The value shift: merging social and financial imperatives

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808395.013

11 - The value shift: merging social and financial imperatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2011

Edited by

Shiban Khan and

Heiko Spitzeck: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The turn to values

Business has changed dramatically in the past few decades. Advances in technology, increasing globalization, heightened competition, shifting demographics – these have all been documented and written about extensively. Far less notice has been given to another, more subtle, change – one that is just as remarkable as these more visible developments. What I have in mind is the attention being paid to values in many companies today.

When I began doing research and teaching about business ethics in the early 1980s, skepticism about this subject was pervasive. The whole enterprise, said critics, was misguided and based on a naive view of the business world. Back then, accepted wisdom held that “business ethics” was a contradiction in terms. The most generous view was that business ethics had something to do with corporate philanthropy, a topic that might interest executives after their companies became financially successful. But even then, it was only a frill – an indulgence for the wealthy or eccentric.

Today, attitudes are different. Though far from universally embraced – witness the scandals of 2001 and 2002 – ethics is increasingly viewed as an important corporate concern. What is our purpose? What do we believe in? What principles should guide our behavior? What do we owe one another and the people we deal with – our employees, our customers, our investors, our communities? Such questions of ethics are being taken seriously in many companies around the world.

Type: Chapter
Information: Humanism in Business , pp. 204 - 217

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amabile, T. M. 1997. “Mobilizing Creativity in Organizations,” California Management Review 40(1): 39–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. 1998. “How to Kill Creativity,” Harvard Business Review (September–October): 77–87.Google Scholar PubMed

Baldwin, F. D. 1984. Conflicting Interests: Corporate-Governance Controversies. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar

Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, NY: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.Google Scholar

Carr, A. Z. 1968. “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?” Harvard Business Review, 68102: 5–7.Google Scholar

Coke, E. 1613. “The Case of Sutton's Hospital,” 10 Coke Report 1a, 77 Eng. Rep. 937 (Exchequer Chamber).

Dewey, J. 1926. “The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality,” Yale Law Journal, XXXV(6) (April 1926): 655–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications,” Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Freeman, E. R. 1984. Strategic Planning: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” New York Times Magazine, September 13, p. 33.

GlobeScan, . 1999. “The Millennium Poll on Corporate Social Responsibility,” in cooperation with the Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum and the Conference Board, http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/MPExecBrief.pdf (accessed August 22, 2008).

Heberton Evans, G. 1948. Business Incorporations in the United States 1800–1943. New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 3, 10, 35.Google Scholar

Horwitz, M. J. 1992. “Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory,” in The Transformation of American Law 1870–1960. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–107.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H., 1988. “Classical Corporation in American Legal Thought,” Georgetown Law Journal, 76(5): 1593–689.Google Scholar

James, W. 1948. “What Pragmatism Means,” in A. Castell (ed.) Essays in Pragmatism. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company, p.146.Google Scholar

Kim, C. and Mauborgne, R. 1993. “Making Global Strategies Work,” Sloan Management Review (Spring): 11–27.Google Scholar

Kumar, N. 1996. “The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer relationships,” Harvard Business Review (November–December): 92–106.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P. 2001. People and Profits? The Search for a Link between a Company's Social and Financial Performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Moorman, R. H. 1991. “Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?” Journal of Applied Psychology 76(6): 845–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Organ, D. W. and Konovsky, M. 1989. “Cognitive Versus Affective Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology 74(1): 157–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stone, C. D. 1975. Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar