Hydrogen and the electricity sector

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511635359.017

16 - Hydrogen and the electricity sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2010

Martin Wietschel ,

Clemens Cremer and

Michael Ball

Edited by

Michael Ball and

Martin Wietschel

Show author details

Michael Ball: Affiliation:
Shell, The Netherlands
Martin Wietschel: Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany

Book contents

Get access

Summary

If hydrogen production at a large scale is to be integrated into the energy system, a more holistic view needs to be applied, in particular, with respect to its interactions with the electricity sector. These concern, for instance, the ensuing competition for renewable energies as, in the long term, only hydrogen production using renewable energy sources offers the possibility of reducing dependence on fossil fuels and enhancing security of supply. Other examples are the dispatch of electrolysers or the possible co-production of electricity and hydrogen in IGCC plants (with CCS), which is an important aspect because such a plant design offers the opportunity of producing for two different markets, depending on the market prices for the products. Hydrogen can also be used as a storage medium for electricity from intermittent renewable energies, such as wind energy. The various aspects of the interplay between hydrogen production and electricity generation are addressed in this chapter.

Hydrogen from intermittent renewable-energy sources

Fluctuating renewable energies and hydrogen

The markets for wind power and also for photovoltaic or solar thermal power are rapidly growing (for details on renewable energies and their market development, see Chapter 5). Despite clear advantages (renewable, CO2-lean or free), the inherent characteristics of wind- and solar-generated electricity lead to several challenges. These resources are intermittent, differ in their seasonal availability and secure capacity is low, which makes it more difficult to predict power output than for conventional power plants. One additional barrier for these resources is that they depend on local conditions, like wind and place, and, therefore, the transport of electricity over long distances to demand centres could be necessary.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Hydrogen Economy
Opportunities and Challenges
, pp. 482 - 506

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635359.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altmann, M. and Gamallo, F. (2000). Autarke Wind-Wasserstoff-Systeme. www.hyweb.de/Wissen/autarke.htm.

Altmann, M., Niebauer, P., Pschorr-Schoberer, E. and Zittel, W. (2000). WHySE wind-hydrogen supply of electricity markets – technology – economics. Wind Power for the 21st Century Conference, September 25–27, 2000, Kassel(Germany). www.hyweb.de/Wissen/pdf/windpw00.pdf.Google Scholar

Ball, M. (2006). Integration einer Wasserstoffwirtschaft in ein nationales Energiesystem am Beispiel Deutschlands. Dissertation, VDI Fortschritt-Berichte 16, No. 177. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag.Google Scholar

Blesl, M. and Ohl, M. (2003). Fuel Cells: Bottom-up Interpretation of the Experience Curve. Presentation during the Workshop of EU-EXTOOL and IEA EXCEPT 2003.

Chiesa, P., Consonni, S., Kreutz, T. and Williams, R. (2005). Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: performance and emissions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30 (7), 747–767.CrossRef Google Scholar

DENA, (2005). Energiewirtschaftliche Planung für die Netzintegration von Windenergie in Deutschland an Land und Offshore bis zum Jahr 2020. Cologne: Energiewirtschaftliches Institut. Commissioned by Deutsche Energie Agentur (DENA), Berlin.Google Scholar

DENA, (2007). Interactive Map of the North Sea. Planned Offshore Projects in the North Sea. Deutsche Energie Agentur (DENA). www.offshore-wind.de/page/index.php?id=2620.Google Scholar

Geer, T., Manwell, J. F. and McGown, J. G. (2005). A feasibility study of a wind/hydrogen system for Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. American Wind Energy Association; Windpower 2005 Conference, May 2005. www.ceere.org/rerl/publications/published/2005/AWEA05_Wind-Hydrogen.pdf.

Gielen, D. and Simbolotti, G. (2005). H2 Policy Analysis using the ETP model. Paris:IPHE Task Force on Socio-Economics.Google Scholar

Hammerschlag, R. and Mazza, P. (2005). Questioning hydrogen. Energy Policy, 33 (2005), 2039–2043.CrossRef Google Scholar

,HyWays (2007). Hydrogen Energy in Europe. www.hyways.de.

,IEA (International Energy Agency) (2005). Prospects for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells. IEA Energy Technology Analysis Series, Paris: OECD/IEA.

,IE/IPTS (Institute for Energy and Institute for Prospective Technological Studies) (2005). Hypogen Pre-Feasibility Study. Report EUR 21512 EN. European Commission, Directorate-General, Joint Research Centre.

Kreutz, T., Williams, R., Consonni, S. and Chiesa, P. (2005). Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part B: economic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30 (7), 769–784.CrossRef Google Scholar

Leighty, W. C., Hirata, M., O'aAshl, K. and Benoit, J. (2006). Large Stranded Renewables: The International Renewable Hydrogen Transmissions Demonstration Facility (IRHTDF). www.hydrogennow.org/Facts/Pipeline/Leighty/WEC-Sydney-Sept04-30Apr-Final-Rev12May.pdf.Google Scholar

,Mineralölwirtschaftsverband e.V. (German Association of Mineral Oil Economy; MWV) (2006). www.mwv.de.

,PURE Energy Centre (2006). PURE Project. www.pure.shetland.co.uk/html.

Ragwitz, M.et al. (2005). Analysis of the EU Renewable Energy Sources' Evolution up to 2020 (FORRES 2020). Report for the European Commission, Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.Google Scholar

Schatz project (2006). The Schatz Solar Hydrogen Project. www.schatzlab.org/projects/real_world/schatz_solar.html.

Schönharting, W. and Nettesheim, S. (2006). RES2H2 a European Hydrogen Project: Hydrogen Generation from Wind Energy. www.res2h2.com/goals0.htm.Google Scholar

Sensfuß, F., Ragwitz, M. and Wietschel, M. (2003). Fluktuationen der Windenergie und deren Vorhersagbarkeit bei einem verstärkten Ausbau des Offshore Anteils in Deutschland bis 2020. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, In Proceedings Internationale Energiewirtschaftstagung (IEWT) 2003. Vienna.Google Scholar

Sensfuß, F., Klobasa, M., Ragwitz, M. and Wietschel, M. (2004). Energiemodelle zum europäischen Klimaschutz – der Beitrag der deutschen Energiewirtschaft. In Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen in Deutschland. Münster: LIT-Verlag, pp. 745–753.Google Scholar

Smekens, K. E. L., Feber, M. A. P. C and Seebregts, A. J. (2002). Learning in clusters: methodological issues and lock-out effects. International Energy Workshop. EMF/IIASA, 18–20 June 2002, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Starr, F., Tzimas, E. and Peteves, S. (2007). Critical factors in the design, operation and economics of coal gasification plants: the case of the flexible co-production of hydrogen and electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (10–11), 1477–1485.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsuchiya, H. and Kobayashi, O. (2002). Fuel cell cost study by learning curve. International Energy Workshop. EMF/IIASA, 18–20 June 2002. Stanford University. www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/ECS/IEW2002/docs/Paper_Tsuchiya.pdf.Google Scholar

,Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity (2000). Hourly Load Values of a Specific Country Every Weekend of the Year 2000. The Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity (UCTE). www.ucte.org.

,Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity (2005). Hourly Load Values of a Specific Country, Every 3rd Wednesday of a Specific Year. The Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity (UCTE). www.ucte.org.

Wietschel, M., Hasenauer, U., Vicens, N. J., Klobasa, M. and Seydel, P. (2006). Ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Speichermedien für überschüssigen Windstrom. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 2, 103–114.Google Scholar

Yamashita, K. and Barreto, L. (2003). Integrated Energy Systems for the 21st Century: Coal Gasification for Co-producing Hydrogen, Electricity and Liquid Fuels. Interim Report IR-03-039. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).Google Scholar

Crotogino, F. and Huebner, S. (2008). Energy Storage in Salt Caverns – Developments and Concrete Projects for Adiabatic Compressed Air and for Hydrogen Storage. www.kbbnet.de.Google Scholar

,VDE (Association for Electrical, Electronic and Information Technologies) (2009). Energiespeicher in Stromversorgungs system mit hohen Anteil erneuerbarer Energieträger. ETG Task Force Energiespeicher. Frankfurt: VDE.

Yang, C. (2008). Hydrogen and electricity: parallels, interactions, and convergence. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33 (8), 1977–1994.