google Scholar
Croke, B. F. W., Andrews, F., Jakeman, A. J., Cuddy, S. M., and Luddy, A. (2006). IHACRES Classic Plus: a redesign of the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. Environ. Mod. Software, 21, 426–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croke, B. F. W. and Jakeman, A. J. (2004). A catchment moisture deficit module for the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. Environ. Mod. Software, 19, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croke, B. F. W., Smith, A. B., and Jakeman, A. J. (2002). A one-parameter groundwater discharge model linked to the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. In Proceedings of the 1st Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Rizzoli, A. and Jakeman, A. (eds.), Vol. I. University of Lugano, Switzerland, 428–33.Google Scholar
Croke, B. F. W., Evans, W. R., Schreider, S. Y., and Buller, C. (2001). Recharge estimation for Jerrabomberra Creek catchment, the Australian Capital Territory. In MODSIM2001, International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Canberra, 10–13 December 2001, Ghassemi, F., Whetton, P., Little, R. and Littleboy, M. (eds.), Vol. 2., ISBN 0 86740 525 2, 555–60.Google Scholar
Dye, P. J. and Croke, B. F. W. (2003). Evaluation of streamflow predictions by the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model in two South African catchments. Environ. Mod. Software, 18, 705–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, D. P., Ye, W., Jakeman, A. J., Cooke, R., and Sharma, P. (1996). Analysis of the effect of rainfall and streamflow data quality and catchment dynamics on streamflow prediction using the rainfall-runoff model IHACRES. Environ. Software, 11, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbard, W. (1998). VisAD: connecting people to computations and people to people. Comp. Graphics, 32, 10–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakeman, A. J. and Hornberger, G. M. (1993). How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?Water Resour. Res., 29, 2637–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakeman, A. J., Littlewood, I. G., and Whitehead, P. G. (1990). Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. J. Hydrol., 117, 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokkonen, T., Jakeman, A. J., Young, P. C., and Koivusalo, H. J. (2003). Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina. Hydrolog. Proc., 17, 2219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, I. G., Croke, B. F. W., Jakeman, A. J., and Sivapalan, M. (2003). The role of “top-down” modelling for Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB). Hydrolog. Proc., 17, 1673–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, I. G., Down, K., Parker, J. R., and Post, D. A. (1997). IHACRES – Catchment-scale rainfall-streamflow modelling (PC version) Version 1.0 – April 1997. Canberra: The Australian National University, Institute of Hydrology and Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.Google Scholar
Post, D. A. and Jakeman, A. J. (1996). Relationships between catchment attributes and hydrological response characteristics in small Australian mountain ash catchments. Hydrolog. Proc., 10, 877–92.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, D. A. and Jakeman, A. J. (1999). Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in S.E. Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Ecolog. Modelling, 123, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreider, S. Y., Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A., et al. (1999). Impacts and Implications of Farm Dams on Catchment Yield, iCAM working paper 1999/3. ISSN 1442–3707.
Schreider, S. Yu., Jakeman, A. J., and Pittock, A. B. (1996). Modelling rainfall-runoff from large catchment to basin scale: The Goulburn Valley, Victoria. Hydrolog. Proc., 10, 863–76.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefton, C. E. M. and Howarth, S. M. (1998). Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales. J. Hydrol., 211, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, W. T. (2000). A physics-based function for modelling transient groundwater discharge at the watershed scale. Water Resour. Res., 36, 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Jakeman, A. J., and Beven, K. J. (1993). Progress and directions in rainfall-runoff modelling. In Modelling Change in Environmental Systems, ed. Jakeman, A. J., Beck, M. B. and McAleer, M. J.Chichester: Wiley, 101–32.Google Scholar
Ye, W., Bates, B. C., Viney, N. R., Sivapalan, M. and Jakeman, A. J. (1997). Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchments. Water Resour. Res., 33, 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×