Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:56:01.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

Bruce Lindley McCormack
Bruce Lindley McCormack
Affiliation:
Princeton Theological Seminary, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Humility of the Eternal Son
Reformed Kenoticism and the Repair of Chalcedon
 , pp. 297 - 306
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Anatolios, Khaled. Athanasius. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
István, Páztori-Kupán. Theodoret of Cyrus. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Leontius of Byzantium. Complete Works, ed. and trans. by Daley, Brian E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
McLeod, Frederick G., ed. Theodore of Mopsuestia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Origen. Contra Celsum, trans. by Chadwick, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Origen. On First Principles, ed. and trans. by Behr, John, two volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Athanasius, Saint. On the Incarnation, trans. by Behr, John. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Against Those Who are Unwilling to Confess That the Holy Virgin Is Theotokos. Rollinsford, NH: Orthodox Research Institute, 2004.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. On the Unity of Christ. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Three Christological Treatises. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2014.Google Scholar
St. Gregory of Nazianzus. On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius [Orations 27–31]. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002.Google Scholar
St. Gregory of Nyssa. Anti-Apollinarian Writings. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2015.Google Scholar
St. Gregory Thaumaturgus. Life and Works, trans. by Slusser, Michael. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
St. John of Damascus. Writings, trans. by Chase, Frederic H. Jr. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., SJ, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Sheed & Ward/Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bruce, Alex. B. The Humiliation of Christ, 5th ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1900.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Heinrich. “The Fourth Decade, the Sixth Sermon,” in Bullinger, Heinrich, Decades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1851.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2 vols, ed. by McNeill, John T.. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, Martin. The Two Natures in Christ. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1971.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Christi von den ältesten Zeiten bis auf die neuesten, dargestellt. Stuttgart: Verlag von S. G. Liesching, 1939.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Chirsti von der ältesten bis auf die neueste dargestellt, Zweiter Teil.Berlin: Gustav Schlawitz, 1853.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August “Rezension von G. Thomasius, Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie,” Allgemeines Repertorium fü die theologische Literatur und kirchliche Statisik 5 (1846): 33–50.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August “Ueber die richtige Fassung des dogmatischen Begriffs der Unveränderlichkeit Gottes,” in Dorner, Isaak August ed., Gesammelte Schriften aus dem Gebiet der systermatischen Theologie, Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz, 1883, pp. 188–377.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Peter Taylor The Person and Place of Jesus Christ. London: Independent Press Ltd, 1946.Google Scholar
Geß, Wolfgang Friedrich. Die Lehre von der Person Christi entwickelt aus dem Selbstbewußtsein Christi und aus dem Zeugnisse der Apostel. Basel: Bahnmeiers Buchhandlung (C. Detloff), 1856.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827 (One Volume Edition), ed. by Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Hugh Ross. The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1927.Google Scholar
Martensen, Hans Lassen Die christliche Dogmatik. Berlin: Verlag von Gustav Schlawitz, 1870.Google Scholar
Stephan, Horst and Schmidt, Martin. Geschichte der evangelischen Theologie in Deutschland seit dem Idealismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1973.Google Scholar
Strauss, David Friedrich. Die christliche Glaubenslehre, Zweiter Band. Tübingen and Stuttgart: C. F. Osiander and F. H. Köhler, 1841.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Gottfried. Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1845.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Dartellung der evangelische-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkt der Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1853.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Philipperbriefes. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1927. English translation: The Epistle to the Philippians. London: SCM Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/2. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1978.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Erster Band: Prolegomena, 1924. Zürich: TVZ, 1985. English translation: The Göttingen Dogmatics, Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Dritter Band: Die Lehre von der Versöhung / Die Lehre von der Erlösung, 1925/1926. Zürich: TVZ, 2003.Google Scholar
Bulgakov, Sergius. The Lamb of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Explorations in Theology, Vol. I: The Word Made Flesh. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1989.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. III: Dramatis Personae: Persons in Christ. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1992.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. IV: The Action. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. New York: Nelson, 1963.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. God After God. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Christ in the Trinity: Communicatio Idiomatum,” in Holmes, Stephen R. and Rae, Murray, eds., The Person of Christ. London: T. & T. Clark, 2005, pp. 61–9.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Communicatio Idiomatum Revisited,” unpublished paper, 2005.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Ipsa pater non est impassibilis,” in Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, OP, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 117–26.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Once More on the Logos asarkos,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 119–23.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “You Wonder Where the Spirit Went,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 110–18.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. Gottes Sein ist im Werden: Verantwortliche Rede vom Sein Gottes bei Karl Barth, Eine Paraphrase, 2nd improved ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. Gott als Geheimis der Welt: Zur Begründung der Theologie des Gekreuzigten im Streit zwischen Theismus und Atheismus, 3rd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1978.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Das Verhältnis von ‘ökonomischer’ und ‘immanenter’ Trinität: Erwägungen über eine biblische Begründung der Trinitätslehre – im Anschluß an und in Auseinandersetzung mit Karl Rahner’s Lehre vom dreifaltigen Gott als transzendentem Urgrung der Heilsgeschichte,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Entsprechungen: Gott – Wahrheit – Mensch, Theologische Erörterungen. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1980, pp. 265–75. [Originally published in 1975.]Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “ … keine Menschenlosigkeit Gottes: Zur Theologie Karl Barths zwischen Theismus und Atheismus,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Barth-Studien. Zürich-Köln/Güterloh: Benziger Verlag and Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1982, pp. 332–47. [Originally published in Evangelische Theologie in 1971.]Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Toward the Heart of the Matter.” The Christian Century 108 (1991): 228–33.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Thesen zur Grundlegung der Christologie,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Unterwegs zur Sache: Theological Erörterungen, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000, pp. 274–95. [Orginally presented in a lecture course on Christology in Tübingen, WS 1969/1970.]Google Scholar
Anatolios, Khalid. Athanasius: The Coherence of His Thought. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and Its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Matthew. “‘Offenbarung, Philosophie, und Theologie’: Karl Barth and Georges Florovsky in Dialogue,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2016, pp. 59–93.Google Scholar
Breidert, Martin. Die kenotische Christologie des 19. Jahrhunderts. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1977.Google Scholar
Brown, David. Divine Humanity: Kenosis and the Construction of a Christian Theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. “What Does Chalcedon Solve and What Does It Not? Some Reflections on the Status and Meaning of the Chalcedonian ‘Definition’,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 143–63.Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. God Visible: Patristic Christology Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, Brian E. “Nature and ‘Mode of Union’: Late Patristic Models for the Personal Unity of Christ,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 164–96.Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. “‘One Thing and Another’: The Persons in God and the Person of Christ in Patristic Theology.” Pro Ecclesia 15 (2005): 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, Brian E. “The Giant’s Twin Substances: Ambrose and the Christology of Augustine’s Contra sermonem Arianorum,” in Lienhard, Joseph T., SJ, Muller, Earl C., SJ, and Teske, Roland J., SJ, eds., Augustine: Presbyter Factus Sum. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1993, pp. 477–95.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. Origen, trans. by Mitchell, Walter. London: Sheed & Ward, 1955 [reprint by Wipf & Stock].Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ. The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
DeHart, Paul J. Beyond the Necessary God: Trinitarian Faith and Philosophy in the Thought of Eberhard Jüngel. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1999.Google Scholar
de Lubac, Henri, SJ. History and Spirit: The Understanding of Scripture According to Origen, trans. by Nash, Anne Englund. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gallaher, Brandon. “‘A Supertemporal Continuum’: Christocentric Trinity and the Dialectical Reenvisioning of Divine Freedom in Bulgakov and Barth,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 95–133.Google Scholar
Gallaher, Brandon. Freedom and Necessity in Modern Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Gavrilyuk, Paul. “The Kenotic Christology of Sergius Bulgakov.” Scottish Journal of Theology 58 (2005): 251–69.Google Scholar
Gavrilyuk, Paul. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Gockel, Matthias. “Mediating Theology in Germany,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 301–18.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Aloys, SJ. Christ in Christian Tradition, Vol. 1. London and Oxford: Mobrays, 1975.Google Scholar
Heron, Alasdair. Table and Tradition. Edinburgh: The Handsel Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Emanuel. Geschichte der neuern evangelischen Theologie, Vol. 5. Gütersloh: Gütershoher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1960.Google Scholar
Holte, Ragnar. Die Vermittlungstheologie: Ihre theologischen Grundbegriffe kritisch untersucht. Upsala: Almquist & Wiksells, 1965.Google Scholar
Hunsinger, George. “Karl Barth’s Christology: Its Basic Chalcedonian Character,” in Hunsinger, George, Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar
Jones, Paul Dafyyd. The Humanity of Christ: Christology in Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics. London: T. & T. Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Kilby, Karen. Balthasar: A (Very) Critical Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Kirkland, Scott A. “Some Reflections on Election and Apophasis: Barth and Lossky,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 163–88.Google Scholar
Law, David R. “Kenotic Christology,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 251–79.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. “Analogy in Karl Barth and Orthodox Theology,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 189–210.Google Scholar
Martens, Peter W. Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, Jennifer Newsome. Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Critical Appropriation of Russian Religious Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. “God Is His Decision: The Jüngel-Gollwitzer ‘Debate’ Revisted,” in McCormack, Bruce L. and Bender, Kimlyn J., eds., Theology as Conversation. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 48–66.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. “Karl Barth’s Historicized Christology: Just How ‘Chalcedonian’ Is It?” in McCormack, Bruce L., Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008, pp. 201–33.Google Scholar
McGuckin, John. Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2004.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Mark A. “Christology,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
Nichols, Aidan, OP. A Key to Balthasar: Hans Urs von Balthasar on Beauty, Goodness, and Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Light in Darkness: Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Catholic Doctrine of Christ’s Descent into Hell. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Christ’s Descent into Hell: John Paul II, Joseph Ratzinger, and Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Theology of Holy Saturday. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy: An Exchange.” First Things (2006, December): 25–32.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “More on Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy.” First Things (2007, January): 16–19.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Responses to ‘Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy’.” First Things (2007, March): 5–14.Google Scholar
Quash, Ben. “The Theo-Drama,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Russell, Norman. The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Stead, Christopher. Philosophy in Christian Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Trigg, Joseph Wilson. Origen: The Bible and Philosophy in the Third-Century Church. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Trostyanskiy, Sergey. St. Cyril of Alexandria’s Metaphysics of the Incarnation. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.Google Scholar
Valliere, Paul. Modern Russian Theology, Bukharev, Soloviev, Bulgakov: Orthodox Theology in a New Key. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
van Loon, Hans. The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Spirit and Fire: A Thematic Anthology of the Writings of Origen, trans. by Daly, Robert J., SJ. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Wigley, Stephen. Balthasar’s Trilogy. London: T. & T. Clark, 2010.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anatolios, Khaled. Athanasius. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
István, Páztori-Kupán. Theodoret of Cyrus. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Leontius of Byzantium. Complete Works, ed. and trans. by Daley, Brian E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
McLeod, Frederick G., ed. Theodore of Mopsuestia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Origen. Contra Celsum, trans. by Chadwick, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Origen. On First Principles, ed. and trans. by Behr, John, two volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Athanasius, Saint. On the Incarnation, trans. by Behr, John. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Against Those Who are Unwilling to Confess That the Holy Virgin Is Theotokos. Rollinsford, NH: Orthodox Research Institute, 2004.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. On the Unity of Christ. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Three Christological Treatises. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2014.Google Scholar
St. Gregory of Nazianzus. On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius [Orations 27–31]. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002.Google Scholar
St. Gregory of Nyssa. Anti-Apollinarian Writings. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2015.Google Scholar
St. Gregory Thaumaturgus. Life and Works, trans. by Slusser, Michael. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
St. John of Damascus. Writings, trans. by Chase, Frederic H. Jr. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., SJ, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Sheed & Ward/Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bruce, Alex. B. The Humiliation of Christ, 5th ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1900.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Heinrich. “The Fourth Decade, the Sixth Sermon,” in Bullinger, Heinrich, Decades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1851.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2 vols, ed. by McNeill, John T.. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, Martin. The Two Natures in Christ. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1971.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Christi von den ältesten Zeiten bis auf die neuesten, dargestellt. Stuttgart: Verlag von S. G. Liesching, 1939.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Chirsti von der ältesten bis auf die neueste dargestellt, Zweiter Teil.Berlin: Gustav Schlawitz, 1853.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August “Rezension von G. Thomasius, Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie,” Allgemeines Repertorium fü die theologische Literatur und kirchliche Statisik 5 (1846): 33–50.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August “Ueber die richtige Fassung des dogmatischen Begriffs der Unveränderlichkeit Gottes,” in Dorner, Isaak August ed., Gesammelte Schriften aus dem Gebiet der systermatischen Theologie, Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz, 1883, pp. 188–377.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Peter Taylor The Person and Place of Jesus Christ. London: Independent Press Ltd, 1946.Google Scholar
Geß, Wolfgang Friedrich. Die Lehre von der Person Christi entwickelt aus dem Selbstbewußtsein Christi und aus dem Zeugnisse der Apostel. Basel: Bahnmeiers Buchhandlung (C. Detloff), 1856.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827 (One Volume Edition), ed. by Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Hugh Ross. The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1927.Google Scholar
Martensen, Hans Lassen Die christliche Dogmatik. Berlin: Verlag von Gustav Schlawitz, 1870.Google Scholar
Stephan, Horst and Schmidt, Martin. Geschichte der evangelischen Theologie in Deutschland seit dem Idealismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1973.Google Scholar
Strauss, David Friedrich. Die christliche Glaubenslehre, Zweiter Band. Tübingen and Stuttgart: C. F. Osiander and F. H. Köhler, 1841.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Gottfried. Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1845.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Dartellung der evangelische-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkt der Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1853.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Philipperbriefes. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1927. English translation: The Epistle to the Philippians. London: SCM Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/2. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1978.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Erster Band: Prolegomena, 1924. Zürich: TVZ, 1985. English translation: The Göttingen Dogmatics, Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Dritter Band: Die Lehre von der Versöhung / Die Lehre von der Erlösung, 1925/1926. Zürich: TVZ, 2003.Google Scholar
Bulgakov, Sergius. The Lamb of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Explorations in Theology, Vol. I: The Word Made Flesh. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1989.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. III: Dramatis Personae: Persons in Christ. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1992.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. IV: The Action. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. New York: Nelson, 1963.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. God After God. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Christ in the Trinity: Communicatio Idiomatum,” in Holmes, Stephen R. and Rae, Murray, eds., The Person of Christ. London: T. & T. Clark, 2005, pp. 61–9.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Communicatio Idiomatum Revisited,” unpublished paper, 2005.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Ipsa pater non est impassibilis,” in Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, OP, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 117–26.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Once More on the Logos asarkos,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 119–23.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “You Wonder Where the Spirit Went,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 110–18.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. Gottes Sein ist im Werden: Verantwortliche Rede vom Sein Gottes bei Karl Barth, Eine Paraphrase, 2nd improved ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. Gott als Geheimis der Welt: Zur Begründung der Theologie des Gekreuzigten im Streit zwischen Theismus und Atheismus, 3rd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1978.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Das Verhältnis von ‘ökonomischer’ und ‘immanenter’ Trinität: Erwägungen über eine biblische Begründung der Trinitätslehre – im Anschluß an und in Auseinandersetzung mit Karl Rahner’s Lehre vom dreifaltigen Gott als transzendentem Urgrung der Heilsgeschichte,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Entsprechungen: Gott – Wahrheit – Mensch, Theologische Erörterungen. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1980, pp. 265–75. [Originally published in 1975.]Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “ … keine Menschenlosigkeit Gottes: Zur Theologie Karl Barths zwischen Theismus und Atheismus,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Barth-Studien. Zürich-Köln/Güterloh: Benziger Verlag and Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1982, pp. 332–47. [Originally published in Evangelische Theologie in 1971.]Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Toward the Heart of the Matter.” The Christian Century 108 (1991): 228–33.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Thesen zur Grundlegung der Christologie,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Unterwegs zur Sache: Theological Erörterungen, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000, pp. 274–95. [Orginally presented in a lecture course on Christology in Tübingen, WS 1969/1970.]Google Scholar
Anatolios, Khaled. Athanasius. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
István, Páztori-Kupán. Theodoret of Cyrus. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Leontius of Byzantium. Complete Works, ed. and trans. by Daley, Brian E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
McLeod, Frederick G., ed. Theodore of Mopsuestia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Origen. Contra Celsum, trans. by Chadwick, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Origen. On First Principles, ed. and trans. by Behr, John, two volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Athanasius, Saint. On the Incarnation, trans. by Behr, John. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Against Those Who are Unwilling to Confess That the Holy Virgin Is Theotokos. Rollinsford, NH: Orthodox Research Institute, 2004.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. On the Unity of Christ. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Three Christological Treatises. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2014.Google Scholar
St. Gregory of Nazianzus. On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius [Orations 27–31]. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002.Google Scholar
St. Gregory of Nyssa. Anti-Apollinarian Writings. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2015.Google Scholar
St. Gregory Thaumaturgus. Life and Works, trans. by Slusser, Michael. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
St. John of Damascus. Writings, trans. by Chase, Frederic H. Jr. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., SJ, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Sheed & Ward/Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bruce, Alex. B. The Humiliation of Christ, 5th ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1900.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Heinrich. “The Fourth Decade, the Sixth Sermon,” in Bullinger, Heinrich, Decades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1851.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2 vols, ed. by McNeill, John T.. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, Martin. The Two Natures in Christ. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1971.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Christi von den ältesten Zeiten bis auf die neuesten, dargestellt. Stuttgart: Verlag von S. G. Liesching, 1939.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Chirsti von der ältesten bis auf die neueste dargestellt, Zweiter Teil.Berlin: Gustav Schlawitz, 1853.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August “Rezension von G. Thomasius, Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie,” Allgemeines Repertorium fü die theologische Literatur und kirchliche Statisik 5 (1846): 33–50.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak August “Ueber die richtige Fassung des dogmatischen Begriffs der Unveränderlichkeit Gottes,” in Dorner, Isaak August ed., Gesammelte Schriften aus dem Gebiet der systermatischen Theologie, Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz, 1883, pp. 188–377.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Peter Taylor The Person and Place of Jesus Christ. London: Independent Press Ltd, 1946.Google Scholar
Geß, Wolfgang Friedrich. Die Lehre von der Person Christi entwickelt aus dem Selbstbewußtsein Christi und aus dem Zeugnisse der Apostel. Basel: Bahnmeiers Buchhandlung (C. Detloff), 1856.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827 (One Volume Edition), ed. by Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Hugh Ross. The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1927.Google Scholar
Martensen, Hans Lassen Die christliche Dogmatik. Berlin: Verlag von Gustav Schlawitz, 1870.Google Scholar
Stephan, Horst and Schmidt, Martin. Geschichte der evangelischen Theologie in Deutschland seit dem Idealismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1973.Google Scholar
Strauss, David Friedrich. Die christliche Glaubenslehre, Zweiter Band. Tübingen and Stuttgart: C. F. Osiander and F. H. Köhler, 1841.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Gottfried. Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1845.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Dartellung der evangelische-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkt der Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1853.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Philipperbriefes. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1927. English translation: The Epistle to the Philippians. London: SCM Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/2. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1978.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Erster Band: Prolegomena, 1924. Zürich: TVZ, 1985. English translation: The Göttingen Dogmatics, Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Dritter Band: Die Lehre von der Versöhung / Die Lehre von der Erlösung, 1925/1926. Zürich: TVZ, 2003.Google Scholar
Bulgakov, Sergius. The Lamb of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Explorations in Theology, Vol. I: The Word Made Flesh. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1989.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. III: Dramatis Personae: Persons in Christ. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1992.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. IV: The Action. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. New York: Nelson, 1963.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. God After God. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Christ in the Trinity: Communicatio Idiomatum,” in Holmes, Stephen R. and Rae, Murray, eds., The Person of Christ. London: T. & T. Clark, 2005, pp. 61–9.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Communicatio Idiomatum Revisited,” unpublished paper, 2005.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Ipsa pater non est impassibilis,” in Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, OP, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 117–26.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “Once More on the Logos asarkos,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 119–23.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. “You Wonder Where the Spirit Went,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 110–18.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. Gottes Sein ist im Werden: Verantwortliche Rede vom Sein Gottes bei Karl Barth, Eine Paraphrase, 2nd improved ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. Gott als Geheimis der Welt: Zur Begründung der Theologie des Gekreuzigten im Streit zwischen Theismus und Atheismus, 3rd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1978.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Das Verhältnis von ‘ökonomischer’ und ‘immanenter’ Trinität: Erwägungen über eine biblische Begründung der Trinitätslehre – im Anschluß an und in Auseinandersetzung mit Karl Rahner’s Lehre vom dreifaltigen Gott als transzendentem Urgrung der Heilsgeschichte,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Entsprechungen: Gott – Wahrheit – Mensch, Theologische Erörterungen. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1980, pp. 265–75. [Originally published in 1975.]Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “ … keine Menschenlosigkeit Gottes: Zur Theologie Karl Barths zwischen Theismus und Atheismus,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Barth-Studien. Zürich-Köln/Güterloh: Benziger Verlag and Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1982, pp. 332–47. [Originally published in Evangelische Theologie in 1971.]Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Toward the Heart of the Matter.” The Christian Century 108 (1991): 228–33.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “Thesen zur Grundlegung der Christologie,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Unterwegs zur Sache: Theological Erörterungen, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000, pp. 274–95. [Orginally presented in a lecture course on Christology in Tübingen, WS 1969/1970.]Google Scholar
Anatolios, Khalid. Athanasius: The Coherence of His Thought. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and Its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Matthew. “‘Offenbarung, Philosophie, und Theologie’: Karl Barth and Georges Florovsky in Dialogue,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2016, pp. 59–93.Google Scholar
Breidert, Martin. Die kenotische Christologie des 19. Jahrhunderts. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1977.Google Scholar
Brown, David. Divine Humanity: Kenosis and the Construction of a Christian Theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. “What Does Chalcedon Solve and What Does It Not? Some Reflections on the Status and Meaning of the Chalcedonian ‘Definition’,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 143–63.Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. God Visible: Patristic Christology Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, Brian E. “Nature and ‘Mode of Union’: Late Patristic Models for the Personal Unity of Christ,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 164–96.Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. “‘One Thing and Another’: The Persons in God and the Person of Christ in Patristic Theology.” Pro Ecclesia 15 (2005): 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, Brian E. “The Giant’s Twin Substances: Ambrose and the Christology of Augustine’s Contra sermonem Arianorum,” in Lienhard, Joseph T., SJ, Muller, Earl C., SJ, and Teske, Roland J., SJ, eds., Augustine: Presbyter Factus Sum. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1993, pp. 477–95.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. Origen, trans. by Mitchell, Walter. London: Sheed & Ward, 1955 [reprint by Wipf & Stock].Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ. The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
DeHart, Paul J. Beyond the Necessary God: Trinitarian Faith and Philosophy in the Thought of Eberhard Jüngel. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1999.Google Scholar
de Lubac, Henri, SJ. History and Spirit: The Understanding of Scripture According to Origen, trans. by Nash, Anne Englund. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gallaher, Brandon. “‘A Supertemporal Continuum’: Christocentric Trinity and the Dialectical Reenvisioning of Divine Freedom in Bulgakov and Barth,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 95–133.Google Scholar
Gallaher, Brandon. Freedom and Necessity in Modern Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Gavrilyuk, Paul. “The Kenotic Christology of Sergius Bulgakov.” Scottish Journal of Theology 58 (2005): 251–69.Google Scholar
Gavrilyuk, Paul. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Gockel, Matthias. “Mediating Theology in Germany,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 301–18.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Aloys, SJ. Christ in Christian Tradition, Vol. 1. London and Oxford: Mobrays, 1975.Google Scholar
Heron, Alasdair. Table and Tradition. Edinburgh: The Handsel Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Emanuel. Geschichte der neuern evangelischen Theologie, Vol. 5. Gütersloh: Gütershoher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1960.Google Scholar
Holte, Ragnar. Die Vermittlungstheologie: Ihre theologischen Grundbegriffe kritisch untersucht. Upsala: Almquist & Wiksells, 1965.Google Scholar
Hunsinger, George. “Karl Barth’s Christology: Its Basic Chalcedonian Character,” in Hunsinger, George, Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar
Jones, Paul Dafyyd. The Humanity of Christ: Christology in Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics. London: T. & T. Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Kilby, Karen. Balthasar: A (Very) Critical Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Kirkland, Scott A. “Some Reflections on Election and Apophasis: Barth and Lossky,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 163–88.Google Scholar
Law, David R. “Kenotic Christology,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 251–79.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. “Analogy in Karl Barth and Orthodox Theology,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 189–210.Google Scholar
Martens, Peter W. Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, Jennifer Newsome. Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Critical Appropriation of Russian Religious Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. “God Is His Decision: The Jüngel-Gollwitzer ‘Debate’ Revisted,” in McCormack, Bruce L. and Bender, Kimlyn J., eds., Theology as Conversation. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 48–66.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. “Karl Barth’s Historicized Christology: Just How ‘Chalcedonian’ Is It?” in McCormack, Bruce L., Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008, pp. 201–33.Google Scholar
McGuckin, John. Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2004.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Mark A. “Christology,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
Nichols, Aidan, OP. A Key to Balthasar: Hans Urs von Balthasar on Beauty, Goodness, and Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Light in Darkness: Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Catholic Doctrine of Christ’s Descent into Hell. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Christ’s Descent into Hell: John Paul II, Joseph Ratzinger, and Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Theology of Holy Saturday. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy: An Exchange.” First Things (2006, December): 25–32.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “More on Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy.” First Things (2007, January): 16–19.Google Scholar
Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Responses to ‘Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy’.” First Things (2007, March): 5–14.Google Scholar
Quash, Ben. “The Theo-Drama,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Russell, Norman. The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Stead, Christopher. Philosophy in Christian Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Trigg, Joseph Wilson. Origen: The Bible and Philosophy in the Third-Century Church. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Trostyanskiy, Sergey. St. Cyril of Alexandria’s Metaphysics of the Incarnation. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.Google Scholar
Valliere, Paul. Modern Russian Theology, Bukharev, Soloviev, Bulgakov: Orthodox Theology in a New Key. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
van Loon, Hans. The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Spirit and Fire: A Thematic Anthology of the Writings of Origen, trans. by Daly, Robert J., SJ. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Wigley, Stephen. Balthasar’s Trilogy. London: T. & T. Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bates, Matthew W. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in New Testament & Early Christian Interpretation of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” in Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard, Driver, Daniel B., Hart, Trevor A., and MacDonald, Nathan, eds. The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. The Epistle to the Philippians. London: A. & C. Black, 1997.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. “‘The Form of God’ (Phil.2:6): Variations on a Theme of Jewish Mysticism.” Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 48 (1997): 1–23.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. “The New Testament and Kenosis Christology,” in Evans, C. Stephen, ed., Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. Pauline Christology. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. God of the Living: A Biblical Theology, trans. by Biddle, Mark E.. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. Menschwerdung. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke, 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1981/1985.Google Scholar
Fowl, Stephen. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Gerald F. Philippians. Waco, TX: Word Books, 1983.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions About Earliest Devotion to Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar
Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J. Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P. Where Christology Began: Essays on Philippians 2. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rehfeld, Emmanuel L. Relationale Ontologie bei Paulus. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Tilling, Chris. Paul’s Divine Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Vincent, Marvin. Philippians and Philemon. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1985.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. The Historical Christ and the Theological Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Johannes Evangelium (Kapitel 1–8), ed. by Fürst, Walther. Zürich: TVZ, 1976.Google Scholar
Bates, Matthew. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in the New Testament & Early Christian Interpretations of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “Is ‘High Human Christology’ Sufficient? A Critical Response to J. R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 27 (2017): 503–25.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” In Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
Bovon, Francois. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, 3 vols. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2002, 2012, 2013.Google Scholar
Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St. Luke. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.Google Scholar
Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 2. London: T. & T. Clark, 1991.Google Scholar
Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 3. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 1997.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon J. The Pre-Existent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar
Henrichs-Tarasenkova, Nina. Luke’s Christology of Divine Identity. London: T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Kirk, J. R. Daniel. A Man Attested by God: The Human Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. Gottes Körper: Jüdische, christliche and pagane Gottesvorstellungen in der Antike. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2016.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. “The Identity of the Son: Karl Barth’s Exegesis of Hebrews 1:1–4,” in Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J., eds., Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. Kavin. Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar
Turner, Max. Power From On High: The Spirit in Israel’s Restoration and Witness in Luke-Acts. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2000.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bates, Matthew W. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in New Testament & Early Christian Interpretation of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” in Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard, Driver, Daniel B., Hart, Trevor A., and MacDonald, Nathan, eds. The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. The Epistle to the Philippians. London: A. & C. Black, 1997.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. “‘The Form of God’ (Phil.2:6): Variations on a Theme of Jewish Mysticism.” Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 48 (1997): 1–23.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. “The New Testament and Kenosis Christology,” in Evans, C. Stephen, ed., Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. Pauline Christology. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. God of the Living: A Biblical Theology, trans. by Biddle, Mark E.. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. Menschwerdung. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke, 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1981/1985.Google Scholar
Fowl, Stephen. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Gerald F. Philippians. Waco, TX: Word Books, 1983.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions About Earliest Devotion to Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar
Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J. Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P. Where Christology Began: Essays on Philippians 2. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rehfeld, Emmanuel L. Relationale Ontologie bei Paulus. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Tilling, Chris. Paul’s Divine Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Vincent, Marvin. Philippians and Philemon. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1985.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. The Historical Christ and the Theological Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Johannes Evangelium (Kapitel 1–8), ed. by Fürst, Walther. Zürich: TVZ, 1976.Google Scholar
Bates, Matthew. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in the New Testament & Early Christian Interpretations of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “Is ‘High Human Christology’ Sufficient? A Critical Response to J. R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 27 (2017): 503–25.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” In Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
Bovon, Francois. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, 3 vols. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2002, 2012, 2013.Google Scholar
Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St. Luke. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.Google Scholar
Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 2. London: T. & T. Clark, 1991.Google Scholar
Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 3. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 1997.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon J. The Pre-Existent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar
Henrichs-Tarasenkova, Nina. Luke’s Christology of Divine Identity. London: T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Kirk, J. R. Daniel. A Man Attested by God: The Human Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. Gottes Körper: Jüdische, christliche and pagane Gottesvorstellungen in der Antike. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2016.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. “The Identity of the Son: Karl Barth’s Exegesis of Hebrews 1:1–4,” in Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J., eds., Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. Kavin. Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar
Turner, Max. Power From On High: The Spirit in Israel’s Restoration and Witness in Luke-Acts. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2000.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn. Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Barron, Robert. The Priority of Christ: Towards a Postliberal Catholicism. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar
Brown, David. Divine Humanity: Kenosis and the Construction of a Christian Theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. “Does Kenosis Rest on a Mistake? Three Kenotic Models in Patristic Exegesis,” in Evans, C. Stephen, ed., Exploring Kenotic Christology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 246–64.Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. “Kenosis and Subversion: On the Repression of ‘Vulnerability’ in Christian Feminist Writing,” in Coakley, Sarah, Powers and Submissions: Spirituality, Philosophy and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
Crisp, Oliver. Divinity and Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Crisp, Oliver and Sanders, Fred, eds. Christology Ancient and Modern: Explorations in Constructive Dogmatics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2013.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Dalferth, Ingolf U. Crucified and Resurrected: Restructuring the Grammar of Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2015.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, and O’Collins, Gerald, eds. The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Del Colle, Ralph. Christ and the Spirit: Spirit-Christology in Trinitarian Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen, ed. Exploring Kenotic Christology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Sinclair B. The Holy Spirit. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Geyer, Hans-Georg. Andenken: Theologische Aufsätze. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar
Haight, Roger, SJ. Jesus: Symbol of God. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Kasper, Walter. Jesus the Christ. New York: Paulist Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Lampe, Geoffrey William Hugo. God as Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Legge, Dominic, OP. The Trinitarian Christology of St Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Marmadoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, eds. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John. Christ in Eastern Christian Thought. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Jürgen. Der gekreuzigte Gott: Der Kreuz Christi als Grund und Kritik christlicher Theologie. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar
Pârvan, Alexandra and McCormack, Bruce L. “Immutability, (Im)passibility and Suffering: Steps Towards a ‘Psychological’ Ontology of God.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie 59 (2017): 1–25.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. Christ the Key. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. Jesus, Humanity and the Trinity. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Turretin, Francis. Institutes of Elenctic Theology, Vol. 2. Phillipsburg, NJ: P. & R. Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar
van Driel, Edwin Chr. Incarnation Anyway: Arguments for Supralapsarian Christology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Welker, Michael. God the Revealed: Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar
White, Thomas Joseph, OP. The Incarnate Lord: A Thomistic Study in Christology. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan. Christ the Heart of Creation. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Bruce Lindley McCormack, Princeton Theological Seminary, New Jersey
  • Book: The Humility of the Eternal Son
  • Online publication: 19 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009000123.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Bruce Lindley McCormack, Princeton Theological Seminary, New Jersey
  • Book: The Humility of the Eternal Son
  • Online publication: 19 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009000123.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Bruce Lindley McCormack, Princeton Theological Seminary, New Jersey
  • Book: The Humility of the Eternal Son
  • Online publication: 19 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009000123.011
Available formats
×